04.03.2014 Views

Elio D'Amato presentation - Australian Investors Association

Elio D'Amato presentation - Australian Investors Association

Elio D'Amato presentation - Australian Investors Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fundamental Analysis –<br />

The bottom up approach<br />

<strong>Elio</strong> D’Amato<br />

Chief Executive Officer<br />

AIA Conference - Sydney<br />

1 September 2011


Important information<br />

This <strong>presentation</strong> is provided for educational purposes only and has been prepared<br />

without taking into account your personal circumstances, and you should therefore<br />

consider its appropriateness in light of your objectives, financial situation and needs,<br />

before acting on it. Investments can go up and down.<br />

Information in this <strong>presentation</strong> is current as at date of <strong>presentation</strong> unless otherwise<br />

stated. However, please bear in mind that shares or other investments may go up or<br />

down in value, that past performance may not be repeated and that such information is<br />

no guarantee of future performance.<br />

For further ‘Important Information’ (e.g. relating to the Lincoln <strong>Australian</strong> Share Fund,<br />

Testimonials, Disclosures of Interest and other disclaimers), please refer to the<br />

“Important Information” section at the end of this <strong>presentation</strong>.


How do you ‘fundamental’?<br />

Two approaches:<br />

• Top down<br />

• Start with the big picture (e.g. favourable markets)<br />

• Drill down multiple levels to individual stock<br />

selection that meets all the above criteria<br />

• Bottom up<br />

• Assess quality companies first and foremost<br />

• Consider broader factors secondary to core<br />

company’s business<br />

3


Bottom up analysis<br />

“The key to investing is not assessing how much<br />

an industry is going to affect society, or how<br />

much it will grow, but rather determining the<br />

competitive advantage of any given company<br />

and, above all, the durability of that advantage.”<br />

Warren Buffett<br />

4


Bottom up analysis<br />

• So how do we apply this analysis?<br />

• Financial Health – examine the financial structure of<br />

the business<br />

• Performance – consider management’s historical<br />

performance and its drivers<br />

• Company assessment – understand how the<br />

business works, the sector it operates within and<br />

assess its future going forward<br />

• Valuation – quantify the value of the company,<br />

accommodating for growth prospects going forward<br />

5


Financial Health<br />

6


Understanding financial statements<br />

To be able to assess the Financial Health of<br />

a company, it is first necessary to<br />

understand the different financial statements<br />

• Profit and Loss statement<br />

• Balance Sheet<br />

• Cash Flow statement<br />

7


Profit and Loss statement<br />

• The Profit and Loss statement (P&L) is also referred<br />

to as the ‘Income Statement’<br />

• It gives a summary of a company’s revenues and<br />

expenses for a specified period of time<br />

• The most important figure generated is the Net<br />

Income and Earnings Per Share (EPS)<br />

• Remove significant items and focus only on<br />

recurring items to get a better picture<br />

8


Balance Sheet<br />

• The Balance Sheet is also referred to as a<br />

‘Statement of Financial Position’<br />

• It lists a company’s Assets, Liabilities and<br />

Shareholders’ Equity as at a particular point in<br />

time<br />

9


Cash Flow statement<br />

• The Cash Flow statement shows the movements<br />

of cash and cash equivalents as affected by<br />

changes in a company’s income and balance<br />

sheet accounts<br />

• It is usually divided into three parts:<br />

• Cash flows from Operations<br />

• Cash flows from Investing Activities<br />

• Cash flows from Financing Activities<br />

10


Financial ratios<br />

• The task of determining the<br />

health of a listed company by<br />

looking at financial statements<br />

seems daunting<br />

• But it doesn’t really require special training or<br />

countless hours of research!<br />

• Even the novice investor can make sense of a<br />

listed company’s Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss<br />

and Cash Flow statement by using financial ratios<br />

11


Financial ratio analysis<br />

What is financial ratio analysis?<br />

12<br />

• When we take a financial figure and look at it relative to another<br />

financial figure<br />

• These ratios simplify the process of determining the health of a<br />

listed company and make reported financial information more<br />

meaningful and useful for investors<br />

• It allows for comparison with previous years, other companies and<br />

the industry sector<br />

• First popularised by Benjamin Graham (considered by many as the<br />

‘Father of fundamental analysis’)<br />

• Ratios can measure many factors of a business


Liquidity ratios<br />

• Liquidity ratios indicate whether a company has<br />

the ability to pay off short-term debt obligations<br />

