19.12.2013 Views

PMTCT, and National's - Health Systems Trust

PMTCT, and National's - Health Systems Trust

PMTCT, and National's - Health Systems Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AIM OF THE EVALUATION<br />

METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN<br />

The overall aim of the evaluation was to assess the performance <strong>and</strong> uptake of the <strong>PMTCT</strong><br />

programme in the eighteen pilot sites <strong>and</strong> to describe the processes underway in the provinces<br />

to exp<strong>and</strong> the <strong>PMTCT</strong> programme beyond the original pilot sites.<br />

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES<br />

• To assess implementation of the components of the programme in the original pilot<br />

sites.<br />

• To assess uptake of the programme components in the pilot sites.<br />

• To analyse routine information collected in the 18 <strong>PMTCT</strong> pilot sites.<br />

• To evaluate <strong>PMTCT</strong> management at the provincial <strong>and</strong> national level.<br />

• To describe progress with the scaling up of <strong>PMTCT</strong> services in nine provinces.<br />

• To make policy recommendations to enhance the functioning of <strong>PMTCT</strong> services.<br />

RESEARCH DESIGN<br />

The evaluation utilised a cross-sectional design that incorporated both qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative<br />

research methods. The evaluation covers the period January to December 2002. Data was<br />

collected at district, provincial <strong>and</strong> national levels by one HST staff member <strong>and</strong> three external<br />

consultants. Two of the researchers were also involved in the first evaluation.<br />

SAMPLING FRAME<br />

In each of the nine provinces one pilot site hospital <strong>and</strong> one feeder clinic were visited. The<br />

same hospital <strong>and</strong> clinic that were visited for the first evaluation (covering the period January<br />

to December 2001) were selected for this repeat evaluation in order to assess progress over<br />

time.<br />

DATA COLLECTION METHODS<br />

Data collection methods utilised in this evaluation included individual interviews, document<br />

review, participant observation <strong>and</strong> review of routine monthly <strong>PMTCT</strong> data.<br />

Two questionnaires were developed for the evaluation, one for the facility level, <strong>and</strong> the other<br />

for the provincial level. The site questionnaire addressed management, training, counselling<br />

<strong>and</strong> testing, antenatal care, infant feeding, monitoring <strong>and</strong> follow up, procurement of supplies<br />

<strong>and</strong> community involvement. The provincial questionnaire addressed provincial management,<br />

information management, plans for expansion of the programme, <strong>and</strong> expenditure.<br />

At the facilities visited, individual interviews were conducted with health care workers (mostly<br />

midwives) in contact with antenatal clients, lay counsellors, nutrition advisors, hospital matrons<br />

<strong>and</strong> doctors. Individual interviews were conducted at the provincial level with the HIV director,<br />

<strong>PMTCT</strong> co-ordinator, MCWH co-ordinator <strong>and</strong> information officers. A review of documentation<br />

such as provincial roll-out plans, training plans, <strong>and</strong> financial reports was also undertaken.<br />

In order to ensure st<strong>and</strong>ardisation amongst researchers, the same tools were used in all<br />

provinces <strong>and</strong> the same categories of health workers were interviewed across all provinces.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!