15.11.2013 Views

The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland - Urban Institute

The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland - Urban Institute

The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland - Urban Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 6.<br />

Bivariate Outcomes<br />

<strong>Death</strong> notice not filed<br />

(n = 425)<br />

<strong>Death</strong> notice filed<br />

(n = 55)<br />

<strong>Death</strong> sentence returned<br />

(n = 29)<br />

Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.<br />

Phase<br />

Guilt trial $158 $94 $601*** $289 $775*** $381<br />

<strong>Penalty</strong> trial $0 $0 $71*** $74 $263*** $289<br />

Post-conviction $40 $73 $39 $64 $82** $101<br />

Appellate $42 $45 $134*** $96 $474*** $300<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r (state-level) $1 $3 $2* $40 $9*** $11<br />

Federal habeas $0 $0 $0 $0 $82*** $137<br />

Federal appellate $0 $0 $0 $0 $14 $78<br />

Prison $862 $549 $946 $540 $1,318*** $704<br />

Significance-levels are based on group mean comparison tests detail<strong>in</strong>g two comparisons: (1) cases <strong>in</strong><br />

which a death notice was filed versus cases <strong>in</strong> which a death notice was not filed and (2) cases <strong>in</strong> which a<br />

death sentence s returned versus cases <strong>in</strong> which a death notice is not filed. All analyses are conducted<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g sampl<strong>in</strong>g weights.<br />

Significance test<strong>in</strong>g: * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01.<br />

Cases result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a death sentence were significantly more expensive than cases <strong>in</strong> which a<br />

death notice was not filed <strong>in</strong> all but one phase <strong>of</strong> case process<strong>in</strong>g. Four phases – <strong>the</strong> guilt trial<br />

($775,000), <strong>the</strong> penalty trial ($263,000), <strong>the</strong> appellate process at <strong>the</strong> state level ($483,000), and <strong>the</strong><br />

lifetime cost <strong>of</strong> prison ($1.3 million) – expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> cost.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results <strong>in</strong> Table 6 do not account for potentially confound<strong>in</strong>g explanations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

differences <strong>in</strong> cost. That is, it is possible that some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differences between groups described <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 3 are responsible for <strong>the</strong> differences. For example, it is possible that cases <strong>in</strong> Baltimore County<br />

(where <strong>the</strong>re are significantly more death notices filed than average) are rout<strong>in</strong>ely more expensive to<br />

process than are cases <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r counties, and thus <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> Table 4 are due to differences <strong>in</strong><br />

county costs and not <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> death penalty. Or, it might be that particularly horrify<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

complicated cases may have cost more to prosecute regardless <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y were processed<br />

under a death statute. To account for <strong>the</strong>se possibilities we specify eight regression models that<br />

control for compet<strong>in</strong>g explanations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> cost.<br />

Table 7 displays regression coefficients from eight OLS models <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> dependent<br />

variable is <strong>the</strong> total cost <strong>of</strong> case process<strong>in</strong>g. In each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> models, we report two coefficients: <strong>the</strong><br />

additional cost associated with <strong>the</strong> fil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a death notice, and <strong>the</strong> additional cost associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

receipt <strong>of</strong> a death sentence. We first specify a model (1) that conta<strong>in</strong>s only <strong>the</strong> two ma<strong>in</strong> effects –<br />

dummy variables for <strong>the</strong> fil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a death notice and <strong>the</strong> return<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a death sentence. In model (2)<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Death</strong> <strong>Penalty</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong><br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!