01.01.2014 Views

2011 Annual School Report - Gordon West Public School

2011 Annual School Report - Gordon West Public School

2011 Annual School Report - Gordon West Public School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NSW Department of Education & Training<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

NSW <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong>s – Leading the way<br />

1


CONTENTS<br />

PRINCIPAL'S MESSAGE<br />

What another great year at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> with so much happening<br />

at our “home away from home!” Every year <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong> seems to become a more dynamic, enthusiastic, exciting<br />

centre of learning with more and more opportunities being<br />

provided for our students.<br />

As I have stated previously the challenge of course is to balance<br />

the extensive range of school activities being offered and<br />

continue to perform at the highest level in school, state and<br />

national tests in literacy, numeracy, technology and science.<br />

I have every confidence that we are up to the challenge.<br />

Our commitment to very high academic, sporting and cultural<br />

standards is being realised with wonderful results in the National<br />

Naplan literacy/numeracy tests. <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> was ranked<br />

19th overall of the 2070 NSW schools that completed the <strong>2011</strong><br />

Naplan tests in the Sydney Morning Herald’s ranking schedule.<br />

We have also successfully participated in district PSSA and an<br />

inspiring “Showcase at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong>” concert where the talents<br />

of our dance, drama and band programs were highlighted.<br />

The introduction of electronic whiteboards across all classes<br />

in the school, the installation of two interactive classrooms and<br />

the employment of specialist technology teachers certainly<br />

provides an extra dimension to the teaching/learning cycle<br />

across all key learning areas.<br />

Our Sustainability Environment program has been very successful<br />

in making the school community aware and proactive<br />

in caring for our environment.<br />

A very active and involved parent community continued to work<br />

closely with the school to provide the best possible opportunities<br />

and facilities for the children of <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong>.<br />

The school is now totally air conditioned thanks to the FRASC<br />

and the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> P&C.<br />

Thank you students, teachers and parents of <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> for<br />

your support over the past 12 months and for making <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong> a great place to be. We look forward to an even bigger<br />

and better 2012.<br />

Jim Huckerby B.A.<br />

Principal<br />

.<br />

2


P&C MESSAGE<br />

The P&C had another very successful year. The "Five Year<br />

Business Plan for expenditure for the P&C" was updated in<br />

<strong>2011</strong>, with all parents invited to participate. Air-conditioning for<br />

the library, library staff room, and associated break-out room<br />

achieved highest priority for early 2012. Lights to illuminate the<br />

path to Pee Wee Park were also put on the 2012 agenda. The<br />

Plan also channels $5K into a "Special Education Program"<br />

in 2013, with staff to decide one area from science, music,<br />

drama, art or literature. The P&C again continued their commitment<br />

to the provision of the Special Needs Teachers at <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong>, on an annual basis.<br />

The Fund Raising & Social Committee (FRASC), under the<br />

leadership of Mrs Megan Guenther, again performed well, despite<br />

the unfavourable economic climate. With $40K raised,<br />

and $15K expenses, the FRASC contributed $25K net to the<br />

P&C funds in <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The P&C continued to provide for the Canteen and sadly<br />

ended the year with the resignation of the Canteen Manager,<br />

Mrs Una Fong, after 8 years of exemplary management and<br />

service. The P&C was very sorry to see Mrs Fong's departure.<br />

The provision of the Clothing Pool was also overseen by the<br />

P&C. Mrs Kim McPartlin continued with her excellent management<br />

of the Clothing Pool, in this now salaried position.<br />

The P&C also continued to manage the delivery of Outside<br />

Of <strong>School</strong> Hours Care, in collaboration with the school. Communication<br />

with the school community, in reply to the annual<br />

<strong>School</strong> Survey, again involved the participation of the P&C<br />

Communications Officer.<br />

The P&C concluded the review of traffic in Kooyong Street after<br />

extensive research in 2010 and a two term trial of a voluntary<br />

"one-way" system during <strong>2011</strong>. "<strong>West</strong> facing" parking remains<br />

prohibited on the northern kerb of Kooyong, due to council's<br />

compliance with parking laws. In reality, the voluntary system<br />

works well only with continual surveillance by P&C members,<br />

but deteriorates over time, especially on raining days. The P&C<br />

remains committed to advertising a voluntary "one-way" system<br />

in Bulletins once per term. Given that the P&C respects<br />

the interests of the residents of Kooyong Street, as much as<br />

it considers the wishes of the school parents, Kooyong Street<br />

cannot be designated an official one way street, and therefore,<br />

congestion is unfortunately expected into the future.<br />

The P&C at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> continues to contribute substantially<br />

to a strong sense of school community and continues to contribute<br />

to improving the fantastic facilities of this great school.<br />

Parental involvement was encouraging throughout the year.<br />

The P&C looks forward to “fresh blood” in the Office Bearer<br />

positions in 2012.<br />

Alison Gray P&C President<br />

STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE'S<br />

MESSAGE<br />

This year <strong>2011</strong>, has been a brilliant year for the student representative<br />

team. It has been an honour to be selected as school<br />

captains. We will always remember the things we did as the<br />

representatives. We know that we are ready for high school<br />

and we have so many skills that we have learned throughout<br />

primary school that we can use next year.<br />

One of the highlights of <strong>2011</strong> was going to Canberra and the<br />

snow with years five and six. We did so many activities like<br />

going to Questacon, Parliament House, Old Parliament House<br />

and playing in the snow at Mt Blue Cow. We also played many<br />

games throughout the year, which made our year the best<br />

ever.<br />

STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE<br />

COUNCIL 2010<br />

The <strong>2011</strong> SRC have had another successful year of fundraising,<br />

taking care of lost property and being involved in sharing<br />

ideas of the students with the Principal and the whole school.<br />

The SRC ran a Crazy Hair Day and Yellow Daffodil Day raising<br />

money for various charities including the Cancer Council.<br />

We really appreciated the school community’s generosity in<br />

supporting the <strong>2011</strong> charities.<br />

We would like to wish Rachel, Hamish and the prefects good<br />

luck for 2012 and hope they do a good job.<br />

Josh Phillips and Emma Watkins<br />

<strong>School</strong> Captains <strong>2011</strong><br />

3


SCHOOL CONTEXT<br />

Student information<br />

Student attendance is very good at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong>. All absences<br />

must be explained in writing. The school implements the<br />

Department of Education <strong>School</strong> Attendance Policy (2005).<br />

STUDENT ENROLMENT PROFILE<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 <strong>2011</strong><br />

Male 217 231 220 222 228<br />

Female 194 194 201 228 245<br />

Students<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Enrolments<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 <strong>2011</strong><br />

Year<br />

Male Female<br />

STUDENT ATTENDANCE PROFILE<br />

Year 2008 2009 2010 <strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> K 95.9 95.9 96.2<br />

