26.12.2013 Views

Amniotic Fluid Composition Responds to Changes in Maternal ...

Amniotic Fluid Composition Responds to Changes in Maternal ...

Amniotic Fluid Composition Responds to Changes in Maternal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nutrient<br />

Metabolism<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> <strong>Fluid</strong> <strong>Composition</strong> <strong>Responds</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Changes</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Maternal</strong> Dietary Carbohydrate and is Related <strong>to</strong><br />

Metabolic Status <strong>in</strong> Term Fetal Rats1»2<br />

KRISTINE G. KOSKI3 AND MARJORIE A. FERGUSSON4<br />

School of Dietetics and Human Hutrition, McGill University,<br />

Ste. Anne de Bellevue, PQ, H9X ICO, Canada<br />

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was twofold: 1)<br />

<strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e whether amniotic fluid composition re<br />

sponded <strong>to</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> the level or source (glucose vs.<br />

fruc<strong>to</strong>se) of maternal dietary carbohydrate, and 2) <strong>to</strong><br />

establish whether any dietary-<strong>in</strong>duced changes <strong>in</strong> am<br />

niotic fluid composition correlated with matemal or fetal<br />

metabolic status at term. Pregnant rat dams were fed<br />

graded levels (0, 4, 12 and 60%) of glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se<br />

<strong>in</strong> a triglyceride-based diet (Experiment 1) or isoenergetic<br />

low carbohydrate diets hav<strong>in</strong>g 4% glucose equiva<br />

lents as glucose, fruc<strong>to</strong>se, or lipid-grycerol (Experiment<br />

2) throughout pregnancy. <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid and maternal<br />

and fetal samples were collected at term (d 21). Results<br />

demonstrated a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid<br />

glucose and a significant decrease <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid uric<br />

acid as the level of carbohydrate <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> the ma<br />

ternal diet. Pearson correlation coefficients showed am<br />

niotic fluid glucose <strong>to</strong> be positively associated with ma<br />

ternal and fetal liver giycogen and fetal weight; amniotic<br />

fluid uric acid and urea nitrogen were negatively corre<br />

lated with these same measures. Regression analysis<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated that amniotic fluid glucose was predictive of<br />

fetal body weight and fetal liver giycogen at term. The<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs show that amniotic fluid can be modified by<br />

maternal diet and suggest that composition of amniotic<br />

fluid might be used as an accessible nutritional <strong>in</strong>dica<strong>to</strong>r<br />

of carbohydrate status <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g fetus. J. Nutr.<br />

122: 385-392, 1992.<br />

INDEXING KEY WORDS:<br />

•carbohydrate •amniotic fluid<br />

•glucose •uric acid •rats<br />

retardation followed (1, 6, 7). The belief has been that<br />

this compromised growth arose from lack of nutrients<br />

normally provided by amniotic fluid.<br />

Glucose is considered the major metabolic fuel<br />

utilized by the develop<strong>in</strong>g fetus (8). Lowered amniotic<br />

fluid glucose has been associated with <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

growth retardation and has been produced dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

prolonged fast<strong>in</strong>g and starvation (9, 10). However, no<br />

study has exam<strong>in</strong>ed whether amniotic fluid glucose<br />

responds <strong>to</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> the level of glucose <strong>in</strong> the<br />

maternal diet.<br />

The purpose of the present study was <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

whether the level or source of maternal dietary carbo<br />

hydrate, an essential nutrient dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy (11),<br />

would produce changes <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid composi<br />

tion. A second aspect of the study was <strong>to</strong> establish<br />

whether any diet-<strong>in</strong>duced changes <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid<br />

glucose, láclate,uric acid or urea—putative <strong>in</strong>dica<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

of fetal maturity and metabolic distress (12-22)—<br />

were correlated with the previously reported maternal<br />

or fetal metabolites (23) and could be predictive of the<br />

poor reproductive outcome that generally accom<br />

panies the feed<strong>in</strong>g of carbohydrate-restricted diets<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy (11, 23-26).<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by guest on August 30, 2013<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid may play an important role <strong>in</strong> fetal<br />

nutrition (1). It is well known that the fetus swallows<br />

amniotic fluid and that the fetus <strong>in</strong> humans and <strong>in</strong><br />

several animal species has the ability <strong>to</strong> digest and<br />

absorb carbohydrate and prote<strong>in</strong> (2-5). The possibility<br />

that the <strong>in</strong>gested amniotic fluid represents a source of<br />

nutrition for normal fetal growth and development<br />

has been <strong>in</strong>ferred from studies <strong>in</strong> which fetal swal<br />

low<strong>in</strong>g was prevented and substantial growth<br />

Resented at the 75th Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g of the Federation of<br />

American Societies for Experimental Biology, April 1991, Atlanta,<br />

GA [Koski, K. G. S. Fergusson, M. A. (1991) <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid com<br />

position responds <strong>to</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> maternal dietary carbohydrate and<br />

predicts term fetal metabolic status <strong>in</strong> rats. FASEB J. 5: A917 (abs.)].<br />

^The f<strong>in</strong>ancial support of the Natural Sciences and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Research Council of Canada (NSERC A3623) is gratefully acknowl<br />

edged.<br />

To whom correspondence should<br />

4M. A. Fergusson was the recipient<br />

be addressed.<br />

of the Natural Sciences and<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Council Postgraduate Research Scholarship.<br />

0022-3166/92 $3.00 ©1992 American Institute of Nutrition. Received 26 November 1990. Accepted 10 July 1991.<br />

385


386 KOSKI AND FERGUSSON<br />

TABLE 1<br />

<strong>Composition</strong> of triglyceride-based and fatty acid-based carbohydrate-restricted diets1<br />

