Workshop National Courts vis-a-vis EU Law - European University ...
Workshop National Courts vis-a-vis EU Law - European University ...
Workshop National Courts vis-a-vis EU Law - European University ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CENTRE FOR JUDICIAL<br />
COOPERATION<br />
INSTITUTIONS<br />
<strong>EU</strong>DO – european union democracy observatory<br />
& Centre for Judicial Cooperation<br />
<strong>Workshop</strong><br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Courts</strong> <strong>vis</strong>-à-<strong>vis</strong> <strong>EU</strong> <strong>Law</strong>:<br />
New Issues, Theories and Methods<br />
Villa Schifanoia, Sala Europa<br />
Via Boccaccio, 121 – Florence<br />
Co-organized by<br />
Bruno de Witte | <strong>EU</strong>I and Maastricht <strong>University</strong><br />
Marlene Wind | <strong>University</strong> of Copenhagen<br />
Juan Antonio Mayoral Díaz-Asensio | <strong>EU</strong>I<br />
Urszula Jaremba | Erasmus <strong>University</strong> Rotterdam<br />
Overview Florence, 29-30 November 2012<br />
Nearly from the beginning of the existence of the <strong>European</strong> Communities, later the <strong>European</strong> Union, political and<br />
legal scholars have been aiming at providing various and frequently competing theories regarding the problem of<br />
the determinants that influence the manner national judges behave in the process of integration within the <strong>EU</strong>. This<br />
interdisciplinary stream of scholarship has paid attention to, inter alia, the problem of judicial co-operation between<br />
the Court of Justice of the <strong>European</strong> Union and national judiciaries and the role national judges play in this process.<br />
Individual writers focused on, for instance, the cooperation between the CJ<strong>EU</strong> and national constitutional courts, the<br />
role national litigants play in the preliminary reference procedure, the reasons of accepting the principles of supremacy<br />
and direct effect of <strong>EU</strong> law by national judges, etc.<br />
The workshop will follow and develop a new research agenda and review some old aspects on how and why courts<br />
are involved in the process of <strong>EU</strong> legal integration by raising new questions and discussing different empirical aspects<br />
concerning the relevance of national judges’ knowledge, experiences and judicial networks for the application of <strong>EU</strong><br />
law or the impact of national courts on the implementation of <strong>EU</strong> rights, policies and treaty ratification, among others.<br />
The general purpose of the workshop is to bring together scholars who work in the area of judicial behaviour in the<br />
process of legal integration within the Union and who employ a new methodological and theoretical approach to the<br />
problem. This would allow for cross-fertilization, exchange of opinions and knowledge between the academics but<br />
also for the critical assessment of the new tools which the scholars use to scrutinize the problem of judicial behaviour<br />
in the context of <strong>EU</strong> law.
Programme Florence, 29-30 November 2012<br />
Thursday 29<br />
09.10-09.30 Welcome<br />
Bruno de Witte | Co-Director of the <strong>EU</strong>DO Observatory on Democratic<br />
Institutional Reforms, <strong>EU</strong>I<br />
Loïc Azoulai | Director of Centre for Judicial Cooperation, <strong>EU</strong>I<br />
Marlene Wind | Director of Centre for <strong>European</strong> Politics, <strong>University</strong> of Copenhagen<br />
Juan Antonio Mayoral Díaz-Asensio | <strong>EU</strong>I<br />
09.30-11.15 Panel I – Judicial <strong>European</strong>ization<br />
Chair: Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz<br />
Marlene Wind | <strong>University</strong> of Copenhagen<br />
<strong>Courts</strong>, Democracy and the Nordic Dilemma<br />
Michal Bobek | <strong>University</strong> of Oxford<br />
<strong>EU</strong> <strong>Law</strong> in <strong>National</strong> <strong>Courts</strong>: Should Reality Matter?<br />
Tobias Nowak | <strong>University</strong> of Groningen<br />
Juan Antonio Mayoral Díaz-Asensio | <strong>EU</strong>I<br />
Urszula Jaremba | Erasmus <strong>University</strong> Rotterdam<br />
Generation Effects on the Approach of <strong>National</strong> Judges to <strong>EU</strong> <strong>Law</strong>: Myth or Reality?<br />
