01.01.2014 Views

2011 Annual School Report - Gordon West Public School

2011 Annual School Report - Gordon West Public School

2011 Annual School Report - Gordon West Public School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NSW Department of Education & Training<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

NSW <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong>s – Leading the way<br />

1


CONTENTS<br />

PRINCIPAL'S MESSAGE<br />

What another great year at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> with so much happening<br />

at our “home away from home!” Every year <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong> seems to become a more dynamic, enthusiastic, exciting<br />

centre of learning with more and more opportunities being<br />

provided for our students.<br />

As I have stated previously the challenge of course is to balance<br />

the extensive range of school activities being offered and<br />

continue to perform at the highest level in school, state and<br />

national tests in literacy, numeracy, technology and science.<br />

I have every confidence that we are up to the challenge.<br />

Our commitment to very high academic, sporting and cultural<br />

standards is being realised with wonderful results in the National<br />

Naplan literacy/numeracy tests. <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> was ranked<br />

19th overall of the 2070 NSW schools that completed the <strong>2011</strong><br />

Naplan tests in the Sydney Morning Herald’s ranking schedule.<br />

We have also successfully participated in district PSSA and an<br />

inspiring “Showcase at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong>” concert where the talents<br />

of our dance, drama and band programs were highlighted.<br />

The introduction of electronic whiteboards across all classes<br />

in the school, the installation of two interactive classrooms and<br />

the employment of specialist technology teachers certainly<br />

provides an extra dimension to the teaching/learning cycle<br />

across all key learning areas.<br />

Our Sustainability Environment program has been very successful<br />

in making the school community aware and proactive<br />

in caring for our environment.<br />

A very active and involved parent community continued to work<br />

closely with the school to provide the best possible opportunities<br />

and facilities for the children of <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong>.<br />

The school is now totally air conditioned thanks to the FRASC<br />

and the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> P&C.<br />

Thank you students, teachers and parents of <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> for<br />

your support over the past 12 months and for making <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong> a great place to be. We look forward to an even bigger<br />

and better 2012.<br />

Jim Huckerby B.A.<br />

Principal<br />

.<br />

2


P&C MESSAGE<br />

The P&C had another very successful year. The "Five Year<br />

Business Plan for expenditure for the P&C" was updated in<br />

<strong>2011</strong>, with all parents invited to participate. Air-conditioning for<br />

the library, library staff room, and associated break-out room<br />

achieved highest priority for early 2012. Lights to illuminate the<br />

path to Pee Wee Park were also put on the 2012 agenda. The<br />

Plan also channels $5K into a "Special Education Program"<br />

in 2013, with staff to decide one area from science, music,<br />

drama, art or literature. The P&C again continued their commitment<br />

to the provision of the Special Needs Teachers at <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong>, on an annual basis.<br />

The Fund Raising & Social Committee (FRASC), under the<br />

leadership of Mrs Megan Guenther, again performed well, despite<br />

the unfavourable economic climate. With $40K raised,<br />

and $15K expenses, the FRASC contributed $25K net to the<br />

P&C funds in <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The P&C continued to provide for the Canteen and sadly<br />

ended the year with the resignation of the Canteen Manager,<br />

Mrs Una Fong, after 8 years of exemplary management and<br />

service. The P&C was very sorry to see Mrs Fong's departure.<br />

The provision of the Clothing Pool was also overseen by the<br />

P&C. Mrs Kim McPartlin continued with her excellent management<br />

of the Clothing Pool, in this now salaried position.<br />

The P&C also continued to manage the delivery of Outside<br />

Of <strong>School</strong> Hours Care, in collaboration with the school. Communication<br />

with the school community, in reply to the annual<br />

<strong>School</strong> Survey, again involved the participation of the P&C<br />

Communications Officer.<br />

The P&C concluded the review of traffic in Kooyong Street after<br />

extensive research in 2010 and a two term trial of a voluntary<br />

"one-way" system during <strong>2011</strong>. "<strong>West</strong> facing" parking remains<br />

prohibited on the northern kerb of Kooyong, due to council's<br />

compliance with parking laws. In reality, the voluntary system<br />

works well only with continual surveillance by P&C members,<br />

but deteriorates over time, especially on raining days. The P&C<br />

remains committed to advertising a voluntary "one-way" system<br />

in Bulletins once per term. Given that the P&C respects<br />

the interests of the residents of Kooyong Street, as much as<br />

it considers the wishes of the school parents, Kooyong Street<br />

cannot be designated an official one way street, and therefore,<br />

congestion is unfortunately expected into the future.<br />

The P&C at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> continues to contribute substantially<br />

to a strong sense of school community and continues to contribute<br />

to improving the fantastic facilities of this great school.<br />

Parental involvement was encouraging throughout the year.<br />

The P&C looks forward to “fresh blood” in the Office Bearer<br />

positions in 2012.<br />

Alison Gray P&C President<br />

STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE'S<br />

MESSAGE<br />

This year <strong>2011</strong>, has been a brilliant year for the student representative<br />

team. It has been an honour to be selected as school<br />

captains. We will always remember the things we did as the<br />

representatives. We know that we are ready for high school<br />

and we have so many skills that we have learned throughout<br />

primary school that we can use next year.<br />

One of the highlights of <strong>2011</strong> was going to Canberra and the<br />

snow with years five and six. We did so many activities like<br />

going to Questacon, Parliament House, Old Parliament House<br />

and playing in the snow at Mt Blue Cow. We also played many<br />

games throughout the year, which made our year the best<br />

ever.<br />

STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE<br />

COUNCIL 2010<br />

The <strong>2011</strong> SRC have had another successful year of fundraising,<br />

taking care of lost property and being involved in sharing<br />

ideas of the students with the Principal and the whole school.<br />

The SRC ran a Crazy Hair Day and Yellow Daffodil Day raising<br />

money for various charities including the Cancer Council.<br />

We really appreciated the school community’s generosity in<br />

supporting the <strong>2011</strong> charities.<br />

We would like to wish Rachel, Hamish and the prefects good<br />

luck for 2012 and hope they do a good job.<br />

Josh Phillips and Emma Watkins<br />

<strong>School</strong> Captains <strong>2011</strong><br />

3


SCHOOL CONTEXT<br />

Student information<br />

Student attendance is very good at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong>. All absences<br />

must be explained in writing. The school implements the<br />

Department of Education <strong>School</strong> Attendance Policy (2005).<br />

STUDENT ENROLMENT PROFILE<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 <strong>2011</strong><br />

Male 217 231 220 222 228<br />

Female 194 194 201 228 245<br />

Students<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Enrolments<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 <strong>2011</strong><br />

Year<br />

Male Female<br />

STUDENT ATTENDANCE PROFILE<br />

Year 2008 2009 2010 <strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> K 95.9 95.9 96.2<br />