(debts due to be paid within one year) as they<br />

fall due<br />

• Generally, a higher value is desired as this<br />

indicates greater capacity to meet debt<br />

obligations<br />

13


Liquidity ratios<br />

Operating Cash Flow to Current Liabilities (OCFCL)<br />

• Operating cash flow to current liabilities pertains to the<br />

cash generated from the operations of a company<br />

(revenues less all operating expenses, plus<br />

depreciation), in relation to short-term debt obligations<br />

• Operating cash flow is a more accurate measure of a<br />

company’s profitability than net income because it only<br />

deducts actual cash expenses and therefore<br />

demonstrates the strength of a company’s operations<br />

• Consistently negative operating cash flow implies a<br />

business is going backwards in relation to the cost to<br />

conduct ordinary operations<br />

14


Liquidity ratios<br />

OCFCL ratio<br />

Formula:<br />

OCFCL Ratio =<br />

Operating Cash Flow<br />

Current Liabilities<br />

• The higher the value of the OCFCL ratio, the lower<br />

the level of risk<br />

• A high value indicates that the company generates<br />

sufficient cash from its operations to cover shortterm<br />

liabilities<br />

15


Financial Health exercise<br />

OCFCL ratio<br />

Example: RCG Corporation Limited (RCG) – Rounded to ‘000s<br />

OCFCL Ratio =<br />

$7,690<br />

$9,409<br />

OCFCL Ratio =<br />

0.82<br />

16


Liquidity ratios<br />

Cash Balance to Total Liabilities (CBTL)<br />

• Measures a company’s ability to meet total debt commitments<br />

using its current cash balance<br />

• This measures the company’s ability to absorb liquidity shocks<br />

should profitability drop or debt covenants breached<br />

• A lower value indicates a company may be susceptible to failing<br />

to meet its commitments due to low cash reserves<br />

17


Liquidity ratios<br />

CBTL ratio<br />

Formula:<br />

CBTL =<br />

Cash Balance<br />

Total Liabilities<br />

• A ratio of 1 is usually considered the benchmark,<br />

but could vary across industries<br />

• A ratio of less than 1 suggests the company may not<br />

have sufficient resources to settle its debt<br />

obligations if they fell due today<br />

18


Financial Health exercise<br />

CBTL ratio<br />

Example: RCG Corporation Limited (RCG) – Rounded to ‘000s<br />

CBTL =<br />

$17,172<br />

$10,067<br />

Current Ratio =<br />

1.70<br />

19


Leverage ratios<br />

• Leverage ratios, also referred to as gearing<br />

ratios, measure the extent to which a company<br />

utilises debt to finance growth<br />

• Can provide an indication of a company’s longterm<br />

solvency<br />

• While most financial experts will acknowledge<br />

that debt is a cheaper form of financing than<br />

equity, debt carries risks and investors need to<br />

be aware of the extent of this risk<br />

20


Leverage ratios<br />

Total Liabilities to Total Tangible Assets (TLTAI)<br />

• Provides an indication of a company’s capital<br />

structure and whether the company is more reliant on<br />

borrowings (debt) or shareholder capital (equity) to<br />

fund assets and activities<br />

• Contrary to what many believe, debt is not necessarily<br />

a bad thing. Debt can be positive, provided it is used<br />

for productive purposes such as purchasing assets<br />

and improving processes to increase net profits<br />

• Acceptable TLTAI ratios may also vary across<br />

industries<br />

21


Leverage ratios<br />

TLTAI ratio<br />

Formula:<br />

TLTAI Ratio =<br />

Total Liabilities<br />

Total Assets - Intangibles<br />

• A higher ratio generally indicates greater risk<br />

• Greater debt can result in volatile earnings due to<br />

additional interest expense as well as increased<br />

vulnerability to business downturns<br />

22


Financial Health exercise<br />

TLTAI ratio<br />

Example: RCG Corporation Limited (RCG)<br />

TLTAI Ratio =<br />

$10,067<br />

($53,215 – $18,642)<br />

TLTAI Ratio = 0.29<br />

23


Leverage ratios<br />

Interest Cover ratio<br />

• A company’s interest cover ratio measures its ability<br />

to meet interest expenses on debt using profits<br />

• Generally, a ratio of greater than two is regarded as a<br />

healthy position to cover interest<br />

Formula:<br />

Interest Cover Ratio =<br />

Net Profit Before<br />

Tax + Interest<br />

(EBIT)<br />

Interest<br />

24


Financial Health exercise<br />

Interest Cover ratio<br />

Example: RCG Corporation Limited (RCG) – Rounded to ‘000s<br />

Interest Cover Ratio =<br />

Interest Cover Ratio =<br />

133.27<br />

$13,024 - $97<br />

$97<br />

25


Financial Health exercise<br />

• Summary RCG Corporation Limited (RCG)<br />

• OCFCL ratio: 0.82<br />

• CBTL ratio: 1.70<br />

• TLTAI ratio: 0.29<br />

• Interest Cover ratio: 133.27<br />

• What does this tell us about RCG as a whole?<br />

26<br />

The company is a profit-making that has little interest<br />

bearing debt. RCG generates sufficient cash flow in a<br />

year to repay short term obligations. RCG has<br />

excellent debt-serving ability on the back of its very<br />

strong interest cover (ie no debt)


