22.12.2013 Views

JTfM Vol 1 No 1 2008 - ONLINE EDITION - Inclusionality Research

JTfM Vol 1 No 1 2008 - ONLINE EDITION - Inclusionality Research

JTfM Vol 1 No 1 2008 - ONLINE EDITION - Inclusionality Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Superchannel—Inside and Beyond Superstring<br />

quark and an anti-quark. In that case, a proton is a baryon, that is a type of hadron, made of<br />

three quarks. These are two up quarks and one down quark (uud). The example of the meson<br />

is a pion which is made of an up quark and a down antiquark.<br />

The definitive presupposition or ‘prophecy’ that is guiding the investigations that single<br />

out these hadrons is that things are made of atoms, which are point-like. This prophecy<br />

continued to be self-fulfilling until the quarks emerged. Before then, based on the same outlook,<br />

particles could be isolated from one another even if they are, based on the foundations<br />

that produced them, isolated from space to make them conform with the discrete numbers of<br />

classical and modern mathematics even down to the fractions. Trouble began when it was<br />

discovered that quarks cannot be isolated from one another or the hadron that includes them.<br />

Since to launch a new foundation in which point-likeness does not hold would bring the<br />

whole of physics tumbling down, the only solution is to refine the outlook. The requisite refinement<br />

was provided by Richard Feynman (in Why Hadron Physics DRAFT 2000, bj).<br />

A vizualisation based on Feinman’s refinement requires that the reference frame is removed<br />

from the laboratory, in which electrons? collide with energetic protons moving in opposite<br />

direction with the speed of light. This reference frame requires proton to be viewed as<br />

a beam of point-like constituents. These constituents are called partons. The electrons therefore<br />

collide with partons which are now viewed as quarks.<br />

As the field enters 1970, questions that could not be answered surfaced. One of them<br />

puts the picture of quark into question. The other asks to know why during violent collisions,<br />

quarks could not be knocked completely free. This is called confinement in nuclear physics.<br />

Confinement is the phenomenon in physics that ‘colour-charged’ particles such as quarks<br />

cannot be isolated. Confinement states simply, “you can never pull hard enough to liberate a<br />

quark from a proton”. Quarks are confined by strong interaction to form pairs and triplets<br />

whose net colour (nothing to do with colours but just a way of giving names to quarks) is<br />

neutral. We shall have more to say on this phenomenon later.<br />

The theoretical response to this is to conclude that quarks are bound together by elementary<br />

strings with constant force that is independent of the string as presented below in<br />

which q stands for quark and bar-q stands for anti-quark. Quark and anti-quark therefore<br />

constitute geometrically, the ends of the line – Planck length – that is the string.<br />

This idea was extensively developed but it couldn’t explain the phenomena from<br />

which it arose. For a while, the sun was allowed to set on it. When it resurfaced, it was not<br />

applied to the force between quarks but was directed to the synthesis of quantum mechanics<br />

and the gravity of general relativity with other forces in nature. It is here that string theory<br />

finds itself up to this day.<br />

In all this, what string theory initially sets out to do is to understand the properties of<br />

32<br />

Journal of Transfigural Mathematics <strong>Vol</strong>.1 <strong>No</strong>.1.<strong>2008</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!