1 96.0 96.4 96.5<br />

2 96.8 95.8 95.6<br />

3 96.2 96.5 96.8<br />

4 97.0 96.5 96.3<br />

5 97.8 96.0 96.4<br />

6 96.7 97.0 96.5<br />

Total 96.1 96.6 96.3 96.3<br />

Region K 96.1 96.0 96.3<br />

1 95.6 95.8 95.7<br />

2 95.8 95.9 95.7<br />

3 95.8 96.1 96.0<br />

4 95.8 96.0 95.8<br />

5 96.0 96.1 95.9<br />

6 95.4 95.7 95.2<br />

Total 95.7 94.7 96.0 95.8<br />

State K 94.3 94.7 94.7<br />

1 93.7 94.2 94.2<br />

2 94.0 94.4 94.2<br />

3 94.1 94.5 94.4<br />

4 94.0 94.5 94.3<br />

5 94.0 94.4 94.2<br />

6 93.6 94.0 93.8<br />

Total 94.1 92.1 94.4 94.3<br />

CLASS SIZES<br />

The following table shows our class sizes as reported at the<br />

<strong>2011</strong> annual class size audit.<br />

Roll Class/Year Total/Year Total in Class<br />

KL K 17 17<br />

KP K 18 18<br />

KS K 18 18<br />

KT K 18 18<br />

1/2P 1 10 22<br />

1C 1 21 21<br />

1L 1 20 20<br />

1M 1 21 21<br />

1/2P 2 12 22<br />

2M 2 25 25<br />

2S 2 25 25<br />

3B 3 27 27<br />

3D 3 27 27<br />

3H 3 27 27<br />

4D 4 31 31<br />

4T 4 30 30<br />

5G 5 33 33<br />

5W 5 32 32<br />

6D 6 30 30<br />

6E 6 29 29<br />

Attendance rate<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

Student attendance rates<br />

2008 2009 2010 <strong>2011</strong><br />

Year<br />

<strong>School</strong> Region State DEC<br />

4


STAFF INFORMATION<br />

It is a requirement that the reporting of information<br />

for all staff must be consistent with privacy<br />

and personal information policies.<br />

Position<br />

Number<br />

Principal 1<br />

Assistant Principal(s) 4<br />

Classroom Teachers 16<br />

Teacher of Emotional<br />

0<br />

Disabilities<br />

Teacher of Mild<br />

0<br />

Intellectual Disabilities<br />

Teacher of Reading<br />

0<br />

Recovery<br />

Support Teacher<br />

2<br />

Learning Assistance<br />

Teacher Librarian 1<br />

Teacher of ESL 1<br />

Counsellor 1<br />

<strong>School</strong> Administrative<br />

& Support Staff<br />

4<br />

(SASS)<br />

Total 30<br />

There are no indigenous members of the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> staff.<br />

Teacher Retention<br />

Staff retention remains high at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong>. The school retained<br />

all staff from 2010. However over the course of the year,<br />

one teacher went on extended leave prior to resigning from<br />

the Department. At the end of <strong>2011</strong> two teachers announced<br />

their pending retirement and one teacher took a year's leave<br />

without pay.<br />

FINANCIAL SUMMARY<br />

This summary covers funds for operating costs and does not<br />

involve expenditure areas such as permanent salaries, building<br />

and major maintenance.<br />

Date of financial summary: 30/11/2010<br />

Income $<br />

Balance brought forward 140 592.50<br />

Global funds 215 471.53<br />

Tied funds 31 827.35<br />

<strong>School</strong> & community sources 308 232.22<br />

Interest 7 295.01<br />

Trust receipts 15 095.95<br />

Canteen 0.00<br />

Total income 718 514.56<br />

Expenditure<br />

Teaching & learning<br />

Key learning areas 126 788.63<br />

Excursions 67 306.98<br />

Extracurricular dissections 105 475.54<br />

Library 9 949.66<br />

Training & development 1 092.04<br />

Tied funds 24 903.36<br />

Casual relief teachers 52 809.80<br />

retained all staff from 2009. However<br />

Administration & office 62 765.06<br />

<strong>School</strong>-operated canteen 0.00<br />

Utilities 48 220.84<br />

Maintenance 37 639.88<br />

Trust accounts 14 282.01<br />

Capital programs 32 975.00<br />

Total expenditure 584 208.80<br />

Balance carried forward 134 305.76<br />

Teacher qualifications<br />

All teaching staff meet the professional requirements for<br />

teaching in NSW public schools.<br />

Qualifications<br />

% of staff<br />

Degree or Diploma 90%<br />

Postgraduate 10%<br />

A full copy of the school’s <strong>2011</strong> financial statement is tabled<br />

at the annual general meeting of the P&C. Further details<br />

concerning the statement can be obtained by contacting the<br />

school.<br />

5


SCHOOL PERFORMANCE<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

ACHIEVEMENTS<br />

CREATIVE ARTS<br />

The school continues to emphasise and excel in the creative<br />

arts.<br />

Visual arts continues to be a priority at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> with learning experiences embedded in the COGs<br />

(Connected Outcome Groups) units used across the school<br />

together with a variety of techniques taught for expressive artworks<br />

K-6.<br />

Dance and Drama components of the creative arts syllabus<br />

are integrated in COGs units developed by the Department of<br />

Education and Training across all classes K-6.<br />

Music and performing arts groups continued in Years 3, 4, 5<br />

and 6. These rotating groups provide a variety of enrichment<br />

activities and learning experiences for students.<br />

Creative arts and music appreciation continued in Years K-2.<br />

All students K-6 engaged in a variety of dance programs<br />

throughout the year. Students from Year 1- 6 benefited from<br />

the expertise of a professional dance teacher.<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>School</strong> Choir<br />

In <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> choristers had the opportunity to be part<br />

of 4 different choirs including the Ryde Spectacular Choir, the<br />

Festival Choir, the Opera House Choir and the Senior Concert<br />

Choir.<br />

The Opera House Choir consisting of 36 Year 6 students,<br />

performed beautifully at the Sydney Opera House in the Bennelong<br />

Concert during Term 3 after successfully auditioning to<br />

be part of a massed choir of 700 students from across New<br />

South Wales.<br />

The Festival Choir consisting of 30 Year 4 students, performed<br />

with a massed choir of 400 public school students at the<br />

Festival of Children’s Music at the Concourse Concert Hall,<br />

Chatswood in October.<br />

The Ryde Spectacular Choir performed at the Sydney Opera<br />

House in Term 4 as part of a group of 600 students from<br />

schools in the Ryde district.<br />

All choirs performed at our annual Showcase performance,<br />

entertaining the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> community with a compilation of<br />

exciting and challenging material from the Ryde Spectacular,<br />

Festival and Opera House choir repertoires. All students have<br />

displayed superb musicianship throughout the year and have<br />

been fantastic musical ambassadors for <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Bands<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Band Programme <strong>2011</strong> involved 120 students,<br />

3 conductors, 13 tutors and 2 parent volunteers. <strong>2011</strong><br />

was the inaugural year for a dedicated jazz band under the<br />

guidance of Peter Walmsley OAM. Two training bands and<br />

Concert Band 1 and 2 were also tutored.<br />

During Term 2 the band performed at the Yamaha Band Festival.<br />

This festival encourages all band members to strive to be<br />

their best. The students were rewarded with gold and silver<br />

awards. The annual band breakfast and lunchtime concerts<br />

and a performance by the jazz band to open our Showcase on<br />

Open Day were highlights of Term 3.<br />

During Term 4 a band intensive was held for all bands with the<br />

year culminating with a great end of year concert held under<br />

the COLA.<br />

Catherine Walmsley<br />

Director of Bands<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Senior Dance Group<br />

In <strong>2011</strong>, 22 dancers from Year 6 were selected to represent<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> in dance. Under the expert tuition of 2 teachers<br />

and a professional dance teacher the group learnt a fabulous<br />

dance choreographed to the music “Disco Inferno”.<br />

At the end of Term 2 the group danced in 3 performances<br />

in the Metropolitan North Dance Festival at Glen St Theatre.<br />

This was a terrific opportunity for them to experience dancing<br />

in a professional situation with students from other schools.<br />

The dance group also performed in the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Showcase.<br />