Ingredient<br />

CarbohydrateSoybean<br />

oilOleic<br />

acidCelluloseCase<strong>in</strong>Vitam<strong>in</strong><br />

Carbohydrate-restricted<br />

Control diet2 Triglyceride-based3 Fatty acid-based4<br />

diets<br />

wt438.06—38.9411.01.25.50.341.017.36(4.15)1234.91—34.0911.<br />

g dry<br />

mixM<strong>in</strong>eral<br />

mixMethion<strong>in</strong>eSodium<br />

bicarbonateMetabolizable<br />

kf/g(kcal/g)6016—511.01.25.50.341.017.36(4.15)039.64—41.3611.01.25.50.341.017.36(4.15)g/100<br />

energy,<br />

1The detailed composition was described previously (23).<br />

2The control diet represents the 60% carbohydrate diet conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g either glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se at this level.<br />

3The carbohydrate-restricted triglyceride-based diets conta<strong>in</strong> 0% carbohydrate (0%C-TG) and 4 or 12% glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se.<br />

''The fatty acid based diets are designated by either 4%G-FA or 4%F-FA, with the G or F designation referr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the type of carbohydrate<br />

(glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se) added <strong>to</strong> these diets.<br />

MATERIALS<br />

AND METHODS<br />

Experimental design. The study formed part of a<br />

larger <strong>in</strong>vestigation that compared the potential of<br />

fruc<strong>to</strong>se <strong>to</strong> replace an isoenergetic amount of glucose<br />

<strong>in</strong> the diet of pregnant rats. The maternal and fetal<br />

variables were previously reported (23). In this paper<br />

the changes <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid composition follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> maternal dietary carbohydrate are<br />

described. This <strong>in</strong>vestigation was similar <strong>in</strong> design<br />

and rationale <strong>to</strong> the previously reported study (23)<br />

and, like the earlier study, was divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> two ex<br />

periments. In Experiment 1, graded levels (0, 4, 12 and<br />

60%) of two carbohydrates (fruc<strong>to</strong>se or glucose) were<br />

fed <strong>to</strong> pregnant rat dams throughout pregnancy, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

triglyceride-based diets. In Experiment 2, <strong>to</strong> de<br />

term<strong>in</strong>e whether the form of carbohydrate was im<br />

portant at low levels of <strong>in</strong>take, three different diets<br />

with similar levels of "glucose equivalents" were<br />

compared. These diets were as follows: 1}4% glucose,<br />

fatty acid-based (4% G-FA); 2} 4% fruc<strong>to</strong>se, fatty<br />

acid-based (4% F-FA); and 3) 0% carbohydrate,<br />

triglyceride-based diets (0% C-TG). These diets con<br />

ta<strong>in</strong>ed 4% glucose, 4% fruc<strong>to</strong>se or 4% carbohydrate<br />

precursor as lipid-glycerol (soybean oil), respectively.<br />

The term "glucose equivalent" as used <strong>in</strong> this<br />

paper refers <strong>to</strong> the potential glucose yield from either<br />

dietary carbohydrate directly or the glycerol moiety of<br />

the <strong>in</strong>tact triglycéride(soybean oil). Glucose equiva<br />

lents that could be derived from the glycerol moiety<br />

are calculated based on the observation that the<br />

glycerol moiety is 10% by weight of the <strong>in</strong>tact trigly<br />

cérideand lipid is 90-95% digestible. Thus, the fatty<br />

acid-based diets conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g glucose and fruc<strong>to</strong>se had,<br />

<strong>in</strong> addition <strong>to</strong> the 4% glucose equivalent from either<br />

the glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se, an additional 0.5% glucose<br />

equivalent as lipid-glycerol from the 5% soybean oil,<br />

due <strong>to</strong> the previously established dietary requirement<br />

for this level of <strong>in</strong>tact triglycéride<strong>in</strong> the diet of<br />

pregnant rats (26, 27).<br />

Diet formulation. The general composition of the<br />

diets is described <strong>in</strong> Table 1; the detailed composition<br />

was described previously (23). Each diet was calcu<br />

lated <strong>to</strong> conta<strong>in</strong> 17.36 kj (4.15 kcal) of metabolizable<br />

energy per gram dry matter, which is the energy<br />

requirement for pregnant rat dams (27).<br />

The rationale for the formulation of the basal<br />

carbohydrate-free diet for pregnant rat dams was<br />

described previously (26). These carbohydrate-free<br />

diets were based on the concept that glucose must be<br />

the first limit<strong>in</strong>g nutrient, and any measurable change<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g the addition of <strong>in</strong>cremental amounts of<br />

glucose or its equivalents must be attributable specif<br />

ically <strong>to</strong> the addition of glucose or glucose equiva<br />

lents and not <strong>to</strong> significant alterations <strong>in</strong> any other<br />

dietary component. The metabolizable energy of<br />

fruc<strong>to</strong>se is considered <strong>to</strong> be identical <strong>to</strong> that of<br />

glucose (23). hi these diets, prote<strong>in</strong> is m<strong>in</strong>imally ade<br />

quate <strong>to</strong> supply the levels of prote<strong>in</strong>, nitrogen and<br />

essential am<strong>in</strong>o acids and not <strong>in</strong> excess <strong>to</strong> provide<br />

supplementary gluconeogenic precursors. The major<br />

dietary component, therefore, is lipid, either as <strong>in</strong>tact<br />

triglycérideor food grade fatty acids, the latter hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the m<strong>in</strong>imally adequate level of <strong>in</strong>tact triglycéride<br />

