26.12.2013 Views

Blossey & Notzold, 1995

Blossey & Notzold, 1995

Blossey & Notzold, 1995

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A<br />

Hypothesis<br />

Bernd <strong>Blossey</strong>; Rolf <strong>Notzold</strong><br />

The Journal of Ecology, Vol. 83, No. 5. (Oct., <strong>1995</strong>), pp. 887-889.<br />

Stable URL:<br />

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-0477%28<strong>1995</strong>10%2983%3A5%3C887%3AEOICAI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V<br />

The Journal of Ecology is currently published by British Ecological Society.<br />

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at<br />

http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained<br />

prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in<br />

the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.<br />

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at<br />

http://www.jstor.org/journals/briteco.html.<br />

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed<br />

page of such transmission.<br />

The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic<br />

journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers,<br />

and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take<br />

advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.<br />

http://www.jstor.org<br />

Thu Oct 25 09:51:51 2007


Journal of<br />

Ecology <strong>1995</strong>,<br />

83,887-889<br />

FORUM<br />

Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive<br />

nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis<br />

BERND BLOSSEY* and ROLF NOTZOLD<br />

International Institute of Biological Control, European Station, 1, Chemin des Grillons, CH-2800 Delimont,<br />

Switzerland; Zoologisches Institut, Christian-Albrechts-Universitat, Olshausenstr. 40, 0-24098 Kiel, Germany<br />

Introduction<br />

There are very few valid generalizations about invasive<br />

species, so that it is only possible to make weak,<br />

probabilistic predictions about which species will<br />

invade (Gilpin 1990; Daehler & Strong 1993). A<br />

phenomenon that has not received much attention,<br />

however, is the observation that, in alien environments,<br />

plants tend to be more vigorous and taller,<br />

producing more seeds than in their native distribution<br />

(Crawley 1987). The seed production of Chrysanthemoides<br />

monilijera (native to South Africa) in<br />

Australia and of Acacia longijolia (native to Australia)<br />

in South Africa is an order of magnitude higher where<br />

the plants are aliens (Noble 1989). The vigour and<br />

success of aliens in areas where they have been introduced<br />

has been attributed to both, more favourable<br />

environments, and to the release from natural phytophagous<br />

enemies (Crawley 1987).<br />

These alternatives can be evaluated according<br />

to two theories relating to resource allocation. The<br />

optimal defence hypothesis predicts that plants with<br />

limited resources will show trade-offs in biomass<br />

allocation among maintenance, growth, storage,<br />

reproduction, and defence (Coley et al. 1985; Bazzaz<br />

et al. 1987; Fagerstrom 1989; Herms & Mattson 1994;<br />

Lerdau et al. <strong>1995</strong>). The environmental constraint<br />

hypothesis (Bryant et al. 1988), however, predicts that<br />

the evolution of defence mechanisms against herbivory<br />

will result in only minor reductions in growth.<br />

Resource availability is then the primary force determining<br />

whether there is surplus photosynthate available<br />

for allocation to secondary metabolism.<br />

Optimal defence theory and invasions: development<br />

of the evolution of increased competitive<br />

ability (EICA) hypothesis<br />

The theoretical framework of the optimal defence<br />

hypothesis can be applied to invasive plants. Invas-<br />

*Present address: New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife<br />

Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell<br />

University, Fernow Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Fax:<br />