1 96.0 96.4 96.5<br />

2 96.8 95.8 95.6<br />

3 96.2 96.5 96.8<br />

4 97.0 96.5 96.3<br />

5 97.8 96.0 96.4<br />

6 96.7 97.0 96.5<br />

Total 96.1 96.6 96.3 96.3<br />

Region K 96.1 96.0 96.3<br />

1 95.6 95.8 95.7<br />

2 95.8 95.9 95.7<br />

3 95.8 96.1 96.0<br />

4 95.8 96.0 95.8<br />

5 96.0 96.1 95.9<br />

6 95.4 95.7 95.2<br />

Total 95.7 94.7 96.0 95.8<br />

State K 94.3 94.7 94.7<br />

1 93.7 94.2 94.2<br />

2 94.0 94.4 94.2<br />

3 94.1 94.5 94.4<br />

4 94.0 94.5 94.3<br />

5 94.0 94.4 94.2<br />

6 93.6 94.0 93.8<br />

Total 94.1 92.1 94.4 94.3<br />

CLASS SIZES<br />

The following table shows our class sizes as reported at the<br />

<strong>2011</strong> annual class size audit.<br />

Roll Class/Year Total/Year Total in Class<br />

KL K 17 17<br />

KP K 18 18<br />

KS K 18 18<br />

KT K 18 18<br />

1/2P 1 10 22<br />

1C 1 21 21<br />

1L 1 20 20<br />

1M 1 21 21<br />

1/2P 2 12 22<br />

2M 2 25 25<br />

2S 2 25 25<br />

3B 3 27 27<br />

3D 3 27 27<br />

3H 3 27 27<br />

4D 4 31 31<br />

4T 4 30 30<br />

5G 5 33 33<br />

5W 5 32 32<br />

6D 6 30 30<br />

6E 6 29 29<br />

Attendance rate<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

Student attendance rates<br />

2008 2009 2010 <strong>2011</strong><br />

Year<br />

<strong>School</strong> Region State DEC<br />

4


STAFF INFORMATION<br />

It is a requirement that the reporting of information<br />

for all staff must be consistent with privacy<br />

and personal information policies.<br />

Position<br />

Number<br />

Principal 1<br />

Assistant Principal(s) 4<br />

Classroom Teachers 16<br />

Teacher of Emotional<br />

0<br />

Disabilities<br />

Teacher of Mild<br />

0<br />

Intellectual Disabilities<br />

Teacher of Reading<br />

0<br />

Recovery<br />

Support Teacher<br />

2<br />

Learning Assistance<br />

Teacher Librarian 1<br />

Teacher of ESL 1<br />

Counsellor 1<br />

<strong>School</strong> Administrative<br />

& Support Staff<br />

4<br />

(SASS)<br />

Total 30<br />

There are no indigenous members of the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> staff.<br />

Teacher Retention<br />

Staff retention remains high at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong>. The school retained<br />

all staff from 2010. However over the course of the year,<br />

one teacher went on extended leave prior to resigning from<br />

the Department. At the end of <strong>2011</strong> two teachers announced<br />

their pending retirement and one teacher took a year's leave<br />

without pay.<br />

FINANCIAL SUMMARY<br />

This summary covers funds for operating costs and does not<br />

involve expenditure areas such as permanent salaries, building<br />

and major maintenance.<br />

Date of financial summary: 30/11/2010<br />

Income $<br />

Balance brought forward 140 592.50<br />

Global funds 215 471.53<br />

Tied funds 31 827.35<br />

<strong>School</strong> & community sources 308 232.22<br />

Interest 7 295.01<br />

Trust receipts 15 095.95<br />

Canteen 0.00<br />

Total income 718 514.56<br />

Expenditure<br />

Teaching & learning<br />

Key learning areas 126 788.63<br />

Excursions 67 306.98<br />

Extracurricular dissections 105 475.54<br />

Library 9 949.66<br />

Training & development 1 092.04<br />

Tied funds 24 903.36<br />

Casual relief teachers 52 809.80<br />

retained all staff from 2009. However<br />

Administration & office 62 765.06<br />

<strong>School</strong>-operated canteen 0.00<br />

Utilities 48 220.84<br />

Maintenance 37 639.88<br />

Trust accounts 14 282.01<br />

Capital programs 32 975.00<br />

Total expenditure 584 208.80<br />

Balance carried forward 134 305.76<br />

Teacher qualifications<br />

All teaching staff meet the professional requirements for<br />

teaching in NSW public schools.<br />

Qualifications<br />

% of staff<br />

Degree or Diploma 90%<br />

Postgraduate 10%<br />

A full copy of the school’s <strong>2011</strong> financial statement is tabled<br />

at the annual general meeting of the P&C. Further details<br />

concerning the statement can be obtained by contacting the<br />

school.<br />

5


SCHOOL PERFORMANCE<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

ACHIEVEMENTS<br />

CREATIVE ARTS<br />

The school continues to emphasise and excel in the creative<br />

arts.<br />

Visual arts continues to be a priority at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> with learning experiences embedded in the COGs<br />

(Connected Outcome Groups) units used across the school<br />

together with a variety of techniques taught for expressive artworks<br />

K-6.<br />

Dance and Drama components of the creative arts syllabus<br />

are integrated in COGs units developed by the Department of<br />

Education and Training across all classes K-6.<br />

Music and performing arts groups continued in Years 3, 4, 5<br />

and 6. These rotating groups provide a variety of enrichment<br />

activities and learning experiences for students.<br />

Creative arts and music appreciation continued in Years K-2.<br />

All students K-6 engaged in a variety of dance programs<br />

throughout the year. Students from Year 1- 6 benefited from<br />

the expertise of a professional dance teacher.<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>School</strong> Choir<br />

In <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> choristers had the opportunity to be part<br />

of 4 different choirs including the Ryde Spectacular Choir, the<br />

Festival Choir, the Opera House Choir and the Senior Concert<br />

Choir.<br />

The Opera House Choir consisting of 36 Year 6 students,<br />

performed beautifully at the Sydney Opera House in the Bennelong<br />

Concert during Term 3 after successfully auditioning to<br />

be part of a massed choir of 700 students from across New<br />

South Wales.<br />

The Festival Choir consisting of 30 Year 4 students, performed<br />

with a massed choir of 400 public school students at the<br />

Festival of Children’s Music at the Concourse Concert Hall,<br />

Chatswood in October.<br />

The Ryde Spectacular Choir performed at the Sydney Opera<br />

House in Term 4 as part of a group of 600 students from<br />

schools in the Ryde district.<br />

All choirs performed at our annual Showcase performance,<br />

entertaining the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> community with a compilation of<br />

exciting and challenging material from the Ryde Spectacular,<br />

Festival and Opera House choir repertoires. All students have<br />

displayed superb musicianship throughout the year and have<br />

been fantastic musical ambassadors for <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Bands<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Band Programme <strong>2011</strong> involved 120 students,<br />

3 conductors, 13 tutors and 2 parent volunteers. <strong>2011</strong><br />

was the inaugural year for a dedicated jazz band under the<br />

guidance of Peter Walmsley OAM. Two training bands and<br />

Concert Band 1 and 2 were also tutored.<br />

During Term 2 the band performed at the Yamaha Band Festival.<br />

This festival encourages all band members to strive to be<br />

their best. The students were rewarded with gold and silver<br />

awards. The annual band breakfast and lunchtime concerts<br />

and a performance by the jazz band to open our Showcase on<br />

Open Day were highlights of Term 3.<br />

During Term 4 a band intensive was held for all bands with the<br />

year culminating with a great end of year concert held under<br />

the COLA.<br />

Catherine Walmsley<br />

Director of Bands<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Senior Dance Group<br />

In <strong>2011</strong>, 22 dancers from Year 6 were selected to represent<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> in dance. Under the expert tuition of 2 teachers<br />

and a professional dance teacher the group learnt a fabulous<br />

dance choreographed to the music “Disco Inferno”.<br />

At the end of Term 2 the group danced in 3 performances<br />

in the Metropolitan North Dance Festival at Glen St Theatre.<br />

This was a terrific opportunity for them to experience dancing<br />

in a professional situation with students from other schools.<br />

The dance group also performed in the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Showcase.<br />

