1 GPSG 2 LFG - German Grammar Group FU Berlin - Freie ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• http://www.delph-in.net/erg/ • http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/Demos/ 5 Construction Grammar John Bryant, Nancy Chang, Eva Mok developed a system for the implementation of Embodied Construction Grammar 6 . Luc Steels works on the simulation of language evolution and language acquisition (Steels, 2003). In personal communication (p. M. 2007) he stated that is is a long way to go until robots finally will be able to learn to speak but the current state of the art is already impressive. Steels can use robots that have a visual system (camera and image processing) and uses visual information paired with audio information in the language acquisition simulation. The implementation of Fluid Construction Grammar is documented in Steels, 2011 and Steels, 2012. The second book contains parts about German, in which the implementation of German declarative clauses and w interrogative clauses is explained with respect to topological fields (Micelli, 2012). The FCG system, various publications and example analyses are available at: http://www.fcg-net.org/. Jurafsky (1996) developed a Construction Grammar for English that was paired with a probabilistic component. He showed that many preformance phenomena that are discussed in the literature (see Section ?? on the Competence/Preformance Distinction) can be explained with recourse to probabilities of phrasal constructions and valency properties of words. Bannard, Lieven and Tomasello (2009) use a probabilistic context free grammar to model grammatical knowledge of two and three year old children. 6 TAG There exist various synstems for the processing of TAG grammars (Doran, Hockey, Sarkar, Srinivas and Xia, 2000; Parmentier, Kallmeyer, Maier, Lichte and Dellert, 2008; Kallmeyer, Lichte, Maier, Parmentier, Dellert and Evang, 2008). Smaller and larger TAG fragments have been developed for the following languages: • Arabic (Fraj, Zribi and Ahmed, 2008), • German (Rambow, 1994; Gerdes, 2002; Kallmeyer and Yoon, 2004; Lichte, 2007), • Englisch (XTAG Research Group, 2001; Frank, 2002; Kroch and Joshi, 1987), • French (Abeillé, 1988; Candito, 1996, 1998, 1999; Crabbé, 2005), • Italian (Candito, 1998, 1999), • Korean (Han, Yoon, Kim and Palmer, 2000; Kallmeyer and Yoon, 2004), • Vietnamese (Le, Nguyen and Roussanaly, 2008) 6 See http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~jbryant/old-analyzer.html and Bryant, 2003. 6
Candito (1996) developed a system for the representation of meta grammars, which allows the uniform specification of crosslinguistic generalizations. This system was used by some of the projects mentioned above for the derivation of grammars for specific languages. For instance Kinyon, Rambow, Scheffler, Yoon and Joshi (2006) derive verb second languages from the meta grammar. Among thoses grammars for verb second languages is a grammar of Jiddish for which there was no TAG grammar since 2006. Resnik (1992) combines TAG with a statistics component. References Abeillé, Anne. 1988. Parsing French with Tree Adjoining Grammar: Some Linguistic Accounts. In Proceedings of COLING, pages 7–12, Budapest. http://www.aclweb. org/anthology/C/C88/C88-1002.pdf, 25.01.2010. Abney, Steven P. and Hinrichs, Erhard W. (eds.). 1995. Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Associationfor Computational Linguistics, Dublin, Association for Computational Linguistics. Abzianidze, Lasha. 2011. An HPSG-based Formal Grammar of a Core Fragment of Georgian Implemented in TRALE. Masters Thesis, Charles University in Prague. https://sites.google.com/site/lashabzianidze/thesis, 31.08.2012. Alencar, Leonel Figueiredo de. 2004. Complementos verbais oracionais – uma análise léxicofuncional. Lingua(gem) 1(1), 173–218. Arka, I Wayan, Andrews, Avery, Dalrymple, Mary, Mistica, Meladel and Simpson, Jane. 2009. A Linguistic and Computational Morphosyntactic Analysis for the Applicative -i in Indonesian. In Butt and King (2009), pages 85–105. http:// csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/14/, 22.03.2010. Attia, Mohammed A. 2008. Handling Arabic Morphological and Syntactic Ambiguity within the LFG Framework with a View to Machine Translation. Ph. D.thesis, School of Languages, Linguistics and Cultures, University of Manchester. Avgustinova, Tania and Zhang, Yi. 2009. Exploiting the Russian National Corpus in the Development of a Russian Resource Grammar. In Núria Bel, Erhard Hinrichs, Kiril Simov and Petya Osenova (eds.), Adaptation of Language Resources and Technology to New Domains at the RANLP 2009 Conference, Borovets, Bulgaria, pages 1–11, Shoumen, Bulgaria: INCOMA Ltd. Bahrani, Mohammad, Sameti, Hossein and Manshadi, Mehdi Hafezi. 2011. A Computational Grammar for Persian Based on GPSG. Language Resources and Evaluation 45(4), 387–408. Baldridge, Jason. 2002. Lexically Specified Derivational Control in Combinatory Categorial Grammar. Ph. D.thesis, University of Edinburgh. http://comp.ling.utexas.edu/ jbaldrid/papers/Baldridge_dissertation.pdf, 17.03.2007. 7
Page 1 and 2: 1 GPSG The following is a list of l
Page 3 and 4: 3 Categorial Grammar The basic oper
Page 5: • Persian (Müller, 2010; Müller
Page 9 and 10: Bender, Emily M. and Siegel, Melani
Page 11 and 12: Cahill, Aoife, Burke, Michael, O’
Page 13 and 14: Crysmann, Berthold. 2011. A Unified
Page 15 and 16: Flickinger, Daniel P. 2000. On Buil
Page 17 and 18: Hedeland, Hanna, Schmidt, Thomas an
Page 19 and 20: Keller, Frank. 1994. German Functio
Page 21 and 22: Papers in Linguistics from the 9th
Page 23 and 24: Müller, Stefan. 1999. Deutsche Syn
Page 25 and 26: Netter, Klaus. 1993. Architecture a
Page 27 and 28: Pineda, Luis Alberto and Meza, Ivá
Page 29 and 30: Steels, Luc. 2003. Evolving Grounde
Page 31: Yampol, Todd and Karttunen, Lauri.

1 GPSG 2 LFG - German Grammar Group FU Berlin - Freie ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?