Reliability in Classroom Observations - Harvard Graduate School of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TAP Teacher Evaluations versus Traditional Teacher Evaluations 70% Observational Ratings in Urban Districts with Non-Binary Scales Reported in The Widget Effect 70% Observational (SKR) Ratings in TAP Schools Before Value-Added Scores are Calculated 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% Lowest Ratings Middle Ratings Highest Ratings 0% 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Similar Scale for Classroom Observations and Value-Added Scores Classroom Observations Unsatisfactory Proficient Exemplary 1 2 3 4 5 Much less than a year’s growth Less than a year’s growth One year’s growth More than a year’s growth Much more than a year’s growth Value-Added Scores
Page 1 and 2: Reliability in Classroom Observatio
Page 3 and 4: TAP Reaches Teachers and Students N
Page 5 and 6: The TAP System’s Lessons Learned
Page 7: Classroom Observation Component of
Page 11 and 12: TAP’s Teaching Standards are Rese
Page 13 and 14: Example of One Indicator in the TAP
Page 15 and 16: Initial Training and Ongoing Suppor
Page 17 and 18: Monitoring Inter-Rater Reliability:
Page 19 and 20: Example of average observer vs. tea
Page 21 and 22: Ways to Build Inter-rater reliabili
Page 23 and 24: Inter-rater Reliability in Practice
Page 25 and 26: Tennessee First to the Top - Evalua
Page 27 and 28: School Districts in Tennessee Using
Page 29 and 30: Tennessee Teachers Access NIET’s
Page 31 and 32: Evaluator Certification Certificati
Page 33 and 34: Training Modules
Page 35 and 36: NIET Data System Reports
Page 37 and 38: TN Administrators Brief their Facul

Reliability in Classroom Observations - Harvard Graduate School of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?