The group’s final performance was in the Ryde <strong>School</strong>s<br />

Spectacular at The Sydney Opera House.<br />

6


Rugby Union<br />

Children in Years 3 and 4 and Years 5 and 6 fielded three<br />

teams in a Rugby Union Gala Day organised by the ARU<br />

North Sydney Development Team at Cliff Oval. The Junior A<br />

and Senior A teams won their respective divisions and the Senior<br />

B team were runners up.<br />

Touch Football<br />

Two senior teams were entered in the inaugural PSSA Touch<br />

Football competition with the Senior Girls winning their division.<br />

Intra <strong>School</strong> Sport<br />

The intra school sporting programs had another successful<br />

year with the emphasis being placed on a balanced sports<br />

program.<br />

SPORTS<br />

The school entered teams in the Ku-ring-gai Primary <strong>School</strong>s’<br />

Sports Association (PSSA).<br />

Soccer<br />

Both the Junior A and B teams and Senior team played in the<br />

Division 1 competition with all three teams playing in their respective<br />

Grand Finals. The Junior A team and the Senior team<br />

became Premiers.<br />

Snowsport<br />

Two children represented the school at the Northern NSW Interschools<br />

Snowsports Championships.<br />

Tennis<br />

Over one hundred children received private coaching from<br />

Tennis Advantage, our resident tennis professionals. Children<br />

were sent to the Kuringai Zone tennis trials with two children<br />

progressing to Area. Teams of children competed in the Northern<br />

Suburbs Tennis Association Primary <strong>School</strong>s Challenge<br />

with one <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> team winning the masters challenge.<br />

Cricket<br />

Both Junior and Senior teams played in the Division 1 competition.<br />

One girl became a member of the NSWPSSA Girls<br />

State Cricket team.<br />

Netball<br />

Three of our eight teams reached the Grand Finals with the<br />

Senior 4 team becoming Zone Premiers. One child represented<br />

our zone at the Area Carnival.<br />

Modball<br />

The Junior and Senior teams played in the Division 1 competition<br />

with the Junior team progressing to the Semi Finals.<br />

Swimming<br />

Our team finished 5th in the overall point score at the Zone<br />

Carnival. Two students represented our zone at the Area Carnival.<br />

Cross Country<br />

Our school team participated in the Zone Cross Country Carnival<br />

at St Ives Showground. Three children progressed to the<br />

Sydney North Area Carnival at Gosford, with one student progressing<br />

to the State Carnival.<br />

Athletics<br />

Our school finished 5th in the overall point score at the Zone<br />

Carnival. Fourteen children progressed to the Area Carnival at<br />

Homebush. Two children progressed to the NSWPSSA State<br />

Championships.<br />

Rugby League<br />

Children in Years 2-4 participated in clinics run by the ARL<br />

Development Team and over 30 children completed the Kids<br />

to Kangaroos Coaching Clinic.<br />

7


ACADEMIC<br />

In the National Assessment Program, the results across years 3, 5, 7 and 9 literacy and numeracy assessments are reported on<br />

a scale from Band 1 to Band 10. The achievement scale represents increasing levels of skills and understanding demonstrated in<br />

the assessments. Year 3 students can achieve to Band 6, while Year 5 students can attain to Band 8. The Commonwealth Government<br />

sets minimum standards for reading, writing, grammar and punctuation, spelling and numeracy for years 3, 5, 7 and 9.<br />

The performance of our students is compared to a National Minimum Standard (NMS). The percentages of our students at or<br />

above these standards are reported below.<br />

Year 3 NAPLAN - Reading<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 517.3 467.9 415.6<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 0 3 9 13 50<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 4.0 12.0 17.3 66.7<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.4 1.1 6.8 16.2 26.7 48.9<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.1 4.0 9.2 17.2 20.9 47.6<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 4.6 12.2 19.4 21.1 16.6 26.2<br />

Year 3 NAPLAN - Writing<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 485.6 455.3 422.4<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 0 0 3 38 35<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 50.0 46.1<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.5 2.1 5.7 15.5 45.7 30.5<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 2.5 5.0 14.4 21.7 40.7 15.8<br />

70<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Reading<br />

60<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Writing<br />

Percentage of students<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Percentage of students<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

8


Year 3 NAPLAN - Spelling<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 489.1 461.0 415.5<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 0 1 9 26 40<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 1.3 11.8 34.2 52.6<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 21.6 29.9<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.9 2.6 9.9 15.9 28.0 42.6<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 4.4 7.9 19.4 20.3 24.8 23.1<br />

Year 3 NAPLAN - Grammar and Punctuation<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 530.7 481.8 422.9<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 0 3 5 10 58<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 3.9 6.6 13.2 76.3<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.0 0.4 4.9 9.7 21.6 29.9<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.3 2.0 7.1 18.4 23.7 47.5<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 5.6 7.8 16.2 24.2 20.7 25.5<br />

60<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Spelling<br />

100<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Grammar & Punctuation<br />

Percentage of students<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Percentage of students<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

NOTE: SSG = Statistically Similar Group<br />

The 'Percentage in Band' and '<strong>School</strong> Average' columns are not shown if results are available for less than 10<br />

students.<br />

State average band distributions do not include students who were exempted from the tests.<br />

9


Year 3 NAPLAN - Numeracy numeracy<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 483.8 445.0 400.9<br />

\ Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number in Band 0 1 2 11 21 40<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 1.3 2.7 14.7 28.0 53.3<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.0 1.1 7.5 17.7 30.5 43.2<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.9 4.5 11.3 23.6 27.2 32.5<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 3.5 13.6 20.8 25.7 20.0 16.4<br />

60<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 3 Numeracy<br />

Percentage of students<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

10


Year 5 NAPLAN - Reading<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 550.6 546.2 489.0<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 1 1 8 9 22 21<br />

Percentage in Band 1.6 1.6 12.9 14.5 35.5 33.9<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.5 2.3 18.2 19.5 32.3 27.3<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.3 3.1 15.4 20.8 26.9 32.6<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 8.8 12.6 27.0 19.9 17.5 14.3<br />

Year 5 NAPLAN - Writing<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 520.2 525.2 486.6<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 0 0 13 29 16 4<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 0.0 21.0 46.8 25.8 6.5<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.1 2.8 19.8 31.5 25.3 19.5<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 5.6 8.4 32.7 29.2 15.7 8.4<br />

40<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Reading<br />

50<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Writing<br />

Percentage of students<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Percentage of students<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

NOTE: SSG = Statistically Similar Group<br />

The 'Percentage in Band' and '<strong>School</strong> Average' columns are not shown if results are available for less than 10<br />

students.<br />

State average band distributions do not include students who were exempted from the tests.<br />

11


Year 5 NAPLAN - Spelling<br />

\<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 548.9 538.0 493.7<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 0 1 6 14 25 16<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 1.6 9.7 22.6 40.3 25.8<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.5 2.3 10.9 20.5 37.7 28.2<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.7 3.1 13.8 26.0 29.6 26.9<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 5.8 10.1 25.2 25.7 20.2 13.1<br />

Year 5 NAPLAN - Grammar and Punctuation<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 590.1 558.6 500.7<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 1 0 LSGs (Like 2 <strong>School</strong> Groups) 9 are schools 23from a similar 27socio<br />

Percentage in Band 1.6 0.0 economic 3.2area.<br />

14.5 37.1 43.5<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.5 0.5 6.8 15.0 35.5 41.8<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 1.3 2.7 11.2 20.2 33.4 31.3<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 8.0 10.0 22.1 22.4 22.6 14.8<br />

50<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Spelling<br />

50<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Grammar & Punctuation<br />

Percentage of students<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Percentage of students<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

12


Year 5 NAPLAN - Numeracy<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average score, <strong>2011</strong> 562.8 554.7 495.9<br />

