10.02.2014 Views

Designing E-learning Interactions in the 21st Century: revisiting and ...

Designing E-learning Interactions in the 21st Century: revisiting and ...

Designing E-learning Interactions in the 21st Century: revisiting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Andrew Ravenscroft 141<br />

many contemporary approaches to e-<strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> that emphasise <strong>the</strong> necessity for<br />

collaborative, argumentative <strong>and</strong> reflective discourses. He conceived <strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> as<br />

an <strong>in</strong>structional process aimed at transform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>the</strong> child <strong>in</strong>to that of an<br />

adult <strong>and</strong> treated <strong>the</strong> role of language as primary <strong>in</strong> this process, with <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />

activities performed primarily <strong>in</strong> school. However, it is accepted that his ideas are<br />

not limited to relationships <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g strictly schoolchildren <strong>and</strong> adult teachers,<br />

but more appropriately, to any relevant context <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a learner <strong>and</strong> a more<br />

learned o<strong>the</strong>r. Similarly, his <strong>the</strong>ories are not bound to <strong>the</strong> `traditional' concept of a<br />

school. Never<strong>the</strong>less, I will reta<strong>in</strong> his orig<strong>in</strong>al taxonomy to reta<strong>in</strong> au<strong>the</strong>nticity for<br />

<strong>the</strong> purpose of this article.<br />

Vygotsky draws a clear dist<strong>in</strong>ction between lower level mental processes, such<br />

as elementary perception <strong>and</strong> attention, <strong>and</strong> higher level mental processes that<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude verbal thought, logical memory, selective attention <strong>and</strong> reason<strong>in</strong>g. He<br />

argues for a qualitative dist<strong>in</strong>ction between <strong>the</strong>se two levels of mental<br />

performance, because unlike lower level activity, <strong>the</strong> higher level is: mediated<br />

through cultural symbols <strong>and</strong> tools; self-regulated ra<strong>the</strong>r than bound to a stimulus<br />

context; social <strong>in</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>; <strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> result of conscious awareness ra<strong>the</strong>r than an<br />

automatic response.<br />

Critical <strong>in</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g higher <strong>and</strong> lower level activity is <strong>the</strong> qualitative<br />

developmental transition that occurs when language, or any o<strong>the</strong>r sign system, is<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternalised to operate as a mediat<strong>in</strong>g factor between environmental stimuli <strong>and</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual's response. This mediation transforms <strong>the</strong> lower level activity by lift<strong>in</strong>g it<br />

onto a higher plane <strong>and</strong> can be achieved through <strong>the</strong> application of material or<br />

psychological tools. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g such tools we become conscious <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

control of our mental activities. However, Vygotsky considered language to be <strong>the</strong><br />

most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> powerful of <strong>the</strong>se semiotic mediators <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary tool for<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g. He claims that <strong>the</strong>se higher mental functions orig<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> social, <strong>and</strong><br />

development proceeds `from action to thought' <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore communication <strong>and</strong><br />

social contact are essential. It is through <strong>the</strong> communicative process that external<br />

sign systems convey<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpersonal communication become <strong>in</strong>ternalised to<br />

operate as <strong>in</strong>trapersonal psychological tools that can transform mental function<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>in</strong>ternal language <strong>and</strong> thought are transformed from <strong>the</strong> `outside'.<br />

This idea is critical to Vygotsky's notions about conceptual development <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

evolution of l<strong>in</strong>guistic mean<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>the</strong> child evolves <strong>in</strong>to that of an adult.<br />

A problem dur<strong>in</strong>g conceptual development stems from <strong>the</strong> tension between<br />

two different forms of experience that give rise to two <strong>in</strong>terrelated groups of<br />

concepts that Vygotsky called scientific <strong>and</strong> spontaneous. Spontaneous concepts<br />

arise out of everyday experience <strong>and</strong> so <strong>the</strong>y are rich <strong>in</strong> contextual associations but<br />

unsystematic, follow<strong>in</strong>g a `common sense' logic <strong>and</strong> expressed <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>formal<br />

language. In contrast, scientific concepts orig<strong>in</strong>ate dur<strong>in</strong>g highly structured<br />

activity with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> culturally coord<strong>in</strong>ated practices of a school. Teachers<br />

possess<strong>in</strong>g a received, au<strong>the</strong>ntic knowledge of a subject Ð that is organised,<br />

systematic <strong>in</strong> its reason<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> because of its more abstract language, less<br />

dependent on contextual reference Ð assist <strong>in</strong> enculturat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> learner with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

scientific knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Vygotsky, it is critical<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g school<strong>in</strong>g to develop <strong>the</strong> concrete, spontaneous concepts held by <strong>the</strong> child<br />

<strong>in</strong>to abstract, scientific concepts representative of adult underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that is <strong>the</strong><br />

content of <strong>the</strong> curriculum. However, he argues that <strong>in</strong>struction should stem from<br />

<strong>the</strong> scientific concepts <strong>and</strong> not build on <strong>the</strong> spontaneous ones, argu<strong>in</strong>g that mental<br />

ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!