Solving the bracketing paradox - German Grammar Group FU Berlin

BRACKETING PARADOX AND GERMAN PARTICLE VERBS
Pollard, C. J. & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (Studies in Contemporary
Linguistics). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Przepiórkowski, A. (1999). On case assignment and ‘adjuncts as complements’. In Webelhuth,
G., Koenig, J.-P. & Kathol, A. (eds.), Lexical and constructional aspects of linguistic explanation
(Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism 1). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 231–245.
Reape, M. (1992). A formal theory of word order: a case study in West Germanic. Ph.D. thesis,
University of Edinburgh.
Reape, M. (1994). Domain union and word order variation in German. In Nerbonne et al. (eds.),
151–198.
Reape, M. (1996). Getting things in order. In Bunt & van Horck (eds.), 209–253.
Reis, M. (1976). Reflexivierungen in deutschen A.c.I-Konstruktionen. Ein transformationsgrammatisches
Dilemma. Papiere zur Linguistik 9. 5–82.
Rentier, G. (1994). Dutch cross serial dependencies in HPSG. In Proceedings of COLING 94.
Kyoto. 818–822.
Riehemann, S. Z. (1998). Type-based derivational morphology. Journal of Comparative
Germanic Linguistics 2. 49–77.
Sag, I. A. & Wasow, T. (1999). Syntactic theory: a formal introduction. Stanford, CA: CSLI
Publications. http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/site/1575861607.html. 08.18.2002.
Spencer, A. J. (1988). Bracketing paradoxes and the English lexicon. Language 64.4. 663–682.
Stiebels, B. (1996). Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte: Zum semantischen Beitrag verbaler
Präfixe und Partikeln (Studia grammatica XXXIX). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Stiebels, B. & Wunderlich, D. (1994). Morphology feeds syntax: the case of particle verbs.
Linguistics 32.6. 913–968.
Stump, G. T. (1991). A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67.4.
675–725.
Trost, H. (1991). Recognition and generation of word forms for natural language understanding
systems: integrating two-level morphology and feature unification. Applied Artificial Intelligence
5. 411–457.
Trost, H. (1993). Coping with derivation in a morphological component. In Proceedings of the
Sixth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
Utrecht. 368–376.
van Eynde, F. (1994). Auxiliaries and verbal affixes: a monostratal cross-linguistic analysis.
Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculteit Letteren, Departement Linguïstiek.
van Noord, G. & Bouma, G. (1994). The scope of adjuncts and the processing of lexical rules.
In Proceedings of COLING 94. Kyoto: ACL – Association for Computational Linguistics.
250–256. http://grid.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/papers/coling94.ps.gz. 08.18.2002.
Wells, R. S. (1947). Immediate constituents. Language 23. 81–117. [Reprinted in Joos, M. (ed.)
(1958). Readings in linguistics I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 186–207.]
Werner, O. (1994). Was da sich ölles aahotmüßhör!, Was der sich alles hat anhören müssen!
Auxiliar-Inkorporation im Ostfränkisch-Thüringischen. In Löffler, H., Jakob, K. & Kelle, B.
(eds.), Texttyp, Sprechergruppe, Kommunikationsbereich. Studien zur deutschen Sprache in
Geschichte und Gegenwart. Festschrift für Hugo Steger zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlin: Walter de
Gruyter. 343–361.
Williams, E. (1981). On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry
12.2. 245–274.
Yip, M., Maling, J. & Jackendoff, R. (1987). Case in tiers. Language 63.2. 217–250.
Zifonun, G. (1999). Wenn mit alleine im Mittelfeld erscheint: Verbpartikeln und ihre Doppelgänger
im Deutschen und Englischen. In Wegener, H. (ed.), Deutsch kontrastiv. Typologischvergleichende
Untersuchungen zur deutschen Grammatik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
211–234.
Author’s address: Universität Bremen, FB 10, Postfach 33 04 40,
D-28 334 Bremen, Germany.
E-mail: Stefan.Mueller@uni-bremen.de
325