04.01.2014 Views

Psychological Review - Harvard Graduate School of Education ...

Psychological Review - Harvard Graduate School of Education ...

Psychological Review - Harvard Graduate School of Education ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THEORY OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT 515<br />

levels in the same domains. The environmental<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> human experience, as<br />

well as the genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> the human<br />

species, ensures the occurrence <strong>of</strong> major<br />

individual differences in development.<br />

Skill theory thus makes several general<br />

predictions about the effects <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

factors on sequence and synchrony<br />

in development and provides tools for analyzing<br />

some <strong>of</strong> these effects. In addition,<br />

the structures defined by the theory suggest<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> general corollaries about structural<br />

relations and how they determine sequence<br />

and synchrony.<br />

Structural Corollaries<br />

I shall not attempt to provide an exhaustive<br />

list <strong>of</strong> structural corollaries but instead<br />

will present a few illustrations <strong>of</strong><br />

potentially useful ones.<br />

Consistent Decalage Within a Task Domain<br />

Unevenness in skills across domains<br />

seems to be a fact <strong>of</strong> development. But<br />

according to the theory, many phenomena<br />

that are commonly classified as instances <strong>of</strong><br />

unevenness are in fact microdevelopmental<br />

sequences: The unevenness follows the<br />

same pattern in virtually all children in a<br />

given social group, and it seems actually to<br />

arise from differences in the complexity <strong>of</strong><br />

the skills. Most <strong>of</strong> the instances <strong>of</strong> horizontal<br />

decalage (unevenness within a stage or<br />

period) studied by Piaget and his colleagues<br />

show such microdevelopmental sequences.<br />

The skill theory explanation is simplest in<br />

cases where the skills belong to the same<br />

task domain. The skill that develops later<br />

can be derived by the transformation rules<br />

from the skill that develops earlier.<br />

Among the best documented cases <strong>of</strong><br />

consistent decalage within a task domain is<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> substance<br />

and conservation <strong>of</strong> weight. Research<br />

has repeatedly shown that school<br />

children develop conservation <strong>of</strong> substance<br />

1 to 3 years before conservation <strong>of</strong> weight<br />

(e.g., Hooper et al., 1971; Piaget & Inhelder,<br />

1941/1974, especially in the introduction to<br />

the 2nd edition; Uzgiris, 1964). In conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> substance, 14 children understand,<br />

usually by 7 or 8 years <strong>of</strong> age, that the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> clay does not change when a ball<br />

<strong>of</strong> clay is elongated into a sausage, flattened<br />

into a pancake, or changed into some other<br />

shape. At the same age, however, they still<br />

believe that the weight <strong>of</strong> the clay ball does<br />

change when the shape changes. Typically,<br />

they will not develop the skill for conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> weight until 9 or 10 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

Within Piaget's framework, this consistent<br />

sequence is puzzling because both types <strong>of</strong><br />

conservation are said to require exactly the<br />

same kind <strong>of</strong> concrete operational scheme:<br />

Two factors (height and length) covary in<br />

such a way that changes in one compensate<br />

for changes in the other.<br />

According to skill theory, conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

weight develops after conservation <strong>of</strong> substance<br />

because it requires a compounded<br />

Level 6 skill that subsumes the skill for conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> substance. In conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

substance, the child must coordinate the<br />

length and width <strong>of</strong> the original piece <strong>of</strong><br />

clay, ?BL,W» with the length and width <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transformed piece, i# L w (Halford, 1970;<br />

Peill, 1975; Verge & Bogartz, 1978). 15 In<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> weight, on the other hand,<br />

the child must go beyond mere amount <strong>of</strong><br />

clay and think about weight <strong>of</strong> clay. That is,<br />

he must relate the changes in the length and<br />

width <strong>of</strong> the clay to a third factor, such as<br />

the weight readings on a scale or the amount<br />

<strong>of</strong>feree that he feels when he holds the clay<br />

in his hand, 6 F. To coordinate all three sets<br />

together in a single skill, he must compound<br />

the skill for conservation <strong>of</strong> the substance<br />

clay with a skill involving the weight <strong>of</strong> the<br />

clay, such as the skill in which the child<br />

relates the length <strong>of</strong> pieces <strong>of</strong> clay (for<br />

instance, sausage-shaped pieces) to their<br />

14 Note that this type <strong>of</strong> conservation is properly<br />

called conservation <strong>of</strong> substance. It has <strong>of</strong>ten been<br />

erroneously translated as conservation <strong>of</strong> matter or<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> volume. Both matter and volume are<br />

much more abstract and difficult concepts than amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> a substance such as clay, and they develop at<br />

later ages.<br />

15 A precise measure <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> clay, <strong>of</strong><br />

course, requires three dimensions (height, length, and<br />

thickness), not just two; but with early Level 6 skills the<br />

child does not yet understand true volume—that is,<br />

three-dimensional volume. His understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

amount <strong>of</strong> clay is based on a relatively crude coordination<br />

<strong>of</strong> just two dimensions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!