10.01.2014 Views

EDUCATION FOR LIFE AND WORK - Hewlett Foundation

EDUCATION FOR LIFE AND WORK - Hewlett Foundation

EDUCATION FOR LIFE AND WORK - Hewlett Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century<br />

22 <strong>EDUCATION</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>LIFE</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>WORK</strong><br />

goals (Hoyle and Davisson, 2011). The interpersonal domain we propose<br />

is not included in Bloom’s taxonomy but rather is based partly on a recent<br />

National Research Council (NRC) workshop that clustered various 21st<br />

century skills into the cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal domains<br />

(National Research Council, 2011a). In that workshop, Bedwell, Fiore, and<br />

Salas (2011) proposed that interpersonal competencies are those used both<br />

to express information to others and to interpret others’ messages (both<br />

verbal and nonverbal) and respond appropriately.<br />

Distinctions among the three domains are reflected in how they are<br />

delineated, studied, and measured. In the cognitive domain, knowledge and<br />

skills are typically measured with tests of general cognitive ability (also referred<br />

to as g or IQ) or with more specific tests focusing on school subjects<br />

or work-related content. Research on intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies<br />

often uses measures of broad personality traits (discussed further<br />

below) or of child temperament (general behavioral tendencies, such as attention<br />

or shyness). Psychiatrists and clinical psychologists studying mental<br />

disorders use various measures to understand the negative dimensions of<br />

the intrapersonal and interpersonal domains (Almlund et al., 2011).<br />

Although we differentiate the three domains for the purpose of understanding<br />

and organizing 21st century skills, we recognize that they are<br />

intertwined in human development and learning. Research on teaching and<br />

learning has begun to illuminate how intrapersonal and intrapersonal skills<br />

support learning of academic content (e.g., National Research Council,<br />

1999) and how to develop these valuable supporting skills (e.g., Yeager and<br />

Walton, 2011). For example, we now know that learning is enhanced by<br />

the intrapersonal skills used to reflect on one’s learning and adjust learning<br />

strategies accordingly—a process called “metacognition” (National<br />

Research Council, 2001; Hoyle and Davisson, 2011). At the same time<br />

research has shown that the development of cognitive skills, such as the<br />

ability to stop and think objectively about a disagreement with another person,<br />

can increase positive interpersonal skills and reduce antisocial behavior<br />

(Durlak et al., 2011). And the interpersonal skill of effective communication<br />

is supported by the cognitive skills used to process and interpret complex<br />

verbal and nonverbal messages and formulate and express appropriate<br />

responses (Bedwell, Fiore, and Salas, 2011).<br />

A DIFFERENTIAL PERSPECTIVE ON 21st CENTURY SKILLS<br />

To address our charge to define 21st century skills and describe how<br />

they relate to each other, we turn to the research in differential psychology.<br />

This research has focused on understanding human behavior by examining<br />

systematic ways in which individuals vary and by using relatively stable<br />

patterns of individual differences as the basis for structural theories of<br />

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!