The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland - Urban Institute
The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland - Urban Institute
The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland - Urban Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7) it is unlikely that <strong>the</strong> defendant will engage <strong>in</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r crim<strong>in</strong>al activity that would be a<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g threat to society; or<br />
8) any o<strong>the</strong>r fact that <strong>the</strong> court or jury specifically sets forth <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g as a mitigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
circumstance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case.<br />
<strong>The</strong> decision as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> aggravators outweigh <strong>the</strong> mitigators belongs to <strong>the</strong> jury. <strong>The</strong> jury<br />
may, for example, f<strong>in</strong>d that a s<strong>in</strong>gle aggravat<strong>in</strong>g circumstance—<strong>the</strong> allegation that <strong>the</strong> murder took<br />
place while <strong>the</strong> defendant was attempt<strong>in</strong>g to commit ano<strong>the</strong>r crime— outweighs <strong>the</strong> mitigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
circumstances—youthful age at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> murder and an absence <strong>of</strong> violent crim<strong>in</strong>al history—<br />
and, accord<strong>in</strong>gly, impose <strong>the</strong> death penalty.<br />
State Post-Conviction Review <strong>in</strong> Trial Court<br />
<strong>The</strong> post-conviction review procedure allows a defendant to raise specific challenges <strong>in</strong> court<br />
that may not have been heard on appeal. 4 Most <strong>of</strong>ten, those challenges <strong>in</strong>volve issues which fall<br />
outside <strong>the</strong> trial record, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>effectiveness <strong>of</strong> counsel or withhold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> evidence by <strong>the</strong><br />
state. <strong>The</strong> defendant may also raise claims based on new case law or on claims that <strong>the</strong> defendant<br />
unknow<strong>in</strong>gly waived fundamental rights. Because <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se claims <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>volves reopen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case, <strong>the</strong> defendant may seek to prove prior counsel failed to present<br />
exculpatory evidence. Thus, preparation for post-conviction review may result <strong>in</strong> significant costs,<br />
particularly to <strong>the</strong> new defense.<br />
All defendants have a statutory right to counsel on <strong>the</strong>ir first petition. 5 In subsequent postconviction<br />
reviews for death sentence cases counsel is also provided. Counsel is rarely provided for<br />
additional post-conviction reviews for cases with o<strong>the</strong>r sentences. In <strong>Maryland</strong>, a capital defendant is<br />
typically represented by a private attorney who is reimbursed by <strong>the</strong> state. <strong>The</strong> prosecut<strong>in</strong>g attorney<br />
and <strong>the</strong> attorney general represent <strong>the</strong> State at this stage. Prior to 1994, <strong>the</strong> deadl<strong>in</strong>e for fil<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
petition for post-conviction relief was 340 days prior to 1994 and <strong>the</strong> deadl<strong>in</strong>e was reduced to 210<br />
days <strong>the</strong>reafter. Once a decision is rendered, a defendant seek<strong>in</strong>g to appeal must file for a leave to<br />
appeal with <strong>the</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals.<br />
Before 1995, a capital or non-capital defendant had <strong>the</strong> right to file a second post conviction<br />
petition. Under current law, however, a second post conviction petition can be only be filed if<br />
reopen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> case is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> justice.’ <strong>The</strong> right to a hear<strong>in</strong>g is only guaranteed for <strong>the</strong> first<br />
post-conviction review. In practice, defendants <strong>in</strong> death sentence cases <strong>of</strong>ten proceed through<br />
multiple post-sentenc<strong>in</strong>g reviews.<br />
Direct Review <strong>in</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals<br />
After a guilty verdict and sentenc<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> defendant progresses through multiple stages <strong>of</strong> postsentenc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
case review. Defendants <strong>in</strong> cases with a sentence o<strong>the</strong>r than death first appeal to <strong>the</strong><br />
4 <strong>Maryland</strong> Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act.<br />
5 Section 645A (A) <strong>of</strong> Article 27.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Death</strong> <strong>Penalty</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong><br />
13