September 2008 Economic Snapshot Survey - InfoComm

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$AV Math Online - InfoComm$

D. Strategies Exhibit D1: Strategic Reactions % with strategy in place We have laid off or let staff go 9.5% We have not filled vacant positions 16.2% We are hiring, but have hired fewer people than we originally anticipated 24.8% We are hiring, and have hired more people than we originally anticipated 15.8% We have outsourced tasks rather than hire staff 20.7% We have cut staff salaries or benefits 2.3% We have increased staff salaries or benefits 19.8% We have delayed or decreased planned pay increases 12.2% We have boosted planned pay increases or provided bonuses 9.9% We have cut staff training budgets 4.5% We have increased staff training budgets 18.9% None of the above 21.6% No response 5.4% Page 32 InfoComm 2008 International Economic Snapshot Survey © InfoComm International 2008
Exhibit D2: Strategic Reactions by Segment Laid off or let staff go Not filled vacant positions Hired fewer than anticipated Hired more than anticipated Outsource rather than hire Cut salaries or benefits Overall 9.5% 16.2% 24.8% 15.8% 20.7% 2.3% Systems Integrator 8.1% 16.1% 37.1% 17.7% 29.0% 3.2% Rental and Staging 15.0% 25.0% 12.5% 17.5% 22.5% 0.0% Company type Ind. Design Consultant 2.9% 8.6% 31.4% 22.9% 8.6% 0.0% Manufacturer/Rep/ Dealer/Distributor 12.2% 20.4% 22.4% 16.3% 20.4% 6.1% Ind. Programmer/ Multimedia Prof. 9.7% 9.7% 9.7% 3.2% 9.7% 0.0% Up to $2 million 12.7% 10.1% 15.2% 5.1% 12.7% 1.3% $2.1 to $5 million 6.3% 21.9% 28.1% 25.0% 34.4% 6.3% Company size $5.1–$10 million 4.3% 26.1% 34.8% 13.0% 30.4% 0.0% $10.1–$25 million 5.3% 18.4% 34.2% 34.2% 26.3% 2.6% $25+ million 20.0% 23.3% 36.7% 16.7% 23.3% 3.3% Northeast 2.2% 8.7% 32.6% 10.9% 10.9% 2.2% Location (U.S. only) South Atlantic 12.2% 19.5% 14.6% 26.8% 24.4% 2.4% South Central 10.7% 17.9% 21.4% 7.1% 17.9% 0.0% North Central 3.6% 17.9% 28.6% 25.0% 46.4% 0.0% Mountain/Pacific 17.6% 21.6% 27.5% 11.8% 17.6% 5.9% Perceived company position Perceived performance, past six months Better 6.5% 13.0% 29.3% 22.8% 23.6% 1.6% Same 5.7% 15.7% 24.3% 7.4% 18.6% 0.0% Worse 32.1% 32.1% 7.1% 3.6% 14.3% 10.7% Strong 4.3% 14.9% 23.4% 34.0% 14.9% 0.0% Good 7.9% 12.4% 25.8% 19.1% 20.2% 0.0% Fair 12.5% 15.6% 32.8% 3.1% 26.6% 4.7% Weak 19.0% 38.1% 0.0% 0.0% 19.0% 9.5% Table continued on following page InfoComm 2008 International Economic Snapshot Survey Page 33 © InfoComm International 2008
Page 1 and 2: InfoComm International 08 InfoComm
Page 3 and 4: The survey results show that the re
Page 5 and 6: six months, and the one that has se
Page 7 and 8: Project Overview InfoComm Internati
Page 9 and 10: The U.S.-based respondents are grou
Page 11 and 12: U.S. Regional Breakout Mountain 6.6
Page 13 and 14: Exhibit A7: Company Function Functi
Page 15 and 16: InfoComm Performance Index Categori
Page 17 and 18: Summer season has proven to be a bo
Page 19 and 20: Performance category = Fair A littl
Page 21 and 22: Exhibit B6: Perceived Company Posit
Page 23 and 24: Lending Climate Impact How has the
Page 25 and 26: Comments from respondents on the cu
Page 27 and 28: Exhibit B11: Confidence Metrics by
Page 29 and 30: Exhibit B11: Confidence Metrics by
Page 31 and 32: C. Product/Service Indicators What
Page 33 and 34: • Video conferencing • Video co
Page 35 and 36: Briefly describe how your company's
Page 37: Through the use of videoconferencin
Page 41 and 42: 1. Which of the following best desc
Page 43 and 44: 14. What was your company's estimat

September 2008 Economic Snapshot Survey - InfoComm

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?