The group’s final performance was in the Ryde <strong>School</strong>s<br />

Spectacular at The Sydney Opera House.<br />

6


Rugby Union<br />

Children in Years 3 and 4 and Years 5 and 6 fielded three<br />

teams in a Rugby Union Gala Day organised by the ARU<br />

North Sydney Development Team at Cliff Oval. The Junior A<br />

and Senior A teams won their respective divisions and the Senior<br />

B team were runners up.<br />

Touch Football<br />

Two senior teams were entered in the inaugural PSSA Touch<br />

Football competition with the Senior Girls winning their division.<br />

Intra <strong>School</strong> Sport<br />

The intra school sporting programs had another successful<br />

year with the emphasis being placed on a balanced sports<br />

program.<br />

SPORTS<br />

The school entered teams in the Ku-ring-gai Primary <strong>School</strong>s’<br />

Sports Association (PSSA).<br />

Soccer<br />

Both the Junior A and B teams and Senior team played in the<br />

Division 1 competition with all three teams playing in their respective<br />

Grand Finals. The Junior A team and the Senior team<br />

became Premiers.<br />

Snowsport<br />

Two children represented the school at the Northern NSW Interschools<br />

Snowsports Championships.<br />

Tennis<br />

Over one hundred children received private coaching from<br />

Tennis Advantage, our resident tennis professionals. Children<br />

were sent to the Kuringai Zone tennis trials with two children<br />

progressing to Area. Teams of children competed in the Northern<br />

Suburbs Tennis Association Primary <strong>School</strong>s Challenge<br />

with one <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> team winning the masters challenge.<br />

Cricket<br />

Both Junior and Senior teams played in the Division 1 competition.<br />

One girl became a member of the NSWPSSA Girls<br />

State Cricket team.<br />

Netball<br />

Three of our eight teams reached the Grand Finals with the<br />

Senior 4 team becoming Zone Premiers. One child represented<br />

our zone at the Area Carnival.<br />

Modball<br />

The Junior and Senior teams played in the Division 1 competition<br />

with the Junior team progressing to the Semi Finals.<br />

Swimming<br />

Our team finished 5th in the overall point score at the Zone<br />

Carnival. Two students represented our zone at the Area Carnival.<br />

Cross Country<br />

Our school team participated in the Zone Cross Country Carnival<br />

at St Ives Showground. Three children progressed to the<br />

Sydney North Area Carnival at Gosford, with one student progressing<br />

to the State Carnival.<br />

Athletics<br />

Our school finished 5th in the overall point score at the Zone<br />

Carnival. Fourteen children progressed to the Area Carnival at<br />

Homebush. Two children progressed to the NSWPSSA State<br />

Championships.<br />

Rugby League<br />

Children in Years 2-4 participated in clinics run by the ARL<br />

Development Team and over 30 children completed the Kids<br />

to Kangaroos Coaching Clinic.<br />

7


ACADEMIC<br />

In the National Assessment Program, the results across years 3, 5, 7 and 9 literacy and numeracy assessments are reported on<br />

a scale from Band 1 to Band 10. The achievement scale represents increasing levels of skills and understanding demonstrated in<br />

the assessments. Year 3 students can achieve to Band 6, while Year 5 students can attain to Band 8. The Commonwealth Government<br />

sets minimum standards for reading, writing, grammar and punctuation, spelling and numeracy for years 3, 5, 7 and 9.<br />

The performance of our students is compared to a National Minimum Standard (NMS). The percentages of our students at or<br />

above these standards are reported below.<br />

Year 3 NAPLAN - Reading<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 517.3 467.9 415.6<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 0 3 9 13 50<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 4.0 12.0 17.3 66.7<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.4 1.1 6.8 16.2 26.7 48.9<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.1 4.0 9.2 17.2 20.9 47.6<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 4.6 12.2 19.4 21.1 16.6 26.2<br />

Year 3 NAPLAN - Writing<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 485.6 455.3 422.4<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 0 0 3 38 35<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 50.0 46.1<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.5 2.1 5.7 15.5 45.7 30.5<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 2.5 5.0 14.4 21.7 40.7 15.8<br />

70<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Reading<br />

60<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Writing<br />

Percentage of students<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Percentage of students<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

8


Year 3 NAPLAN - Spelling<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 489.1 461.0 415.5<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 0 1 9 26 40<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 1.3 11.8 34.2 52.6<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 21.6 29.9<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.9 2.6 9.9 15.9 28.0 42.6<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 4.4 7.9 19.4 20.3 24.8 23.1<br />

Year 3 NAPLAN - Grammar and Punctuation<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 530.7 481.8 422.9<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 0 3 5 10 58<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 3.9 6.6 13.2 76.3<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.0 0.4 4.9 9.7 21.6 29.9<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.3 2.0 7.1 18.4 23.7 47.5<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 5.6 7.8 16.2 24.2 20.7 25.5<br />

60<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Spelling<br />

100<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Grammar & Punctuation<br />

Percentage of students<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Percentage of students<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

NOTE: SSG = Statistically Similar Group<br />

The 'Percentage in Band' and '<strong>School</strong> Average' columns are not shown if results are available for less than 10<br />

students.<br />

State average band distributions do not include students who were exempted from the tests.<br />

9


Year 3 NAPLAN - Numeracy numeracy<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 483.8 445.0 400.9<br />

\ Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 1 2 11 21 40<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 1.3 2.7 14.7 28.0 53.3<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.0 1.1 7.5 17.7 30.5 43.2<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.9 4.5 11.3 23.6 27.2 32.5<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 3.5 13.6 20.8 25.7 20.0 16.4<br />

60<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Numeracy<br />

Percentage of students<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

10


Year 5 NAPLAN - Reading<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 550.6 546.2 489.0<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 1 1 8 9 22 21<br />

Percentage in Band 1.6 1.6 12.9 14.5 35.5 33.9<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.5 2.3 18.2 19.5 32.3 27.3<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.3 3.1 15.4 20.8 26.9 32.6<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 8.8 12.6 27.0 19.9 17.5 14.3<br />

Year 5 NAPLAN - Writing<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 520.2 525.2 486.6<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 0 0 13 29 16 4<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 21.0 46.8 25.8 6.5<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.1 2.8 19.8 31.5 25.3 19.5<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 5.6 8.4 32.7 29.2 15.7 8.4<br />

40<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Reading<br />

50<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Writing<br />

Percentage of students<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Percentage of students<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

NOTE: SSG = Statistically Similar Group<br />

The 'Percentage in Band' and '<strong>School</strong> Average' columns are not shown if results are available for less than 10<br />

students.<br />

State average band distributions do not include students who were exempted from the tests.<br />

11


Year 5 NAPLAN - Spelling<br />

\<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 548.9 538.0 493.7<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 0 1 6 14 25 16<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 1.6 9.7 22.6 40.3 25.8<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.5 2.3 10.9 20.5 37.7 28.2<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.7 3.1 13.8 26.0 29.6 26.9<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 5.8 10.1 25.2 25.7 20.2 13.1<br />

Year 5 NAPLAN - Grammar and Punctuation<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 590.1 558.6 500.7<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 1 0 LSGs (Like 2 <strong>School</strong> Groups) 9 are schools 23from a similar 27socio<br />

Percentage in Band 1.6 0.0 economic 3.2area.<br />

14.5 37.1 43.5<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.5 0.5 6.8 15.0 35.5 41.8<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.3 2.7 11.2 20.2 33.4 31.3<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 8.0 10.0 22.1 22.4 22.6 14.8<br />

50<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Spelling<br />

50<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Grammar & Punctuation<br />

