18.02.2014 Views

CMP Prod Oct2012.pdf - Training and Research Support Centre

CMP Prod Oct2012.pdf - Training and Research Support Centre

CMP Prod Oct2012.pdf - Training and Research Support Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Community Monitoring<br />

Programme<br />

Quarterly Community Assessment of the<br />

Socio-economic Situation in Zimbabwe:<br />

<strong>Prod</strong>uction <strong>and</strong> Food Security<br />

Sept-Oct 2012<br />

An explanation of the Community Monitoring<br />

This report is one of a series of quarterly monitoring of social <strong>and</strong> economic<br />

conditions at community level. This community based monitoring on<br />

<strong>Prod</strong>uction <strong>and</strong> Food Security was carried out in September-October 2012.<br />

The report is compiled from 238 monitoring reports from 58 districts from all<br />

the ten provinces of Zimbabwe, with an average of 4.1 reports per district.<br />

Community monitoring of social <strong>and</strong> economic conditions has been carried out<br />

every three months since 2003. The quarterly rounds cover: Health <strong>and</strong><br />

Education, Income <strong>and</strong> Employment, <strong>Prod</strong>uction <strong>and</strong> assets. All rounds also<br />

cover food security monitoring. Monitors based in sentinel wards from civil<br />

society organizations report on specific areas of social <strong>and</strong> economic<br />

conditions at community level. Information on a district is compiled from three<br />

to four sentinel sites. These reports are thus not statistical sample surveys, but<br />

regular community assessments of the social <strong>and</strong> economic conditions in<br />

sentinel sites. They provide information on how things are changing across<br />

time or how things differ across areas.<br />

The Community Monitoring is implemented through civil society organisations<br />

based within districts <strong>and</strong> community based monitors to inform the work of the<br />

organisations implementing it, to support informed civil society <strong>and</strong> public<br />

sector dialogue with evidence on conditions at community level.<br />

This round is the eighth time quarterly monitoring has been done of production<br />

<strong>and</strong> food security, with previous rounds having been done annually from 2004<br />

to 2011. Where feasible, comparisons with previous rounds have been made.<br />

Continuous measures including training <strong>and</strong> peer review are being<br />

implemented to improve the quality <strong>and</strong> relevance of the reports. Proposals for<br />

issues to monitor <strong>and</strong> feedback on the report are welcomed <strong>and</strong> can be sent to<br />

communitymonitor@googlemail.com


<strong>Prod</strong>uction <strong>and</strong> Food Security<br />

September-October 2011<br />

Summary of Findings<br />

Returns from <strong>Prod</strong>uction<br />

Small scale farming <strong>and</strong> informal vending continue to be the main production<br />

activities. Formal <strong>and</strong> informal manufacturing, formal retail <strong>and</strong> large scale farming<br />

remained at lower levels. Informal vending has risen sharply since 2007, with sale of<br />

clothes, building materials, electrical gadgets, food items - including alcohol - <strong>and</strong><br />

agricultural commodities.<br />

Women are reported to be more involved in informal vending <strong>and</strong> men more involved in<br />

the other production activities, particularly those associated with more secure incomes.<br />

For small scale agriculture, the majority of households were reported to have limited<br />

access to l<strong>and</strong>, with a small improvement in access in 2012, <strong>and</strong> with greater access to<br />

l<strong>and</strong> in men than in women.<br />

Fertilizer <strong>and</strong> maize seed are reported to be available in more than two thirds of sites,<br />

with rising prices for fertilizer <strong>and</strong> lower prices reported for maize seed in 2012<br />

compared with 2011.<br />

The availability of groundnut <strong>and</strong> sorghum seed in sites is reported to be relatively low,<br />

having fallen after 2009 <strong>and</strong> costs for these seed to be higher than for maize seed,<br />

possibly inhibiting use of sorghum despite its resilience in low rainfall areas.<br />

Across provinces, access to tillage <strong>and</strong> credit was lower in Masvingo <strong>and</strong> Matabelel<strong>and</strong><br />

North, <strong>and</strong> to irrigation lower in Manical<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Matabelel<strong>and</strong> South, <strong>and</strong> men were<br />

reported to have better access to inputs than women. Community monitors reported that<br />

when prices for crops such as maize are low, <strong>and</strong> input costs high, they struggle to make<br />

adequate income to meet needs such as health <strong>and</strong> education fees.<br />

