We Have No Orders to Save You - Human Rights Watch
We Have No Orders to Save You - Human Rights Watch
We Have No Orders to Save You - Human Rights Watch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The main accused are giving them threats saying, “<strong>We</strong> will file cases against you if you move<br />
forward with your testimony.” When the victims call the police and say, “Arrest the accused,<br />
they are threatening us,” the police respond by saying, “That’s our work, you leave it alone.” The<br />
police are also being bribed. They don’t use the names of the accused and they don’t testify in<br />
court. <strong>No</strong> families have returned <strong>to</strong> Gulbarg Society. It looks exactly as it did months ago. Their<br />
residences are not livable. 64<br />
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> spoke <strong>to</strong> one such witness whose son has been missing since the attack on Gulbarg Society.<br />
A police sub-inspec<strong>to</strong>r (PSI) visited the witness in her home and promised that he would help locate her son. In<br />
return, he asked her <strong>to</strong> sign a piece of paper stating that the police came <strong>to</strong> save the victims in Gulbarg Society.<br />
The witness <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> what happened next:<br />
I said I wouldn’t sign it and he ripped up the paper. Then he brought another piece of paper<br />
saying that if the police hadn’t arrived at 5:30 p.m. then we all would have been killed. He asked<br />
me <strong>to</strong> do this because he said that his job was at stake, and that he would be transferred. 65<br />
The at<strong>to</strong>rney helping her with her case explained that the police sub-inspec<strong>to</strong>r had been implicated in “private<br />
firing” on the crowd earlier in the day, that is, not as a police officer. The at<strong>to</strong>rney claims that a statement from<br />
the witness stating that he arrived after 5:30 p.m. would help clear those charges. 66 A <strong>to</strong>tal of eighteen<br />
eyewitnesses have submitted sworn affidavits <strong>to</strong> the trial court hearing the case detailing other blatant attempts <strong>to</strong><br />
subvert the Gulbarg Society investigations. 67<br />
The problems associated with the Naroda Patia and Gulbarg Society investigations, including the harassment of<br />
witnesses, are also found in other parts of the state. During their visit <strong>to</strong> Gujarat <strong>to</strong> determine the feasibility of<br />
holding early elections, members of India’s Election Commission documented similar patterns from almost all of<br />
the twelve districts that they covered. According <strong>to</strong> the Election Commission report:<br />
Everywhere there were complaints of culprits of the violence still moving around scot-free<br />
including some prominent political persons and those on bail. These persons threaten the<br />
displaced affected persons <strong>to</strong> withdraw cases against them, failing which they would not be<br />
allowed <strong>to</strong> return <strong>to</strong> their homes. In Dhakor (Kheda District), the team was <strong>to</strong>ld by a delegation,<br />
in the presence of senior police officers and the district administration authorities, that the culprits<br />
had been identified before the police but no arrests had taken place and the main culprits<br />
continued <strong>to</strong> threaten the villagers <strong>to</strong> withdraw their FIRs. The team has cited many other such<br />
cases from almost all the 12 districts covered by them. 68<br />
In Gujarwaha village in Sabarkantha district one Muslim family had resided amidst 3,000 Hindu households for<br />
over thirty years. When the mobs came, Zubeida Razak Memom and her family members ran <strong>to</strong> hide in the<br />
fields. Zubeida filed an FIR against the villagers who burned down her house. In turn the villagers filed a<br />
complaint against her alleging that she poisoned the village well. They threatened more trouble if she dared <strong>to</strong><br />
return <strong>to</strong> the village; she had no plans <strong>to</strong> go back. 69<br />
64 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with at<strong>to</strong>rney (name withheld), Ahmedabad, January 3, 2003.<br />
65 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> telephone interview with Gulbarg Society witness (name withheld), Ahmedabad, January 3, 2003.<br />
66 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with at<strong>to</strong>rney (name withheld), Ahmedabad, January 3, 2003.<br />
67<br />
Teesta Setalvad, “Gujarat—One year later,” Communalism Combat , April 2003 [online],<br />
www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2003/apr03/cover1.html (retrieved May 20, 2003).<br />
68 Election Commission of India, “Press note: General Elections <strong>to</strong> the Gujarat Legislative Assembly,” August 16, 2002, p. 24<br />
[online] http://www.eci.gov.in/press/current/PN_16082002.pdf (retrieved June 5, 2003) [hereinafter Election Commission of<br />
India, “Press <strong>No</strong>te.”].<br />
69 Habitat International Coalition, <strong>You</strong>th for Unity and Voluntary Action, Rebuilding From The Ruins:<br />
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH 21 JULY 2003, Vol. 15, <strong>No</strong>. 3 (C)