Performance<br />

27


Assessing company performance<br />

• Also an assessment of management performance<br />

• Can be carried out by reviewing some profitability<br />

ratios<br />

• Should be compared across time and against<br />

industry peers<br />

• May also be compared against companies globally<br />

within the same industry<br />

28


Management assessment<br />

Return on Assets (ROA)<br />

29<br />

• ROA is a measurement of management performance<br />

• It tells the investor how well a company uses its<br />

assets to generate income<br />

• Technically, a company should produce an ROA<br />

higher than the risk free rate of return to be rewarded<br />

for the additional risks involved in operating the<br />

business. If a company’s ROA is equal or even less<br />

than the risk free rate, investors should think twice as<br />

they would be better off just purchasing a bond with a<br />

guaranteed yield


Management assessment<br />

Return on Assets<br />

Formula:<br />

Return on Assets =<br />

Net Income<br />

Average Total Assets<br />

• A higher ROA denotes a higher level of management<br />

performance but must still be compared with peers<br />

• A rising ROA may initially appear good but can turn<br />

out to be unimpressive if other companies in its<br />

industry have been posting higher returns and greater<br />

improvements in ROA<br />

30


Management assessment<br />

Return on Assets<br />

Example: RCG Corporation Limited (RCG) – Rounded to ‘000s<br />

Return on Assets =<br />

Return on Assets =<br />

17.5%<br />

$8,937<br />

($53,215 + $49,453) / 2<br />

31


Management assessment<br />

Return on Equity (ROE)<br />

• ROE is another measurement of management<br />

performance<br />

• It tells the investor how well a company has used<br />

capital from shareholders to generate profits<br />

32


Management assessment<br />

Return on Equity<br />

Formula:<br />

Return on Equity =<br />

Net Income<br />

Average Shareholders’ Equity<br />

• Similar to the ROA ratio, a higher ROE denotes a<br />

higher level of management performance<br />

33


Management assessment<br />

Return on Equity<br />

Example: RCG Corporation Limited (RCG) – Rounded to ‘000s<br />

Return on Equity =<br />

$8,937<br />

($43,148 + $42,152) / 2<br />

Return on Equity =<br />

21%<br />

34


Management assessment<br />

Earnings growth<br />

• Another way to gauge management’s performance is<br />

to look at a company earnings growth<br />

• Net profit after tax may be used but a better indicator<br />

would be Earnings Per Share (EPS) as this would<br />

take into account any increases in the number of<br />

shares<br />

• Look for an increasing trend as this would indicate<br />

improvement in shareholder value<br />

• Can apply a minimum target e.g. EPS growth > 8%<br />

35


Management assessment<br />

EPS growth<br />

Formula:<br />

EPS growth =<br />

EPS Present - EPS Previous<br />

EPS Previous<br />

• Should be observed over several periods<br />

• Look for companies with consistent EPS growth<br />

• Prefer increasing EPS growth trend<br />

36


Management assessment<br />

Earnings Growth<br />

Example: RCG Corporation Limited (RCG)<br />

EPS Growth =<br />

(3.65 – 2.84 cents)<br />

2.84 cents<br />

EPS Growth =<br />

29%<br />

37


Profitability ratios<br />

Gross Profit margin<br />

• Gross profit margin tells us what percentage of a<br />

company's sales revenue would remain after<br />

deducting the cost of goods sold<br />

• This is important as it helps to determine whether the<br />

company would still have enough funds to cover<br />

operating expenses such as employee benefits, lease<br />

payments, advertising, and so on<br />

38


Profitability ratios<br />

Gross Profit margin<br />

Formula:<br />

Gross Profit margin =<br />

Sales – Cost of Sales<br />

Sales<br />

• A company’s gross profit margin may also be<br />

viewed as a measurement of production efficiency<br />

• A company with a gross profit margin higher than<br />

that of its competitors, or the industry average, is<br />

deemed to be more efficient and is therefore, all<br />

