12.01.2014 Views

Catalogue 38, Part 3 - Jeremy Norman's HistoryofScience.com

Catalogue 38, Part 3 - Jeremy Norman's HistoryofScience.com

Catalogue 38, Part 3 - Jeremy Norman's HistoryofScience.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mechanics to visible and tangible objects. In the fifth<br />

section of his paper (p. 812), he set forth the “quite<br />

burlesque” case of a cat<br />

penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following<br />

diabolical apparatus (which must be<br />

secured against direct interference by the cat): in a<br />

Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive<br />

substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of<br />

the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with<br />

equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the<br />

counter tube discharges and through a relay<br />

releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of<br />

hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system<br />

to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat<br />

still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The<br />

psi-function of the entire system would express<br />

this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon<br />

the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal<br />

parts.<br />

It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy<br />

originally restricted to the atomic domain<br />

be<strong>com</strong>es transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy,<br />

which can then be resolved by direct observation.<br />

That prevents us from so naively accepting<br />

as valid a “blurred model” for representing reality.<br />

In itself it would not embody anything unclear or<br />

contradictory. There is a difference between a<br />

shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot<br />

of clouds and fog banks (Schrödinger, “The present<br />

situation in quantum mechanics,” translated<br />

by John D. Trimmer [Proceedings of the American<br />

Philosophical Society 124 (1980): 323-<strong>38</strong>]).<br />

This conclusion sets forth what has been called the<br />

principle of state distinction: “states of a macroscopic<br />

system which could be told apart by a macroscopic<br />

observation are distinct from each other whether<br />

observed or not” (Moore, p. 308). Schrödinger’s paper<br />

represents “his definitive statement about the theory<br />

that he and Heisenberg had discovered” (Moore, p.<br />

307). Moore, Schrödinger: Life and Thought, pp. 306-9.<br />

40521<br />

From One of the Founders of<br />

Modern Geology<br />

95. Sedgwick, Adam (1785-1873). Two autograph<br />

letters signed to [James] Marshall. Dent<br />

[Yorkshire], Oct. 7, 1857; Trinity College [Cambridge],<br />

Oct. 31, 1857. 8pp. total. 186 x 113 mm.<br />

Light soiling along folds, but very good. $950<br />

Letters with excellent scientific content from one<br />

of the founders of modern geology. Sedgwick was<br />

responsible for defining the Devonian and Cambrian<br />

ages in the geological time scale, and his immensely<br />

popular lecture courses on geology, delivered annually<br />

at Cambridge between 1819 and 1870, had an enormous<br />

influence on succeeding generations of English<br />

geologists. One of his students was Charles Darwin,<br />

who began attending Sedgwick’s lectures in January<br />

1831 and ac<strong>com</strong>panied Sedgwick on a geological field<br />

tour of Wales the following summer. The two men<br />

remained friends until Sedgwick’s death, even though<br />

Sedgwick was never able to accept Darwin’s theory of<br />

evolution by natural selection.<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!