PERCEIVED RISK AND THE SITING OF A CONTROVERSIAL ...
PERCEIVED RISK AND THE SITING OF A CONTROVERSIAL ...
PERCEIVED RISK AND THE SITING OF A CONTROVERSIAL ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
families on the traditional, Sunday afternoon drive who wish to spend quiet time in the<br />
country.<br />
The negotiated settlement provides that 40 acres of the 243 will be dedicated for<br />
99 years to a future park with community recreational facilities (see Appendix G, page<br />
3). According to the county commissioner, Kelly Snell, the park will serve as a “county<br />
precinct park” and be located upstream from the wastewater treatment plant (Gonzalez,<br />
2009). It is part of the 2010 county wide master park plan adopted by the<br />
commissioner’s court and recommends a park that will include a sports complex, a<br />
playground, concession stands, recreational vehicle spaces, a fishing area, horseback<br />
trails, hike and bike trails, a water sports area, camping facilities, and picnic areas<br />
(Mundo and Associates, 2010). Although the Bull Hide site was not identified as the<br />
future park in the plan, the 40 acres has been designated.<br />
A recreational area adjacent to the creek was insisted upon by stakeholders who<br />
were concerned that the plant site would be used as a future regional landfill. This<br />
possibility was conveyed to the author by the staff member at the Heart of Texas Council<br />
of Governments in charge of regional solid waste planning but the City of Waco denied<br />
the allegation on the grounds they projected 15 years remaining space in their landfill.<br />
An employee in the solid waste division of TCEQ, however, told the author that while<br />
Waco had 15 years capacity remaining in 2009, the six county region was expected to<br />
reach landfill capacity before 2018 (Mann, 2008).<br />
53