Percentage of students<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Percentage of students<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

12


Year 5 NAPLAN - Numeracy<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 562.8 554.7 495.9<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 0 1 3 17 11 29<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 1.6 4.9 27.9 18.0 47.5<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.0 2.3 8.2 24.2 29.2 36.1<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.8 2.7 13.6 27.5 19.8 35.6<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 5.0 11.3 28.8 27.6 12.4 14.8<br />

50<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Numeracy<br />

Percentage of students<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

Learn and Advance<br />

13


Average progress in Reading<br />

between Year 3 and 5*<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> 90.0 85.4<br />

SSG \<br />

88.0 76.3<br />

State DEC 83.7 74.0<br />

Average progress in Spelling<br />

between Year 3 and 5*<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> 95.9 75.8<br />

SSG 82.8 73.4<br />

State DEC 84.5 75.4<br />

Average progress in Reading between<br />

Year 3 and 5<br />

Average progress in Spelling between<br />

Year 3 and 5<br />

100<br />

150<br />

Progress<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Progress<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average progress in Numeracy<br />

between Year 3 and 5*<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> 104.8 100.1<br />

SSG 97.0 104.6<br />

State DEC 89.6 95.8<br />

Average progress in Grammar and<br />

Punctuation between Year 3 and 5*<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> 72.6 91.8<br />

SSG 100.6 90.0<br />

State DEC 96.6 82.7<br />

Average progress in Numeracy between<br />

Year 3 and 5<br />

150<br />

150<br />

Average progress in Grammar &<br />

Punctuation between Year 3 and 5<br />

Progress<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Progress<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

* Average progress data is for matched students<br />

from within the school.<br />

Note: Average progress for Writing 2009-<strong>2011</strong> is not<br />

displayed due to the change in the Writing scale<br />

from Narrative to Persuasive.<br />

14


National Benchmarks<br />

The Commonwealth Government sets minimum desirable<br />

standards for reading, writing and numeracy at particular ages.<br />

These are referred to as national benchmarks.<br />

Percentage of Year 3 students achieving at or<br />

above minimum standard<br />

(exempt students included)<br />

Reading 100.0<br />

Writing 100.0<br />

Spelling 100.0<br />

Grammar and Punctuation 100.0<br />

Numeracy 100.0<br />

Percentage of Year 5 students achieving at or<br />

above minimum standard<br />

(exempt students included)<br />

Reading 98.4<br />

Writing 100.0<br />

Spelling 100.0<br />

Grammar and Punctuation 98.4<br />

Numeracy 100.0<br />

15


SIGNIFICANT PROGRAMS AND<br />

INITIATIVES<br />

• participation in an overnight Year 4 visit to the Sydney Academy<br />

of Sport;<br />

• participation in a Year 5 & 6 excursion to Canberra and the<br />

Snowy Mountains;<br />

• participation and high level of achievement of senior students<br />

in the University of NSW Science and Computer competitions;<br />

• participation and high level of achievement in district, state<br />

and national competitions, including Australian <strong>School</strong>s English<br />

and Mathematics competitions and the Maths Olympiad;<br />

• celebration of Book Week with author visits in July;<br />

• Year 4 venturing to Blackbutt Creek to learn about Aboriginal<br />

culture and history with an educational officer from the Aboriginal<br />

Heritage Office;<br />

• selected Year 6 students attended the <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Speaking<br />

Competition organised by the N.S.W Premier’s Office;<br />

• Year 3 travelled to Kurnell to learn about where Captain Cook<br />

landed in Australia;<br />

• Year 1 went on an excursion to Long Reef as part of Year 1’s<br />

HSIE unit on Shelter;<br />

• Kindergarten to Year 2 visited the Australian Museum;<br />

• a continuing high profile for the Student Representative Council<br />

(SRC) in fundraising for Stewart House, Cancer Council ,<br />

and by fostering leadership and peer support;<br />

• full school participation in the celebration of <strong>Public</strong> Education<br />

Day;<br />

• Year 6 competed in the <strong>2011</strong> Children’s Book Council of Australia<br />

N.S.W branch on Screen Competition with 3 groups of<br />

Year 6 students nominated as shortlisted finalists;<br />

• presentation of a Performing Arts Showcase during Education<br />

Week where every child in the school was involved in this<br />

wonderful display of performing arts;<br />

• as part of the Creative and Performing Arts program, The<br />

Ceroc and Modern Jive Dance Company worked with children<br />

from Years 1-6;<br />

• continuation of the very successful school reunion celebration<br />

for children completing their year 12 in <strong>2011</strong> who attended<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong>;<br />

• implementation of our ever popular Easter Hat Parade, where<br />

a fabulous collection of hats, baskets, sandwich boards and<br />

masks were on display for the very large number of parents<br />

and grandparents in attendance;<br />

• continuation of our very successful Grandparent’s Day where<br />

many grandparents visited the school;<br />

• celebration of Harmony Day by children participating in a variety<br />

of activities and culminating in a whole school assembly;<br />

and<br />

• Year 6 participated in Murder under the Microscope an exciting<br />

online environment project.<br />

ABORIGINAL EDUCATION<br />

Aboriginal Education remains an integral part of the curriculum<br />

at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong>. We aim to complement and<br />

reflect the elements of the Aboriginal Education and Training<br />

Policy including building increased knowledge and understanding<br />

of Aboriginal Australia.<br />

In <strong>2011</strong> K-6 students were provided with opportunities to develop<br />

deeper understandings of Aboriginal histories, cultures<br />

and languages through cross curriculum content including literature,<br />

Creative and Practical Arts and Human Society and its<br />

Environment. In support of the Aboriginal education outcomes<br />

included in the HSIE syllabus, Year 4 students attended an excursion<br />

to Blackbutts Reserve with an educational officer from<br />

the Aboriginal Heritage Office to learn about local Aboriginal<br />

culture and history including tools and the use of endemic plant<br />

for food and medicine.<br />

During weekly flag raising assemblies and other formal occasions<br />

staff and students were provided with opportunities to<br />

show respect for the Aboriginal community past and present<br />

through the Custodianship of Country Acknowledgement.<br />

MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION<br />

Multicultural Education is embraced in the school’s curriculum.<br />

Students whose first language is not English may require<br />

assistance in improving their English level. The English as a<br />

Second Language (ESL) program is aimed at developing students’<br />

English language competence to a level where they can<br />

participate fully at school and complete the required learning<br />

outcomes.<br />

The program is delivered in various ways to meet the different<br />

needs of students at various stages of learning English.<br />

An ESL teacher conducts this program 2 days per week and<br />

collaborates with class teachers to cater for individual student<br />

requirements. Thirty three students were enrolled in the ESL<br />

program in <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

DEBATING<br />

A hardworking debating team represented <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> in <strong>2011</strong>. The team consisted of 6 students from Stage 3.<br />

