20.12.2013 Views

A SOUND EAR II - Association of British Orchestras

A SOUND EAR II - Association of British Orchestras

A SOUND EAR II - Association of British Orchestras

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>SOUND</strong> <strong>EAR</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />

You should have a written noise policy, which may form part <strong>of</strong> your safety policy, or become the core <strong>of</strong> a safety<br />

policy. See http://www.hse.gov.uk/smallbusinesses/must/policy.htm<br />

The noise policy should spell out:<br />

• specific noise responsibilities, from the managing director downwards;<br />

• how you manage noise assessments;<br />

• how you manage noise control;<br />

• how the noise group relates to your safety committee or other consultation arrangements.<br />

An assessment should include consideration <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• level, type and duration <strong>of</strong> exposure;<br />

• exposure to peak sound pressure;<br />

• effect on employees at particular risk;<br />

• information from health surveillance;<br />

• availability <strong>of</strong> personal hearing protection (php).<br />

And will therefore include:<br />

• knowledge <strong>of</strong> the works to be played - how loud; how long; composer’s style;<br />

• knowledge <strong>of</strong> the venue - space / restrictions / resources / acoustic;<br />

• any valid measurements;<br />

• analysis <strong>of</strong> the works - how energetic; extreme changes in dynamic; significant concentrations <strong>of</strong> energy; instruments<br />

that are masked etc;<br />

• knowledge <strong>of</strong> the individuals - conductor / soloists / principals;<br />

• feelings about the works - how painful / startling / unpleasant / tiring.<br />

The output <strong>of</strong> the assessment is a statement <strong>of</strong> the things to be done to reduce risk, and by whom. Clearly this needs to<br />

dovetail with all the other activity on the day, so actions may need to be delegated. Some noise controls are unpopular,<br />

and you will need to check that they actually happen. If you do not check, you do not have a control system. Most<br />

noise controls have unhelpful side effects, and you should get feedback about the extent to which these side effects were<br />

successfully avoided. Where you measure noise levels, please share them with other orchestras via the ABO.<br />

You should keep a written record <strong>of</strong> the assessment, sufficient to demonstrate that it was adequate, to provide<br />

others (including players) with the significant findings, to develop your action plan, to learn from it when doing later<br />

assessments, and to be able to share ideas with other orchestras. You should expect your record to include:<br />

23<br />

Date Venue Programme<br />

Players<br />

Valid Data<br />

Mandatory PHP Periods<br />

Checks Made<br />

Conductor<br />

Prominent Risks<br />

What Controls<br />

Did the Controls Work?<br />

Soloist(s)<br />

Risk Ball-Park<br />

Managed by Whom<br />

Measured Noise Levels<br />

Action plans<br />

Some noise controls are easy, some require long-range planning. All require management effort, and communication<br />

with the players and others. You will need to develop a plan for noise that identifies the new things to be done and<br />

the effort, persuasion and funding required, and lays out the stages towards attainment. Responsibility for and regular<br />

review <strong>of</strong> the plan should be incorporated into your noise policy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!