26.10.2012 Views

Indiana's Response to Intervention Academy - Center of Excellence ...

Indiana's Response to Intervention Academy - Center of Excellence ...

Indiana's Response to Intervention Academy - Center of Excellence ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2009 CELL Futures Conference<br />

November 2009<br />

Leah Nellis, Ph.D.<br />

Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, School Psychology<br />

Direc<strong>to</strong>r, Blumberg <strong>Center</strong><br />

Bayh College <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

Indiana State University<br />

leah.nellis@indstate.edu


“Without data,<br />

you are just another person<br />

with an opinion.”<br />

Boeing Aircraft Company


Essential Components <strong>of</strong> RTI<br />

� Scientifically-based, effective core curriculum and<br />

instruction,<br />

� Continuum <strong>of</strong> intervention that align with student<br />

need,<br />

� System <strong>of</strong> assessment that supports moni<strong>to</strong>ring<br />

progress over time,<br />

� Data-based decision making.<br />

3


What is a “system” <strong>of</strong> Assessment<br />

� Includes multiple measures or assessment <strong>to</strong>ols,<br />

� Various purposes <strong>of</strong> assessment are addressed,<br />

� Measures or <strong>to</strong>ols are appropriate for a particular<br />

purpose,<br />

� Measures are administered in a way that yields valid<br />

data,<br />

� Users (teachers, school/district administra<strong>to</strong>rs,<br />

student services staff, families, students) <strong>of</strong> the data<br />

understand and can apply the information.<br />

4


Multiple Measures:<br />

Recommended and Required<br />

� National Council on Measurement in Education’s<br />

(1995) Code <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Responsibilities in<br />

Educational Measurement (section 6.7)<br />

� AERA, APA, NCME’s Standards for Educational and<br />

Psychological Testing (Standard 13.7)<br />

� Title I <strong>of</strong> the 1994 Improving America’s Schools Act<br />

� No Child Left Behind<br />

5


Multiple Measures…<br />

� Provide a more complete and valid picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />

knowledge, skill, or performance construct being<br />

measured (construct validity).<br />

� Improves the quality <strong>of</strong> the decisions we make.<br />

� Brookhart, S. (2009). The many meanings <strong>of</strong> “multiple<br />

measures”. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 7-12.<br />

6


Levels (frequency) <strong>of</strong> Assessments<br />

� Formative assessments are conducted on a regular and<br />

ongoing basis <strong>to</strong> assess learning and identify the next<br />

instructional step. They occur during learning, <strong>to</strong> inform<br />

instruction.<br />

� Interim assessments are administered on a regular,<br />

preplanned schedule <strong>to</strong> assess student progress on<br />

common standards or benchmarks that students must<br />

master <strong>to</strong> be on tract <strong>to</strong> reach end <strong>of</strong> the year goals.<br />

� Summative assessments are conducted at the end <strong>of</strong> a<br />

learning period (e.g., year, semester, unit/course) and<br />

summarize the learning that has taken place. These<br />

assessments occur after learning, as a comparison <strong>to</strong><br />

expected levels/goals <strong>of</strong> performance.<br />

Stiggins, Chappuis, & Chappuis (2006)<br />

7


Huebner, 2009<br />

8


Purposes <strong>of</strong> Assessment<br />

Screening Assessments: Assessments used <strong>to</strong> determine if<br />

students are meeting grade level expectations and which<br />

students may be at risk.<br />

Diagnostic Assessments: Assessment conducted for<br />

students identified as at-risk <strong>to</strong> gain more in-depth analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> a student’s strengths and areas <strong>of</strong> need. These<br />

assessments help target instruction and intervention.<br />

Progress Moni<strong>to</strong>ring Assessments: Assessment conducted<br />

frequently <strong>to</strong> estimate rates <strong>of</strong> student improvement,<br />

determine if adequate progress is being made, and evaluate<br />

the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> instruction and intervention strategies.<br />

Entitlement Assessment: Assessment used <strong>to</strong> aid in the<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> entitlement <strong>to</strong> special services.<br />

9


� Two critical functions/purposes for assessment data in<br />

RTI.<br />

� Universal Screening<br />

� Progress Moni<strong>to</strong>ring<br />

10


Universal Screening:<br />

Definition and Purpose<br />

� Definition: Universal screening is the administration<br />

<strong>of</strong> an assessment <strong>to</strong> all students in the classroom,<br />

grade, school or district.<br />

� Frequency: 2-3 times a year<br />

� Purpose: To determine which students may be<br />

struggling with certain skills (e.g., phonological<br />

awareness or reading fluency)<br />

Adapted from<br />

http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/rti02_assessment/cresource.htm


Benefits <strong>of</strong> universal screening<br />

� Global indica<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> the overall academic or behavioral<br />