(5%) previously described as an essential dietary com<br />

ponent of fatty acid-formulated diets (26). Supple<br />

ments of glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se were added <strong>to</strong> the basal<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by guest on August 30, 2013


carbohydrate-free diet <strong>to</strong> replace an equal weight of an<br />

isoenergetic amount of oleic acid or triglycérideplus a<br />

complementary amount of cellulose <strong>to</strong> compensate<br />

for the weight of the supplement.<br />

Experimental animals and chemical analysis. Bred<br />

female Sprague-Dawley rats (180-200 g) (Charles<br />

River Canada, St. Constant, PQ) were used <strong>in</strong> all<br />

experiments. Upon arrival (d 0 or 1 of pregnancy), the<br />

pregnant rats were housed <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual suspended<br />

wire-screen cages and were fed the experimental diet,<br />

<strong>to</strong> which they were randomly assigned, <strong>in</strong> a<br />

temperature-controlled room (20"C); fluorescent<br />

light<strong>in</strong>g was provided au<strong>to</strong>matically for a period of 12<br />

h daily from 0700 <strong>to</strong> 1900 h. Water and experimental<br />

diets were fed ad libitum. Individual body weights<br />

and food <strong>in</strong>take were measured every second or third<br />

day. Dams were delivered of fetuses by caesarean<br />

section on d 21 of gestation. All dams were killed <strong>in</strong> a<br />

post-absorptive (fed) state under anesthesia with<br />

ketam<strong>in</strong>e-HCl (Rogarsetic, Roqar/STB Inc., Montréal,<br />

PQ) <strong>in</strong>jected at a level of 30 mg/kg body wt <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the<br />

jugular region <strong>to</strong> avoid anesthetiz<strong>in</strong>g the fetuses. Ma<br />

ternal blood was withdrawn by cardiac puncture. All<br />

procedures were conducted <strong>in</strong> conformance with the<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es for experimental procedures set forth by<br />

the local animal care committee of McGill University<br />

and by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (28).<br />

Plasma was subsequently isolated by centrifugation<br />

and s<strong>to</strong>red at -20*C until analyzed as previously<br />

described (23). Immediately follow<strong>in</strong>g cardiac punc<br />

ture, the <strong>in</strong>tact uterus was removed. <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid<br />

was drawn from each amniotic sac <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> a 4-cc tuber<br />

cul<strong>in</strong> syr<strong>in</strong>ge until 1-2 mL were collected <strong>in</strong> an Eppendorf<br />

tube on ice. The pooled amniotic fluid was<br />

subsequently s<strong>to</strong>red at -20°Cuntil analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

Abbott VP-Super System (Irv<strong>in</strong>g, TX) with Sigma Kits<br />

(Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) for glucose, lactate,<br />

uric acid and urea nitrogen as described by the<br />

manufacturer. The number of analyses performed on<br />

AMNIOTIC FLUID AND MATERNAL DIET 387<br />

each amniotic fluid constituent varied accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong><br />

the quantity of amniotic fluid obta<strong>in</strong>ed as a result of<br />

different pup and litter sizes. In general, the practice<br />

was <strong>to</strong> perform the analyses <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g order:<br />

glucose, lactic acid, uric acid and urea, until the am<br />

niotic fluid sample was exhausted. <strong>Maternal</strong> and fetal<br />

livers were removed, freeze-clamped us<strong>in</strong>g liquid air<br />

and s<strong>to</strong>red at -80'C until analyzed for glycogen as<br />

described previously (23).<br />

Statistical analysis. All statistical procedures were<br />

analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g SAS (29). A two-way ANOVA was<br />

conducted on data from Experiment 1 us<strong>in</strong>g level and<br />

source of carbohydrate as ma<strong>in</strong> effects. The amniotic<br />

fluid values <strong>in</strong> the zero carbohydrate group were ran<br />

domly divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> two groups so that the design was<br />

a 4 x 2 fac<strong>to</strong>rial <strong>in</strong>itially; however, all 0% values were<br />

regrouped and treated as one <strong>in</strong> the presentation of<br />

the results, because the absence of either carbohy<br />

drate <strong>in</strong> these treatment groups resulted <strong>in</strong> the com<br />

position of the diets be<strong>in</strong>g equal. If there were no<br />

statistically significant differences between the<br />

glucose and fruc<strong>to</strong>se groups, the data for these two<br />

groups were comb<strong>in</strong>ed and the statistical analysis<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ear contrasts was performed and reported <strong>in</strong><br />

the results section for the pooled data (glu + fra). The<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g comparisons us<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ear contrasts were<br />

done for Experiment 1: 0 vs. 4%, 4 vs. 12%, 12 vs.<br />

60% for amniotic fluid glucose, uric acid and urea,<br />

and 0 vs. 60% was added for lactic acid only. In<br />

Experiment 2, a one-way ANOVA was performed<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g data from rats fed the three glucose equivalent<br />

diets. Correlations were done us<strong>in</strong>g pooled fetal data<br />

rather than the <strong>in</strong>dividual pup data, because only one<br />

amniotic fluid sample had been obta<strong>in</strong>ed per litter.<br />

Multiple l<strong>in</strong>ear regression analyses were performed<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g all of the amniotic fluid constituents as <strong>in</strong>de<br />

pendent variables <strong>in</strong> the model and each fetal variable<br />

(fetal weight, glucose, lactate, uric acid or liver<br />

glycogen) as the dependent variable.<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by guest on August 30, 2013<br />

