Crossmodal Action 1 Crossmodal Action Selection - RWTH Aachen ...

Crossmodal Action 22
References
Bekkering, H., Adam, J. J., Kingma, H., Huson, A., & Whiting, H. T. A. (1994). Reaction
time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions.
Experimental Brain Research, 97, 471-476.
Byrne, M. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Serial modules in parallel: The psychological
refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review, 108, 847-869.
Dunbar, K., & MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference
patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 10, 622-639.
Duncan, J. (1979). Divided attention: The whole is more than the sum of its parts. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 216–228.
Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the
central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
and Performance, 18, 1058-1079.
Gottsdanker, R. (1979). A psychological refractory period or an unprepared period? Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 216-228.
Hancock, P. A., Oron-Gilad, T., & Szalma, J. L. (2007). Elaborations of the multiple-resource
theory of attention. In A. F. Kramer, D. A. Wiegmann, & A. Kirlik (Eds.), Attention:
From theory to practice (pp. 45-56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). The role of input and output modality
pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference.
Cognitive Psychology 52, 291-345.
Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals
parallel response selection after practise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 28, 527-545.