“health” <strong>of</strong> a system and the individuals within the<br />

system<br />

� % at risk, % some risk, % low risk<br />

� Helps identify prevalence and severity <strong>of</strong> problems so<br />

resources can be applied efficiently<br />

� Allows personnel <strong>to</strong> make judgments about<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> supports provided and need for adding<br />

or reducing supports<br />

Ikeda, Neesen, & Witt, 2008


Helps Answer Questions such as….<br />

� How is each student responding <strong>to</strong> instruction?<br />

� How many students are at risk for failure?<br />

� Is the current core instruction effective?<br />

� Which students may need additional assessment?<br />

� What levels <strong>of</strong> resource support might be needed <strong>to</strong><br />

promote desired (criterion-level) performance?<br />

Ikeda, Neesen, & Witt, 2008


Progress Moni<strong>to</strong>ring:<br />

Definition and Purpose<br />

� Definition: Progress Moni<strong>to</strong>ring is the<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> an assessment <strong>to</strong> some students in<br />

the classroom, grade, school or district.<br />

� Frequency: Usually every week, but at least every<br />

month<br />

� Purpose: To determine which students respond <strong>to</strong><br />

intervention and which students are in need <strong>of</strong> more<br />

intensive supports<br />

Adapted from<br />

http://www.rtinetwork.org/Essential/Assessment/Progress/ar/MutlilevelPrevention


Benefits <strong>of</strong> Progress Moni<strong>to</strong>ring<br />

� Accelerates learning because students are receiving<br />

more appropriate instruction<br />

� Allows for more informed instructional decisions<br />

� Documents student progress for accountability<br />

purposes<br />

� Yields more efficient communication with families and<br />

other pr<strong>of</strong>essionals about students’ progress<br />

� Promotes higher expectations for students by teachers<br />

� Leads <strong>to</strong> more accurate Special Education referrals<br />

http://www.studentprogress.org/progresmon.asp#3


Helps Answer Questions such as…<br />

� Is this group <strong>of</strong> students making adequate progress?<br />

� Is this student making adequate progress?<br />

� Is the intervention targeting the correct skills?<br />

� What else is needed <strong>to</strong> support this student’s progress<br />

and growth?<br />

16


Tier 3:<br />

• Twice a month <strong>to</strong><br />

once a week<br />

Tier 2:<br />

• Monthly <strong>to</strong><br />

twice a month<br />

Tier I:<br />

• 2-3 times a year<br />

Intense,<br />

Individualized<br />

Support<br />

Targeted, Supplemental<br />

Supports<br />

Core Curriculum, Instruction, and Learning<br />

Environment


School Options Regarding Assessment<br />

� Selection <strong>of</strong> the assessment instruments<br />

� Frequency <strong>of</strong> the assessments<br />

� Recommendations <strong>of</strong>fered in research<br />

� Criteria used <strong>to</strong> determine which students are in need<br />

<strong>of</strong> intervention<br />

Adapted from<br />

http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/rti02_assessment/cresource.htm


Regardless <strong>of</strong> the school or district's plan for<br />

implementing a universal screening and<br />

progress moni<strong>to</strong>ring process, the school's<br />

resources need <strong>to</strong> be organized so students<br />

who are struggling can be identified and can<br />

receive the services they need in order <strong>to</strong> be<br />

successful.<br />

Ikeda, Neesen, & Witt, 2008


Selecting Students in Need <strong>of</strong> Tier 2<br />

<strong>Intervention</strong><br />

� Use universal screening data <strong>to</strong> identify the lowest<br />

performing students in a class or grade level,<br />

� Confirm using other measures – teacher observation,<br />

other assessment data, short term progress<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>ring,<br />

� Determine intervention needs – focus and<br />

intensity.<br />

Adapted from<br />

http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/rti02_assessment/cresource.htm


Note: When determining who struggles<br />

� If the standard is set <strong>to</strong>o high, students who do not<br />

need intervention may be identified, and the school's<br />

resources could be strained because <strong>to</strong>o many students<br />

are receiving intensive, expensive services that they do<br />

not need.<br />

� On the other hand, if the standard is set <strong>to</strong>o low,<br />

students who are struggling may not receive needed<br />

intervention.<br />

Adapted from<br />

http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/rti02_assessment/cresource.htm


Using Data <strong>to</strong> Determine Progress<br />

� Not adequately<br />

responding <strong>to</strong><br />

instruction or<br />

intervention<br />

� Different or more<br />

intense intervention is<br />

needed<br />

Adapted from<br />

http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/rti02_assessment/cresource.htm


Using Data <strong>to</strong> Determine Progress<br />

� Benefiting from<br />

instruction or<br />

intervention<br />

� No instructional<br />

changes required<br />

Adapted from<br />

http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/rti02_assessment/cresource.htm


