19.12.2013 Views

appendix o exposure scenarios and unit dose factors ... - Hanford Site

appendix o exposure scenarios and unit dose factors ... - Hanford Site

appendix o exposure scenarios and unit dose factors ... - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HNF-5636 Rev. 0<br />

HNF-SD-WM-TI-707 Revision 1<br />

Living plants supplying food for people fall into two broad categories, aquatic plants <strong>and</strong><br />

terrestrial plants. It will be assumed that aquatic plants contribute very little to the typical human<br />

diet -- either directly or indirectly. If exceptions are identified then a suitable set of parameters<br />

<strong>and</strong> models for contaminant uptake by aquatic plants <strong>and</strong> subsequent consumptions by humans<br />

will be utilized. All plants eaten are assumed to be terrestrial rather than aquatic.<br />

The calculation of radionuclide concentrations in living terrestrial plants uses three main<br />

routes, (1) root uptake, (2) resuspension to leaves (also called "rain splash"), <strong>and</strong> (3) direct<br />

deposition of irrigation water on foliage. Each of these will be considered separately below.<br />

The three uptake routes are then combined to obtain the total concentration in edible portions of<br />

plants.<br />

2.4.1 Root Uptake<br />

The model for root uptake of a contaminant into terrestrial plants assumes that the<br />

concentration in the edible portion is proportional to the concentration in the soil at the time of<br />

harvest. The constants of proportionality are known as the soil-to-plant concentration ratios.<br />

These concentration ratios are measured as the concentration of the dry produce item divided by<br />

the soil concentration. They have no <strong>unit</strong>s, since the soil <strong>and</strong> food items have the same massbased<br />

concentration <strong>unit</strong>s, eg. pCi/kg.<br />

Because the human consumption rates shown in Tables 13 <strong>and</strong> 14 are the wet weights, it is<br />

necessary to select suitable constants to convert from dry weight to wet weight. These constants<br />

are known as "dry-to-wet ratios". They are simply the dry weight of the food item divided by the<br />

wet weight of the item. The "dry-to-wet ratios" from three sources are listed in Table 24. The<br />

values chosen for the ILAW PA are from PNWD-2023 for leafy vegetables <strong>and</strong><br />

NUREG/CR-5512 for the others. The chosen values for the ILAW PA appear in the last column<br />

of Table 24. The values under the "GENII" column have been used in prior <strong>Hanford</strong> <strong>Site</strong><br />

performance assessments.<br />

The GENII dry-to-wet ratios for grains differ greatly from the other collections. However,<br />

it has been assumed in prior performance assessments that grains would be unlikely to become<br />

contaminated in the intruder or irrigation <strong>scenarios</strong>. The intruder would probably not raise grains<br />

in his home garden, <strong>and</strong> the principal grain crop in this area (dry-l<strong>and</strong> wheat) would not be<br />

irrigated. For the ILAW PA grains are included as contaminated vegetable intakes. The basis for<br />

this approach is that some grains (e.g. corn) are irrigated. In addition, the 25% contamination<br />

fraction incorporates the presence of non-irrigated grains (e.g. wheat) in the individual's diet.<br />

O-71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!