19.12.2013 Views

PMTCT, and National's - Health Systems Trust

PMTCT, and National's - Health Systems Trust

PMTCT, and National's - Health Systems Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proposed Infant HIV Test Timelines<br />

6 weeks 1 st well baby clinic visit<br />

Clinical assessment<br />

HIV DNA PCR test<br />

10 or 14 weeks Timing of 2 nd <strong>and</strong> 3 rd immunization visit<br />

Clinical assessment<br />

HIV DNA PCR result<br />

• PCR positive – child is HIV infected – refer for HIV specific<br />

care, reinforce infant feeding choices + start co-trimoxazole<br />

• PCR negative – mother counseled that child is HIV uninfected<br />

at present <strong>and</strong> educated on feeding practices<br />

Note: test not infallible as breastfeeding <strong>and</strong> other exposure would mean<br />

possible window period infection status {+ specimen mix up possible but<br />

limited (12 months age<br />

AND<br />

• >3 months after breastfeeding has ceased<br />

Positive Children<br />

If no ART <strong>and</strong> no HIV stigmata<br />

• Confirm HIV status by rapid HIV test at 18 months<br />

Note: this test would pick up any children misdiagnosed as positive probably by<br />

specimen mix up at 6 weeks.<br />

Note: It is envisaged that this diagnostic protocol would enable the majority of children (>97%)<br />

to be correctly diagnosed at 6 weeks of age. By reducing the number of children requiring<br />

follow up for HIV by approximately 90% at 10-14 weeks of age, scarce health care resources<br />

can be focused on HIV infected children. Child health care workers would need to maintain<br />

a high index of suspicion in HIV exposed children who present with clinical stigmata of HIV<br />

later on in life in order to diagnose post natal transmission of the virus <strong>and</strong> to refer these<br />

children for appropriate medical management.<br />

Practical Issues Surrounding Implementation of NAT Testing for <strong>PMTCT</strong> follow-up<br />

• The DOH <strong>and</strong> NHLS need to work more closely to leverage their significant, but<br />

currently inefficiently employed, resources to make this diagnostic method deliverable.<br />

• Provinces should be able to decide when to implement alternative testing strategies<br />

depending on their capabilities. In places where rapid tests are not yet available this<br />

should be implemented prior to nucleic acid testing as a basic requirement.<br />

• The same problems experienced already with rapid testing such as stocks running out,<br />

poor quality control, <strong>and</strong> inadequate staff training will occur with an alternative form<br />

of testing. These logistical <strong>and</strong> infrastructural issues should therefore be addressed<br />

before a new method of testing is made widely available otherwise this could worsen<br />

existing services.<br />

• Thorough investigation is needed to determine the adequacy of transport systems to<br />

facilities to enable this form of testing to be undertaken.<br />

• The NHLS laboratory network (>150 nationwide) needs to be exploited <strong>and</strong> staff<br />

trained at all clinics on how to use this system. Currently the NHLS has links to all<br />

antenatal clinics <strong>and</strong> systems in place for transport of specimens to tertiary centers<br />

that have NAT capability. The decision to use NAT would require these logistics to be<br />

effectively mobilized. Currently NAT capability exists in Cape Town, Durban, Bloemfontein,<br />

Johannesburg <strong>and</strong> Pretoria. Consideration to use dried blood spots vs EDTA collection<br />

tubes would need to be investigated. This is a separate discussion that should be held<br />

with the relevant team from the NHLS but is definitely achievable.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!