TABLE 2<br />

Effect of low carbohydrate, 4% glucose equivalent diets dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy on amniotic fluid composition at term (Experiment 2)1<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid<br />

constituentsGlucose<br />

|4%G-FA)0.44<br />

glucose (4%)Fruc<strong>to</strong>se(4%F-FA)mmol/L<br />

equivalents<br />

(0%C-TG)0.44<br />

Uric acid<br />

Lactate<br />

Urea nitrogenGlucose<br />

± 0.05 (8)<br />

47.5 ±11.9 (7)<br />

4.44 ± 0.04 (8)<br />

4.43 ± 0.60 (7)Dietary<br />

0.33 ± 0.05 (9)<br />

83.27 ±11.9 (9)<br />

4.77 ± 0.22 (8)<br />

4.17 ± 0.79 (9)Lipid-Glycerol<br />

± 0.05 (9)<br />

89.22 ±11.9 (5)<br />

5.11 ± 0.44 (8)<br />

5.36 ± 0.89 (6)<br />

Values are means ±SEM.Number <strong>in</strong> parentheses equals number of dams from which amniotic fluid samples were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. There were no<br />

significant differences for any value among the three dietary treatment groups us<strong>in</strong>g one-way ANOVA. 4% G-FA - 4% glucose, fatty<br />

acid-based diet; 4% F-FA - 4% fruc<strong>to</strong>se, fatty acid-based diet; 0% C-TG - 0% carbohydrate, triglyceride-based diet.


388 KOSKI AND FERGUSSON<br />

TABLE 3<br />

Effect of graded levels of maternal dietary ¡focóseor fruc<strong>to</strong>se dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy on amniotic fluid composition at term<br />

(Experiment<br />

Dietarycarbohydrate0%4%Level<br />

of Carbohydrate12%60%<br />

GlucoseFruc<strong>to</strong>seGlu+fru30.44<br />

±0.44<br />

±0.110.11a(9)(9)0.72<br />

\unol/L"GlucoseFruc<strong>to</strong>seGlu+fru389<br />

Glucose, mmol/L*<br />

±0.66<br />

±0.69<br />

±0.160.11(9)(1010.12ab<br />

(19)1.00 (18)Uric<br />

acid,<br />

±89<br />

±30<br />

±47<br />

±3030«(5)(5)59<br />

±24612b(8)(7)(15)18 (14)Láclate,<br />

mmol/L'"GlucoseFruc<strong>to</strong>seGlu+fru3GlucoseFruc<strong>to</strong>seGlu+fru35.10<br />

±5.10<br />

±5.4<br />

±5.4<br />

(8)0.90.9a(6)16)4.22<br />

±0.44(8)0.44^<br />

±5.00<br />

±4.60<br />

±3.3<br />

±0.89<br />

±0.94<br />

±0.110.160.1 lb(9)(7)(16)1.89<br />

±24<br />

±23<br />

±5.00<br />

±4.88<br />

±nitrogen,<br />

mmol/L^3.5<br />

±6612C(6)(5)(11)24<br />

±1.83 (8)0.16<br />

±1.85 (10)O.llc<br />

±0.11<br />

±18<br />

±17<br />

±5.22<br />

±5.43<br />

±3.0<br />

(7)6<br />

(7)12C<br />

±6<br />

(9)0.22<br />

(10)0.22b<br />

(19)0.3<br />

±3.9<br />

±3.2<br />

±2.8 (8)0.2<br />

±3.6<br />

±3.4<br />

±2.9 (10)0.3b<br />

±0.330.330.22a0.30.70.3b(8)(10)(18)Urea(8)(9)(17)4.66<br />

±0.220.220.22a0.20.30.4b(8)(7)(15)(8)(6)(14)5.77<br />

±0.11 (18)<br />

'Values are means ±SEM.Number <strong>in</strong> parentheses equals number of dams from which amniotic fluid samples were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Means for<br />

each amniotic fluid constituent hav<strong>in</strong>g different letter superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) us<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ear contrasts.<br />

^Significance of ma<strong>in</strong> effects from two-way ANOVA: for none of the measurements was the source of the carbohydrate or the <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

of source x level of carbohydrate significant. Based on significance of ma<strong>in</strong> effects by ANOVA, level of carbohydrate was significant at: *P <<br />

0.0001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.005.<br />

3Glu+fru represents the pooled means for glucose and fruc<strong>to</strong>se comb<strong>in</strong>ed (see statistical analysis section).<br />

RESULTS<br />

Analysis of variance. The effect of low carbohy<br />

drate 4% glucose equivalent diets dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy<br />

(Experiment 2) on amniotic fluid glucose, lactate, uric<br />

acid and urea nitrogen is summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 2. The<br />

effects of graded levels of maternal dietary glucose or<br />

fruc<strong>to</strong>se on these same amniotic fluid constituents<br />

(Experiment 1) are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 3. There<br />

were no significant differences (Experiment 2, Table<br />

2) for any amniotic fluid constituent among rats fed<br />

these three 4% glucose-equivalent diets (4% F-FA,<br />

4% G-FA, 0% C-TG), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the source of<br />

carbohydrate (glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se) or carbohydrate<br />

precursor (lipid-glycerol) was not important. How<br />

ever, the results showed that all amniotic fluid con<br />

stituents were significantly affected by the level of<br />

carbohydrate <strong>in</strong> the maternal diet (Experiment 1,<br />

Table 3). As the amount of either glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> the maternal diet, there was a significant<br />

rise <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid glucose concentration from a<br />

low of 0.44 mmol/L when there was only lipidglycerol<br />

as a carbohydrate precursor <strong>in</strong> the maternal<br />

diet <strong>to</strong> a high of 1.89 mmol/L when 60% glucose or<br />

fruc<strong>to</strong>se was supplied <strong>in</strong> the diet. In contrast, as di<br />

etary glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se was added <strong>to</strong> the maternal<br />

diet, amniotic fluid uric acid concentration showed a<br />

statistically significant and progressive decrease be<br />

tween 0, 4 and 12% dietary carbohydrate,- it then<br />

plateaued, because there was no statistically signif<br />

icant difference between the 12 and 60% dietary<br />

treatment groups. <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid lactic acid and urea<br />

concentrations were not as sensitive <strong>to</strong> changes <strong>in</strong><br />

maternal dietary carbohydrate. For amniotic fluid<br />

urea nitrogen, there was only a statistically signi<br />

ficant reduction between 0 and 4% dietary carbohy<br />

drate. The 4, 12 and 60% dietary treatment groups did<br />

not differ significantly. The 60% carbohydrate control<br />

group had a significantly higher concentration of<br />

lactic acid <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid compared with either the<br />