Skill Band Distribution<br />

Band 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Number in Band 0 1 3 17 11 29<br />

Percentage in Band 0.0 1.6 4.9 27.9 18.0 47.5<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong> 0.0 2.3 8.2 24.2 29.2 36.1<br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 0.8 2.7 13.6 27.5 19.8 35.6<br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong> 5.0 11.3 28.8 27.6 12.4 14.8<br />

50<br />

Percentage in bands:<br />

Year 5 Numeracy<br />

Percentage of students<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Bands<br />

Percentage in Band<br />

<strong>School</strong> Average 2008-<strong>2011</strong><br />

SSG % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

State DEC % in Band <strong>2011</strong><br />

Learn and Advance<br />

13


Average progress in Reading<br />

between Year 3 and 5*<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> 90.0 85.4<br />

SSG \<br />

88.0 76.3<br />

State DEC 83.7 74.0<br />

Average progress in Spelling<br />

between Year 3 and 5*<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> 95.9 75.8<br />

SSG 82.8 73.4<br />

State DEC 84.5 75.4<br />

Average progress in Reading between<br />

Year 3 and 5<br />

Average progress in Spelling between<br />

Year 3 and 5<br />

100<br />

150<br />

Progress<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Progress<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

Average progress in Numeracy<br />

between Year 3 and 5*<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> 104.8 100.1<br />

SSG 97.0 104.6<br />

State DEC 89.6 95.8<br />

Average progress in Grammar and<br />

Punctuation between Year 3 and 5*<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> 72.6 91.8<br />

SSG 100.6 90.0<br />

State DEC 96.6 82.7<br />

Average progress in Numeracy between<br />

Year 3 and 5<br />

150<br />

150<br />

Average progress in Grammar &<br />

Punctuation between Year 3 and 5<br />

Progress<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Progress<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

0<br />

2008-2010 2009-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

<strong>School</strong> SSG State DEC<br />

* Average progress data is for matched students<br />

from within the school.<br />

Note: Average progress for Writing 2009-<strong>2011</strong> is not<br />

displayed due to the change in the Writing scale<br />

from Narrative to Persuasive.<br />

14


National Benchmarks<br />

The Commonwealth Government sets minimum desirable<br />

standards for reading, writing and numeracy at particular ages.<br />

These are referred to as national benchmarks.<br />

Percentage of Year 3 students achieving at or<br />

above minimum standard<br />

(exempt students included)<br />

Reading 100.0<br />

Writing 100.0<br />

Spelling 100.0<br />

Grammar and Punctuation 100.0<br />

Numeracy 100.0<br />

Percentage of Year 5 students achieving at or<br />

above minimum standard<br />

(exempt students included)<br />

Reading 98.4<br />

Writing 100.0<br />

Spelling 100.0<br />

Grammar and Punctuation 98.4<br />

Numeracy 100.0<br />

15


SIGNIFICANT PROGRAMS AND<br />

INITIATIVES<br />

• participation in an overnight Year 4 visit to the Sydney Academy<br />

of Sport;<br />

• participation in a Year 5 & 6 excursion to Canberra and the<br />

Snowy Mountains;<br />

• participation and high level of achievement of senior students<br />

in the University of NSW Science and Computer competitions;<br />

• participation and high level of achievement in district, state<br />

and national competitions, including Australian <strong>School</strong>s English<br />

and Mathematics competitions and the Maths Olympiad;<br />

• celebration of Book Week with author visits in July;<br />

• Year 4 venturing to Blackbutt Creek to learn about Aboriginal<br />

culture and history with an educational officer from the Aboriginal<br />

Heritage Office;<br />

• selected Year 6 students attended the <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Speaking<br />

Competition organised by the N.S.W Premier’s Office;<br />

• Year 3 travelled to Kurnell to learn about where Captain Cook<br />

landed in Australia;<br />

• Year 1 went on an excursion to Long Reef as part of Year 1’s<br />

HSIE unit on Shelter;<br />

• Kindergarten to Year 2 visited the Australian Museum;<br />

• a continuing high profile for the Student Representative Council<br />

(SRC) in fundraising for Stewart House, Cancer Council ,<br />

and by fostering leadership and peer support;<br />

• full school participation in the celebration of <strong>Public</strong> Education<br />

Day;<br />

• Year 6 competed in the <strong>2011</strong> Children’s Book Council of Australia<br />

N.S.W branch on Screen Competition with 3 groups of<br />

Year 6 students nominated as shortlisted finalists;<br />

• presentation of a Performing Arts Showcase during Education<br />

Week where every child in the school was involved in this<br />

wonderful display of performing arts;<br />

• as part of the Creative and Performing Arts program, The<br />

Ceroc and Modern Jive Dance Company worked with children<br />

from Years 1-6;<br />

• continuation of the very successful school reunion celebration<br />

for children completing their year 12 in <strong>2011</strong> who attended<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong>;<br />

• implementation of our ever popular Easter Hat Parade, where<br />

a fabulous collection of hats, baskets, sandwich boards and<br />

masks were on display for the very large number of parents<br />

and grandparents in attendance;<br />

• continuation of our very successful Grandparent’s Day where<br />

many grandparents visited the school;<br />

• celebration of Harmony Day by children participating in a variety<br />

of activities and culminating in a whole school assembly;<br />

and<br />

• Year 6 participated in Murder under the Microscope an exciting<br />

online environment project.<br />

ABORIGINAL EDUCATION<br />

Aboriginal Education remains an integral part of the curriculum<br />

at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong>. We aim to complement and<br />

reflect the elements of the Aboriginal Education and Training<br />

Policy including building increased knowledge and understanding<br />

of Aboriginal Australia.<br />

In <strong>2011</strong> K-6 students were provided with opportunities to develop<br />

deeper understandings of Aboriginal histories, cultures<br />

and languages through cross curriculum content including literature,<br />

Creative and Practical Arts and Human Society and its<br />

Environment. In support of the Aboriginal education outcomes<br />

included in the HSIE syllabus, Year 4 students attended an excursion<br />

to Blackbutts Reserve with an educational officer from<br />

the Aboriginal Heritage Office to learn about local Aboriginal<br />

culture and history including tools and the use of endemic plant<br />

for food and medicine.<br />

During weekly flag raising assemblies and other formal occasions<br />

staff and students were provided with opportunities to<br />

show respect for the Aboriginal community past and present<br />

through the Custodianship of Country Acknowledgement.<br />

MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION<br />

Multicultural Education is embraced in the school’s curriculum.<br />

Students whose first language is not English may require<br />

assistance in improving their English level. The English as a<br />

Second Language (ESL) program is aimed at developing students’<br />

English language competence to a level where they can<br />

participate fully at school and complete the required learning<br />

outcomes.<br />

The program is delivered in various ways to meet the different<br />

needs of students at various stages of learning English.<br />

An ESL teacher conducts this program 2 days per week and<br />

collaborates with class teachers to cater for individual student<br />

requirements. Thirty three students were enrolled in the ESL<br />

program in <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

DEBATING<br />

A hardworking debating team represented <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> in <strong>2011</strong>. The team consisted of 6 students from Stage 3.<br />

