28.12.2013 Views

Galland EPS 2012 - VBN

Galland EPS 2012 - VBN

Galland EPS 2012 - VBN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1374 D. <strong>Galland</strong><br />

The larger cities have increasingly been able to detect that problems become more<br />

complex and more difficult to solve by known means. The most notable is that the<br />

larger cities have been hit hard by unemployment during the last 10 years. Unemployment<br />

is now above the national average. Therefore it is important that these<br />

cities engage in promising business policy. (Ministry of the Environment, 1987,<br />

p. 10, author’s translation)<br />

The last national planning report of the decade pointed towards a major and radical shift<br />

in Danish national planning. The 1989 report entitled “The Danish regional picture now<br />

and in the future” (Det regionale Danmarksbillede nu og i fremtiden) depicted how the<br />

country was to develop on a geographically differentiated basis, stressing the new challenges<br />

to be faced when entering the Single European Market and the need for adopting<br />

an international position. The report was clearly strategic, as it served as a preamble for<br />

subsequent national planning reports.<br />

Downloaded by [Daniel <strong>Galland</strong>] at 07:22 25 July <strong>2012</strong><br />

It is the government’s view that the earlier form of development pursued by the<br />

nationwide goal of equality is outdated. The future must be guided by regional<br />

political activities that have diversity. Attention must be given to harnessing the<br />

development potential of the regions to strengthen Denmark’s position internationally.<br />

(Ministry of the Environment, 1989, p. 5, emphasis added, author’s translation)<br />

The diversity goal takes its point of departure in the government’s liberal ideology and<br />

its agenda to reform distribution policy resulting on the push to stimulate private and local<br />

solutions rather than the former public and national ones (Nielsen & Olsen, 1990). Moreover,<br />

diversity seemed to reflect the national government’s desires towards promoting<br />

deregulation and changing its sectoral foci (Jørgensen & Tonboe, 1993). This can be illustrated,<br />

for instance, by the shift away from manufacturing to tourism and transport. The<br />

shift from equality to diversity was similarly influenced by the change in focus within<br />

regional policy in Western Europe, which in the 1980s shifted from regional balance to<br />

regional development programmes.<br />

In the 1980s, national planning discourse was influenced by the neoliberal climate<br />

that swept most of the West. The Keynesian welfare state policy was challenged<br />

under the slogans of de-centralization and modernization. (Jensen & Jørgensen,<br />

2000, p. 34)<br />

It was the view of the government by the end of the decade that the expansion of the<br />

manufacturing industry and population growth had become more equally distributed<br />

within Denmark as a result of policy measures that were adopted during previous years.<br />

As a result of this perception, the need for regional support to sustain peripheral areas<br />

was no longer necessary. This position asserted that pursuing equal development<br />

through a hierarchy of urban settlements would rather imply little diversification<br />

amongst Danish regions and thereby an obsolete strategy for regional development.<br />

Therefore, in support of the new diversity and internationalization agenda, the liberal–<br />

conservative coalition government established Copenhagen to be the metropolitan<br />

centre upon which the country would rely on to meet its redefined national goals<br />

(Ministry of the Environment, 1989, p. 34). This assertion was equally sustained by the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!