The competition was demanding. The team learnt a lot about<br />

debating and were presented with some challenging topics,<br />

having to work hard as a team to formulate their case for each<br />

debate.<br />

The children are to be commended on their ability to work collaboratively<br />

to discuss ideas, agree on what they consider to<br />

be strong, supportive ideas for their debate and their positive<br />

attitude and encouragement of fellow teammates.<br />

16


TECHNOLOGY<br />

With the increase in classes at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> in <strong>2011</strong> there was<br />

a need to increase the Computer timetable from two to three<br />

days. Mr Graeme Coates took up the extra one day position.<br />

Mr Coates has many years experience in this field and has<br />

brought with him a wealth of expertise which has enriched the<br />

ICT program.<br />

Kindergarten, Year 1 and Year 2 attend lessons each week<br />

whilst Years 3, 4, 5 and 6 continue to attend once a term for<br />

5 weeks for a longer period of time. At <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> the ICT<br />

program is fully integrated into the school’s teaching and learning<br />

program. We believe ICT can have a positive outcome on<br />

student learning and understanding and that it can assist in<br />

student motivation and engagement.<br />

In <strong>2011</strong>, students from Kindergarten from to Year 6 learnt, reviewed<br />

or extended their skills using the Microsoft Office package.<br />

Activities included word processing, spreadsheets and<br />

presentations using PowerPoint and writing booklets, posters<br />

and calendars using Microsoft Publisher. Several grades enjoyed<br />

designing multimedia projects using MovieMaker and<br />

Photostory whilst others explored programs such as Google<br />

Earth, Kidspiration and Kidpix. Students from Years 3 to 6<br />

learnt how to manipulate photographs in a variety of ways using<br />

Photoshop.<br />

Year 6 entered a few competitions this year with the highlight<br />

being the “Picture Book” competition run by the CBCA. Three<br />

groups were chosen as finalists and together with Mrs Pickup,<br />

Miss Papic and several parents, attended the presentation<br />

at the Teachers’ Federation Auditorium in Surry Hills. <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong>'s The Bush Jumper came in 3rd, The Gobbling Tree 4th<br />

and Max 5th. The seniors participated in Google’s design competition<br />

‘Doodle 4 Google’ where young people from across<br />

Australia were invited to design their own doodle based on<br />

this year’s theme ‘My Future Australia’. The best doodles were<br />

voted on by the public and one winner had the honour of having<br />

their doodle displayed on the Google Australia homepage<br />

for a day. Our students came up with some excellent designs.<br />

Year 6 also entered Murder Under the Microscope, an interactive<br />

environmental online competition developed by the Department<br />

of Education and were successful in correctly solving the<br />

ficticous eco crime.<br />

With an extra “lab” of computers available in the library this<br />

year, students also had the opportunity to extend their research<br />

skills using a variety of different search engines.<br />

PROGRESS ON <strong>2011</strong> TARGETS<br />

Target 1<br />

Numeracy K-6 Space and Geometry – 2 and 3 Dimensional<br />

Space<br />

To increase student capacity to identify, describe and manipulate,<br />

using mathematical language, 2D and 3D space.<br />

Our achievements include:<br />

After the review of 2010 NAPLAN results, teachers at <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong> identified a weakness in the area of Space and Geometry,<br />

2D and 3D space for both Years 3 and 5. There was a<br />

decrease in the percentage of students in band 6 (Year 3) and<br />

band 8 (Year 5). Teachers began with the review of outcome<br />

statements to develop a shared vision and understanding of<br />

the skills of this curriculum area. A pre test was implemented<br />

which consisted of 2D and 3D space questions from past NA-<br />

PLAN papers (Years 2-6) and practical lessons (K-1). In stage<br />

groups, teachers analysed results and identified concepts requiring<br />

development.<br />

Two members of staff attended a DET inservice which provided<br />

schools with practical lesson plans and resources across the<br />

K-6 Space and Geometry continuum. Teachers collaboratively<br />

planned practical lessons with a focus on real life applications<br />

based on pre test data. Using ‘Teaching Space and Geometry<br />

K-6’ teachers designed explicit teaching and learning activities<br />

to improve students ability to identify, describe and manipulate<br />

using mathematical language in the areas of 2D and 3D space.<br />

A resource kit was compiled for use in the future.<br />

Late in Term 3, teachers conducted assessments including post<br />

testing (Years 2-6) and teacher observation (K-6). The results<br />

of these tests were compared with pre test data to ascertain the<br />

effectiveness of the intervention. The statistical data highlighted<br />

success of the intervention program. Through the collegial<br />

sharing of data, teachers reflected on the broad applications of<br />

this skill base across all key learning areas. They recognised<br />

the importance of consistent and frequent exposure in a variety<br />

of contexts to ensure students attain a thorough understanding<br />

of these often abstract concepts. Teachers commented that it<br />

was imperative to provide students with a variety of opportunities<br />

to touch, feel and manipulate shapes and objects in order<br />

to fully understand their properties. While appropriate resources<br />

took time to plan and organise, teachers remarked that the<br />

practical lessons were well received by students and encouraged<br />

positive mathematical language exchange.<br />

Target 2<br />

Literacy K-6 Writing – Persuasive Text<br />

To improve student knowledge, skills and understandings of<br />

persuasive texts.<br />

Our achievements include:<br />

Following 2010 NAPLAN analysis with K-6 staff, Michelle Mawer,<br />

DET English consultant visited <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> PS in Term 1 to<br />

discuss purposes of persuasive text, elements of persuasion,<br />

language devices and grammatical elements to achieve success<br />

when working with this text type. Staff found the discussion<br />

on the dissection of NAPLAN marking guide particularly<br />

useful.<br />

Through modelling of persuasive written and spoken texts using<br />

previous BST and ELLA marking guides, teachers provided<br />

students with a range of interesting and challenging work<br />

samples to motivate and introduce them to what delineates an<br />

effective, sustained argument.<br />

Teachers collected examples of persuasive text used in advertisements<br />

and newspaper articles, critiqued peer work samples<br />

and gave students opportunities to evaluate or give judgments<br />

through explicit spoken and written learning activities.<br />

Staff were encouraged to attend various professional learning<br />

opportunities to improve their knowledge and skills in teaching<br />

persuasive text. In Terms 2 and 3, <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> K-6 staff<br />

were inserviced by experienced teachers who informed them<br />

about available resources including websites and publications.<br />

Successful teaching and learning strategies were also shared.<br />

In Term 3, 2 members of staff attended the Northern Sydney<br />

Regional debating inservice which highlighted the link between<br />

persuasive text and debating.<br />

17


Following this professional learning, <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> staff were<br />

educated about the PEEL method and the progression from<br />

Stage 2 comparison style topics to Stage 3 political / change<br />

debates. Year 1 teachers provided students with opportunities<br />

to practise their ability to support an opinion or point of<br />

view and shared work samples with the K-6 staff. As part of<br />

the <strong>2011</strong> Turramurra Learning Community project, Year 4 students<br />