607 2551895. E-mail: bb22@cornell.edu<br />

iveness of nonindigenous plants is then seen as a result<br />

of shifts in biomass allocation patterns. In the absence<br />

of herbivores, selection will favour genotypes with<br />

improved competitive abilities and reduced resource<br />

allocation to herbivore defence. Competitive abilities<br />

can be maximized by increasing vegetative growth<br />

or reproductive efforts depending on which is more<br />

important for success in a particular new environment.<br />

This hypothesis predicts (a) that, under identical<br />

growing conditions, individuals of a species taken<br />

from an area where they have been introduced will<br />

produce more biomass than individuals taken from<br />

the species native range; and (b) specialized herbivores<br />

(i.e. those with potential for introduction as biological<br />

control agents) will show improved performance on<br />

plant individuals originating from an area where<br />

plants have been introduced.<br />

In preliminary experiments we tested the predictions<br />

of the EICA hypothesis using a comparison<br />

of the growth of Lythrum salicaria L. (purple loosestrife)<br />

plants from two locations (one with and one<br />

without natural herbivory). In addition, we evaluated<br />

the performance of herbivorous insects which had<br />

been studied for their potential as biological control<br />

agents against L. salicaria, on plants from both<br />

locations. Purple loosestrife is an Eurasian wetland<br />

perennial introduced into North America in the early<br />

1800s. Its spread across the temperate part of the<br />

continent has degraded many prime wetlands. Large,<br />

monotypic stands eliminate native plant communities<br />

and threaten endangered plant and animal species<br />

(Thompson et al. 1987; Malecki et al. 1993). Once<br />

established, L. salicaria populations persist over decades<br />

in North America and tend to encroach upon<br />

adjacent areas (Thompson et al. 1987). In contrast,<br />

populations in Europe are rapidly invaded by other<br />

plant species and L. salicaria is a regular but<br />

infrequent component of mixed wetland communities<br />

(Shamsi &Whitehead 1974; <strong>Blossey</strong> 1991). In Europe,<br />

displacement from communities is promoted by specialized<br />

insects which devastate tissues, both above<br />

and below ground, but these insects were absent from<br />

North America until 1992 when three species were


888<br />

B. <strong>Blossey</strong> &<br />

R. <strong>Notzold</strong><br />

Table 1 Mean ( k SE) dry biomass and height at the end of development time or pupal weights in experiments<br />

the growing (N = 20 per group) purple with the leaf-feeder (Table 2). However, excised leaves<br />

loosestrife plants from Ithaca (US) and Lucelle (Switzerland),<br />

Plants were grown in a common garden under were maintained in Petri dishes for raising larvae of<br />

identical conditions<br />

the leaf-feeder and this might have altered their quality<br />

as food for the herbivores. In addition, the results<br />

Ithaca Lucelle P* of our experiments might reflect different defence<br />

investments of purple loosestrife. Foliage is easily<br />

Dry biomass (g)<br />

1991 29.3 & 1.9 16.3 & 1.4 i0.001 replaceable, generally within a few days, whereas root<br />

1992 96.0 k 12.3 28.7 & 4.3 < 0.001 tissue is essential for over-wintering survival, com-<br />

Plant height (cm)<br />

petitive success in the following growing season and<br />

1991 99.7 k 4.4 82.6 k 2.0 0.001 long-term survival. If foliage were less well defended<br />

1992 177.8 k 4.8 109.7 7.4 i0.001<br />

only minor differences would be expected between<br />

*Probability value (t-test).<br />

European and North American plants. This would<br />

explain why larval performance of the leaf-feeder is<br />

not significantly different on plants from Ithaca or<br />

introduced as biological control agents (Hight 1990; Lucelle.<br />

<strong>Blossey</strong> 1993, <strong>1995</strong>; Malecki et al. 1993).<br />

In fall 1990 seeds were collected from at least 20<br />

individual well-spaced plants from populations in<br />

Ithaca, New York, USA and Lucelle, Switzerland.<br />

Alternative explanations?<br />

Seeds were shipped to Christian-Albrechts University, Though we can not exclude the possibility, we believe<br />

Kiel, northern Germany. In spring 1991 seeds were that maternal effects offer no explanation for the large<br />

germinated on a mixture of sand and potting soil. differences observed among plants from Ithaca and<br />

After establishment seedlings were transferred indi- Lucelle. In general, environmentally induced varividually<br />

into clay pots (10 cm in diameter) and kept ation has been demonstrated for species with larger<br />

outdoors in a common garden 30 km south of Kiel. seeds where seeds with higher weight had higher<br />

Plants were grown in commercial potting soil (real viability, germinated faster, and produced more vigsoil,<br />

mixture of Sphagnum moss and compost, nutri- orous seedlings (Nelson et al. 1970). L. salicaria has<br />

ents added by manufacturer) and placed at random. extremely small seeds (0.5mg) and such carry-over<br />

