PMTCT, and National's - Health Systems Trust
PMTCT, and National's - Health Systems Trust
PMTCT, and National's - Health Systems Trust
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
AIM OF THE EVALUATION<br />
METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN<br />
The overall aim of the evaluation was to assess the performance <strong>and</strong> uptake of the <strong>PMTCT</strong><br />
programme in the eighteen pilot sites <strong>and</strong> to describe the processes underway in the provinces<br />
to exp<strong>and</strong> the <strong>PMTCT</strong> programme beyond the original pilot sites.<br />
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES<br />
• To assess implementation of the components of the programme in the original pilot<br />
sites.<br />
• To assess uptake of the programme components in the pilot sites.<br />
• To analyse routine information collected in the 18 <strong>PMTCT</strong> pilot sites.<br />
• To evaluate <strong>PMTCT</strong> management at the provincial <strong>and</strong> national level.<br />
• To describe progress with the scaling up of <strong>PMTCT</strong> services in nine provinces.<br />
• To make policy recommendations to enhance the functioning of <strong>PMTCT</strong> services.<br />
RESEARCH DESIGN<br />
The evaluation utilised a cross-sectional design that incorporated both qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative<br />
research methods. The evaluation covers the period January to December 2002. Data was<br />
collected at district, provincial <strong>and</strong> national levels by one HST staff member <strong>and</strong> three external<br />
consultants. Two of the researchers were also involved in the first evaluation.<br />
SAMPLING FRAME<br />
In each of the nine provinces one pilot site hospital <strong>and</strong> one feeder clinic were visited. The<br />
same hospital <strong>and</strong> clinic that were visited for the first evaluation (covering the period January<br />
to December 2001) were selected for this repeat evaluation in order to assess progress over<br />
time.<br />
DATA COLLECTION METHODS<br />
Data collection methods utilised in this evaluation included individual interviews, document<br />
review, participant observation <strong>and</strong> review of routine monthly <strong>PMTCT</strong> data.<br />
Two questionnaires were developed for the evaluation, one for the facility level, <strong>and</strong> the other<br />
for the provincial level. The site questionnaire addressed management, training, counselling<br />
<strong>and</strong> testing, antenatal care, infant feeding, monitoring <strong>and</strong> follow up, procurement of supplies<br />
<strong>and</strong> community involvement. The provincial questionnaire addressed provincial management,<br />
information management, plans for expansion of the programme, <strong>and</strong> expenditure.<br />
At the facilities visited, individual interviews were conducted with health care workers (mostly<br />
midwives) in contact with antenatal clients, lay counsellors, nutrition advisors, hospital matrons<br />
<strong>and</strong> doctors. Individual interviews were conducted at the provincial level with the HIV director,<br />
<strong>PMTCT</strong> co-ordinator, MCWH co-ordinator <strong>and</strong> information officers. A review of documentation<br />
such as provincial roll-out plans, training plans, <strong>and</strong> financial reports was also undertaken.<br />
In order to ensure st<strong>and</strong>ardisation amongst researchers, the same tools were used in all<br />
provinces <strong>and</strong> the same categories of health workers were interviewed across all provinces.<br />
6