completed reflective journals, encouraging the use of<br />

persuasive language devices following play building experiences<br />

in drama.<br />

Target 3<br />

Literacy Target <strong>2011</strong> – Eco-garden Literacy<br />

Program K-2<br />

To expand and incorporate all aspects of literacy K-2 into<br />

teaching and learning programs using the eco garden as<br />

a learnscape by developing a teaching resource bank for<br />

spoken and written texts to improve student literacy learning<br />

outcomes.<br />

Our achievements include:<br />

The Literacy target’s K-2 focus was to expand and incorporate<br />

all aspects of the literacy K-2 into the teaching and learning<br />

programs using the eco-garden as a learnscape by developing<br />

a teaching resource bank for spoken and written texts to<br />

improve student literacy outcomes.<br />

At combined stage meetings K-2 teachers determined the<br />

English syllabus outcomes which would be addressed through<br />

interaction in and with the eco-garden. K-2 teachers brainstormed<br />

relevant literacy teaching and learning activities<br />

based on the Quality Teaching Framework. Following these<br />

initial discussions two K-2 teachers attended a professional<br />

development course at the Botanical Gardens and returned to<br />

share their knowledge with colleagues. At subsequent stage<br />

and grade meetings and across stage levels K-2 student work<br />

samples were shared and discussed to show the progression<br />

in writing and the development and interpretation of visual literacy.<br />

During Term 2 student work samples were also presented<br />

at a K-6 staff meeting for broader professional learning.<br />

Students and K -2 teachers were involved in planting, maintaining,<br />

observing, recording and utilising the eco garden as<br />

a tool for real and relevant learning beyond the classroom in<br />

the outdoor environment. Teaching and learning programs incorporated<br />

many learning experiences in the eco garden as a<br />

stimulus for literacy learning including talking and listening, visual<br />

literacy and writing of various text types including description,<br />

recount, persuasive text, narrative and poetry. Student<br />

work samples demonstrated enhanced vocabulary and an<br />

increased understanding and interpretation of visual literacy.<br />

The Quality Teaching dimensions of Intellectual Quality, Quality<br />

Learning Environment and Significance were embedded in<br />

the teaching and learning programs.<br />

Teachers and students further developed their communication<br />

skills of questioning, reasoning, and critical thinking through<br />

the various opportunities to share dialogue about the literacy<br />

outcomes. These experiences contributed to the development<br />

of rubrics for the assessment of persuasive texts.<br />

Target 4<br />

Literacy through Drama – Turramurra Learning<br />

Community Project <strong>2011</strong><br />

Using the dramatic skills (playbuilding) taught, students will<br />

develop deep knowledge and deep understanding of the<br />

concept focus and use drama to further develop their literacy<br />

skills.<br />

Our achievements include:<br />

The focus of the <strong>2011</strong> Turramurra Learning Community project<br />

was to use drama strategies to enhance student’s English and<br />

literacy outcomes. The program focused on the professional<br />

learning of primary teachers to enhance the creative and literacy<br />

processes of their students through the use of educational<br />

drama as the medium for improving students’ English<br />

and literacy outcomes.<br />

In Term 1, <strong>2011</strong> Year 4 teachers at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> identified<br />

relevant literacy outcomes derived from current state syllabus<br />

documents and an analysis of the students’ needs. The syllabus<br />

outcomes selected included students undertaking and<br />

sustaining roles in a variety of drama forms to express meaning<br />

in a wide range of imagined situations, performing in improvisations,<br />

incorporating elements of drama (focus, space,<br />

character, mood, movement, dramatic tension) and vocal<br />

skills, creating meaning for an audience and reflecting on and<br />

discussing the effectiveness of their own work and the work of<br />

others. Participating teachers identified that Year 4 students<br />

could benefit from improvement in their expressive oral language<br />

skills, their understanding and use of expressive and<br />

descriptive language, their confidence in writing texts and their<br />

capacity to develop the use of imagery and the elaboration of<br />

ideas in their persuasive and descriptive writing.<br />

The program was attended by <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Year 4 teachers<br />

and students throughout <strong>2011</strong>. With the professional assistance<br />

from Turramurra High <strong>School</strong>’s drama department,<br />

relevant drama strategies and authentic literary texts were<br />

incorporated into a series of drama lessons. Through these<br />

transformative learning opportunities the students engaged<br />

in curriculum and educational experiences that promoted creativity,<br />

innovation, cultural appreciation and personal values.<br />

The <strong>2011</strong> Turramurra Learning Community project culminated<br />

in Term 4 with a collaborative workshop presented and coordinated<br />

by Year 9 Turramurra High <strong>School</strong> drama students.<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> teachers were very positive about the professional<br />

learning and the improved student literacy outcomes<br />

of their students involved in the program. The teachers reported<br />

a growth in confidence, understanding and expertise in<br />

using drama strategies in their programming and recognised<br />

that many of the learning activities undertaken corresponded<br />

closely with important life skills including persistence, listening<br />

with understanding and empathy, metacognition, striving<br />

for accuracy, questioning and problem posing, finding humour,<br />

taking responsible risks and creating, imagining and innovating.<br />

Through drama exercises students were encouraged to<br />

be active rather than passive learners. They demonstrated<br />

increased levels of attention, retention and enjoyment in the<br />

act of learning through drama. Following each drama session,<br />

students wrote reflection journal entries and pieces of<br />

persuasive and descriptive writing. They learnt to draft, revise,<br />

proofread and published well structured texts based on these<br />

creative experiences and showed development in their literacy<br />

skills in terms of their ideas, audience and written language<br />

features.<br />

18


KEY EVALUATIONS<br />

It is a requirement for all NSW public schools to conduct at<br />

least two annual evaluations – one related to educational and<br />

management practice and the other related to curriculum. The<br />

school has adopted a cyclical approach to the evaluation of the<br />

six areas of education and management practices to ensure<br />

that it operates at a highly efficient level.<br />

Educational and Management<br />

Practice<br />

Culture<br />

Background<br />

Enhancing the quality of the school’s management practices<br />

and improving the learning outcomes of all students are key<br />

educational objectives.<br />

The survey tool <strong>School</strong>Map, developed by the Department of<br />

Education and Training (DET) was used to collect information.<br />

The primary purpose of the <strong>School</strong>Map best practice statements<br />

is to provide a framework for analysis of the operation<br />

of schools in six key areas. The statements are based on the<br />

findings of research and the views of a wide cross section of<br />

teachers, parents and students about current practices and<br />

potential best practice in schools.<br />

<strong>School</strong>Map best practice statements were used to evaluate<br />

school management at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> with regard to school improvement<br />

performance, major and minor changes to school<br />

programs, monitoring and evaluation of programs, student and<br />

staff welfare, teacher professional development, school organisation,<br />

financial management and communication.<br />

Responses were collated under strongly agree, agree, neutral,<br />

disagree and strongly disagree.<br />

The <strong>School</strong>Map evaluation instrument was used to evaluate<br />

whether:<br />

1. The school is continually looking at ways to improve its performance.<br />

2. The school continually makes minor changes to its programs<br />

to improve what it does.<br />

3. The school makes major changes from time to time to improve<br />

what it does.<br />

4. The school regularly measures the success of its programs.<br />

5. The educational needs of all students are met by the school.<br />

6. The school care about the students and the discipline is fair.<br />

7. The staff at the school are valued and supported.<br />

8. Teachers undertake extra training to improve their classroom<br />

teaching.<br />

9. The school is well organised.<br />

10. The allocation of money and other resources is managed<br />

effectively.<br />

Findings and Conclusions<br />

Staff<br />

The school set preliminary targets before administering the<br />

tests. The school expectation was that at least 80% of teachers<br />

would respond ‘Strongly Agree’ or ‘Agree’ to the statements<br />

in the area of <strong>School</strong> Management.<br />

The staff response to the best practice statements was over<br />

80% for eight of the ten statements with responses to Question<br />

3 and 8 at 75%. These statements related to major change<br />

(Question 3) and systematically planned professional development<br />

(Question 8).<br />

Parents<br />

A total of 89 parents responded to the <strong>School</strong>Map best practice<br />

survey. Parent responses were very positive. Responses<br />

of strongly agree/agree were selected for 8 of the 10 statements<br />

with each of these receiving over 80% combined. The 2<br />

statements which rated less positively were “The educational<br />

needs of all students are met by the school” (56%) and “The<br />

school makes major changes from time to time to improve<br />

what it does.” (57%)<br />

Some parents surveyed believe the school could further improve<br />

in the area of meeting the needs of all students. Currently<br />

the school employs a specialist learning support teacher<br />

and three learning support teachers’ aides to work closely with<br />

our students who require additional assistance. The $30,000<br />

received annually from the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Parents and Citizens<br />