In 1991 and 1992 final plant height and dry biomass effects seem highly unlikely especially if plants are<br />

of 20 plants from each site were determined. We also grown for more than one growing season as in our<br />

tested larval performance of a root-feeding weevil on experiments (Nelson et al. 1970).<br />

potted plants and of a leaf-feeding chrysomelid beetle We also believe that phenotypic plasticity cannot<br />

on foliage of plants from both locations.<br />

be the explanation for the observed differences in<br />

The results of our preliminary tests confirmed pre- growth between introduced and native populations of<br />

dictions that plants from the area with low herbivore a plant species or between European and American<br />

pressure show increased vegetative growth. Plants purple loosestrife. In the absence of herbivory phenofrom<br />

Ithaca grew taller and produced more biomass typic plasticity should lead to increased vegetative<br />

in both years (Table 1). At the same time survival growth not only where species are aliens but also in<br />

of the root feeder was higher and larval weight was their native lands where low and high levels of herincreased<br />

if larvae were raised on plants from Ithaca bivory fluctuate over time but are generally unprecompared<br />

to larvae on plants from Lucelle (Table 2). dictable. Phenotypic plasticity in plant growth should<br />

There were no significant differences in survival rates, reflect the currently experienced herbivore pressure.<br />

Table 2 Performance of a leaf-feeder (Galerucella pusilla) and a root-feeder (Hylobius transversovittatus) on plants from Ithaca<br />

(US) and Lucelle (Switzerland). Survival and development time data of G. pusilla are means (+ SE) of five replicates with 20<br />

larvae each; weight data are means ( k SE) of 19 pupae in each group. Weight data for H. transversovittatus are means (+ SE)<br />

of 32 larvae on plants from Ithaca and 15 larvae on plants from Lucelle<br />

Ithaca Lucelle P*<br />

Galerucella pusilla<br />

Survival (%)L,-Imago 34 k 9.8 40 & 11.4 0.700<br />

Development time (days) L,-Imago 25.9 k 0.5 25.7 & 0.4 0.760<br />

Pupal weight (mg) 4.4 & 0.3 3.9 k 0.1 0.186<br />

Hylobius transversovittatus<br />

Survival (%) 62.7 18.1 iO.Ol**<br />

Larval weight after one year (mg) 42.2 + 5.1 32.6 k 5.8 0.040<br />

*Probability value (t-test). <br />

**Chi-square test x2 = 25.785.


889 The observation that plants grow taller where they<br />

Competitive ability are aliens supports the EICA hypothesis.<br />

in invasive<br />

nonindigenous<br />

plants<br />

Conclusions<br />

The results of our preliminary tests with one population<br />

from each continent supported the two predictions<br />

of the 'evolution of increased competitive<br />

ability' hypothesis. However, the origin of introduced<br />

plant species is not generally well known and differences<br />

might exist in biomass allocation patterns<br />

among populations in the native and alien range of a<br />

plant. Multiple introductions are likely for L. salicaria<br />

(Thompson et al. 1987) but all populations in the<br />

native range experience the impact of the same herbivores<br />

over much of its distribution (Dieckmann<br />

1963; Silfverberg 1974; <strong>Blossey</strong> 1993). Comparisons<br />

of more populations from both continents and other<br />

plant species are needed to investigate whether we are<br />

just comparing populations with different biomass<br />

allocation patterns or whether plants from areas of<br />

introduction consistently produce more biomass and<br />

are less well defended. These experiments are currently<br />

under way for L. salicaria.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We thank A. <strong>Blossey</strong>, P. McEvoy, R. Malecki, M.<br />

Williamson, and three anonymous reviewers for<br />

improving earlier versions of this paper.<br />

References<br />

Bazzaz, F.A., Chiarello, N.R., Coley, P.D. & Pitelka, L.F.<br />

(1987) Allocating resources to reproduction and defense.<br />

Bioscience, 37, 58-67.<br />

<strong>Blossey</strong>, B. (1991) Biology, ecology, host speciJicity and<br />

impact of Galerucella calmariensis, L., G. pusilla Dufr.<br />

(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Hylobius transversovittatus<br />