Household food security<br />

Communities are reported to be almost entirely relying on commercial sources of food,<br />

with only eight percent of the sites reporting consumption of own produce. The big fall in<br />

own produce as a source since 2009 may reflect a shift away from food production<br />

towards other cash crops, but it also appears that returns from sales of other crops may<br />

not match costs of commercial foods for many households as sale of assets to purchase<br />

food was reported to be happening in almost all (94%) sites.<br />

Food is generally widely available, with a small increase in prices.<br />

Nevertheless the share of sites where households were reported to have no food stocks<br />

remained relatively high (over 60%) <strong>and</strong> has been deteriorating since 2009.<br />

If the returns from the other production activities are not adequately supporting food<br />

security, as it appears from the evidence, then more focus needs to be given to<br />

incentives for food production, such as in making inputs more affordable for food<br />

producers, especially women producers.<br />

Environments for health<br />

Nearly a third (30%) of sites report less than a quarter of the households in their site<br />

having access to safe water.<br />

There has also been a small reported improvement in access to safe sanitation during<br />

2012, although still with 20% of sites reporting less than a quarter of sites having access<br />

to safe sanitation.<br />

1


Returns from <strong>Prod</strong>uction<br />

Successful production is an important contributor to improved household wealth, incomes,<br />

<strong>and</strong> food security. How are households recovering after the prolonged period of economic<br />

decline in Zimbabwe in the 2000s? Are they accessing the resources needed for production?<br />

This round of monitoring has tracked performance on indicators of production <strong>and</strong> food<br />

security to help in answering these questions.<br />

What production activities are households engaged in? The community monitoring reports<br />

indicate that small scale farming <strong>and</strong> informal vending continue to be the main production<br />

activities. Formal <strong>and</strong> informal manufacturing, formal retail <strong>and</strong> large scale farming<br />

remained at lower levels, with unchanged frequency of reporting since 2011 (See Figure<br />

1). Informal vending has risen sharply since 2007, <strong>and</strong> although fewer sites reported it as<br />

the main activity in 2011, it rose again in frequency in 2012. Community monitors<br />

reported that vending in informal markets includes sale of clothes, building materials,<br />

electrical gadgets, food items including alcohol <strong>and</strong> agricultural commodities.<br />

Women are reported to be more involved in informal vending <strong>and</strong> men more involved in the<br />

other production activities, particularly those associated with more secure incomes (formal<br />

manufacture, formal marketing <strong>and</strong> large scale farming). Men have become more involved<br />

in small scale farming since 2011 (Table 1).<br />

Table 1: Percent of sites reporting production activity by gender M=Men, F=Women<br />

Small scale<br />

farming<br />

Large scale<br />

farming<br />

Formal<br />

manufacturing<br />

Informal<br />

manufacturing<br />

Formal<br />

marketing<br />

Informal<br />

vending<br />

Province<br />

M F M F M F M F M F M F<br />

Sept 2012 68 66 24 12 23 10 32 12 16 12 55 63<br />

Sept 2011 60 54 27 7 21 13 30 12 17 9 43 56<br />

Sept 2010 67 70 13 6 17 7 40 12 14 13 60 74<br />

Sept 2009 50 58 17 7 25 14 50 42 43 30 47 64<br />

Total Sept 2012 67 18 16 22 14 59<br />

2


Securing meaningful income from small scale farming <strong>and</strong> informal vending depends on<br />

improved access to production inputs, improved outputs from production <strong>and</strong> returns from<br />

the market. How well are households faring in these areas?<br />

For small scale<br />

agriculture, the<br />

monitoring reports show<br />

that while the majority of<br />

households had limited<br />

access to l<strong>and</strong>, there<br />

was a small<br />

improvement in access<br />

in 2012. This was<br />

particularly the case for<br />

men, whose access to<br />

l<strong>and</strong> is greater than for<br />

women (See Figure 2)<br />

Lower access to l<strong>and</strong> is<br />

reported in Masvingo<br />

<strong>and</strong> Matabelel<strong>and</strong> North<br />

(Table 2)<br />

Table 2: Reported access to adequate l<strong>and</strong>, M= Male, F = Female<br />

% sites reporting share of households having access to l<strong>and</strong><br />

