12.01.2014 Views

Catalogue 38, Part 3 - Jeremy Norman's HistoryofScience.com

Catalogue 38, Part 3 - Jeremy Norman's HistoryofScience.com

Catalogue 38, Part 3 - Jeremy Norman's HistoryofScience.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

et; instead of hands, each clock had a rotating disk<br />

with a notch cut into it so that only one letter on the<br />

clock face was visible at a time (Standage 1998, 19).<br />

Ronalds placed one clock at each end of eight miles of<br />

insulated wire that he had laid down in his garden, and<br />

used electrical impulses to transmit signals between<br />

them. He wrote to Lord Melville of the British Admiralty<br />

offering to demonstrate his telegraph, but was<br />

rejected: John Barrow, secretary to the admiralty, wrote<br />

back to Ronalds saying that “telegraphs of any kind are<br />

now [after the conclusion of the Napoleonic wars]<br />

totally unnecessary, and that no other than the one<br />

now in use [a semaphore telegraph] will be adopted”<br />

(quoted in DNB). Ronalds did not pursue his telegraphy<br />

venture any further, but left a record of it in his<br />

Descriptions of an Electric Telegraph and of Some<br />

Other Electrical Apparatus (1823; reprinted in 1871 at<br />

the suggestion of Latimer Clark). It was left to Charles<br />

Wheatstone and William Fothergill Cooke, both of<br />

whom knew of Ronalds’s experiments, to develop the<br />

first telegraph adopted for public use in Britain in<br />

1845.<br />

In 1871, in response to a petition submitted the previous<br />

year to Prime Minister William Gladstone, Ronalds<br />

received a knighthood for his contribution to<br />

telegraphy. His letter to Clark expresses his gratitude<br />

for this honor and for Clark’s part in it:<br />

Your kind congratulations are peculiarly<br />

esteemed; for I have every reason to believe that<br />

your expressions of approbation &c. of my humble<br />

labours in Electro-Telegraphy have been influential<br />

in Her Majesty’s gracious act in my behalf.<br />

I believe it is almost needless to tell you that the<br />

honour conferred is much less valued by me than<br />

the testimony it helps to afford to the validity of<br />

my early labours in the matter. . . . “<br />

Origins of Cyberspace 187. 40745<br />

“Resurrection Men”<br />

93. Royal College of Surgeons. Anatomy.<br />

Copy of a letter from the Council of the Royal<br />

College of Surgeons in London, to Viscount Melbourne;<br />

dated 10 December 1831. Folio. 3pp.<br />

[London:] House of Commons, 17 December<br />

1831. 333 x 208 mm. Disbound, gutter margin a<br />

little frayed. Light toning but very good. $950<br />

First Edition. On December 5, 1831, the notorious<br />

London “resurrection men” John Bishop and<br />

Thomas Williams were executed for the murder of an<br />

itinerant fourteen-year-old (known only as the “Italian<br />

Boy”), whose corpse they had then attempted to sell to<br />

the anatomical demonstrator at King’s College. Five<br />

days later, the Council of the Royal College of Surgeons—whose<br />

members included such luminaries as<br />

Astley Cooper, William Lawrence, Benjamin Collins<br />

Brodie, Charles Bell and Benjamin Travers—sent the<br />

present letter to Viscount Melbourne, the British<br />

Home Secretary, urging reform of the antiquated British<br />

laws governing procurement and possession of<br />

cadavers for dissection in medical schools. The work is<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!