Goeze (Coleotera: Curculionidae) on their<br />

host plant Lythrum salicaria, L. (purple loosestrife). PhD<br />

thesis, Zoological Institute, Christian Albrechts University,<br />

Kiel, Germany (in German).<br />

<strong>Blossey</strong>, B. (1993) Herbivory below ground and biological<br />

weed control: life history of a root-boring weevil on<br />

purple loosestrife. Oecologia, 94, 38&387.<br />

<strong>Blossey</strong>, B. (<strong>1995</strong>) Impact of Galerucella pusilla Duft. & G.<br />

calmariensis, L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on field<br />

populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.).<br />

Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium on the<br />

Biological Control of Weeds (eds E. S. Delfosse & R. R.<br />

Scott), in press. DSIR/CSIRO, Melbourne.<br />

Bryant, J.P., Tuomi, J. & Niemela, P. (1988) Environmental<br />

constraint of constitutive and long-term inducible<br />

defences in woody plants. Chemical Mediation of Coeuolution<br />

(ed. K. C. Spencer), pp. 367-389. Academic Press,<br />

San Diego.<br />

Coley, P.D., Bryant, J.P. &Chapin, F.S. 111. (1985) Resource<br />

availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science,<br />

230, 895-899.<br />

Crawley, M.J. (1987) What makes a community invasible?<br />

Colonization, Succession and Stability (eds A. J. Gray,<br />

M. J. Crawley & P. J. Edwards), pp. 429453. Blackwell<br />

Scientific Publications, Oxford.<br />

Daehler, C.C. & Strong, D.R. (1993) Prediction and biological<br />

invasions. Trends in Ecology & Euolution, 8, 380.<br />

Dieckmann, L. (1963) Die mitteleuropaischen Arten der<br />

Gattung Nanophyes Schonh. nebst einer neuen Art aus<br />

Bulgarien. Reichenbachia Dresden, 1, 169-194.<br />

Fagerstrom, T. (1989) Anti-herbivory chemical defense in<br />

plants: a note on the concept of cost. American Naturalist,<br />

133, 281-287.<br />

Gilpin, H. (1990) Ecological prediction. Science, 248, 88-89.<br />

Herms, D.A. & Mattson, W.J. (1994) Plant growth and<br />

defense. Trends in Ecology &Evolution, 9, 488.<br />

Hight, S.D. (1990) Available feeding niches in populations<br />

of Lythrum salicaria, L. (purple loosestrife) in the Northeastern<br />

United States. Proceedings of the VII International<br />

Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds<br />

(ed. E. S. Delfosse), pp. 269-278. 1st. Sper. Patol. Veg.<br />

(MAF), Rome.<br />

Lerdau, M., Litvak, M. & Monson, R. (<strong>1995</strong>) Plant growth<br />

and defense: reply to Herms and Mattson Trends in<br />

Ecology & Evolution, 10, 39.<br />

Malecki, R.A., <strong>Blossey</strong>, B., Hight, S.D., Schroeder, D., Kok,<br />

L.T. & Coulson, J.R. (1993) Biological control of purple<br />

loosestrife. Bioscience, 43, 480486.<br />

Nelson, J.R., Harris, G.A. & Goebel, C.J. (1970) Genetic<br />

vs. environmentally induced variation in medusahead<br />

(Taeniatherum asperum [Simonkai] Nevski). Ecology, 51,<br />

526- 529.<br />

Noble, I.R. (1989) Attributes of invaders and the invading<br />

process: terrestrial and vascular plants. Biological<br />

invasions (eds J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri,<br />

R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmanek & M. Williamson),<br />

pp. 301-3 13. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.<br />

Shamsi, S.R.A. &Whitehead, F.H. (1974) Comparative ecophysiology<br />

of Epilobium hirsutum, L. & Lythrum salicaria<br />

L.I. General biology, distribution and germination.<br />

Journal of Ecology, 62, 279-90.<br />

Silfverberg, H. (1974) The West Palaeartic species of Galerucella<br />

Crotch and related genera (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae).<br />

Notulae Entomologicae, 54, 1-1 1.<br />

Thompson, D.Q., Stuckey, R.L. & Thompson, E.B. (1987)<br />

Spread, impact, and control of purple loosestrife<br />

(Lythrum salicaria) in North American wetlands. U.S.<br />

Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Research 2.<br />

Received 16 January <strong>1995</strong><br />

revised version accepted 16 May <strong>1995</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!