16.01.2014 Views

The morphological productivity of selected ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

The morphological productivity of selected ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

The morphological productivity of selected ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

introducing elements such as bi-, di-, hyper-, hypo-, meta-, micro- and multi- – the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> pre<strong>fi</strong>xes outnumbering that <strong>of</strong> suf<strong>fi</strong>xes (Kastovsky 2006: 170). In<br />

addition, any learned af<strong>fi</strong>xes, or combining forms, 3 have acquired new meanings<br />

(Hughes 2004: 347). For example, extra- used to mean ‘out <strong>of</strong>’, as in<br />

extraordinary (‘outside the scope <strong>of</strong> ordinary’) but is nowadays used to denote a<br />

meaning ‘more than the usual’, as in extra strong. Similarly, super- ‘above’ and<br />

ultra- ‘beyond’ are increasingly used to stress<br />

size.<br />

Kastovsky summarizes that the overall structure <strong>of</strong> English<br />

vocabulary has changed and the number <strong>of</strong> derivational patterns available has<br />

increased enormously from Old English to the present day, “partly rivalling each<br />

other, partly restricting each other according to etymological domains” (2006:<br />

170). In a similar vein, Hughes writes that different word-formation patterns are<br />

used with greater flexibility in contemporary English than they were before:<br />

recent coinages that exploit the suf<strong>fi</strong>x -able include, for example, such words as<br />

doable, puttable and liveable (2000: 346).<br />

2.2. Combining forms<br />

2.2.1 De<strong>fi</strong>ning combining forms<br />

It was stated above that af<strong>fi</strong>xes are always bound morphemes that attach to a root<br />

or a base. What should then be thought about such words as neuro-logy or biology?<br />

At <strong>fi</strong>rst sight it seems that lexemes like these are formed with a pre<strong>fi</strong>x and a<br />

suf<strong>fi</strong>x but no root, which <strong>of</strong> course runs counter to the basic assumption that<br />

words should always contain a root (see Bauer 1983: 213–214).<br />

Carstairs-McCarthy <strong>of</strong>fers a partial solution by stating that af<strong>fi</strong>xes<br />

are always bound but roots are not always free (2002: 20). Thus the <strong>fi</strong>rst element<br />

in words like audi-ence, magn-ify, or applic-ant is actually a bound root, since<br />

they cannot occur alone in English (Castairs-McCarthy 2002: 19). <strong>The</strong> common<br />

denominator with all these words is that they are all loanwords, borrowed either<br />

3 <strong>The</strong> distinction between af<strong>fi</strong>xes and combining forms will be discussed in more detail in section<br />

2.2.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!