Nicola Corkin | <strong>University</strong> of Birmingham<br />
<strong>National</strong> courts and the <strong>European</strong>isation of social norms<br />
Discussion<br />
11.15-11.30 Coffee break<br />
11.30-13.15 Panel II – Networks and External Influences<br />
Chair: Miguel Maduro<br />
Monica Claes | Maastricht <strong>University</strong><br />
Marc de Werd | Amsterdam Court of Appeal - <strong>EU</strong> & ECHR <strong>Law</strong> Coordinator<br />
Maartje de Visser | Maastricht <strong>University</strong><br />
<strong>EU</strong> <strong>Law</strong> in <strong>National</strong> <strong>Courts</strong> - Operationalising the <strong>European</strong> Mandate<br />
Allan Tatham | C<strong>EU</strong> San Pablo <strong>University</strong><br />
“Emulate The Neighbour”: Dialogues between the ECJ and Non-<strong>EU</strong> <strong>Courts</strong>?<br />
Giuseppe Martinico | Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Spain<br />
Giuseppe Bianco | <strong>University</strong> of Cambridge<br />
Two Worlds (Still) Apart? <strong>EU</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and the ECHR before <strong>National</strong> Judges:<br />
The Italian Experience<br />
Marcin Górski | <strong>University</strong> of Łódź<br />
Anna Wyrozumska | <strong>University</strong> of Łódź<br />
<strong>EU</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and the ECHR before <strong>National</strong> Judges: The Polish Experience<br />
Cristina Dallara | Institute on Judicial Systems of the <strong>National</strong> Research Council (Irsig-CNR)<br />
Rosanna Amato | <strong>University</strong> of Bologna<br />
Judicial and Legal Expert Networks. New Actors for an <strong>EU</strong> Area of Justice?<br />
Discussion<br />
13.15-14.30 Lunch break
15.00-16.45 Panel III - Immigration, criminal law and discrimination<br />
Chair:<br />
Urszula Jaremba<br />
Tatjana Evas | Global Governance Programme, <strong>EU</strong>I<br />
Judicial Application of <strong>EU</strong> <strong>Law</strong> in Post-Communist Countries<br />
Costanza Hermanin | Open Society <strong>European</strong> Policy Institute<br />
What Does Domestic Case <strong>Law</strong> Tell about <strong>EU</strong> Policy?<br />
Lessons from <strong>EU</strong> Anti-Discrimination <strong>Law</strong><br />
Philippe de Bruycker | Deputy Director of the Migration Policy Centre, <strong>EU</strong>I<br />
Henri Labayle | <strong>University</strong> of Pau<br />
The Reluctance of Judges about <strong>European</strong> Integration in the Field of Immigration<br />
and Asylum<br />
Nina Miller | <strong>University</strong> of Edinburgh<br />
UK Tribunals and <strong>EU</strong> Legal Integration: Alleviating the Friction between<br />
<strong>EU</strong> Free Movement Rules and UK Immigration <strong>Law</strong><br />
Rosa Raffaelli | <strong>European</strong> Parliament<br />
Immigration and Criminal <strong>Law</strong>:Is there a Judge in Luxembourg?<br />
Discussion<br />
Friday 30<br />
09.00-11.15 Panel IV – Judicial Dialogue<br />
Chair: Bruno de Witte<br />
Iyiola Solanke | <strong>University</strong> of Leeds<br />
Doing Dialogue Differently<br />
Urszula Jaremba | Erasmus <strong>University</strong> Rotterdam<br />
Polish Civil Judiciary <strong>vis</strong>-à-<strong>vis</strong> the Preliminary Ruling Procedure.<br />
In Search for Mid-Range Theories<br />
Kelley Littlepage | <strong>University</strong> of Oregon<br />
Transnational Judicial Dialogue and Evolving <strong>European</strong> Jurisprudence in<br />
British <strong>National</strong> <strong>Courts</strong>?<br />
Madalina Moraru | <strong>EU</strong>I<br />
Gabriela Zanfir | <strong>University</strong> of Craiova<br />
Dragos Efrim | <strong>University</strong> of Craiova<br />
The Hesitating Steps of the Romanian <strong>Courts</strong> towards the Judicial Dialogue<br />
with the CJ<strong>EU</strong><br />
Juan Antonio Mayoral Díaz-Asensio | <strong>EU</strong>I<br />
On <strong>EU</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Supremacy: Endogeneizing Judges’ Preferences towards Legal<br />
Doctrines and its Use<br />
Discussion<br />
11.15-11.30 Coffee break
11.30-13.15 Panel V – Constitutional <strong>Courts</strong><br />
Chair:<br />
Marlene Wind<br />
Aida Torres | Pompeu Fabra <strong>University</strong><br />
Between Judicial Cooperation and Confrontation: The Tension between the<br />
