12.01.2014 Views

Orientalizing the Pacific Rim: - History, Department of

Orientalizing the Pacific Rim: - History, Department of

Orientalizing the Pacific Rim: - History, Department of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

everything else about her said ‘American.’ If such assimilated ‘Orientals,’ so obviously<br />

different from ‘normal’ Americans, could fool one into thinking <strong>the</strong>y were actually<br />

Americans in ‘Oriental disguise,’ <strong>the</strong>n obviously <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> cultural assimilation<br />

which an "Oriental" could undergo was enormous. The distance traversed was as<br />

immense as <strong>the</strong> ocean which physically separated America from Japan.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most important results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> opposition between <strong>the</strong> Orient and <strong>the</strong><br />

Occident was <strong>the</strong> way in which it was metaphorically mapped onto <strong>the</strong> enormous<br />

physical distance between Asia and America. When <strong>the</strong> missionaries and sociologists<br />

chose to use <strong>the</strong> example <strong>of</strong> ‘Orientals’ as a way <strong>of</strong> proving <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>the</strong>ories<br />

about Americanizaton and cultural assimilation, <strong>the</strong>y were relying upon <strong>the</strong><br />

presumption <strong>of</strong> a great cultural difference between "Orientals" and Americans. By<br />

putting assimilation along a spectrum from ‘non-American’ to ‘American,’ and by<br />

positing "Orientals" as <strong>the</strong> ultimate exotic non-American o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> sociologists linked<br />

<strong>the</strong> opposition between ‘Oriental’ culture and ‘American’ culture with differences in<br />

location and place. Oriental culture was associated with <strong>the</strong> Asia, and American culture<br />

with <strong>the</strong> United States, and thus <strong>the</strong> cultural differences between <strong>the</strong> two were mapped<br />

into physical space.<br />

The <strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>Rim</strong> as an arc from Asia to America encompassed <strong>the</strong> journey from<br />

one extreme to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, representing <strong>the</strong> spatialization <strong>of</strong> cultural differences.<br />

‘Americanization’ became more than a cultural process; it became one <strong>of</strong> travel,<br />

containing within it <strong>the</strong> movements <strong>of</strong> migration, from a ‘stagnant Orient’ to a<br />

‘modern America’ based upon mobility. In spatializing cultural difference with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>the</strong>ories, <strong>the</strong> sociologists had made <strong>the</strong> distance traversed literal. The Orient was a<br />

world away, but ‘Orientals’ could still be made into Americans.<br />

The ‘Oriental’ stood at <strong>the</strong> far end <strong>of</strong> this opposition, <strong>the</strong> far<strong>the</strong>st point away<br />

from ‘normal’ America, and a symbol <strong>of</strong> everything America was not. This was <strong>the</strong><br />

ultimate meaning which ‘Orientals’ held for not only sociologists and missionaries, but<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!