26.01.2014 Views

Social and Solidarity Economy: Our common road towards Decent ...

Social and Solidarity Economy: Our common road towards Decent ...

Social and Solidarity Economy: Our common road towards Decent ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOCIAL AND SOLIDARITY ECONOMY ACADEMY<br />

Figure 2.1: Members’ roles in a self-management model<br />

Members<br />

Governers<br />

Managers<br />

Invests in<br />

Micro-enterprise<br />

Users<br />

Workers<br />

self-management, collective management <strong>and</strong><br />

hierarchical management in SSEOs.<br />

time. Figure 2.1 below illustrates how members play<br />

different roles at different times.<br />

Self-management<br />

This is the epitome of the principle of democratic<br />

leadership in SSEOs. Self-management accords all<br />

members (<strong>and</strong> sometimes workers <strong>and</strong> users) the right<br />

to participate in the governance <strong>and</strong> management of<br />

the organization by voting on issues requiring<br />

decisions. Unlike in private enterprises where<br />

shareholders vote on the basis of their capital share in<br />

the firm, the members’ votes in SSEOs are equal. The<br />

result of granting equality to all members is<br />

self-management that bestows control of the<br />

organization on each member. <strong>Solidarity</strong> structures are<br />

used to generate goods <strong>and</strong> services for the members<br />

<strong>and</strong> their dependants. Members rely on negotiated<br />

<strong>and</strong> reciprocal rules that are based on collective action<br />

<strong>and</strong> social control to carry out their activities. This<br />

fundamentally helps to establish a more-or-less flat<br />

leadership structure that de-emphasizes hierarchical<br />

authority in governance <strong>and</strong> management. Each<br />

member, therefore, assumes the responsibility of both<br />

governing <strong>and</strong> managing the organization from time to<br />

This members’ control model of management is<br />

typically applied in small-scale organizations where<br />

the members are also the workers <strong>and</strong> sometimes<br />

the beneficiaries. Examples include workers’<br />

cooperatives, mutual benefit societies, associations,<br />

social enterprises <strong>and</strong> community-based<br />

organizations. In Latin America <strong>and</strong> most<br />

Francophone countries, this form of management is<br />

the most <strong>common</strong> in SSEOs, not just because of the<br />

size of the organizations but also because of the<br />

emphasis on the empowering <strong>and</strong> liberating nature<br />

of the solidarity-based economy.<br />

Collective management<br />

Members’ ownership of an organization sometimes<br />

results in sharing responsibilities among themselves<br />

without necessarily ceding the democratic<br />

controlling authority of all members. The result is<br />

that members collectively manage the organizations,<br />

but play different roles. This is what we refer to as<br />

collective management. This is widely used in<br />

medium <strong>and</strong> large social <strong>and</strong> solidarity<br />

20<br />

READER

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!