things being equal, preferred<br />

39


Management assessment exercise<br />

Gross Profit margin<br />

Example: RCG Corporation Limited (RCG) – Rounded to ‘000s<br />

Gross Profit margin =<br />

($42,339 – $14,876)<br />

$42,339<br />

Gross Profit margin =<br />

64.9%<br />

40


Management assessment exercise<br />

• Summary: RCG Corporation Limited (RCG)<br />

• Return on Assets: 17.5%<br />

• Return on Equity: 21%<br />

• EPS Growth: 29%<br />

• Gross Profit Margin: 64.9%<br />

• What does this tell us about RCG’s performance?<br />

41<br />

The company has been performing strongly. The high<br />

ROA and ROE is reflective of efficient operations. High<br />

EPS growth indicates the company’s operations<br />

continue to grow strongly and gross profit margins are<br />

indicative of high profitability of the business


Let’s take a break<br />

See you shortly<br />

42


Company assessment<br />

43


Deconstructing a company<br />

• Understand how a company operates and<br />

generates its profits<br />

• Determine the company’s key competitive<br />

advantage<br />

• Identify key risks in the company’s business model<br />

• Assess the attractiveness of the sector the<br />

company operates within<br />

44


Company operations<br />

• Advantages of understanding a company’s<br />

business model and how its profits are made:<br />

• The ability to comprehend the company’s<br />

announcements and its impact on performance<br />

• The foresight to apply broader economic news and<br />

views when gauging a company’s prospects<br />

• Identify key risk exposures of the company and your<br />

overall portfolio<br />

• Confidence in making investment decisions for your<br />

portfolio<br />

45


Key competitive advantage<br />

• Crucial when comparing a company to its peers<br />

• The three generic competitive strategies are:<br />

• Cost leadership – the lowest cost producer of a<br />

substitutable product<br />

• Differentiation – product perception that it is not easily<br />

substituted and a resulting premium can be charged<br />

• Niche focus – provides a product aimed for a subcategory<br />

of the market<br />

46


Key competitive advantage<br />

• A company’s key competitive advantage can be<br />

distilled from the generic strategies<br />

• e.g. cost leadership due to economies of scale, efficient<br />

distribution networks or vertical integration<br />

• The more difficult it is for competitors to replicate<br />

this advantage the stronger the long term impact of<br />

this advantage<br />

• e.g. through strong branding, Coca-Cola Amatil Limited<br />

(CCL) has been able to differentiate their product from<br />

generic cola beverages to charge higher prices over the<br />

long term<br />

47


Identifying key risks<br />

• Unfortunately, no business model is perfect and<br />

key risks for a business have to be identified<br />

• This is related to both understanding a business<br />

and its sector<br />

• Some risks will be specific to the business and<br />

others apply to the overall sector<br />

48


Key risks<br />

• Like competitive advantages, there are numerous<br />

risks to running a business<br />

• Key is to identify the risks which would be the most<br />

pertinent to a business:<br />

• Magnitude of failure – e.g. for a wheat farmer, the price of<br />

wheat is a key risk and substantially impacts the<br />

profitability of the business<br />

• Likelihood of failure – e.g. likelihood for a fall in the price<br />

of wheat is reasonable as global crop yields can vary<br />

significantly but global demand is relatively stable<br />

49


Understanding the sector<br />

• This process is similar to applying a top down<br />

approach<br />

• Examine country and macroeconomic impacts<br />

• e.g. the recent carbon tax proposal will significantly<br />

impact the profitability of energy intensive industries<br />

in Australia if legislated. This creates uncertainty<br />

making <strong>Australian</strong> industries like aluminum,<br />

agriculture, steel and manufacturing less attractive<br />

• Assess the attractiveness of the sector via<br />

