- Page 1: Director, Operational Test and Eval
- Page 6 and 7: DIRECTOR’S INTRODUCTION iv
- Page 8 and 9: TABLE OF CONTENTS Suite of Integrat
- Page 10 and 11: TABLE OF CONTENTS Unmanned Combat A
- Page 12 and 13: DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT TEST A
- Page 14 and 15: DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT 4
- Page 16 and 17: DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT PROGRA
- Page 18 and 19: DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT NAVY P
- Page 20 and 21: DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT AIR FO
- Page 22 and 23: DOD PROGRAMS GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE
- Page 24 and 25: DOD PROGRAMS AEGIS BALLISTIC MISSIL
- Page 26 and 27: DOD PROGRAMS PATRIOT ADVANCED CAPAB
- Page 28 and 29: DOD PROGRAMS A thorough lethality t
- Page 30 and 31: DOD PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACTI
- Page 32 and 33: DOD PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASSE
- Page 34 and 35: DOD PROGRAMS effectiveness deficien
- Page 36 and 37: DOD PROGRAMS Solution experienced d
- Page 38 and 39: DOD PROGRAMS all users worldwide lo
- Page 40 and 41: DOD PROGRAMS Northwestern United St
- Page 42 and 43: DOD PROGRAMS Environment, and impro
- Page 44 and 45: DOD PROGRAMS with user traffic to e
- Page 46 and 47: DOD PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASSE
- Page 48 and 49: DOD PROGRAMS Additional development
- Page 50 and 51: DOD PROGRAMS Test planning appears
- Page 52 and 53: DOD PROGRAMS suitability for aircra
- Page 54 and 55:
DOD PROGRAMS Because the OA/LUT beg
- Page 56 and 57:
DOD PROGRAMS of the current system
- Page 58 and 59:
DOD PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASSE
- Page 60 and 61:
DOD PROGRAMS JITC will conduct a fo
- Page 62 and 63:
DOD PROGRAMS aboard two ships of th
- Page 64 and 65:
ARMY PROGRAMS Several issues will b
- Page 66 and 67:
ARMY PROGRAMS suppression system (F
- Page 68 and 69:
ARMY PROGRAMS The ASAS RWS risk ass
- Page 70 and 71:
ARMY PROGRAMS The FBCB2 digital com
- Page 72 and 73:
ARMY PROGRAMS ICH using ARL-develop
- Page 74 and 75:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACT
- Page 76 and 77:
ARMY PROGRAMS 66
- Page 78 and 79:
ARMY PROGRAMS risk reduction ballis
- Page 80 and 81:
ARMY PROGRAMS should make the techn
- Page 82 and 83:
ARMY PROGRAMS 72
- Page 84 and 85:
ARMY PROGRAMS Kingdom Armored Divis
- Page 86 and 87:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 88 and 89:
ARMY PROGRAMS 78
- Page 90 and 91:
ARMY PROGRAMS requirements. Four se
- Page 92 and 93:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 94 and 95:
ARMY PROGRAMS ISYSCON(V)4 is deploy
- Page 96 and 97:
ARMY PROGRAMS 86
- Page 98 and 99:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 100 and 101:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 102 and 103:
ARMY PROGRAMS Warrior live fire tes
- Page 104 and 105:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACT
- Page 106 and 107:
ARMY PROGRAMS Recently, the Army de
- Page 108 and 109:
ARMY PROGRAMS The test unit, 4 th I
- Page 110 and 111:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 112 and 113:
ARMY PROGRAMS Headquarters, Delawar
- Page 114 and 115:
ARMY PROGRAMS During FY04, the Army
- Page 116 and 117:
ARMY PROGRAMS IOT&E, the MC had a d
- Page 118 and 119:
ARMY PROGRAMS 108
- Page 120 and 121:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACT
- Page 122 and 123:
ARMY PROGRAMS The LFT&E strategy wi
- Page 124 and 125:
ARMY PROGRAMS PM adopted a short-te
- Page 126 and 127:
ARMY PROGRAMS MH-60R to reduce cost
- Page 128 and 129:
ARMY PROGRAMS 118
- Page 130 and 131:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 132 and 133:
NAVY PROGRAMS Plan. The Navy and DO
- Page 134 and 135:
NAVY PROGRAMS 124
- Page 136 and 137:
NAVY PROGRAMS While design problems
- Page 138 and 139:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACT
- Page 140 and 141:
NAVY PROGRAMS 130
- Page 142 and 143:
NAVY PROGRAMS LHD 8 will likely be
- Page 144 and 145:
NAVY PROGRAMS test/operational test
- Page 146 and 147:
NAVY PROGRAMS AN/USG-3 equipment, a
- Page 148 and 149:
NAVY PROGRAMS grave responsibility
- Page 150 and 151:
NAVY PROGRAMS The Navy tested the p
- Page 152 and 153:
NAVY PROGRAMS 142
- Page 154 and 155:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 156 and 157:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACT
- Page 158 and 159:
NAVY PROGRAMS their own development
- Page 160 and 161:
NAVY PROGRAMS Due to its importance
- Page 162 and 163:
NAVY PROGRAMS field-testing of the
- Page 164 and 165:
NAVY PROGRAMS understanding the imp
- Page 166 and 167:
NAVY PROGRAMS • The PDRR EFV(P)
- Page 168 and 169:
NAVY PROGRAMS November 2003; Milest
- Page 170 and 171:
NAVY PROGRAMS 160
- Page 172 and 173:
NAVY PROGRAMS The F-35 JSF Air Syst
- Page 174 and 175:
NAVY PROGRAMS Software Qualificatio
- Page 176 and 177:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 178 and 179:
NAVY PROGRAMS and Navy later confir
- Page 180 and 181:
NAVY PROGRAMS 170
- Page 182 and 183:
NAVY PROGRAMS 172
- Page 184 and 185:
NAVY PROGRAMS Operational effective
- Page 186 and 187:
NAVY PROGRAMS vulnerable area becau
- Page 188 and 189:
NAVY PROGRAMS performance as the le
- Page 190 and 191:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 192 and 193:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 194 and 195:
NAVY PROGRAMS 184
- Page 196 and 197:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 198 and 199:
NAVY PROGRAMS OT&E for the NESP ter
- Page 200 and 201:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 202 and 203:
NAVY PROGRAMS parameter of 98 perce
- Page 204 and 205:
NAVY PROGRAMS RAM HAS Mode. The pro
- Page 206 and 207:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACT
- Page 208 and 209:
NAVY PROGRAMS Mark 2 must be combin
- Page 210 and 211:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 212 and 213:
NAVY PROGRAMS DOT&E feels the model