in addition to a similar amount funded by the school makes<br />

the Learning Support program the most financially resourced<br />

of all the school programs. Currently this additional learning<br />

support focuses on improving student literacy skills. With the<br />

need to maximise the use of these available funds, the school<br />

prioritises students who need support in literacy as developing<br />

a student’s reading comprehension skills is beneficial to progressing<br />

their proficiency in both literacy and numeracy.<br />

The school’s vision is “to be seen as a school of excellence,<br />

with a definite purpose and direction” and continues to excel<br />

academically, on the sporting field and in cultural pursuits. Our<br />

achievements are in part due to the strong, ongoing efficient<br />

and effective management of the school. While this stability<br />

and success creates little necessity to make major management<br />

changes, <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> is always looking at ways to improve<br />

and refine its existing organisational processes.<br />

Students<br />

A total of 120 students from Year 5 and 6 were surveyed.<br />

Overall the survey results indicated that the students at <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong> were generally positive to the school’s management<br />

practices. The responses relating to the allocation of finances,<br />

student welfare and major school change were statements<br />

scoring 60%. The remaining seven statement responses<br />

scored over 75%.<br />

Future Directions<br />

The evaluation of survey results identified certain areas for future<br />

development including the need for the school to:<br />

• Greater involvement by staff in the decision making and leadership<br />

roles.<br />

• Ensure all staff update their professional learning plans annually,<br />

and<br />

• Investigate implementing additional communication strategies<br />

and refining existing practices.<br />

19


Curriculum<br />

Literacy – Writing and Improving<br />

Student Learning<br />

Background<br />

During Terms 2 to 4 <strong>2011</strong>, Year 3, 4 and 5 teachers developed<br />

an action learning project based on current educational research<br />

identifying the major influences that lead to improved<br />

student learning.<br />

Participant teachers commenced the project by reading an<br />

extract from Professor John Hattie’s paper, “Teachers Make<br />

a Difference -What is the research evidence?” and discussed<br />

the research findings. Teachers viewed and discussed the<br />

dimensions identified in the research that distinguish the difference<br />

between expert and experienced teachers. The three<br />

dimensions that Hattie’s research concluded most effectively<br />

separated expert from experienced teachers were challenge,<br />

deep representation and monitoring /feedback.<br />

Findings and Conclusions<br />

Teachers closely reviewed the research and identified how<br />

these most effective teaching strategies could be directly<br />

implemented in their classrooms. A series of writing lessons<br />

focusing on descriptive writing techniques were chosen by<br />

teacher consensus as a focus area for the project. Teachers<br />

used these lessons to practise a range of teaching strategies<br />

and investigate which were the most effective in leading to improved<br />

student learning and engagement and the most manageable,<br />

practical and realistic to implement in the classroom.<br />

Teachers incorporated scaffolded or tiered lesson activities<br />

with a range of challenges built into the task to meet the scope<br />

of student abilities and provided a range of modelled, independent<br />

and guided small group activities. Through negotiation<br />

with students, highly explicit lesson criteria was identified<br />

and presented to the students at the beginning of each writing<br />

lesson and reinforced throughout the lesson. These specific<br />

statements about the quality of work required of students became<br />

clear reference points for the students to develop and<br />

check their own work. Teachers devised a simple system of<br />

assessing student’s work during development as well as on<br />

completion of the task. This was aimed at giving the students<br />

more immediate, meaningful feedback. To assist students to<br />

develop skills in self evaluation, written work samples that illustrated<br />

high quality work were viewed and discussed. Students<br />

evaluated these as part of their learning process.<br />

An improvement in the level of student on task behaviour was<br />

observed and noted by teachers. They identified a substantial<br />

improvement from the pre assessment task level. Students’<br />

improved on task behaviour in group activities included contributing<br />

to group tasks, helping peers and raising questions.<br />

In Term 4 participating teachers presented their finding<br />

and shared their experiences. Teachers shared student<br />

work samples from the action learning experience and<br />

their thoughts about the effectiveness of the teaching<br />

strategies employed.<br />

Future Directions<br />

Teachers have and will continue to reflect on the benefits and<br />

challenges of the project. They will encourage the wider use<br />

of the positive practices realised and incorporate the best<br />

of these ideas into plans for future students’ learning K to 6<br />

across all Key Learning Areas.<br />

<strong>School</strong> General Satisfaction Survey<br />

2010<br />

Every year a sample of families are surveyed in relation to<br />

general school satisfaction. Survey results and follow up strategies/plans<br />

are reported in the school’s fortnightly newsletter.<br />

A total of 100 parents were invited to respond to the <strong>School</strong><br />

Satisfaction Survey with 94% completing all questions. The<br />

survey consisted of a set of 14 statements and 2 questions<br />

which required a written response.<br />

The following statements were presented for response:<br />

1. My child is happy and enjoys being at school.<br />

2. As a parent/guardian I feel welcome at the school.<br />

3. The school encourages students to achieve their best.<br />

4. The school is a caring and nurturing place.<br />

5. The school facilities are clean and well maintained.<br />

6. The office staff are approachable and helpful.<br />

7. The schools processes and procedures address staff welfare<br />

needs.<br />

8. The school values parents' opinions.<br />

9. There are effective lines of communication between home<br />

and school.<br />

10. There are always opportunities to raise concerns or issues<br />

about my child's schooling.<br />

11. I receive helpful information about my child's progress and<br />

achievement.<br />

12. I am comfortable approaching my child's teacher to talk<br />

about his/her progress.<br />

13. The resources and facilities at the school are sufficient to<br />

meet my child's learning needs.<br />

14. Overall I am satisfied with my child's academic progress.<br />

Responses were collated under strongly agree, agree, neutral,<br />

disagree and strongly disagree.<br />

The feedback was extremely positive with responses of<br />

strongly agree and agree selected for 11 of the 14 statements<br />

over 80%. The 3 statements which rated less positively were<br />

“There are effective lines of communication between home<br />

and school (76%), “The school values parents' opinions”<br />

(73%) and “I receive helpful information about my child's progress<br />

and achievement.” (69%)<br />

The following questions were asked:<br />

1. What could the school do better?<br />

2. What is the school doing well?<br />

In reply to the question “What could the school do better?”<br />

a number of parents indicated the need to improve school/<br />

parent communication regarding upcoming school events and<br />

activities. Increased prior knowledge of events could better<br />

assist forward family planning.<br />

22


To address this concern the office staff regularly update the<br />

school’s website under the banner “Term Calendar” which<br />

not only indicates the date on which an event will be held but<br />

contains hyperlinks to further information and the prerequisite<br />

permission notes. The school newsletter, titled The Bulletin<br />

is printed and distributed fortnightly on a Thursday with the<br />

aim to comprehensively inform parents on a range of educational<br />

and organisational matters. In February 2010 an online<br />

version of The Bulletin was attached to the school’s website<br />

allowing for greater access by busy parents. This feature is<br />

proving more popular with an ever increasing volume of families<br />

requesting direct emailing of the Bulletin in <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Another area of parent concern raised in the responses was<br />

the adverse condition of the children’s toilets with particular<br />

reference to odour and lack of soap. These issues have been<br />

attended to with the installation of deodorisers and soap dispensers.<br />

The school, in conjunction with Transfield the DET<br />

cleaning contractors, will continue to monitor and improve the<br />

hygiene and presentation of these high traffic areas of the<br />

school. The school has been allocated an additional 8 hours<br />

of cleaning for 2012, a proportion of which will concentrate on<br />

cleaning toilets.<br />

It was pleasing to read the responses to the question "What is<br />

the school doing well?” with an overwhelming number of comments<br />

expressing the supportive, caring environment created<br />

at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> and the dedication of the teaching staff to<br />

