DG State Aid – Control and Regeneraton of Deprived Urban ... - REVIT
DG State Aid – Control and Regeneraton of Deprived Urban ... - REVIT
DG State Aid – Control and Regeneraton of Deprived Urban ... - REVIT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NN114/2000<br />
Individual cases <strong>of</strong> application based<br />
on the English Heritage Scheme<br />
The scheme is usually known as the Historic Buildings, Monuments, Parks <strong>and</strong> Gardens<br />
Grant Scheme <strong>and</strong> as its title suggests, the scheme targets the repair <strong>of</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong>’s most<br />
important historic buildings, monuments, parks <strong>and</strong> gardens. Having received a grant, these<br />
heritage attractions must then be open to the general public during certain days <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />
Projects that can be targeted under this scheme are secular monuments, parks,<br />
gardens <strong>and</strong> buildings. These assets must either be listed or registered at a specific<br />
heritage grade for the repair works to proceed under this scheme.<br />
This scheme provides support in the form <strong>of</strong> a grant for the costs <strong>of</strong> immediate repairs that<br />
are necessary to prevent loss or damage to important architectural, archaeological or<br />
l<strong>and</strong>scape features. In addition to the costs for immediate repairs, incidental costs arising<br />
from these repairs are also classed as eligible for support.<br />
The Commission had difficulty in assessing this case as this scheme was not able to<br />
distinguish between the various situations that may require support. For many <strong>of</strong> the projects<br />
supported under this scheme, the Commission agreed with the UK authorities that not all <strong>of</strong><br />
the conditions <strong>of</strong> Article 87(1) <strong>of</strong> the EC Treaty were fulfilled so state aid was not involved.<br />
However, there were some cases where the Commission could not exclude the fact that this<br />
support may advantage undertakings active in sectors in which there is trade between Member<br />
<strong>State</strong>s. Further investigation into this scheme led the Commission to note that the eligible<br />
projects are selected by using st<strong>and</strong>ards based on heritage conservation. As the aid awarded<br />
under this scheme is limited to covering the additional heritage related costs, the Commission<br />
found that such aid promotes heritage conservation without affecting trade <strong>and</strong> competition to<br />
an extent contrary to the common interest in the meaning <strong>of</strong> Article 87(3)(d) <strong>of</strong> the EC Treaty.<br />
Therefore, the Commission found the English Heritage Scheme to be compatible with Article<br />
87(3)(d) <strong>of</strong> the EC Treaty.<br />
For Further Information:<br />
Decision:<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/comp-2000/nn114-00-corr.pdf<br />
47