4 or 12% dietary treatment groups,-however, the con<br />

centration of lactic acid <strong>in</strong> the amniotic fluid for the<br />

low carbohydrate (0% C-TG) group was not signifi<br />

cantly different from that of the 60% control group or<br />

those of the 4 and 12% dietary treatment groups,<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g it difficult <strong>to</strong> use amniotic fluid lactic acid<br />

concentration predictably <strong>to</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>ate between<br />

low and high carbohydrate dietary treatments.<br />

Correlations. The probabilities of the Pearson cor<br />

relation coefficients for comparisons of amniotic fluid<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by guest on August 30, 2013


AMNIOTIC FLUID AND MATERNAL DIET 389<br />

glucose, lactic and uric acids, and urea nitrogen with<br />

maternal or fetal plasma glucose, lactic and uric acids,<br />

urea nitrogen, and liver glycogen and fetal weight are<br />

summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 4.<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid glucose was significantly and posi<br />

tively correlated with maternal plasma lactic acid and<br />

maternal liver glycogen as well as fetal weight and<br />

fetal liver glycogen. There was a weak association (P -<br />

0.07) between amniotic fluid glucose and fetal plasma<br />

glucose. In contrast, amniotic fluid glucose demon<br />

strated a significant negative correlation with ma<br />

ternal and fetal plasma uric acid concentrations and<br />

maternal plasma urea nitrogen.<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid lactic acid was significantly and<br />

positively correlated with only maternal liver<br />

glycogen.<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid uric acid and amniotic fluid urea<br />

nitrogen were correlated significantly with one an<br />

other. Hence, when either one was compared with<br />

maternal and fetal metabolites, the pattern of signif<br />

icant relationships was similar. Both amniotic fluid<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluidLactic<br />

acidUric<br />

acidUrea<br />

nitrogen<strong>Maternal</strong>Plasma<br />

TABLE 4<br />

uric acid and urea nitrogen were significantly posi<br />

tively correlated with maternal plasma urea nitrogen<br />

and significantly negatively correlated with maternal<br />

liver glycogen. Fetal weight, plasma glucose and liver<br />

glycogen were significantly and negatively correlated<br />

with amniotic fluid uric acid and urea nitrogen. The<br />

results showed that fetal plasma uric acid but not<br />

maternal plasma uric acid was significantly related <strong>to</strong><br />

amniotic fluid uric acid.<br />

Multiple regressions. The regression analyses of<br />

the various amniotic fluid constituents aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />

dependent variables of fetal body weight, fetal plasma<br />

glucose, lactic and uric acids, and fetal liver glycogen<br />

are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 5. Certa<strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid<br />

constituents were significantly associated with fetal<br />

(d 21) body weight and term fetal liver glycogen.<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid glucose was positively associated with<br />

fetal weight and fetal liver glycogen at term, whereas<br />

amniotic fluid uric acid was significantly and neg<br />

atively related <strong>to</strong> fetal body weight. <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid<br />

Pearson correlation coefficients of amniotic fluid with maternal, fetal and amniotic fluid variables1'2<br />

Glucose Lactic acid<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong><br />

fluid<br />

Uñeacid Urea nitrogen<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by guest on August 30, 2013<br />

glucosePlasma<br />

acidPlasma uric<br />

acidPlasma lactic<br />

nitrogenLiver urea<br />

glycogenFetalWeightPlasma<br />

glucosePlasma<br />

acidPlasma uric<br />

acidLiverlactic<br />

glycogen0.062(76)-0.538***(61)-O.260*(72)0.180(65)-0.337**(67)0.476****(75)-O.482****(64)0.777****(53)0.509(78)0.218(69)-0.319**(60)-0.087(73)0.693***<br />

'Number <strong>in</strong> parenthesis equals number of observations.<br />

2Probability of Pearson correlation coefficient: *P < 0.05,<br />

'P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.


390 KOSKI AND FERGUSSON<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid<br />

constituentsGlucose<br />

Lactate<br />

Uric acid<br />

Urea nitrogen<br />

f-value<br />

Adjusted multiple<br />

InterceptFetal<br />

TABLE 5<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid constituents as predic<strong>to</strong>rs of fetal metabolic status us<strong>in</strong>g multiple regression1<br />

weight0.023<br />

(0.007)**<br />

-0.010 (0.010)<br />

-0.415 (0.190)*<br />

0.027 (0.027)<br />

4.77**<br />

R2 0.34<br />

4.21 (0.48)Fetal<br />

metabolitesGlucose0.027<br />

plasma<br />

(0.405)<br />

0.677 (0.568)<br />

(0.277)<br />

-0.432 (0.388)<br />

-14.93 (9.88) -0.337 (6.754)<br />

-2.47 (1.40) 0.294 (0.963)<br />

1.71<br />

1.08<br />

0.09<br />

0.001<br />

59.85 (25.41)Lactate-0.223 66.26 (17.36)***Uric<br />

acid-0.007<br />

(0.006)<br />

0.002 (0.008)<br />

0.429 (0.146)**<br />

0.020 (0.020)<br />

4.54**<br />

0.330<br />

0.890 (0.375)*Liver<br />

glycogen1.188<br />

(0.198)****<br />

-0.192 (0.277)<br />

-9.144 (4.814)<br />

-0.795 (0.686)<br />

14.36****<br />

0.65<br />

26.28 (12.38)*<br />

'Values are parameter estimates (SEM).The multiple regression was performed on 36 observations. Probability: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P<br />

