15.11.2013 Views

The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland - Urban Institute

The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland - Urban Institute

The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland - Urban Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7) it is unlikely that <strong>the</strong> defendant will engage <strong>in</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r crim<strong>in</strong>al activity that would be a<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g threat to society; or<br />

8) any o<strong>the</strong>r fact that <strong>the</strong> court or jury specifically sets forth <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g as a mitigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

circumstance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case.<br />

<strong>The</strong> decision as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> aggravators outweigh <strong>the</strong> mitigators belongs to <strong>the</strong> jury. <strong>The</strong> jury<br />

may, for example, f<strong>in</strong>d that a s<strong>in</strong>gle aggravat<strong>in</strong>g circumstance—<strong>the</strong> allegation that <strong>the</strong> murder took<br />

place while <strong>the</strong> defendant was attempt<strong>in</strong>g to commit ano<strong>the</strong>r crime— outweighs <strong>the</strong> mitigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

circumstances—youthful age at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> murder and an absence <strong>of</strong> violent crim<strong>in</strong>al history—<br />

and, accord<strong>in</strong>gly, impose <strong>the</strong> death penalty.<br />

State Post-Conviction Review <strong>in</strong> Trial Court<br />

<strong>The</strong> post-conviction review procedure allows a defendant to raise specific challenges <strong>in</strong> court<br />

that may not have been heard on appeal. 4 Most <strong>of</strong>ten, those challenges <strong>in</strong>volve issues which fall<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> trial record, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>effectiveness <strong>of</strong> counsel or withhold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> evidence by <strong>the</strong><br />

state. <strong>The</strong> defendant may also raise claims based on new case law or on claims that <strong>the</strong> defendant<br />

unknow<strong>in</strong>gly waived fundamental rights. Because <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se claims <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>volves reopen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case, <strong>the</strong> defendant may seek to prove prior counsel failed to present<br />

exculpatory evidence. Thus, preparation for post-conviction review may result <strong>in</strong> significant costs,<br />

particularly to <strong>the</strong> new defense.<br />

All defendants have a statutory right to counsel on <strong>the</strong>ir first petition. 5 In subsequent postconviction<br />

reviews for death sentence cases counsel is also provided. Counsel is rarely provided for<br />

additional post-conviction reviews for cases with o<strong>the</strong>r sentences. In <strong>Maryland</strong>, a capital defendant is<br />

typically represented by a private attorney who is reimbursed by <strong>the</strong> state. <strong>The</strong> prosecut<strong>in</strong>g attorney<br />

and <strong>the</strong> attorney general represent <strong>the</strong> State at this stage. Prior to 1994, <strong>the</strong> deadl<strong>in</strong>e for fil<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

petition for post-conviction relief was 340 days prior to 1994 and <strong>the</strong> deadl<strong>in</strong>e was reduced to 210<br />

days <strong>the</strong>reafter. Once a decision is rendered, a defendant seek<strong>in</strong>g to appeal must file for a leave to<br />

appeal with <strong>the</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals.<br />

Before 1995, a capital or non-capital defendant had <strong>the</strong> right to file a second post conviction<br />

petition. Under current law, however, a second post conviction petition can be only be filed if<br />

reopen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> case is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> justice.’ <strong>The</strong> right to a hear<strong>in</strong>g is only guaranteed for <strong>the</strong> first<br />

post-conviction review. In practice, defendants <strong>in</strong> death sentence cases <strong>of</strong>ten proceed through<br />

multiple post-sentenc<strong>in</strong>g reviews.<br />

Direct Review <strong>in</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals<br />

After a guilty verdict and sentenc<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> defendant progresses through multiple stages <strong>of</strong> postsentenc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

case review. Defendants <strong>in</strong> cases with a sentence o<strong>the</strong>r than death first appeal to <strong>the</strong><br />

4 <strong>Maryland</strong> Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act.<br />

5 Section 645A (A) <strong>of</strong> Article 27.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Death</strong> <strong>Penalty</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong><br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!