The competition was demanding. The team learnt a lot about<br />

debating and were presented with some challenging topics,<br />

having to work hard as a team to formulate their case for each<br />

debate.<br />

The children are to be commended on their ability to work collaboratively<br />

to discuss ideas, agree on what they consider to<br />

be strong, supportive ideas for their debate and their positive<br />

attitude and encouragement of fellow teammates.<br />

16


TECHNOLOGY<br />

With the increase in classes at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> in <strong>2011</strong> there was<br />

a need to increase the Computer timetable from two to three<br />

days. Mr Graeme Coates took up the extra one day position.<br />

Mr Coates has many years experience in this field and has<br />

brought with him a wealth of expertise which has enriched the<br />

ICT program.<br />

Kindergarten, Year 1 and Year 2 attend lessons each week<br />

whilst Years 3, 4, 5 and 6 continue to attend once a term for<br />

5 weeks for a longer period of time. At <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> the ICT<br />

program is fully integrated into the school’s teaching and learning<br />

program. We believe ICT can have a positive outcome on<br />

student learning and understanding and that it can assist in<br />

student motivation and engagement.<br />

In <strong>2011</strong>, students from Kindergarten from to Year 6 learnt, reviewed<br />

or extended their skills using the Microsoft Office package.<br />

Activities included word processing, spreadsheets and<br />

presentations using PowerPoint and writing booklets, posters<br />

and calendars using Microsoft Publisher. Several grades enjoyed<br />

designing multimedia projects using MovieMaker and<br />

Photostory whilst others explored programs such as Google<br />

Earth, Kidspiration and Kidpix. Students from Years 3 to 6<br />

learnt how to manipulate photographs in a variety of ways using<br />

Photoshop.<br />

Year 6 entered a few competitions this year with the highlight<br />

being the “Picture Book” competition run by the CBCA. Three<br />

groups were chosen as finalists and together with Mrs Pickup,<br />

Miss Papic and several parents, attended the presentation<br />

at the Teachers’ Federation Auditorium in Surry Hills. <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong>'s The Bush Jumper came in 3rd, The Gobbling Tree 4th<br />

and Max 5th. The seniors participated in Google’s design competition<br />

‘Doodle 4 Google’ where young people from across<br />

Australia were invited to design their own doodle based on<br />

this year’s theme ‘My Future Australia’. The best doodles were<br />

voted on by the public and one winner had the honour of having<br />

their doodle displayed on the Google Australia homepage<br />

for a day. Our students came up with some excellent designs.<br />

Year 6 also entered Murder Under the Microscope, an interactive<br />

environmental online competition developed by the Department<br />

of Education and were successful in correctly solving the<br />

ficticous eco crime.<br />

With an extra “lab” of computers available in the library this<br />

year, students also had the opportunity to extend their research<br />

skills using a variety of different search engines.<br />

PROGRESS ON <strong>2011</strong> TARGETS<br />

Target 1<br />

Numeracy K-6 Space and Geometry – 2 and 3 Dimensional<br />

Space<br />

To increase student capacity to identify, describe and manipulate,<br />

using mathematical language, 2D and 3D space.<br />

Our achievements include:<br />

After the review of 2010 NAPLAN results, teachers at <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong> identified a weakness in the area of Space and Geometry,<br />

2D and 3D space for both Years 3 and 5. There was a<br />

decrease in the percentage of students in band 6 (Year 3) and<br />

band 8 (Year 5). Teachers began with the review of outcome<br />

statements to develop a shared vision and understanding of<br />

the skills of this curriculum area. A pre test was implemented<br />

which consisted of 2D and 3D space questions from past NA-<br />

PLAN papers (Years 2-6) and practical lessons (K-1). In stage<br />

groups, teachers analysed results and identified concepts requiring<br />

development.<br />

Two members of staff attended a DET inservice which provided<br />

schools with practical lesson plans and resources across the<br />

K-6 Space and Geometry continuum. Teachers collaboratively<br />

planned practical lessons with a focus on real life applications<br />

based on pre test data. Using ‘Teaching Space and Geometry<br />

K-6’ teachers designed explicit teaching and learning activities<br />

to improve students ability to identify, describe and manipulate<br />

using mathematical language in the areas of 2D and 3D space.<br />

A resource kit was compiled for use in the future.<br />

Late in Term 3, teachers conducted assessments including post<br />

testing (Years 2-6) and teacher observation (K-6). The results<br />

of these tests were compared with pre test data to ascertain the<br />

effectiveness of the intervention. The statistical data highlighted<br />

success of the intervention program. Through the collegial<br />

sharing of data, teachers reflected on the broad applications of<br />

this skill base across all key learning areas. They recognised<br />

the importance of consistent and frequent exposure in a variety<br />

of contexts to ensure students attain a thorough understanding<br />

of these often abstract concepts. Teachers commented that it<br />

was imperative to provide students with a variety of opportunities<br />

to touch, feel and manipulate shapes and objects in order<br />

to fully understand their properties. While appropriate resources<br />

took time to plan and organise, teachers remarked that the<br />

practical lessons were well received by students and encouraged<br />

positive mathematical language exchange.<br />

Target 2<br />

Literacy K-6 Writing – Persuasive Text<br />

To improve student knowledge, skills and understandings of<br />

persuasive texts.<br />

Our achievements include:<br />

Following 2010 NAPLAN analysis with K-6 staff, Michelle Mawer,<br />

DET English consultant visited <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> PS in Term 1 to<br />

discuss purposes of persuasive text, elements of persuasion,<br />

language devices and grammatical elements to achieve success<br />

when working with this text type. Staff found the discussion<br />

on the dissection of NAPLAN marking guide particularly<br />

useful.<br />

Through modelling of persuasive written and spoken texts using<br />

previous BST and ELLA marking guides, teachers provided<br />

students with a range of interesting and challenging work<br />

samples to motivate and introduce them to what delineates an<br />

effective, sustained argument.<br />

Teachers collected examples of persuasive text used in advertisements<br />

and newspaper articles, critiqued peer work samples<br />

and gave students opportunities to evaluate or give judgments<br />

through explicit spoken and written learning activities.<br />

Staff were encouraged to attend various professional learning<br />

opportunities to improve their knowledge and skills in teaching<br />

persuasive text. In Terms 2 and 3, <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> K-6 staff<br />

were inserviced by experienced teachers who informed them<br />

about available resources including websites and publications.<br />

Successful teaching and learning strategies were also shared.<br />

In Term 3, 2 members of staff attended the Northern Sydney<br />

Regional debating inservice which highlighted the link between<br />

persuasive text and debating.<br />

17


Following this professional learning, <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> staff were<br />

educated about the PEEL method and the progression from<br />

Stage 2 comparison style topics to Stage 3 political / change<br />

debates. Year 1 teachers provided students with opportunities<br />

to practise their ability to support an opinion or point of<br />

view and shared work samples with the K-6 staff. As part of<br />

the <strong>2011</strong> Turramurra Learning Community project, Year 4 students<br />