providing high quality teaching.<br />

Comments relating to positive aspects of the school included<br />

the wide range of high quality, extracurricular activities offered<br />

to students, the strong, friendly community focus and the provision<br />

of quality teaching and learning resources.<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> will continue to improve all aspects of school<br />

management and aim to address the concerns raised by the<br />

school community.<br />

Future Directions<br />

The evaluation of survey results identified certain areas for<br />

future development including the need for the school to:<br />

• Ensure the fortnightly Bulletin newsletter contains all the relevant<br />

information parents need to keep them up to date with<br />

major and minor changes to school programs and procedures<br />

with plenty of notice given for school events.<br />

• Continue to monitor and improve the hygiene and presentation<br />

of all school amenities.<br />

The school communications committee will follow up all suggestions<br />

during 2012 and report their findings to the school<br />

community.<br />

23


<strong>School</strong> Development<br />

2012-2014<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong> continues to have a long term<br />

strategic management plan with a 3 year horizon in addition<br />

to shorter term strategic goals of a 1 year horizon.<br />

The purpose of the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>School</strong> Management<br />

Plan is to:<br />

Professional Learning<br />

To ensure continual professional growth, all teachers participated<br />

in training and development based on their individual<br />

needs, as well as school and systemic priorities.<br />

Individual plans for training and development were negotiated<br />

with supervisors.<br />

In <strong>2011</strong> a school priority was to further improve individual<br />

Professional Learning Plans encompassing the key focus<br />

areas of Quality Teaching, Gifted and Talented Education,<br />

Connected Learning, The Australian Curriculum and Leadership<br />

to enhance teacher quality and student learning outcomes<br />

in our school. The success of this project has led to<br />

the continued development of the individual Professional<br />

Learning Plans with all staff in 2012.<br />

The budget for teacher professional learning in <strong>2011</strong> was<br />

$14,298.80<br />

• develop efficient and effective administrative and organisation<br />

policies;<br />

• develop educative policies to support relevant and challenging<br />

learning programs;<br />

• monitor and upgrade resources to support teaching/<br />

learning programs;<br />

• promote professional growth and development of all<br />

teaching staff K-6;<br />

• monitor and reflect on changing trends in education and<br />

adjust planning accordingly; and<br />

• provide for longer term school strategic direction. (3 year<br />

horizon 2012- 2014)<br />

Longer term school strategic directions are closely aligned<br />

with school targets through identified needs based on<br />

analysis of student performance and evaluations in consultation<br />

with the <strong>School</strong> Self Evaluation Committee.<br />

24


SCHOOL PLANNING 2012-2014<br />

<strong>School</strong> Priority 1 - Literacy<br />

Outcome for 2012 – 2014<br />

To improve student knowledge, skills and understanding<br />

in literacy.<br />

2012 Target to achieve this outcome include:<br />

• Retain or increase the percentage of students in the higher<br />

bands in NAPLAN Writing, with Year 3 students meeting or<br />

exceeding the Year 3 2009-11 average of 89.6% and the<br />

Year 5 students meeting or exceeding the Year 5 2009-11<br />

average of 48.6%.<br />

Strategies to achieve these targets include:<br />

• review the teaching and evaluation of writing K -6 with particular<br />

focus on the specific writing criteria of persuasive texts<br />

and implementing explicit teaching of a range of spoken and<br />

written persuasive texts;<br />

• establish a school benchmark in persuasive writing;<br />

• analyse school benchmarking results collected biannually<br />

Yr K -6 (T1 and T3) and NAPLAN data to identify specific<br />

areas of student need and tailor programs to address these<br />

requirements;<br />

• identify and promote the collaborative use of appropriate<br />

teaching resources relevant to the target;<br />

• continue the Best Start program in Kindergarten;<br />

• use Best Start Software to plot K-2 students on Literacy<br />

Continuum for reading and writing;<br />

• introduce the Literacy Continuum for Assessment and Planning<br />

(K-6) and<br />

• commence the L3 program for students in Kindergarten.<br />

25


<strong>School</strong> Priority 2 - Numeracy<br />

Outcome for 2012 – 2014<br />

To improve student knowledge, skills and understanding<br />

in numeracy.<br />

2012 Target to achieve this outcome include:<br />

• Retain or increase the percentage of students in the higher<br />

bands in NAPLAN numeracy with Year 3 students meeting<br />

or exceeding the Year 3 2009-11 average of 74.0% and<br />

Year 5 meeting or exceeding the Year 5 2009-11 average<br />

of 68.0%<br />

Strategies to achieve these targets include:<br />

• analyse NAPLAN data to identify specific areas of student<br />

need and tailor programs to address these requirements;<br />

• analyse pre and post school based K-6 assessments in<br />

number where students apply higher order thinking skills<br />

and processes when working mathematically to solve word<br />

problems involving a minimum of two of the four operations;<br />

• development of quality K-6 teaching and learning programs<br />

that investigate a range of interrelated working<br />

mathematically processes (questioning, applying strategies,<br />

communicating, reasoning and reflecting) across all<br />

strands of mathematics when developing new concepts<br />

and skills, when consolidating ideas and when applying<br />

mathematics to a range of activities including real life situations;<br />

• introduce class assessment journals (Yr 3-6) where students<br />

explain and justify their chosen strategies for solving<br />

tasks;<br />

• review the teaching and evaluation of working mathematically<br />

K -6 with particular focus on implementation of explicit<br />

teaching skills that relate to working mathematically;<br />

• identify and promote the collaborative use of appropriate<br />

teaching resources relevant to the target and<br />

• collegially share student work samples and effective<br />

teaching strategies in staff and stage meetings.<br />

26


<strong>School</strong> Priority 3 - Quality Teaching<br />

Outcome for 2012 – 2014<br />

To improve student performance by increasing<br />

teacher confidence, knowledge and skills<br />

in providing teaching and learning experiences<br />

that include all elements of the Quality Teaching<br />

Framework.<br />

2012 Targets to achieve this outcome include:<br />

• embed the Quality Teaching Framework in all learning<br />

and teaching practices and<br />

• develop students to become better self-regulated learners<br />

by providing differentiated curriculum provisions and<br />

options for all students.<br />

Strategies to achieve these targets include:<br />

• foster and implement Quality Teaching elements in all<br />

classrooms;<br />

• share effective teaching strategies to differentiate in staff<br />

and stage meetings and<br />

• modify the curriculum, teaching structures, and teaching<br />

practices in combination to ensure that instruction is relevant,<br />

flexible and responsive to individual student needs<br />

with particular focus on Literacy and Numeracy outcomes.<br />

ABOUT THIS REPORT<br />

In preparing this report information has been gathered<br />

from evaluations conducted during the year, in addition to<br />

the analysis of other information relating to school practice<br />

and student learning outcomes.<br />

The report encompasses the work of a number of school/<br />

parent sub committees.<br />

Mr Huckerby<br />

Principal<br />

SCHOOL CONTACT INFORMATION<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Ryde Rd Pymble NSW 2073<br />

(02) 9498 4644<br />

(02) 9498 4436 (fax)<br />

gordonwest-p.school@det.nsw.edu.au<br />

27


<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong>, Ryde Rd, Pymble NSW 2073 Phone: (02) 9498 4644 Fax: (02) 9498 4436 Email: gordonwest-p.school@det.nsw.edu.au<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!