< 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Units were based on concentrations <strong>in</strong> mg/100 mL for maternal and fetal plasma and ammode fluid values and mg/g<br />

wet wt for liver glycogen.<br />

glucose seemed <strong>to</strong> be predictive of fetal liver glycogen<br />

and expla<strong>in</strong>ed 65% of its variability.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Even though amniotic fluid is thought <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong><br />

volved <strong>in</strong> fetal nutrition, virtually no study <strong>to</strong> date<br />

has <strong>in</strong>vestigated the role of maternal diet on amniotic<br />

fluid composition. This is the first study <strong>to</strong> show that<br />

amniotic fluid glucose, urea, uric acid and lactate<br />

concentrations respond <strong>to</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> the level of<br />

maternal dietary carbohydrate, which is an essential<br />

nutrient for fetal growth and development and<br />

per<strong>in</strong>atal survival (11, 23-26). Aga<strong>in</strong>, as with the pre<br />

vious report compar<strong>in</strong>g the effects of graded levels of<br />

maternal dietary glucose vs. fruc<strong>to</strong>se on fetal growth<br />

and development (23), we concluded that it is the<br />

level, not the source, of carbohydrate that <strong>in</strong>fluences<br />

the outcome. In general, the results from this study<br />

showed that as maternal dietary carbohydrate (either<br />

as glucose or fruc<strong>to</strong>se) <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> the maternal diet,<br />

there was a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid<br />

glucose and a significant decrease <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid<br />

uric acid. The correlation coefficients showed that the<br />

higher amniotic fluid glucose was associated with<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased maternal liver glycogen, fetal weight and<br />

fetal liver glycogen deposition, whereas higher am<br />

niotic fluid uric acid and urea were correlated with<br />

lower fetal weight, fetal plasma glucose, and maternal<br />

and fetal liver glycogen. These data <strong>in</strong>dicate that<br />

measurements of these amniotic fluid constituents<br />

might predict fetal growth and metabolic maturity.<br />

We suggest that a decreased <strong>in</strong>take of maternal di<br />

etary carbohydrate dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy leads <strong>to</strong> lower<br />

maternal and fetal glycogen reserves and a higher<br />

metabolic requirement for gluconeogenesis, hence the<br />

fall <strong>in</strong> plasma glucose and the rise <strong>in</strong> plasma urea and<br />

uric acid levels. The fact that these long-term meta<br />

bolic adaptations <strong>to</strong> reduced dietary carbohydrate are<br />

mirrored <strong>in</strong> the amniotic fluid is a novel f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Previous reports <strong>in</strong> the literature described am<br />

niotic fluid constituents as <strong>in</strong>dica<strong>to</strong>rs of fetal distress,<br />

not<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> separate studies that low glucose (18, 19)<br />

and high lactate (12, 13), urea (15-17) and uric acid<br />

(14, 20) are associated with hypoxia and poor<br />

per<strong>in</strong>atal prognosis. In the present study, we mea<br />

sured all variables simultaneously and found signifi<br />

cantly lower glucose, and significantly higher uric<br />

acid and urea nitrogen <strong>in</strong> the amniotic fluid from<br />

dams fed the 0% carbohydrate triglyceride-based diets<br />

when compared with the other dietary treatment<br />

groups. In Hams fed 0% carbohydrate, amniotic fluid<br />

lactate was comparable and amniotic fluid glucose<br />

was lower than <strong>in</strong> controls, which contrasted with<br />

other carbohydrate-restricted dietary treatment<br />

groups (4 and 12%) that had lower amniotic fluid<br />

glucose and lactate when compared with control<br />

dams. This observation is similar <strong>to</strong> those <strong>in</strong> previous<br />

reports of studies <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g non-diabetic humans (16,<br />

30), <strong>in</strong> which low amniotic fluid glucose concentra<br />

tions <strong>in</strong> conjunction with high concentrations of<br />

plasma lactate were associated with fetal distress and<br />

neonatal asphyxia. The first paper (23) <strong>in</strong> this series<br />

reported an <strong>in</strong>creased résorptionand <strong>in</strong> utero death<br />

rate and fewer live fetuses at term <strong>in</strong> the dams, which<br />

(<strong>in</strong> the present study) were reported with low am<br />

niotic fluid glucose accompanied by high amniotic<br />

fluid uric and lactic acids and urea nitrogen follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the restriction of maternal dietary carbohydrate. It is<br />

known from other studies that offspr<strong>in</strong>g fed a low<br />

carbohydrate diet experience a significantly higher <strong>in</strong><br />

utero (11, 23, 26) and postnatal (11, 23-25) death rate,<br />

but prognostic <strong>in</strong>dica<strong>to</strong>rs of this diet-<strong>in</strong>duced<br />

per<strong>in</strong>atal death have not been established. The appli<br />

cation of the changes <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid composition<br />

<strong>to</strong> these mortality studies suggests that hypoxia,<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by guest on August 30, 2013