completed reflective journals, encouraging the use of<br />

persuasive language devices following play building experiences<br />

in drama.<br />

Target 3<br />

Literacy Target <strong>2011</strong> – Eco-garden Literacy<br />

Program K-2<br />

To expand and incorporate all aspects of literacy K-2 into<br />

teaching and learning programs using the eco garden as<br />

a learnscape by developing a teaching resource bank for<br />

spoken and written texts to improve student literacy learning<br />

outcomes.<br />

Our achievements include:<br />

The Literacy target’s K-2 focus was to expand and incorporate<br />

all aspects of the literacy K-2 into the teaching and learning<br />

programs using the eco-garden as a learnscape by developing<br />

a teaching resource bank for spoken and written texts to<br />

improve student literacy outcomes.<br />

At combined stage meetings K-2 teachers determined the<br />

English syllabus outcomes which would be addressed through<br />

interaction in and with the eco-garden. K-2 teachers brainstormed<br />

relevant literacy teaching and learning activities<br />

based on the Quality Teaching Framework. Following these<br />

initial discussions two K-2 teachers attended a professional<br />

development course at the Botanical Gardens and returned to<br />

share their knowledge with colleagues. At subsequent stage<br />

and grade meetings and across stage levels K-2 student work<br />

samples were shared and discussed to show the progression<br />

in writing and the development and interpretation of visual literacy.<br />

During Term 2 student work samples were also presented<br />

at a K-6 staff meeting for broader professional learning.<br />

Students and K -2 teachers were involved in planting, maintaining,<br />

observing, recording and utilising the eco garden as<br />

a tool for real and relevant learning beyond the classroom in<br />

the outdoor environment. Teaching and learning programs incorporated<br />

many learning experiences in the eco garden as a<br />

stimulus for literacy learning including talking and listening, visual<br />

literacy and writing of various text types including description,<br />

recount, persuasive text, narrative and poetry. Student<br />

work samples demonstrated enhanced vocabulary and an<br />

increased understanding and interpretation of visual literacy.<br />

The Quality Teaching dimensions of Intellectual Quality, Quality<br />

Learning Environment and Significance were embedded in<br />

the teaching and learning programs.<br />

Teachers and students further developed their communication<br />

skills of questioning, reasoning, and critical thinking through<br />

the various opportunities to share dialogue about the literacy<br />

outcomes. These experiences contributed to the development<br />

of rubrics for the assessment of persuasive texts.<br />

Target 4<br />

Literacy through Drama – Turramurra Learning<br />

Community Project <strong>2011</strong><br />

Using the dramatic skills (playbuilding) taught, students will<br />

develop deep knowledge and deep understanding of the<br />

concept focus and use drama to further develop their literacy<br />

skills.<br />

Our achievements include:<br />

The focus of the <strong>2011</strong> Turramurra Learning Community project<br />

was to use drama strategies to enhance student’s English and<br />

literacy outcomes. The program focused on the professional<br />

learning of primary teachers to enhance the creative and literacy<br />

processes of their students through the use of educational<br />

drama as the medium for improving students’ English<br />

and literacy outcomes.<br />

In Term 1, <strong>2011</strong> Year 4 teachers at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> identified<br />

relevant literacy outcomes derived from current state syllabus<br />

documents and an analysis of the students’ needs. The syllabus<br />

outcomes selected included students undertaking and<br />

sustaining roles in a variety of drama forms to express meaning<br />

in a wide range of imagined situations, performing in improvisations,<br />

incorporating elements of drama (focus, space,<br />

character, mood, movement, dramatic tension) and vocal<br />

skills, creating meaning for an audience and reflecting on and<br />

discussing the effectiveness of their own work and the work of<br />

others. Participating teachers identified that Year 4 students<br />

could benefit from improvement in their expressive oral language<br />

skills, their understanding and use of expressive and<br />

descriptive language, their confidence in writing texts and their<br />

capacity to develop the use of imagery and the elaboration of<br />

ideas in their persuasive and descriptive writing.<br />

The program was attended by <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Year 4 teachers<br />

and students throughout <strong>2011</strong>. With the professional assistance<br />

from Turramurra High <strong>School</strong>’s drama department,<br />

relevant drama strategies and authentic literary texts were<br />

incorporated into a series of drama lessons. Through these<br />

transformative learning opportunities the students engaged<br />

in curriculum and educational experiences that promoted creativity,<br />

innovation, cultural appreciation and personal values.<br />

The <strong>2011</strong> Turramurra Learning Community project culminated<br />

in Term 4 with a collaborative workshop presented and coordinated<br />

by Year 9 Turramurra High <strong>School</strong> drama students.<br />

The <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> teachers were very positive about the professional<br />

learning and the improved student literacy outcomes<br />

of their students involved in the program. The teachers reported<br />

a growth in confidence, understanding and expertise in<br />

using drama strategies in their programming and recognised<br />

that many of the learning activities undertaken corresponded<br />

closely with important life skills including persistence, listening<br />

with understanding and empathy, metacognition, striving<br />

for accuracy, questioning and problem posing, finding humour,<br />

taking responsible risks and creating, imagining and innovating.<br />

Through drama exercises students were encouraged to<br />

be active rather than passive learners. They demonstrated<br />

increased levels of attention, retention and enjoyment in the<br />

act of learning through drama. Following each drama session,<br />

students wrote reflection journal entries and pieces of<br />

persuasive and descriptive writing. They learnt to draft, revise,<br />

proofread and published well structured texts based on these<br />

creative experiences and showed development in their literacy<br />

skills in terms of their ideas, audience and written language<br />

features.<br />

18


KEY EVALUATIONS<br />

It is a requirement for all NSW public schools to conduct at<br />

least two annual evaluations – one related to educational and<br />

management practice and the other related to curriculum. The<br />

school has adopted a cyclical approach to the evaluation of the<br />

six areas of education and management practices to ensure<br />

that it operates at a highly efficient level.<br />

Educational and Management<br />

Practice<br />

Culture<br />

Background<br />

Enhancing the quality of the school’s management practices<br />

and improving the learning outcomes of all students are key<br />

educational objectives.<br />

The survey tool <strong>School</strong>Map, developed by the Department of<br />

Education and Training (DET) was used to collect information.<br />

The primary purpose of the <strong>School</strong>Map best practice statements<br />

is to provide a framework for analysis of the operation<br />

of schools in six key areas. The statements are based on the<br />

findings of research and the views of a wide cross section of<br />

teachers, parents and students about current practices and<br />

potential best practice in schools.<br />

<strong>School</strong>Map best practice statements were used to evaluate<br />

school management at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> with regard to school improvement<br />

performance, major and minor changes to school<br />

programs, monitoring and evaluation of programs, student and<br />

staff welfare, teacher professional development, school organisation,<br />

financial management and communication.<br />

Responses were collated under strongly agree, agree, neutral,<br />

disagree and strongly disagree.<br />

The <strong>School</strong>Map evaluation instrument was used to evaluate<br />

whether:<br />

1. The school is continually looking at ways to improve its performance.<br />

2. The school continually makes minor changes to its programs<br />

to improve what it does.<br />

3. The school makes major changes from time to time to improve<br />

what it does.<br />

4. The school regularly measures the success of its programs.<br />

5. The educational needs of all students are met by the school.<br />

6. The school care about the students and the discipline is fair.<br />

7. The staff at the school are valued and supported.<br />

8. Teachers undertake extra training to improve their classroom<br />

teaching.<br />

9. The school is well organised.<br />

10. The allocation of money and other resources is managed<br />

effectively.<br />

Findings and Conclusions<br />

Staff<br />

The school set preliminary targets before administering the<br />

tests. The school expectation was that at least 80% of teachers<br />

would respond ‘Strongly Agree’ or ‘Agree’ to the statements<br />

in the area of <strong>School</strong> Management.<br />

The staff response to the best practice statements was over<br />

80% for eight of the ten statements with responses to Question<br />

3 and 8 at 75%. These statements related to major change<br />

(Question 3) and systematically planned professional development<br />

(Question 8).<br />

Parents<br />

A total of 89 parents responded to the <strong>School</strong>Map best practice<br />

survey. Parent responses were very positive. Responses<br />

of strongly agree/agree were selected for 8 of the 10 statements<br />

with each of these receiving over 80% combined. The 2<br />

statements which rated less positively were “The educational<br />

needs of all students are met by the school” (56%) and “The<br />

school makes major changes from time to time to improve<br />

what it does.” (57%)<br />

Some parents surveyed believe the school could further improve<br />

in the area of meeting the needs of all students. Currently<br />

the school employs a specialist learning support teacher<br />

and three learning support teachers’ aides to work closely with<br />

our students who require additional assistance. The $30,000<br />

received annually from the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> Parents and Citizens<br />

in addition to a similar amount funded by the school makes<br />

the Learning Support program the most financially resourced<br />

of all the school programs. Currently this additional learning<br />

support focuses on improving student literacy skills. With the<br />

need to maximise the use of these available funds, the school<br />

prioritises students who need support in literacy as developing<br />

a student’s reading comprehension skills is beneficial to progressing<br />

their proficiency in both literacy and numeracy.<br />

The school’s vision is “to be seen as a school of excellence,<br />

with a definite purpose and direction” and continues to excel<br />

academically, on the sporting field and in cultural pursuits. Our<br />

achievements are in part due to the strong, ongoing efficient<br />

and effective management of the school. While this stability<br />

and success creates little necessity to make major management<br />

changes, <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> is always looking at ways to improve<br />

and refine its existing organisational processes.<br />

Students<br />

A total of 120 students from Year 5 and 6 were surveyed.<br />

Overall the survey results indicated that the students at <strong>Gordon</strong><br />

