02.01.2014 Views

The Real Green Revolution - Greenpeace UK

The Real Green Revolution - Greenpeace UK

The Real Green Revolution - Greenpeace UK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3.1 – Incentives for adopting OAA<br />

Disillusion with ‘<strong>Green</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong>’<br />

technologies<br />

This is most likely to affect farmers with<br />

direct experience of participation in<br />

conventional chemical-dependent farming<br />

systems that have given rise to what<br />

Paarlberg (1994) terms ‘second generation<br />

rural environmental problems’. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

include:<br />

• diminishing returns from repeated<br />

pesticide and fertiliser applications<br />

• deterioration of soil and water quality<br />

• health-related problems<br />

• declining groundwater levels<br />

• loss of biodiversity<br />

• increased risk of crop disease.<br />

P a rt of the problem lies in the toxic nature<br />

of many forms of pesticides and fert i l i s e r s ,<br />

but is compounded by inadequate methods of<br />

technology transfer. For example, one re p o rt<br />

f rom Algeria suggests that only a small<br />

minority of hill farmers read and follow<br />

i n s t ructions that accompany purc h a s e d<br />

a g rochemicals (Moali-Grine, 2000).<br />

<strong>The</strong> problems outlined above have proved<br />

particularly acute in relation to cotton, which<br />

accounts for 2.4% of global arable land but<br />

24% of the insecticide market (Bärlocher,<br />

2000). Despite the intensity of agrochemical<br />

use in conventional cotton projects, organic<br />

approaches to cotton growing have been<br />

developed in many parts of the world,<br />

creating environmental and economic<br />

benefits (see case study 2, over). Another of<br />

our case studies, of a tea estate in India, also<br />

highlights the health and environmental<br />

benefits of switching to organic production.<br />

Managers at the Ambootia Tea Estate (see<br />

case study 5) identify reductions in<br />

respiratory illness amongst the workforce,<br />

improvement in the quality of drinking water<br />

and the improved stability of steep hillsides<br />

as three key benefits flowing from their<br />

conversion to biodynamic practices. Second<br />

generation environmental problems such as<br />

these have often coincided with declines in<br />

(or stagnation of) yields obtained from<br />

intensive farming practices and/or declining<br />

world market prices. Individually, or in<br />

combination, these forces are influencing<br />

many farmers engaged in commodityorientated<br />

production to jump off the<br />

treadmill of conventional agricultural<br />

production and convert to more sustainable<br />

methods.<br />

Case study 2 – Organic cotton production in<br />

India, Peru and Mali<br />

Cotton is one of the most demanding of<br />

crops in terms of pesticide and insecticide<br />

applications. <strong>The</strong> effect of these on<br />

watercourses, human health and ecosystem<br />

diversity has increasingly become a cause of<br />

concern (Myers and Stolton, 1999). In many<br />

areas cotton pests are becoming increasingly<br />

resistant to spraying, and despite increased<br />

frequency of pesticide applications, farmers<br />

face declining yields. One response is a shift<br />

to organic cultivation, as shown in these<br />

three case studies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Maikaal Bio-Cotton Project, Madhya<br />

Pradesh, India<br />

In 1992 an alliance between local farmers,<br />

their local spinning mill, sales agents and an<br />

organic consultancy set about creating an<br />

organic cotton project. Farmers were<br />

experiencing severe pest problems, despite<br />

repeated pesticide applications: whitefly had<br />

developed pesticide resistance and many<br />

farmers were abandoning cotton production<br />

altogether, due to declining returns and<br />

toxicity problems. Government researchers<br />

and extensionists were sceptical of the<br />

initiative and suggested changing crops<br />

rather than method of production. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!