31.12.2013 Views

Download 6Moons test report. July 2013 (PDF). - German Physiks

Download 6Moons test report. July 2013 (PDF). - German Physiks

Download 6Moons test report. July 2013 (PDF). - German Physiks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On natural tone multi-polar speakers do things differently and arguably<br />

far better than the dominant (barbarian?) hordes of conventional<br />

radiators. From a Shahinian Obelisk to FJ's Ohm of yore, to Dick<br />

Olsher's bygone mini cube with upfiring mid/woofer and front-firing<br />

tweeter, to the already mentioned Duevels and Morrisons and my<br />

Boenicke B10 at right and even the Bose 901, there have been<br />

numerous attempts to energize or 'activate' our playback venues more<br />

evenly as happens during a performance. Planars with out-of-phase<br />

front/back radiation suffer lateral figure-8 phase cancellation. They aren't<br />

omnis to the same degree (and a more appropriate term in the first place<br />

would be polyradials, since true omnis would have to include floor and<br />

ceiling radiation like a pulsating sphere suspended in free space, which<br />

no speaker does). The DDD radiates in-phase like a lighthouse would<br />

disperse light, without its rotating flare. It radiates directly without first<br />

reflecting off its own structure like speakers with dispersion lenses. The<br />

net result is tonal fullness, linked to in-room energy density, linked to<br />

perceived loudness. You can play the HRS-120 at low volume without<br />

diluting this fullness, which arises from more complete room fill.<br />

Meanwhile high volumes scale up more intensely. They load up the<br />

entire space with sound pressure increases in (nearly) all directions.<br />

This would seem to be a more effective less lossy conversion of<br />

amplifier power into loudness, going beyond the basic voltage efficiency<br />

equation where 'x' input voltage nets 'y' decibels at 1 meter on axis.<br />

On that count I was simply tickled that for my civilized<br />

purposes the 10wpc SIT1 didn't run out of steam,<br />

though they did seem to run extra hot. Devotees of big<br />

symphonica or music with punishing bass transients, will<br />

most certainly want more headroom and grunt. I simply<br />

think that stuffing an 80-piece orchestra into a space<br />

barely sufficient to properly hold a string quintet is a<br />

ludicrous proposition. It's as far removed from 'realistic'<br />

or 'believable' as one could get. I thus do precious little<br />

of such extreme stuffing. Back to amplifier matching, I<br />

also tried Norma Audio's 2MHz IPA 140 integrated. This<br />

again was a bit too soft, even in direct mode with my<br />

Nagra, which quickens its performance. Resolution<br />

Audio's Cantata C50 mated slightly better, but not nearly<br />

as well as the Job 225. Whilst the Norma had the<br />

highest bandwidth for presumably fas<strong>test</strong> rise<br />

times and the most raw power, those factors weren't<br />

decisive. What about the Job inked the deal I don't<br />

know. I can't make an educated guess about ideal specs<br />

an amplifier shopper for this speaker should cross off.<br />

What I can say is that this $1.495 amp very nicely offset<br />

some of the HRS-120's steep €11.500 satin-finish<br />

sticker.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!