<strong>West</strong> were generally positive to the school’s management<br />

practices. The responses relating to the allocation of finances,<br />

student welfare and major school change were statements<br />

scoring 60%. The remaining seven statement responses<br />

scored over 75%.<br />

Future Directions<br />

The evaluation of survey results identified certain areas for future<br />

development including the need for the school to:<br />

• Greater involvement by staff in the decision making and leadership<br />

roles.<br />

• Ensure all staff update their professional learning plans annually,<br />

and<br />

• Investigate implementing additional communication strategies<br />

and refining existing practices.<br />

19


Curriculum<br />

Literacy – Writing and Improving<br />

Student Learning<br />

Background<br />

During Terms 2 to 4 <strong>2011</strong>, Year 3, 4 and 5 teachers developed<br />

an action learning project based on current educational research<br />

identifying the major influences that lead to improved<br />

student learning.<br />

Participant teachers commenced the project by reading an<br />

extract from Professor John Hattie’s paper, “Teachers Make<br />

a Difference -What is the research evidence?” and discussed<br />

the research findings. Teachers viewed and discussed the<br />

dimensions identified in the research that distinguish the difference<br />

between expert and experienced teachers. The three<br />

dimensions that Hattie’s research concluded most effectively<br />

separated expert from experienced teachers were challenge,<br />

deep representation and monitoring /feedback.<br />

Findings and Conclusions<br />

Teachers closely reviewed the research and identified how<br />

these most effective teaching strategies could be directly<br />

implemented in their classrooms. A series of writing lessons<br />

focusing on descriptive writing techniques were chosen by<br />

teacher consensus as a focus area for the project. Teachers<br />

used these lessons to practise a range of teaching strategies<br />

and investigate which were the most effective in leading to improved<br />

student learning and engagement and the most manageable,<br />

practical and realistic to implement in the classroom.<br />

Teachers incorporated scaffolded or tiered lesson activities<br />

with a range of challenges built into the task to meet the scope<br />

of student abilities and provided a range of modelled, independent<br />

and guided small group activities. Through negotiation<br />

with students, highly explicit lesson criteria was identified<br />

and presented to the students at the beginning of each writing<br />

lesson and reinforced throughout the lesson. These specific<br />

statements about the quality of work required of students became<br />

clear reference points for the students to develop and<br />

check their own work. Teachers devised a simple system of<br />

assessing student’s work during development as well as on<br />

completion of the task. This was aimed at giving the students<br />

more immediate, meaningful feedback. To assist students to<br />

develop skills in self evaluation, written work samples that illustrated<br />

high quality work were viewed and discussed. Students<br />

evaluated these as part of their learning process.<br />

An improvement in the level of student on task behaviour was<br />

observed and noted by teachers. They identified a substantial<br />

improvement from the pre assessment task level. Students’<br />

improved on task behaviour in group activities included contributing<br />

to group tasks, helping peers and raising questions.<br />

In Term 4 participating teachers presented their finding<br />

and shared their experiences. Teachers shared student<br />

work samples from the action learning experience and<br />

their thoughts about the effectiveness of the teaching<br />

strategies employed.<br />

Future Directions<br />

Teachers have and will continue to reflect on the benefits and<br />

challenges of the project. They will encourage the wider use<br />

of the positive practices realised and incorporate the best<br />

of these ideas into plans for future students’ learning K to 6<br />

across all Key Learning Areas.<br />

<strong>School</strong> General Satisfaction Survey<br />

2010<br />

Every year a sample of families are surveyed in relation to<br />

general school satisfaction. Survey results and follow up strategies/plans<br />

are reported in the school’s fortnightly newsletter.<br />

A total of 100 parents were invited to respond to the <strong>School</strong><br />

Satisfaction Survey with 94% completing all questions. The<br />

survey consisted of a set of 14 statements and 2 questions<br />

which required a written response.<br />

The following statements were presented for response:<br />

1. My child is happy and enjoys being at school.<br />

2. As a parent/guardian I feel welcome at the school.<br />

3. The school encourages students to achieve their best.<br />

4. The school is a caring and nurturing place.<br />

5. The school facilities are clean and well maintained.<br />

6. The office staff are approachable and helpful.<br />

7. The schools processes and procedures address staff welfare<br />

needs.<br />

8. The school values parents' opinions.<br />

9. There are effective lines of communication between home<br />

and school.<br />

10. There are always opportunities to raise concerns or issues<br />

about my child's schooling.<br />

11. I receive helpful information about my child's progress and<br />

achievement.<br />

12. I am comfortable approaching my child's teacher to talk<br />

about his/her progress.<br />

13. The resources and facilities at the school are sufficient to<br />

meet my child's learning needs.<br />

14. Overall I am satisfied with my child's academic progress.<br />

Responses were collated under strongly agree, agree, neutral,<br />

disagree and strongly disagree.<br />

The feedback was extremely positive with responses of<br />

strongly agree and agree selected for 11 of the 14 statements<br />

over 80%. The 3 statements which rated less positively were<br />

“There are effective lines of communication between home<br />

and school (76%), “The school values parents' opinions”<br />

(73%) and “I receive helpful information about my child's progress<br />

and achievement.” (69%)<br />

The following questions were asked:<br />

1. What could the school do better?<br />

2. What is the school doing well?<br />

In reply to the question “What could the school do better?”<br />

a number of parents indicated the need to improve school/<br />

parent communication regarding upcoming school events and<br />

activities. Increased prior knowledge of events could better<br />

assist forward family planning.<br />

22


To address this concern the office staff regularly update the<br />

school’s website under the banner “Term Calendar” which<br />

not only indicates the date on which an event will be held but<br />

contains hyperlinks to further information and the prerequisite<br />

permission notes. The school newsletter, titled The Bulletin<br />

is printed and distributed fortnightly on a Thursday with the<br />

aim to comprehensively inform parents on a range of educational<br />

and organisational matters. In February 2010 an online<br />

version of The Bulletin was attached to the school’s website<br />

allowing for greater access by busy parents. This feature is<br />

proving more popular with an ever increasing volume of families<br />

requesting direct emailing of the Bulletin in <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Another area of parent concern raised in the responses was<br />

the adverse condition of the children’s toilets with particular<br />

reference to odour and lack of soap. These issues have been<br />

attended to with the installation of deodorisers and soap dispensers.<br />

The school, in conjunction with Transfield the DET<br />

cleaning contractors, will continue to monitor and improve the<br />

hygiene and presentation of these high traffic areas of the<br />

school. The school has been allocated an additional 8 hours<br />

of cleaning for 2012, a proportion of which will concentrate on<br />

cleaning toilets.<br />

It was pleasing to read the responses to the question "What is<br />

the school doing well?” with an overwhelming number of comments<br />

expressing the supportive, caring environment created<br />

at <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> and the dedication of the teaching staff to<br />

