Declaration of Brian C. Kerr ISO Plaintiffs - Gilardi & Co, LLC
Declaration of Brian C. Kerr ISO Plaintiffs - Gilardi & Co, LLC
Declaration of Brian C. Kerr ISO Plaintiffs - Gilardi & Co, LLC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
29. After agreeing to the terms set forth in the MOU, the Parties negotiated the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> attorneys’ fees and costs that <strong>Plaintiffs</strong>’ <strong>Co</strong>unsel could request this <strong>Co</strong>urt to award to<br />
them as their fees and costs in connection with all <strong>of</strong> the Actions. As a result <strong>of</strong> those<br />
negotiations, the Parties agreed that <strong>Plaintiffs</strong>’ <strong>Co</strong>unsel may apply for an award for attorneys’<br />
fees and expenses in the aggregate amount <strong>of</strong> $550,000.<br />
30. When Plaintiff’s counsel undertook this case, they knew that they would be<br />
devoting many hours <strong>of</strong> hard work to the prosecution <strong>of</strong> a difficult case, without any assurance <strong>of</strong><br />
receiving any fees or even reimbursement for their out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket expenses.<br />
31. In prosecuting this case, <strong>Plaintiffs</strong>’ <strong>Co</strong>unsel expended an aggregate <strong>of</strong> 660.2 hours<br />
at their current hourly rates. <strong>Plaintiffs</strong>’ <strong>Co</strong>unsel incurred aggregate costs <strong>of</strong> $30,604.69<br />
associated with the prosecution <strong>of</strong> this litigation. A reasonable lodestar calculation therefore<br />
totals $389,348.50.<br />
32. In my experience, the fee <strong>of</strong> $550,000, which includes expenses and which was<br />
negotiated at arm’s-length between the parties to this case, is a fair and reasonable fee for a hardfought<br />
case <strong>of</strong> this nature.<br />
OBSERVATIONS CONCERNING THE SETTLEMENT<br />
33. <strong>Plaintiffs</strong>’ <strong>Co</strong>unsel are experienced in complex litigation such as this and have<br />
been appointed as lead counsel in numerous nationwide class actions. <strong>Plaintiffs</strong>’ <strong>Co</strong>unsel have a<br />
successful track record in litigating major class actions and merger and acquisition litigation<br />
matters.<br />
34. In light <strong>of</strong> this extensive experience, <strong>Plaintiffs</strong>’ <strong>Co</strong>unsel believes that the<br />
Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the Class’ best interest, and that the benefits<br />
secured by the Settlement far outweigh the risks, delays and costs <strong>of</strong> continued litigation.<br />
35. Both the litigation and the negotiations surrounding the settlement were intensive<br />
and hotly contested. There was no fraud or collusion in this action.<br />
36. Although the November 2, 2012 deadline for objections has not yet passed, to<br />
date, no objections to the Settlement or the negotiated amount <strong>of</strong> attorneys’ fees and expenses<br />
have been received by <strong>Plaintiffs</strong>’ <strong>Co</strong>unsel, and none appear to have been filed with the <strong>Co</strong>urt.<br />
- 9 -<br />
DECLARATION OF BRIAN C. KERR <strong>ISO</strong> MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT<br />
AND AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES