- Page 1 and 2: 1 2 3 4 5 6 BRODSKY & SMITH, LLC JA
- Page 3 and 4: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 5 and 6: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 7 and 8: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 9 and 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 11: Plaintiffs' Counsel will address an
- Page 34 and 35: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 36 and 37: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 38 and 39: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Ca
- Page 40 and 41: THE FIRM’S PRACTICE AND ACHIEVEME
- Page 42 and 43: In In re IKON Office Solutions, Inc
- Page 44 and 45: • In re General Electric Co. ERIS
- Page 46 and 47: pursuant to an industry-wide conspi
- Page 48 and 49: PRECEDENT-SETTING DECISIONS Milberg
- Page 50 and 51: that Sony had a policy of treating
- Page 52 and 53: PARTNERS JEFF S. WESTERMAN received
- Page 54 and 55: Mr. Bronson’s practice is focused
- Page 56 and 57: ASSOCIATES MICHELLE FURUKAWA focuse
- Page 58 and 59: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 60: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 63 and 64:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 EXHIBIT 2 I
- Page 65 and 66:
Firm Resume of GARDY & NOTIS, LLP G
- Page 67 and 68:
• In re SFX Entertainment Inc. Se
- Page 69 and 70:
CHARLES A. GERMERSHAUSEN Mr. Germer
- Page 71 and 72:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 73 and 74:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 75 and 76:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EXHIBIT 2 In re Suc
- Page 77 and 78:
Firm Resume AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP A
- Page 79 and 80:
AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP Product Defec
- Page 81 and 82:
AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP Mass Tort, Pe
- Page 83 and 84:
AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP Consumer Liti
- Page 85 and 86:
AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP Insurance/Hea
- Page 87 and 88:
AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP In re: Terazo
- Page 89 and 90:
AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP Unison Health
- Page 91 and 92:
AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP Joshua C. Ezr
- Page 93 and 94:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 95 and 96:
EXHIBIT “A”
- Page 97 and 98:
He received his Juris Doctor from W
- Page 99 and 100:
MARC L. ACKERMAN: Marc L. Ackerman
- Page 101 and 102:
SPX Corporation ERISA Litigation, (
- Page 103 and 104:
In re Natco Group Shareholder Litig
- Page 105 and 106:
In Re Symyx Technologies, Inc. Shar
- Page 107 and 108:
In re Adolor Corporation Shareholde
- Page 109:
In re Coffee Bean Litigation (CDCal