Download 6Moons test report. July 2013 (PDF). - German Physiks
Download 6Moons test report. July 2013 (PDF). - German Physiks
Download 6Moons test report. July 2013 (PDF). - German Physiks
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Setting the HRS-120 up where all other speakers tend to go, the first sonic thing to strike this listener imprinted and<br />
conditioned by conventional monopole sound was how differently the omnipolar HRS-120 energized the room. Thinking<br />
about it beforehand, I knew perfectly well that it would. Yet the actual experience of just how loudness would register<br />
differently was still novel. That's because here the sound was just as loud to the outsides of the stereo triangle—behind<br />
and around the boxes—as it was between and in front of the speakers. This telegraphed even with the preamp set for atear<br />
loudness at my normal level. The sound pressure inside the space was higher. As such it also was far more even. So<br />
what? All that matters is what arrives at your ears, let the ants crawling up the front and side walls have their own party?<br />
Arguably so. Even so this denser room fill translated as greater fullness with my ears where they've always been, about<br />
four meters from the speakers and as such not in those room areas, which now got far more direct sound than before.<br />
We'll return to this.<br />
As a consequence in this first position shown above, the HRS-120 seemed very hooded, its fine uppermost freqs<br />
overpowered by and drowned out in all these compound midband reflections. Setting the tweeter contour to +4dB to rise<br />
at 8.000Hz counteracted it only marginally. This really wasn't about tonal balance in the signal, but acoustic room<br />
loading outside the signal. Tone control tweaks don't really operate there.