28.01.2014 Views

US domestic supply

US domestic supply

US domestic supply

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Commodity-Grade Mercury<br />

U.S. Market Overview<br />

Mercury Products Workshop<br />

Mexico City<br />

October 28-29, 2008<br />

Timothy Lehman, Economist<br />

Economics, Exposure and Technology Division<br />

Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances<br />

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency


Overview<br />

• U.S Mercury Demand<br />

• Existing U.S. Product and Process Demand<br />

• Sources of U.S. Supply<br />

• Trends in the Mercury Market<br />

2


U.S. Mercury Demand<br />

• Between 1980 and 2001, annual mercury use in the U.S.<br />

decreased from 2,225 to 271 metric tons. More recently,<br />

the <strong>US</strong> is estimated to consume 100 metric tons per<br />

year.<br />

• Reductions largely due to:<br />

– Limits on mercury use in batteries.<br />

– EPA cancellation of pesticide registrations for the use of mercury<br />

in paint.<br />

– Closure or conversion of mercury cell chlor-alkali production<br />

facilities.<br />

– Reductions in multiple products.<br />

3


U.S. Mercury Product and Process Use Trends<br />

Other category includes batteries, paints, laboratory applications, biocides, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and<br />

as a preservative in cosmetics<br />

U.S. EPA. EPA’s Roadmap for Mercury, available at http://www.epa.gov/mercury/pdfs/FINAL-Mercury-Roadmap-6-29.pdf, p. 37.<br />

4


Existing U.S. Product and Process<br />

Demand<br />

• Major U.S. Products<br />

– Switches and relays<br />

– Measuring and control devices<br />

– Electrical lighting<br />

– Button cell batteries<br />

– Dental amalgam<br />

• Major U.S. Processes<br />

– Mercury cell chlor-alkali production<br />

5


Total Use of Mercury in Products in <strong>US</strong>, 2004<br />

(percentage)<br />

Switches and Relays<br />

43%<br />

Dental Amalgam<br />

26%<br />

Formulated Products<br />

1%<br />

Batteries<br />

2%<br />

Miscellaneous<br />

2%<br />

Measuring Devices<br />

4%<br />

Lamps<br />

9%<br />

Thermostats<br />

13%<br />

Switches and Relays Dental Amalgam Thermostats Lamps<br />

Measuring Devices Miscellaneous Batteries Formulated Products<br />

Source: Trends in Mercury Use in Products: Northeast Waste Management Officials'<br />