None Few Many All<br />

Province<br />

F M F M F M F M<br />

Bulawayo 21 17 28 31 3 7 0 0<br />

Harare 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0<br />

Manical<strong>and</strong> 0 0 35 4 65 96 0 0<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> Central 0 0 33 0 57 90 0 0<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> East 0 10 24 10 76 81 0 0<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> West 0 0 30 13 70 87 0 0<br />

Masvingo 14 7 79 14 7 79 0 0<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> North 13 6 75 13 13 81 0 0<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> South 0 0 33 11 67 89 0 0<br />

Midl<strong>and</strong>s 0 0 23 19 77 81 0 0<br />

Sub Total Sept 2012 5 4 34 12 41 64 0 0<br />

Sub Total Sept 2011 8 11 49 31 35 37 0 3<br />

Sub Total Sept 2010 21 15 45 27 12 31 0 3<br />

Sub Total Sept 2009 18 14 57 39 6 23 0 4<br />

Total Sept 2012 5 23 53 0<br />

Total Sept 2011 10 40 36 1<br />

Total Sept 2010 18 36 22 2<br />

Total Sept 2009 17 48 15 2<br />

“Not rural” responses make up the difference in total percentages in all provinces<br />

“Farmers are not sure about the rains thus making them slow in preparing the l<strong>and</strong>.”<br />

Masvingo<br />

In relation to inputs, this round of monitoring found that the price of fertilizer in 2012 was<br />

reported to be slightly higher in 2012 than in 2011, <strong>and</strong> the price of maize seed to be<br />

slightly lower in 2012 compared to 2011 (See Figure 3). The monitors report that a<br />

number of new seed varieties are now being sold, particularly for maize.<br />

3


Fertilizer <strong>and</strong> maize seed are reported<br />

to be available in more than 69% <strong>and</strong><br />

73% of sites, <strong>and</strong> have remained at<br />

levels of above 60% sites reporting<br />

availability since September 2009<br />

(See Table 3). However rising prices<br />

of fertilizer may mean that poorer<br />

farmers may not be able to afford to<br />

buy inputs in adequate quantities,<br />

affecting their yields (<strong>and</strong> keeping<br />

them in poverty).<br />

As shown in Figure 4, reported<br />

availability of groundnut <strong>and</strong> sorghum<br />

seed in sites is still relatively low,<br />

having fallen after 2009. Reported<br />

availability of draught power <strong>and</strong> credit<br />

have stayed at relatively constant<br />

levels (<strong>and</strong> reported to be available in<br />

above 50% of sites. The costs for a<br />

10kg bag of sorghum <strong>and</strong> groundnut<br />

seed are reported by monitors to be<br />

relatively high for farmers, with a 10kg<br />

bag of sorghum costing $20.10 <strong>and</strong> a<br />

10 kg bag of groundnut seed costing<br />

$19.80. With these costs higher than<br />

maize seed they may inhibit use of<br />

these crops, such as of sorghum in<br />

low rainfall areas.<br />

‘The Government should subsidies the<br />

cost of seed <strong>and</strong> fertilizer. People did<br />

not harvest anything last year <strong>and</strong><br />

they don’t have income to buy inputs’<br />

Monitor, Midl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Table 3: Reported availability of fertiliser <strong>and</strong><br />

maize seed<br />

% of sites reporting on<br />

availability of<br />

Province<br />

Fertilizer Maize seed<br />

Bulawayo 62 72<br />

Harare 82 79<br />

Manical<strong>and</strong> 78 78<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> Central 71 67<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> East 76 86<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> West 61 74<br />

Masvingo 71 68<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> North 63 63<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> South 56 67<br />

Midl<strong>and</strong>s 65 69<br />

Total Sept 2012 69 73<br />

Total Sept 2011 77 80<br />

Total Sept 2010 65 91<br />

Total Sept 2009 63 69<br />

Total Nov 2008 4 4<br />

“Not rural” responses make up the difference in total<br />

percentages in all provinces<br />

4


Across provinces, access to tillage <strong>and</strong> credit was lower in Masvingo <strong>and</strong> Matabelel<strong>and</strong><br />

