Agatha Christie's Poirot Episode Guide - inaf iasf bologna
Agatha Christie's Poirot Episode Guide - inaf iasf bologna
Agatha Christie's Poirot Episode Guide - inaf iasf bologna
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Agatha</strong> Christie’s <strong>Poirot</strong> <strong>Episode</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />
Five Little Pigs<br />
Season 9<br />
<strong>Episode</strong> Number: 55<br />
Season <strong>Episode</strong>: 1<br />
Originally aired: Sunday December 14, 2003<br />
Writer:<br />
<strong>Agatha</strong> Christie, Kevin Elyot<br />
Director: Paul Unwin<br />
Show Stars: Hugh Fraser (Captain Arthur Hastings), David Suchet (Hercule <strong>Poirot</strong>)<br />
Guest Stars: Richard Teverson (Hollinghurst), Lottie Unwin (Young Caroline),<br />
Darien Smith (Young Amyas), Jacek Bilinski (Young Philip), Joel de<br />
Temperley (Young Meredith), Toby Stephens (Philip Blake), Sophie<br />
Winkleman (Angela), Gemma Jones (Cynthia Williams), Julie Cox (Elsa<br />
Greer), Rachael Stirling (Caroline Crale), Aidan Gillen (Amyas Crale),<br />
Marc Warren (Meredith), Patrick Malahide (Sir Montague Depleach),<br />
Aimee Mullins (Lucy Crale), Annette Badland (Mrs Spriggs)<br />
Summary: Sixteen years before the action opens, Caroline Crale was charged with<br />
killing her husband, Amyas Crale, and no one doubted her guilt. She<br />
was duly tried and convicted, and died in prison while serving life,<br />
so the case was looked on as closed. But then, in the present day,<br />
Caroline’s daughter Lucy Crale (who has been living overseas) receives<br />
a letter her mother wrote her before her death, claiming to be innocent.<br />
Anxious to know the truth, Lucy hires <strong>Poirot</strong> to solve the murder of<br />
her father sixteen years before, and <strong>Poirot</strong> finds a number of possible<br />
suspects who are still alive. The late lamented Amyas was well-known<br />
for having affairs with his models. Does Elsa Greer, his lover at the<br />
time of his death, hold the key to unravelling the case?<br />
Carla is engaged to be married but she is afraid that the fact that her mother killed her<br />
father will poison her husband’s love for her, as he may fear that she has inherited a husbandkilling<br />
tendency. Moreover, Carla remembers that her mother would never lie to her to hide an<br />
unpleasant truth and her mother told her she was innocent through a letter. That is enough for<br />
Carla but she wants <strong>Poirot</strong> to prove her mother’s innocence to her husband to be.<br />
Carla’s father, painter Amyas Crale, was murdered with a poison, coniine, which had been<br />
extracted from poison hemlock by Meredith Blake but subsequently apparently stolen from him<br />
by Carla’s mother, Caroline Crale. Caroline confessed to having stolen the poison, claiming that<br />
she had intended to use it to commit suicide. This poison ended up, however, in a glass from<br />
which Amyas had drunk cold beer, after complaining that ’everything tastes foul today’. Both<br />
the glass and the bottle of cold beer had been brought to him by Caroline. Her motive was<br />
clear: Amyas’s young model, and latest mistress Elsa Greer, had revealed that he was planning<br />
to divorce Caroline and marry her instead. This was a new development; though Amyas had<br />
frequently had mistresses and affairs, he had never before shown any sign of wanting to leave<br />
Caroline.<br />
<strong>Poirot</strong> labels the five alternative suspects ’the five little pigs’: they comprise Phillip Blake<br />
(”went to the market”); Philip’s brother, Meredith Blake (”stayed at home”); Elsa Greer (now Lady<br />
Dittisham, ”had roast beef”); Cecilia Williams, the governess (”had none”); and Angela Warren,<br />
Caroline’s younger half-sister (”went ’Wee! Wee! Wee!’ all the way home”). As <strong>Poirot</strong> learns from<br />
speaking to them during the first half of the novel, none of the quintet has an obvious motive,<br />
and while their views of the original case differ in some respects there is no immediate reason to<br />
suppose that the verdict in the case was wrong.<br />
131