Using Student Progress Data<br />

� Important <strong>to</strong> consider the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

assessment <strong>to</strong>ol, technical properties, culturally and<br />

linguistically appropriate<br />

� Important <strong>to</strong> consider the similarities and/or<br />

differences between individual students and group<br />

data<br />

24


Decision Rules within RTI<br />

� Decision rules specify how school teams will decide<br />

whether “adequate” progress has been made. Requires<br />

a goal and student progress data.<br />

� Zirkel (2008) and Martin (2009) emphasize the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> determining decision rules (e.g., “what<br />

will adequate progress look like”) prior <strong>to</strong> beginning<br />

interventions.<br />

� As decisions become more “high-stakes”, more<br />

sophisticated and valid decision rules should be utilized<br />

(Hixson, Christ, & Bradley-Johnson, 2008).<br />

25


Decision Rules Across Tiers<br />

Tier 3 •Progress moni<strong>to</strong>ring twice<br />

monthly, at minimum<br />

Amount <strong>of</strong> Data Decision Rule<br />

Tier 2 •Progress moni<strong>to</strong>ring monthly,<br />

at minimum<br />

Tier 1 •Progress moni<strong>to</strong>ring 3-4<br />

times/year<br />

•Trend AND Level; Dual Discrepancy<br />

•Trend, using visual analysis and<br />

4-point data rule<br />

•Level <strong>of</strong> performance in comparison <strong>to</strong><br />

benchmarks<br />

•Summary <strong>of</strong> effectiveness for<br />

aggregate data<br />

26


Interpreting Progress Data<br />

� Analysis <strong>of</strong> level (average performance)<br />

� Insufficient, especially when there’s substantial change or trend<br />

� Analysis <strong>of</strong> trend (pattern <strong>of</strong> change over time)<br />

� Visual analysis <strong>of</strong> student progress in relationship <strong>to</strong> goal line<br />

� useful when change is obvious<br />

� Calculate slope or rate <strong>of</strong> improvement (ROI) and compare <strong>to</strong> norms<br />

� improved decision making when sufficient data<br />

� Analysis <strong>of</strong> trend and level (dual discrepancy)<br />

� Combination <strong>of</strong> the above WITH pre-determined criteria specified<br />

� Provides a more comprehensive approach <strong>to</strong> data analysis<br />

27


120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36<br />

Willy 42 43 44 44 45 52 53 56 61 62 66 71 75 78 80 82<br />

Willy<br />

Level:<br />

Willy’s ROI = 2.5<br />

Expected ROI = .90<br />

GOAL 77 110<br />

28


120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36<br />

Wayne 42 43 43 44 45 46 47 47 47 48 49 49 49 49 50 50<br />

Wayne<br />

Latest score <strong>of</strong> 50 at 25 th PR, (Benchmark 66)<br />

Wayne’s ROI = .50<br />

Expected ROI=.90<br />

GOAL 77 110<br />

29


For data analysis techniques <strong>to</strong> be valuable <strong>to</strong> educa<strong>to</strong>rs,<br />

the techniques must enhance the chance that educa<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

gain insight in<strong>to</strong> student performance and that they<br />

translate this insight in<strong>to</strong> improved educational<br />

experiences for children.


Resources for Summarizing and Using<br />

School Data<br />

� School Data Tu<strong>to</strong>rials, web-based resource from the<br />

<strong>Center</strong> for the Advanced Study <strong>of</strong> Technology Leadership<br />

in Education (CASTLE), University Council for<br />

Educational Administration at the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Minnesota. http://www.schooldatatu<strong>to</strong>rials.org<br />

� IRIS <strong>Center</strong> at Vanderbilt University, training modules<br />

and <strong>to</strong>ols. http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/index.html


Resources for Summarizing and Using<br />

School Data<br />

� ChartDog; available from <strong>Intervention</strong> Central at<br />

http://www.interventioncentral.org/<br />

� Variety <strong>of</strong> excel documents for graphing and summarizing<br />

data; available from Measured Effects at<br />

http://www.measuredeffects.com/index.php?id=23<br />

� Easy CBM; available at http://www.easycbm.com/<br />

� Data Management and Graphing Excel <strong>to</strong>ol; available at<br />

http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/rti04_all<strong>to</strong>gether/rti04_02<br />

_link_elements.html


Resources for Academic Assessments<br />

� National RTI <strong>Center</strong>, www.rti4success.org,<br />

Tools/<strong>Intervention</strong>s Tab<br />

� National <strong>Center</strong> on Student Progress Moni<strong>to</strong>ring,<br />

www.studentprogress.org, Tools Tab & Resources Tab<br />

� Florida <strong>Center</strong> for Reading Research, www.fcrr.org,<br />

Assessment Programs Tab


Key Websites<br />

IDOE RTI<br />

http://www.doe.in.gov/Indiana-RTI<br />

Collaborative Problem Solving Project<br />

@ the Blumberg <strong>Center</strong><br />

www.indstate.edu/blumberg<br />

RTI Action Network<br />

http://www.rtinetwork.org<br />

National <strong>Center</strong> on <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Intervention</strong><br />

http://www.rti4success.org/


Key Websites<br />

IRIS <strong>Center</strong><br />

http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/<br />

National <strong>Center</strong> for Culturally Responsive Educational<br />

Systems (NCCRESt)<br />

www.nccrest.org<br />

Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning<br />

http://www.casel.org<br />

OSEP <strong>Center</strong> on Positive Behavioral <strong>Intervention</strong>s &<br />

Supports<br />

http://www.pbis.org/<strong>to</strong>ols


Questions or Comments?<br />

leah.nellis@indstate.edu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!