North, <strong>and</strong> to irrigation lower in Manical<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Matabelel<strong>and</strong> South, The community<br />

reports indicated that men generally have better access to inputs than women, particularly in<br />

relation to access to credit <strong>and</strong> tillage (Table 4). Community monitors reported that when<br />

prices for crops such as maize are low, <strong>and</strong> input costs high, they struggle to make adequate<br />

income to meet needs such as health <strong>and</strong> education fees.<br />

‘The prices offered for the crops are low, people cannot get income from farming to meet<br />

school fees <strong>and</strong> food costs”<br />

Monitor, Mashonal<strong>and</strong> Central<br />

Table 4: Reported access to agricultural inputs in rural provinces<br />

% sites reporting response on share of households with access<br />

None Few Many All<br />

Province<br />

Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men<br />

Tillage/Draught Power<br />

Total Sept 2012 17 8 58 23 5 49 0 0<br />

Total Sept 2011 22 13 47 22 14 45 0 0<br />

Total Sept 2010 24 21 45 10 10 41 0 2<br />

Total Sept 2009 19 15 54 32 5 32 1 0<br />

Credit for farming<br />

Total Sept 2012 38 17 40 49 1 15 0 0<br />

Total Sept 2011 37 21 39 44 6 17 1 0<br />

Total Sept 2010 47 34 35 39 1 6 0 0<br />

Total Sept 2009 30 21 50 54 1 6 0 1<br />

Irrigation<br />

Total Sept 2012 59 47 21 32 0 1 0<br />

Total Sept 2011 50 39 30 37 5 8 0 0<br />

Total Sept 2010 63 61 14 14 3 5 0 0<br />

Total Sept 2009 38 33 39 42 2 3 0 1<br />

Household food security<br />

Communities are<br />

reported to be almost<br />

entirely relying on<br />

commercial sources of<br />

food, with only eight<br />

percent of the sites<br />

reporting consumption<br />

of own produce (See<br />

Table 5 <strong>and</strong> Figure 5).<br />

Reliance on<br />

commercial sources is<br />

highest in urban<br />

provinces (Harare <strong>and</strong><br />

Bulawayo) as well as<br />

in Masvingo (Table 5)<br />

Table 5: Reported primary source of food, Sept 2012.<br />

% sites reporting primary source of food as<br />

Province<br />

Own produce Commercial GMB Relief<br />

Bulawayo 7 93 0 0<br />

Harare 6 94 0 0<br />

Manical<strong>and</strong> 9 91 0 0<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> Central 5 95 0 0<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> East 14 86 0 0<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> West 9 91 0 0<br />

Masvingo 4 96 0 0<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> North 6 94 0 0<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> South 6 94 0 0<br />

Midl<strong>and</strong>s 15 85 0 0<br />

Total Sept 2012 8 92 0 0<br />

Total Sept 2011 11 87 2 0<br />

Total Sept 2009 53 37 5 5<br />

5


This high reliance on commercial sources of food has been reported since September 2011,<br />

with a big fall in own produce as a source when comparing with reports in 2009 (no round on<br />

this was done in 2010) (See Table 5). It may reflect a shift away from food production<br />

towards other cash crops. Increased reliance in commercial sources of food can put a<br />

financial strain on poorer households, especially if returns from production <strong>and</strong> sales of other<br />

crops do not match costs of commercial foods. There is some indication that households<br />

have been negatively affected by this switch to commercial supplies, with sale of assets to<br />

purchase food reported to be happening in almost all (94%) sites.<br />

Food is generally widely available, with a small increase in prices. The food commodities<br />

monitored- maize meal, oil, sugar, bread <strong>and</strong> beans - were reported to be universally<br />

available across all sites, with significant improvements in reported availability since March<br />

2009 (see Figure 6).<br />

The cost of a 10kg bag of maize meal <strong>and</strong> maize grain was reported to have slightly risen in<br />

September 2012 when compared to June 2012 prices, with a 10kg bag of maize meal <strong>and</strong><br />

maize grain costing $6.70 <strong>and</strong> $3.90 respectively in September 2012. However, as shown in<br />

6


Other indicator goods necessary for health that have been monitored over time are shown in<br />

Figure 7. The costs of most of these goods were reported to have fallen slightly in<br />

September 2012, with condoms showing a small price increase.<br />

Food security has largely remained at low levels despite wider availability of food<br />

commodities. As shown in Table 6 <strong>and</strong> Figure 8, the share of sites where households were<br />

reported to have no food stocks remained at relatively high levels(over 60%). This is not<br />

surprising given the shift from own produce to commercial foods described earlier, but does<br />

indicate that food security in terms of own stocks has been deteriorating since 2009.<br />