<strong>European</strong> Arrest Warrant and Fundamental Rights<br />
Arthur Dyevre | Max Planck Institute for International and Comparative <strong>Law</strong><br />
Judicial Non-Compliance in a Non-Hierarchical Legal Order: Isolated Accident<br />
or Omen of Judicial Armageddon?<br />
Darinka Piqani | Leiden <strong>University</strong><br />
The Simmenthal Mandate Re<strong>vis</strong>ited: What Role for <strong>National</strong> Constitutional <strong>Courts</strong>?<br />
Pablo Castillo-Ortiz | Institute of Public Goods and Policies, CSIC<br />
“The Last Say”: Explaining <strong>Courts</strong>’ Declarations of Kompetenz-Kompetenz in t<br />
he Process of Ratification of the Lisbon Treaty<br />
Discussion<br />
13.15 Lunch
Participants<br />
Rosanna Amato<br />
Loïc Azoulai<br />
Giuseppe Bianco<br />
Michal Bobek<br />
Pablo Castillo<br />
Monica Claes<br />
Nicola Corkin<br />
Cristina Dallara<br />
Philippe de Bruycker<br />
Maartje de Visser<br />
Marc de Werd<br />
Bruno de Witte<br />
Arthur Dyevre<br />
Dragos Efrim<br />
Tatjana Evas<br />
Marcin Górski<br />
Costanza Hermanin<br />
Urszula Jaremba<br />
Henri Labayle<br />
Kelley Littlepage<br />
Giuseppe Martinico<br />
Juan Antonio<br />
Mayoral Díaz-Asensio<br />
Nina Miller<br />
Madalina Moraru<br />
Tobias Nowak<br />
Darinka Piqani<br />
Rosa Raffaelli<br />
Iyiola Solanke<br />
Allan Tatham<br />
Aida Torres<br />
Marlene Wind<br />
Anna Wyrozumska<br />
Gabriela Zanfir<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Bologna – rosanna.amato@unibo.it<br />
<strong>European</strong> <strong>University</strong> Institute – loic.azoulai@eui.eu<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Cambridge – g.bianco@hotmail.com<br />
Oxford <strong>University</strong> – michal.bobek@iecl.ox.ac.uk<br />
Spanish <strong>National</strong> Research Council – pablojose.castillo@cchs.csic.es<br />
Maastricht <strong>University</strong> – monica.claes@maastrichtuniversity.nl<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Birmingham – nicola.corkin@sthughs-oxford.com<br />
Institute on Judicial Systems of the <strong>National</strong> Research Council (Irsig-CNR)<br />
cristina.dallara@eui.eu<br />
Migration Policy Centre, <strong>EU</strong>I – philippe.debruycker@eui.eu<br />
Maastricht <strong>University</strong> – maartje.de<strong>vis</strong>ser@maastrichtuniversity.nl<br />
Amsterdam Court of Appeal - <strong>EU</strong> & ECHR law coordinator<br />
mfjm.de.werd@rechtspraak.nl<br />
<strong>European</strong> <strong>University</strong> Institute / Maastricht <strong>University</strong><br />
bruno.dewitte@eui.eu<br />
Max Planck Institute for International and Comparative <strong>Law</strong><br />
dyevre@mpil.de<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Craiova – dragos.efrim@tcpa.ro<br />
<strong>European</strong> <strong>University</strong> Institute - Global Governance Programme<br />
ta_ev@uni-bremen.de<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Łódź – marcin.gorski@tga.com.pl<br />
Open Society <strong>European</strong> Policy Institute<br />
costanza.hermanin@opensocietyfoundations.org<br />
Erasmus Rotterdam <strong>University</strong> – jaremba@law.eur.nl<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Pau – henri.labayle@univ-pau.fr<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Oregon – klittlep@uoregon.edu<br />
Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales, Spain – martinico@sssup.it<br />
<strong>European</strong> <strong>University</strong> Institute – juan.mayoral@eui.eu<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Edinburgh – nina.miller@glasgow.ac.uk<br />
<strong>European</strong> <strong>University</strong> Institute – madalina.moraru@eui.eu<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Groningen – t.nowak@rug.nl<br />
Leiden <strong>University</strong> – d.piqani@law.leidenuniv.nl<br />
<strong>European</strong> Parliament – rosa.raffaelli@europarl.europa.eu<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Leeds – i.solanke@leeds.ac.uk<br />
C<strong>EU</strong> San Pablo <strong>University</strong> – allanftatham@yahoo.co.uk<br />
Pompeu Fabra <strong>University</strong> – aida.torres@upf.edu<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Copenhaguen – mwi@ifs.ku.dk<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Łódź – awyrozumska@uni.lodz.pl<br />
<strong>University</strong> of Craiova – gabriela.zanfir@gmail.com
Change language