- Page 214 and 215:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 216 and 217:
NAVY PROGRAMS 206
- Page 218 and 219:
NAVY PROGRAMS completed. This softw
- Page 220 and 221:
NAVY PROGRAMS 210
- Page 222 and 223:
NAVY PROGRAMS personnel in sea stat
- Page 224 and 225:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
- Page 226 and 227:
NAVY PROGRAMS The AH-1Z attack heli
- Page 228 and 229:
NAVY PROGRAMS On August 28, 2003, t
- Page 230 and 231:
NAVY PROGRAMS 220
- Page 232 and 233:
NAVY PROGRAMS 222
- Page 234 and 235:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Test and Evaluat
- Page 236 and 237:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Force as not per
- Page 238 and 239:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS DOTE also has co
- Page 240 and 241:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS 16 percent decre
- Page 242 and 243:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS The most promisi
- Page 244 and 245:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATIO
- Page 246 and 247:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS changed to a com
- Page 248 and 249:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS aircraft. Fleet
- Page 250 and 251:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATIO
- Page 252 and 253:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS • August 2003,
- Page 254 and 255:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATIO
- Page 256 and 257:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS 246
- Page 258 and 259:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS 248
- Page 260 and 261:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS and sea C2ISR su
- Page 262 and 263:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS engine performan
- Page 264 and 265:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Quarterly Defens
- Page 266 and 267:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS 256
- Page 268 and 269:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS MOT&E was postpo
- Page 270 and 271:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATIO
- Page 272 and 273:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS the Key Performa
- Page 274 and 275:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATIO
- Page 276 and 277:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS F-15C found the
- Page 278 and 279:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATIO
- Page 280 and 281:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS not operationall
- Page 282 and 283:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Operational Test
- Page 284 and 285:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS In FY03, the pri
- Page 286 and 287:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS satellites indic
- Page 288 and 289:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS complex dependen
- Page 290 and 291:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS as a means to co
- Page 292 and 293:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS The risk associa
- Page 294 and 295:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATIO
- Page 296 and 297:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATIO
- Page 298 and 299:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Defense Advanced
- Page 300 and 301:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Operational Requ
- Page 302 and 303:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS The first two pr
- Page 304 and 305:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS 294
- Page 306 and 307:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Common Gyro Refe
- Page 308 and 309:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS 298
- Page 310 and 311:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS 300
- Page 312 and 313:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS DSCS satellites
- Page 314 and 315:
LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION LIVE FI
- Page 316 and 317:
LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION In FY03
- Page 318 and 319:
LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION analyse
- Page 320 and 321:
LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION 310
- Page 322 and 323:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION • Joint U
- Page 324 and 325:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION institution
- Page 326 and 327:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION Combined JT
- Page 328 and 329:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION TEST & EVAL
- Page 330 and 331:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION TEST & EVAL
- Page 332 and 333:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION • JGPSCE
- Page 334 and 335:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION The JLOG/PE
- Page 336 and 337:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION JMACA condu
- Page 338 and 339:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION TEST & EVAL
- Page 340 and 341:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION hand kits w
- Page 342 and 343:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION UAV Operati
- Page 344 and 345:
INFORMATION ASSURANCE • Participa
- Page 346 and 347:
INFORMATION ASSURANCE both training
- Page 348 and 349:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES The mode
- Page 350 and 351:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES Issues i
- Page 352 and 353:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES 40% 35%
- Page 354 and 355:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES migratio
- Page 356 and 357:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES In FY03,
- Page 358 and 359:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES produced
- Page 360 and 361:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES 350
- Page 362 and 363:
INDEX OF PROGRAMS Defense Medical L
- Page 364:
INDEX OF PROGRAMS Navy Standard Int