AMNIOnC FLUID AND MATERNAL DIET 391<br />

aris<strong>in</strong>g from disturbances <strong>in</strong> carbohydrate metabo<br />

lism, may be related <strong>to</strong> the per<strong>in</strong>atal mortality when<br />

pregnant rats or dogs (11, 23-26) are fed carbohydraterestricted<br />

diets. These results suggest that amniotic<br />

fluid constituents may have prognostic significance<br />

for fetal carbohydrate homeostasis, but with differ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sensitivities. <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid glucose and uric acid<br />

responded with significant measurable changes over<br />

the entire range of maternal dietary carbohydrate<br />

<strong>in</strong>take (0-60%). <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid urea and lactic acid<br />

were less sensitive, show<strong>in</strong>g only significantly greater<br />

levels <strong>in</strong> rats fed the low (0%) or high (60%) carbohy<br />

drate diets, respectively. Therefore, we conclude, as<br />

others have, that amniotic fluid glucose seems <strong>to</strong> be a<br />

better guide <strong>to</strong> the condition of the fetus than am<br />

niotic fluid lactic acid (12) and that amniotic fluid<br />

uric acid is a better guide than amniotic fluid urea<br />

nitrogen <strong>in</strong> this diet-<strong>in</strong>duced model of fetal and ne<br />

onatal distress, <strong>in</strong> which carbohydrate-restricted diets<br />

<strong>in</strong> the dams produced <strong>in</strong>creased per<strong>in</strong>atal mortality<br />

(11, 23-26).<br />

The comb<strong>in</strong>ed results from this and the previous<br />

study that used these same dietary conditions (23)<br />

suggest that the <strong>in</strong>take of dietary carbohydrate by rat<br />

dams <strong>in</strong>creased the deposition of maternal liver<br />

glycogen, which <strong>in</strong> turn was associated with <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

concentrations of amniotic fluid glucose and fetal<br />

liver glycogen. Other models of fetal distress have not<br />

used diet <strong>in</strong> the experimental design and these results<br />

suggest it is a fac<strong>to</strong>r. Reductions of maternal dietary<br />

carbohydrate were associated with reductions <strong>in</strong> am<br />

niotic fluid glucose and fetal liver glycogen at d 21,<br />

but not <strong>in</strong> significant disturbances <strong>to</strong> the plasma<br />

glucose concentrations <strong>in</strong> either the fetal or maternal<br />

systems, suggest<strong>in</strong>g [as noted by others (30, 31)] that<br />

the latter were not as sensitive as amniotic fluid<br />

glucose or fetal liver glycogen <strong>to</strong> long-term perturba<br />

tions <strong>in</strong> glucose homeostasis dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy.<br />

Therefore, we suggest that the fetal swallow<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

amniotic fluid glucose assumes a critical role <strong>in</strong> pro<br />

vid<strong>in</strong>g glucose <strong>to</strong> the near-term fetus <strong>in</strong> pregnant rats.<br />

We further suggest that amniotic fluid glucose may be<br />

an accurate mirror of fetal glycogen reserves and the<br />

progressive decrease <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid glucose, which<br />

is widely observed with advanc<strong>in</strong>g age (9, 22, 32),<br />

occurs because the fetal swallow<strong>in</strong>g of amniotic fluid<br />

near term supplies some of the glucose precursor for<br />

the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly rapid rise <strong>in</strong> glycogen reserves <strong>in</strong> the<br />

fetal liver as parturition approaches (33).<br />

LITERATURE<br />

CITED<br />

1. Mulvihill, S. J., S<strong>to</strong>ne, M. M., Debas, H. T. & Fronkalsrud, E.<br />

W. (1985) The role of amniotic fluid <strong>in</strong> fetal nutrition. J.<br />

Pedia«. Surg. 20: 668-672.<br />

2. Charl<strong>to</strong>n-Char, V. &. Rudolf, A. (1979) Digestion and ab<br />

sorption of carbohydrates by the fetal lamb <strong>in</strong> utero. Pediatr.<br />

Res. 13: 1018-1023.<br />

3. Wright, G. H. & Nixon, D. A. (1961) Absorption of amniotic<br />

fluid <strong>in</strong> the gut of the fetal sheep. Nature (Lond.) 190: 816.<br />

4. Lev, R. &. Orlic, D. (1972) Prote<strong>in</strong> absorption by the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e<br />

of the fetal rat <strong>in</strong> utero. Science (Wash<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>n, DC) 177:<br />

522-524.<br />

5. Pitk<strong>in</strong>, R. M. &. Reynolds, W. A. (1975) Fetal <strong>in</strong>gestion and<br />

metabolism of amniotic fluid prote<strong>in</strong>. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.<br />

123: 356-363.<br />

6. Cozzi, F. &. Wilk<strong>in</strong>son, A. W. (1969) Intrauter<strong>in</strong>e growth rate<br />

<strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong> anorectal and oesophageal anomalies. Arch. Dis.<br />

Child. 44: 59-62.<br />

7. Reusens, B., de Gasparo, M., Kühn,E. R. &. Hoet, J. J. (1978)<br />

Controll<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>rs of foetal nutrition. In: Carbohydrate Me<br />

tabolism <strong>in</strong> Pregnancy and the Newborn (Sutherland, H. W. &.<br />

S<strong>to</strong>wers, J. M., eds.), p. 211. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-Verlag, Berl<strong>in</strong>, Germany.<br />

8. Battaglia, F. C. & Meschia, G. (1978) Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal substrates of<br />

fetal metabolism. Physiol. Rev. 58: 499-527.<br />

9. Drazancic, A. &. Kuvacic, I. (1974) <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid glucose<br />

concentration. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 120: 40-48.<br />