providing high quality teaching.<br />

Comments relating to positive aspects of the school included<br />

the wide range of high quality, extracurricular activities offered<br />

to students, the strong, friendly community focus and the provision<br />

of quality teaching and learning resources.<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> will continue to improve all aspects of school<br />

management and aim to address the concerns raised by the<br />

school community.<br />

Future Directions<br />

The evaluation of survey results identified certain areas for<br />

future development including the need for the school to:<br />

• Ensure the fortnightly Bulletin newsletter contains all the relevant<br />

information parents need to keep them up to date with<br />

major and minor changes to school programs and procedures<br />

with plenty of notice given for school events.<br />

• Continue to monitor and improve the hygiene and presentation<br />

of all school amenities.<br />

The school communications committee will follow up all suggestions<br />

during 2012 and report their findings to the school<br />

community.<br />

23


<strong>School</strong> Development<br />

2012-2014<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong> continues to have a long term<br />

strategic management plan with a 3 year horizon in addition<br />

to shorter term strategic goals of a 1 year horizon.<br />

The purpose of the <strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>School</strong> Management<br />

Plan is to:<br />

Professional Learning<br />

To ensure continual professional growth, all teachers participated<br />

in training and development based on their individual<br />

needs, as well as school and systemic priorities.<br />

Individual plans for training and development were negotiated<br />

with supervisors.<br />

In <strong>2011</strong> a school priority was to further improve individual<br />

Professional Learning Plans encompassing the key focus<br />

areas of Quality Teaching, Gifted and Talented Education,<br />

Connected Learning, The Australian Curriculum and Leadership<br />

to enhance teacher quality and student learning outcomes<br />

in our school. The success of this project has led to<br />

the continued development of the individual Professional<br />

Learning Plans with all staff in 2012.<br />

The budget for teacher professional learning in <strong>2011</strong> was<br />

$14,298.80<br />

• develop efficient and effective administrative and organisation<br />

policies;<br />

• develop educative policies to support relevant and challenging<br />

learning programs;<br />

• monitor and upgrade resources to support teaching/<br />

learning programs;<br />

• promote professional growth and development of all<br />

teaching staff K-6;<br />

• monitor and reflect on changing trends in education and<br />

adjust planning accordingly; and<br />

• provide for longer term school strategic direction. (3 year<br />

horizon 2012- 2014)<br />

Longer term school strategic directions are closely aligned<br />

with school targets through identified needs based on<br />

analysis of student performance and evaluations in consultation<br />

with the <strong>School</strong> Self Evaluation Committee.<br />

24


SCHOOL PLANNING 2012-2014<br />

<strong>School</strong> Priority 1 - Literacy<br />

Outcome for 2012 – 2014<br />

To improve student knowledge, skills and understanding<br />

in literacy.<br />

2012 Target to achieve this outcome include:<br />

• Retain or increase the percentage of students in the higher<br />

bands in NAPLAN Writing, with Year 3 students meeting or<br />

exceeding the Year 3 2009-11 average of 89.6% and the<br />

Year 5 students meeting or exceeding the Year 5 2009-11<br />

average of 48.6%.<br />

Strategies to achieve these targets include:<br />

• review the teaching and evaluation of writing K -6 with particular<br />

focus on the specific writing criteria of persuasive texts<br />

and implementing explicit teaching of a range of spoken and<br />

written persuasive texts;<br />

• establish a school benchmark in persuasive writing;<br />

• analyse school benchmarking results collected biannually<br />

Yr K -6 (T1 and T3) and NAPLAN data to identify specific<br />

areas of student need and tailor programs to address these<br />

requirements;<br />

• identify and promote the collaborative use of appropriate<br />

teaching resources relevant to the target;<br />

• continue the Best Start program in Kindergarten;<br />

• use Best Start Software to plot K-2 students on Literacy<br />

Continuum for reading and writing;<br />

• introduce the Literacy Continuum for Assessment and Planning<br />

(K-6) and<br />

• commence the L3 program for students in Kindergarten.<br />

25


<strong>School</strong> Priority 2 - Numeracy<br />

Outcome for 2012 – 2014<br />

To improve student knowledge, skills and understanding<br />

in numeracy.<br />

2012 Target to achieve this outcome include:<br />

• Retain or increase the percentage of students in the higher<br />

bands in NAPLAN numeracy with Year 3 students meeting<br />

or exceeding the Year 3 2009-11 average of 74.0% and<br />

Year 5 meeting or exceeding the Year 5 2009-11 average<br />

of 68.0%<br />

Strategies to achieve these targets include:<br />

• analyse NAPLAN data to identify specific areas of student<br />

need and tailor programs to address these requirements;<br />

• analyse pre and post school based K-6 assessments in<br />

number where students apply higher order thinking skills<br />

and processes when working mathematically to solve word<br />

problems involving a minimum of two of the four operations;<br />

• development of quality K-6 teaching and learning programs<br />

that investigate a range of interrelated working<br />

mathematically processes (questioning, applying strategies,<br />

communicating, reasoning and reflecting) across all<br />

strands of mathematics when developing new concepts<br />

and skills, when consolidating ideas and when applying<br />

mathematics to a range of activities including real life situations;<br />

• introduce class assessment journals (Yr 3-6) where students<br />

explain and justify their chosen strategies for solving<br />

tasks;<br />

• review the teaching and evaluation of working mathematically<br />

K -6 with particular focus on implementation of explicit<br />

teaching skills that relate to working mathematically;<br />

• identify and promote the collaborative use of appropriate<br />

teaching resources relevant to the target and<br />

• collegially share student work samples and effective<br />

teaching strategies in staff and stage meetings.<br />

26


<strong>School</strong> Priority 3 - Quality Teaching<br />

Outcome for 2012 – 2014<br />

To improve student performance by increasing<br />

teacher confidence, knowledge and skills<br />

in providing teaching and learning experiences<br />

that include all elements of the Quality Teaching<br />

Framework.<br />

2012 Targets to achieve this outcome include:<br />

• embed the Quality Teaching Framework in all learning<br />

and teaching practices and<br />

• develop students to become better self-regulated learners<br />

by providing differentiated curriculum provisions and<br />

options for all students.<br />

Strategies to achieve these targets include:<br />

• foster and implement Quality Teaching elements in all<br />

classrooms;<br />

• share effective teaching strategies to differentiate in staff<br />

and stage meetings and<br />

• modify the curriculum, teaching structures, and teaching<br />

practices in combination to ensure that instruction is relevant,<br />

flexible and responsive to individual student needs<br />

with particular focus on Literacy and Numeracy outcomes.<br />

ABOUT THIS REPORT<br />

In preparing this report information has been gathered<br />

from evaluations conducted during the year, in addition to<br />

the analysis of other information relating to school practice<br />

and student learning outcomes.<br />

The report encompasses the work of a number of school/<br />

parent sub committees.<br />

Mr Huckerby<br />

Principal<br />

SCHOOL CONTACT INFORMATION<br />

<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Ryde Rd Pymble NSW 2073<br />

(02) 9498 4644<br />

(02) 9498 4436 (fax)<br />

gordonwest-p.school@det.nsw.edu.au<br />

27


<strong>Gordon</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>School</strong>, Ryde Rd, Pymble NSW 2073 Phone: (02) 9498 4644 Fax: (02) 9498 4436 Email: gordonwest-p.school@det.nsw.edu.au<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!