7


Table 6: Reported levels of household food stocks<br />

% sites reporting food stocks that last<br />

More 1-3 Less None<br />

than 4 months than 1<br />

Province<br />

months<br />

month<br />

Bulawayo 2 15 50 33<br />

Harare 5 15 40 40<br />

Manical<strong>and</strong> 0 0 20 80<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> Central 5 11 17 67<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> East 0 12 18 70<br />

Mashonal<strong>and</strong> West 0 14 24 62<br />

Masvingo 1 2 15 82<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> North 1 2 14 83<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> South 0 7 18 75<br />

Midl<strong>and</strong>s 0 13 20 67<br />

Total Sept 2012 3 8 24 65<br />

Total June 2012 4 9 24 64<br />

Total March 2012 14 16 28 63<br />

Total Sept 2011 6 13 18 63<br />

Total June 2011 9 15 20 56<br />

Total March 2011 6 14 30 50<br />

Total Sept 2010 12 12 21 55<br />

Total June 2010 16 24 31 29<br />

Total March 2010 14 19 24 44<br />

Total June 2009 2 29 30 39<br />

Total March 2009 1 3 10 86<br />

The provinces with the<br />

poorest reported<br />

household food stocks<br />

were Masvingo,<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> North <strong>and</strong><br />

Manical<strong>and</strong>.<br />

If the returns from the<br />

other production activities<br />

are not adequately<br />

supporting food security,<br />

as it appears from the<br />

evidence, then more<br />

focus needs to be given<br />

to incentives for food<br />

production, such as in<br />

making inputs more<br />

affordable for food<br />

producers, especially<br />

women producers.<br />

Environments for health<br />

Access to safe water<br />

(within a distance of<br />

500m) is reported to<br />

have shown mixed<br />

outcomes, with a small<br />

rise in sites with more<br />

than three quarters of<br />

households having<br />

access <strong>and</strong> a larger rise<br />

in sites with less than a<br />

quarter of households<br />

having access (See<br />

Figure 9). Access is<br />

greater in urban than<br />

rural sites, <strong>and</strong> nearly a<br />

third (30%) of sites<br />

report less than a<br />

quarter of the<br />

households in their site<br />

having access to safe<br />

water (See Figure 9)<br />

8


There has also been a small reported improvement in access to safe sanitation during 2012,<br />

although still with 20% of sites reporting less than a quarter of sites having access to safe<br />

sanitation. Mashonal<strong>and</strong> East <strong>and</strong> Mashonal<strong>and</strong> Central have poor reported access to safe<br />

sanitation. Harare also has low access to safe water <strong>and</strong> sanitation from suburbs such as<br />

Epworth <strong>and</strong> Hatcliffe Extension. Lack of progress in water <strong>and</strong> sanitation exposes<br />

households to water borne diseases particularly with the onset of the rain season.<br />

“The council should erect <strong>and</strong> properly maintain public toilets in public places like<br />

Mupedzanammo <strong>and</strong> Mbare Informal Industry (Siyaso)”<br />

Monitor, Harare<br />

Transport availability <strong>and</strong> cost<br />

determines access to services. The<br />

nominal transport costs to the nearest<br />

centre where health services can be<br />

accessed was reported to have remained<br />

relatively constant since June 2009,<br />

except for a lower average level reported<br />

in September 2011 (Table 11).<br />

Matabelel<strong>and</strong> North had the highest<br />

reported transport cost. While these<br />

costs have remained relatively constant<br />

improved availability of supplies,<br />

including in local health services, means<br />

that people have less distance to travel to<br />

access servces, For example if women<br />

have to travel to district hospitals to<br />

access maternity services (<strong>and</strong><br />

Table 11:Nominal costs of transport to nearest<br />

centre<br />

Province<br />

US$ Cost<br />

Total Sept 2012 1.20<br />

Total June 2012 1.20<br />

Total Sept 2011 0.98<br />

Total June 2011 1.13<br />

Total Sept 2010 1.19<br />

Total June 2010 1.15<br />

Total June 2009 1.20<br />

Total Sept 2009 1.03<br />

Total Oct 2007 1.05<br />

Total Aug 2005 0.89<br />

Total July 2004 1.01<br />

Note: 2004, 2005 <strong>and</strong> 2007 fares used parallel<br />

exchange rates for Z$ conversion<br />

midwives) this increases transport cost barriers to use of services <strong>and</strong> the costs will be<br />

much higher than the $1.20 noted above as the cost to the nearest centre.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!