Association, 2008<br />

6


Existing U.S. Product and Process<br />

Demand (cont’d)<br />

• Switches and Relays<br />

– 2004: 51 metric tons<br />

– 2001: 60 metric tons<br />

- Category includes: tilt switches, float switches, flame<br />

sensors and relays.<br />

- By 2006, Honeywell International ceased<br />

manufacture of mercury switches and reduced<br />

mercury use by 11.5 metric tons.<br />

– U.S. motor vehicles produced after January 1, 2003<br />

do not contain mercury switches.<br />

7


Existing U.S. Product and Process<br />

Demand (cont’d)<br />

• Thermostats<br />

– 2004: 15.0 metric tons<br />

– 2001: 15.5 metric tons<br />

- Includes: residential, commercial and industrial<br />

types.<br />

- Many state collection programs exist.<br />

- EPA and private sector are attempting to increase<br />

recycling rates<br />

- Eight states enacted legislation prohibiting the<br />

purchase of new mercury-containing thermostats.<br />

8


Existing U.S. Product and Process<br />

Demand (cont’d)<br />

• Measuring Devices<br />

– 2004: 4.8 metric tons<br />

– 2001: 6.0 metric tons<br />

– Category includes barometers, manometers, blood pressure<br />

cuffs, thermometers, etc.<br />

– Three U.S. manufacturers of precision measuring devices<br />

announced phase-out of mercury-added commercial products.<br />

– Fifteen states enacted legislation prohibiting the purchase of new<br />

mercury-containing thermometers.<br />

9


Existing U.S. Product and Process<br />

Demand (cont’d)<br />

• Electrical Lighting<br />

– 2004: 10.7 metric tons<br />

– 2001: 10.1 metric tons<br />

– Includes mercury used in fluorescent tubes, Compact<br />

fluorescent lights (CFLs), high intensity lights, and<br />

neon signs.<br />

– In 2007, NEMA signed a voluntary agreement to cap<br />

per unit consumption of mercury to 5 mg per CFL.<br />

– Increased promotion of fluorescent lamps shifts<br />

emphasis from mercury demand reduction to disposal<br />

and recycling.<br />

10


Existing U.S. Product and Process<br />

Demand (cont’d)<br />

• Button Cell Batteries<br />

– 2004: 2.6 metric tons<br />

– 2001: 3.0 metric tons<br />

– Mercury consumption in batteries down from 1,000 metric tons in<br />

early 1980s due to federal laws.<br />

– Button cell (including zinc air, silver oxide and alkaline<br />

manganese oxide) and mercuric oxide (only used in military and<br />

medical equipment) only remaining types.<br />

– Members of National Electrical Manufacturers Association<br />

(NEMA) plan to phase out mercury use in button-cell battery<br />

production by 2011.<br />

– Four states enacted legislation prohibiting the distribution of<br />

items containing mercury-added button cell batteries.<br />

11


Existing U.S. Product and Process<br />

Demand (cont’d)<br />

• Dental Amalgam<br />

– 2004: 30.4 metric tons<br />

– 2001: 30.8 metric tons<br />

– Between 1979 and 1990, CDC reports a 38 percent decrease in<br />

use of mercury dental amalgam.<br />

– 17 states enacted legislation to regulate dental amalgam, best<br />

management practices for waste, bans, informed consent<br />

requirements, and mandatory notification of available<br />

alternatives.<br />

– Higher cost non-mercury alternatives may limit future reductions.<br />

12


Existing U.S. Product and Process<br />

Demand (cont’d)<br />

• Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Production<br />

– Current Demand: 5 metric tons<br />

– Consumption down from 124 metric tons in 1996<br />

– In late 2008 to 2009, one plant is anticipated to<br />

convert to non-mercury cell technology and one plant<br />

is expected to close.<br />

- Remaining four plants are expected to close during<br />

next 30 years, but timeframe uncertain.<br />

13


Sources of U.S. Supply<br />

U.S. <strong>domestic</strong> <strong>supply</strong> sources:<br />

• Closing/retrofitting chlor-alkali plants<br />

• By-product from gold mining<br />

• Product recycling and waste recovery<br />

• Import of commodity-grade mercury<br />

• Import of calomel (mercury chloride)<br />

14


Estimated Quantities of Commodity-Grade<br />

Mercury in the U.S. in 2005 and 2006<br />

Totals: 580 359<br />

15


U.S. Domestic Supply Source: Chlor-alkali<br />

Plants<br />

• Elemental mercury released to market upon closure of plants<br />

or conversion to mercury-free technology<br />

– Current Inventory: approx. 2,100<br />

metric tons<br />

– Largest U.S. private-sector source of stored and in-use<br />

mercury.<br />

– Facilities generally operate 40 to 60 years.<br />

• No new construction in U.S. since 1970.<br />

16


U.S. Domestic Supply Source: Chlor-alkali<br />

Plants-cont'd<br />

Recent trends:<br />

– One plant is anticipated to close and one plant is expected<br />

to convert to non-mercury cell technology soon<br />

• Remaining four plants are expected to close during next<br />

30 years, but rate uncertain.<br />

- One plant closure resulted in 174 metric tons sold in 2005<br />

and 71 metric tons in 2006.<br />

- Second plant closure in June/July 2007 resulted in ~400<br />

ton <strong>supply</strong>.<br />

17


U.S. Domestic Supply Source:<br />

Byproduct Mining<br />

• Total Annual Supply: ~118 metric tons of commodity-grade<br />