10. Kim, Y. J. &. Felig, P. (1972) <strong>Maternal</strong> amniotic fluid substrate<br />

levels dur<strong>in</strong>g caloric deprivation <strong>in</strong> human pregnancy. Metab<br />

olism 21: 507-512.<br />

11. Koski, K. G. &. Hill, F. W. (1990) Evidence for a critical period<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g late gestation when maternal dietary carbohydrate is<br />

essential for survival of newborn rat pups. J. Nutr. 120:<br />

1016-1027.<br />

12. Wood, C., Acharya, P. T., Comwell, E. &. P<strong>in</strong>ker<strong>to</strong>n, J.H.M.<br />

(1963) The significance of glucose and lactic acid concen<br />

tration <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw.<br />

70: 274-278.<br />

13. Seeds, A. E., Leung, L. S., Tabor, M. W. & Rüssel,P. I. (1979)<br />

<strong>Changes</strong> <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluid glucose, ß-hydroxybutyrate, glycerol<br />

and lactate concentration <strong>in</strong> diabetic pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet.<br />

Gynecol. 135: 887-895.<br />

14. Carswell, W. &. Semple, P. F. (1974) The effect of fursemide on<br />

uric acid levels <strong>in</strong> maternal blood, fetal blood, and amniotic<br />

fluid. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw. 81: 472-474.<br />

15. McAllister, C. f., Stull, C. G. & Courey, N. G. (1972) <strong>Amniotic</strong><br />

fluid levels of uric acid and crcat<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>o <strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>xcmic patients—<br />

possible relation <strong>to</strong> diuretic use. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 115:<br />

560-563.<br />

16. Rajhav, M., Vijay, G., Chowdhary, D. R. &. Viji, S. C. (1985)<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid am<strong>in</strong>o acids, urea, creat<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> normal and<br />

<strong>to</strong>xcmic pregnancies. Indian J. Med. Sci. 39: 291-293.<br />

17. Cherry, S. H., Dolger, H.; Rosenfield, R. E. & Kochwa, S. (1969)<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid urea nitrogen, uric acid and creat<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> dia<br />

betic pregnancies. Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 45: 46-52.<br />

18. Petit, B. R., K<strong>in</strong>g, G. S. &. Blau, K. (1977) Low glucose concen<br />

trations <strong>in</strong> amniotic fluids from anencephalic pregnancies.<br />

Lancet ii: 1288-1289.<br />

19. Weiss, P.A.M., Hofman, H., W<strong>in</strong>ter, R., Purstner, P. &<br />

Lichtenegger, W. (1985) <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid glucose values <strong>in</strong><br />

normal and abnormal pregnancies. Obstet. Gynecol. 65:<br />

333-339.<br />

20. Teoh, E. S., Lau, Y. K., Ambrose, A. &. Ratnam, S. S. (1973)<br />

<strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid creat<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e, uric acid and urea as <strong>in</strong>dices of<br />

gestational age. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 52: 323-326.<br />

21. Raman, L. & Rao, V. (1978) <strong>Amniotic</strong> fluid glucose as an <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

of fetal maturity. Indian J. Med. Res. 68: 73.<br />

22. lyengar, L., Rao, V. & Kumar, S. (1982) Significance of am<br />

niotic fluid glucose <strong>in</strong> pregnancy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 20:<br />

57-63.<br />

23. Fergusson, M. A. & Koski, K. G. (1990) Comparison of effects<br />

of dietary glucose versus fruc<strong>to</strong>se dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy on fetal<br />

growth and development <strong>in</strong> rats. J. Nutr. 120: 1312-1319.<br />

24. Koski, K. G. & Hill, F. W. (1986) Effect of low carbohydrate<br />

diets dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy on parturition and postnatal survival of<br />

the newborn rat pup. J. Nutr. 116: 1938-1948.<br />

25. Romsos, D. R., Palmer, H. J., Muiruri, K. L. &. Benn<strong>in</strong>k, M. R.<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by guest on August 30, 2013


392 KOSKI AND FERGUSSON<br />

(1981) Influence of i low carbohydrate diet on performance of<br />

pregnant and lactat<strong>in</strong>g dogs. J. Nutr. Ill: 678-689.<br />

26. Koski, K. G., HiU, F. W. &. Hurley, L. S. (1986) Effects of low<br />

carbohydrate diets dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy on embryogenesis and<br />

fetal growth and development <strong>in</strong> rats. J. Nutr. 116: 1922-1937.<br />

27. National Research Council (1978) Nutrient Requirements of<br />

Labora<strong>to</strong>ry Animals, No. 10, 3rd rev. ed. National Academy of<br />

Sciences, Wash<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>n, DC.<br />

28. Canadian Council on Animal Care (1984) Guide <strong>to</strong> the Care<br />

and Use of Experimental Animals, Volumes I and H National<br />

29.<br />

Library of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.<br />

SAS Institute Inc. (1985) SAS User's Guide: Statistics Version 5<br />

Ed. SAS Institute<br />

Inc., Cary, NC.<br />

30. Pedersen, J. (1954) Glucose content of ammo tic fluid <strong>in</strong> dia<br />

betic pregnancies—correlations with maternal blood sugar.<br />

Acta Endocr<strong>in</strong>ol. 15: 342-350.<br />

31. Pschera, H., Persson, B. &. Limeli, N. O. (1988) Interrelation<br />

between glucose, <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>, C-peptide and 3-hydroxybutyrate <strong>in</strong><br />

plasma and amniotic fluid <strong>in</strong> last trimester diabetic women<br />

without residual betacell function. Horm. Metab. Res. 20:<br />

498-501.<br />

32. Spellacy, W. N., Buhi, W. C., Bradley, B. and Hols<strong>in</strong>ger, K. K.<br />

(1973) <strong>Maternal</strong>, fetal, and amniotic fluid levels of glucose,<br />

<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>, and growth hormone. Obstet. Gynecol. 41: 323-331.<br />

33. Shelley, H. J. (1961) Glycogen reserves and their changes at<br />

birth and <strong>in</strong> anoxia. Brit. Med. Bull. 17: 137-143.<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by guest on August 30, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!