16.11.2013 Views

Amylou R. v. County of Riverside Appellant's Opening Brief

Amylou R. v. County of Riverside Appellant's Opening Brief

Amylou R. v. County of Riverside Appellant's Opening Brief

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

suspect 72 hours. (RT 1354-1355, 1405, 1411.~/ Plaintiff asked if she were free to<br />

leave, and the detectives did not respond, but rather paused because they wanted to<br />

continue the interview. (RT 725-26, 729, 737, 738.) Plaintiff asked if she could<br />

leave to get a soda and cigarettes.<br />

(RT 1230-31, 1775-1777.) They told her they<br />

would get these items for her.<br />

(RT 1775-1778.) Plaintiff indicated she wanted to get<br />

the soda and cigarettes from her mother.<br />

(RT 1778.) She then stated they needed a<br />

court order to keep her and that she would tell her attorney they had illegally detained<br />

her and threatened her. (RT 1779-1780, 2483.) She further stated she would not<br />

cooperate with them any longer. (RT 1783, 2484.)<br />

When the interview broke down, Lackie left to speak to his supervisor.<br />

(RT<br />

1786-1787.) At that point he discovered Mrs. Ryan had called an attorney, who was<br />

waiting downstairs and demanding plaintiffs release. (Ibid.) He returned to the<br />

conference room and told plaintiff she was not a suspect; he explained they had been<br />

trying to clarify certain information and obtain as much information about the crime<br />

as possible.<br />

(RT 1788.) Plaintiff said "fuck you" several times and left the room.<br />

(Ibid.)<br />

4. Subsequent attempts to communicate with plaintiff.<br />

After April 2, Moker and Lackie were told by Paul Zellerbach, the deputy<br />

district attorney assigned to the case, to work through plaintiff's counsel, Joseph<br />

Meyers.<br />

(RT 1955.) Lackie testified about attempts to reach Meyers, that Meyers<br />

never returned their calls, and that they were eventually told he would not do so.<br />

(RT<br />

1542, 1868.) Meyers testified that he had requested Moker and Lackie be kept away<br />

from plaintiff and that he wanted to prevent any contact. (RT 958-959.)<br />

~/ Lackie testified that he did not consider her a suspect, that there was a big<br />

difference between believing plaintiff knew the murderer and her being involved in the<br />

murder. (RT 1938-41.)<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!