mercury in 2006<br />

- Extraction will occur until 2015; processing will continue until<br />

2029<br />

• Trend: Quantity may increase modestly over time<br />

– Quantity dependent upon mine life and industry expansion<br />

18


U.S. Domestic Supply Source: Product Recycling and<br />

Waste Recovery<br />

• Total Annual Supply: Anecdotal evidence indicates<br />

that from 50 to 80 metric tons and potentially as much<br />

as 100-200 metric tons were recovered in 2006.<br />

• Sources: Retorting of end-of-life products, off-spec<br />

products, hazardous industrial waste, and<br />

contaminated soil from cleanup sites.<br />

• Trend: Quantity is assumed to remain constant in the<br />

short term (e.g. next decade), and then decline as<br />

mercury content of products decreases and waste<br />

streams get smaller.<br />

19


U.S. Reservoirs of Mercury – Limited<br />

Recovery Potential<br />

• Total Potential Supply: ~2000 metric tons of mercury currently<br />

contained in dental amalgam and products; unknown amount in<br />

contaminated soil<br />

• Most is now being land-filled or otherwise released when discarded,<br />

including:<br />

• discharges of dental amalgam to wastewater from dental offices<br />

and<br />

• small percentages of the mercury are recovered from reservoirs,<br />

e.g. from dental offices, auto switches and fluorescent lamps<br />

•Trend: Unknown percentages may be recovered in the future<br />

20


Year<br />

U.S. Domestic Supply Source: Imports and Exports<br />

(Data from U.S. ITC, Metric Tons)<br />

Mercury<br />

Equivalents of<br />

Calomel<br />

Imports<br />

Imports of<br />

Elemental<br />

Mercury<br />

Total<br />

Imports<br />

Total<br />

Exports<br />

Net Exports<br />

2002 27 210 237 324 87 - 114<br />

2003 11 46 57 287 230 - 241<br />

2004 207 92 299 279 -21 - 187<br />

2005 328 212 540 319 -221 - 107<br />

2006 58 94 152 390 238 – 296<br />

Average 126 131 257 320 63 - 189<br />

• Nearly all calomel imports since 2004 have been from Chile; we assume calomel is 50 percent mercury by<br />

weight (Reported imports of elemental mercury in 2006 were predominantly from Russia (51 metric tons),<br />

Peru (22 metric tons), Germany (14 metric tons), and Canada (eight metric tons) whereas 2005 imports were<br />

predominantly from Peru (128 metric tons), Chile (31 metric tons), Israel (29 metric tons), Canada (13 metric<br />

tons), and Germany (11 metric tons)).<br />

• Net exports = total exports minus total imports; second number in range excludes mercury from imported<br />

calomel due to uncertainty of calomel estimates.<br />

• Average annual net exports may be closer to 140, based on a separate estimate of 50 tons of mercury per year<br />

from calomel imports.<br />

21


Expected Future Trends<br />

• U.S. <strong>domestic</strong> <strong>supply</strong>: ~200 metric tons per year (from byproduct<br />

mining and recycled from products and waste) + releases from<br />

chlor-alkali plants<br />

– Secondary recovery growing slowly, but will ultimately be limited<br />

by size of reservoir.<br />

– May decline with demand (with or without a time lag), and with<br />

closure of all mercury cell chlor-alkali plants.<br />

• Imports for processing: ~257 metric tons per year<br />

- May be impacted by U.S. Mercury Export Ban<br />

22


U.S. Mercury Stockpiles<br />

• Current U.S. stocks: ~8,036 metric tons.<br />

• Progress to date:<br />

– More than half is already in long-term storage.<br />

– DOD maintains 4,436 metric tons of mercury in strategic<br />

stockpile.<br />

• Will be stored at one location for at least 40 years.<br />

– DOE stated it will continue to store 1,200 metric tons.<br />

– Remaining mercury stores in non-federal stocks is ~2,400 metric<br />

tons.<br />

23


Summary of U.S. Mercury Supplies<br />

Mercury<br />

(metric tons)<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

2006<br />

2008<br />

2010<br />

Year<br />

2012<br />

2014<br />

Elemental Mercury Imports<br />

Chlor-alkali plants<br />

Recycling and Waste<br />

Recovery<br />

Byproduct Mining<br />

• Releases from chlor-alkali plants are “lumpy.”<br />

- 2006 data reflects the scheduled closure of two chlor-alkali plants<br />

- We assume a plant releases 300 metric tons every three years after 2009<br />

• Recycling of products and waste may also be “lumpy”-- we assume a slight increase over<br />

time in recycling and waste recovery rates.<br />

• We assume continuing trends in imports based on a linear extrapolation of historical data<br />

from <strong>US</strong> ITC from 1989 through 2006.<br />

• This benchmark does not reflect any controls on exports or <strong>domestic</strong> supplies.<br />

24


U.S. Mercury Export Ban<br />

– Export ban legislation signed this month by<br />

President and should go into effect in 2013.<br />

– Will ban exports of mercury generated in the<br />

U.S.<br />

– Will allow voluntary storage of mercury by<br />

private sector in a DOE facility. User fee will<br />

be imposed.<br />

– Several reports to congress required to<br />

determine the impact of this legislation on<br />

primary mining and recycling.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!