‘Porter’s five forces’<br />

50


Porter’s five forces<br />

51


Porter’s five forces<br />

• An attractive sector will exhibit a combination of<br />

these characteristics:<br />

• low threat of new entrants, thanks to high barriers to<br />

entry, including government regulations and high<br />

start up costs<br />

• low power of suppliers, thanks to available<br />

substitutes and a large number of suppliers<br />

• low power of buyers, due to a large number of buyers<br />

• low threat of substitutes due to absence of similar<br />

products or services<br />

52


Company assessment exercise<br />

• What does RCG Corporation do?<br />

• Investment holding company which owns and operates<br />

a number of footwear businesses<br />

• Businesses include The Athlete’s Foot, Shoe Superstore<br />

and RCG Brands Pty Ltd<br />

• How does it generate its profits?<br />

• Sale of the footwear and apparel through its specialty<br />

stores, and through its wholesale and distribution<br />

subsidiary, RCG Brands<br />

53


Company assessment exercise<br />

• What is RCG Corporation Limited’s (RCG) key<br />

competitive advantage?<br />

• RCG is a niche retailer with unique market position<br />

• RCG differentiates itself on utilitarian and comfort<br />

shoes, hence it is less susceptible to fashion trends<br />

• RCG has a strong and capable management team<br />

who have been successful at turning the company<br />

around and positioning it for growth<br />

54


Company assessment exercise<br />

• What are the key business specific risks for RCG?<br />

• Management has been instrumental in turning the<br />

business around, hence key personnel risk<br />

• Execution risk of new stores rollout for the Athlete’s Foot<br />

and Shoe Superstore<br />

• What are the key sector risks that impact RCG?<br />

• Cost pressure – rising raw material costs will increase the<br />

cost of goods sold (COGS)<br />

• Weak consumer sentiment – higher interest rates and<br />

rising petrol costs may force consumers to trim<br />

discretionary spending<br />

55


Company assessment exercise<br />

• What country or macroeconomic factors are affecting<br />

RCG?<br />

• Rising labor cost – wages in China have been increased<br />

significantly over the past 12 months<br />

• Currency headwind – Chinese Yuan is a highly undervalued<br />

currency, expected to appreciate strongly over time<br />

• Using ‘Porter’s five forces’ what makes RCG’s sector<br />

attractive?<br />

• Power of suppliers is low due to the large number of manufacturers<br />

• High power of buyers as demand for footwear is relatively elastic<br />

• Unfortunately, there is a high threat of new entrants and substitutes,<br />

due to low startup costs and the wide variety of footwear available<br />

56


Valuations<br />

57


Valuations<br />

• <strong>Investors</strong> should determine an intrinsic valuation<br />

when making investment decisions<br />

• Purchase undervalued shares<br />

• Dispose overvalued shares<br />

• Warren Buffett says<br />

“Price is what you pay, value is what you get”<br />

58


How is a valuation determined?<br />

• There are several widely<br />

accepted methods utilised<br />

to do this<br />

• Each has their strengths<br />

and weaknesses<br />

• However, all methodologies<br />

will rely on assumptions and<br />

estimates<br />

59


Valuation methodologies<br />

• Ratio valuation – historical or relative<br />

• Price / Earnings ratio (P/E)<br />

• P/E / Earnings Growth ratio (PEG)<br />

• Price / Cash Flow ratio (P/CF)<br />

• Price / Book Value ratio (P/BV)<br />

• Enterprise Value<br />

• Dividend Discount model (Gordon Growth model)<br />

• Discounted Cash Flow model<br />

60


Ratio valuation calculation<br />

• Ratio valuations are the mostly widely used<br />

valuation tool due to the simplicity of their<br />

calculation<br />

P/E ratio =<br />

Current Price<br />

Estimated Annual Earnings<br />

P/E Ratio<br />

PEG ratio =<br />

Estimated Annual Earnings Growth<br />

61


Ratio valuation calculation<br />

P/BV ratio =<br />

Current Price<br />

Estimated Book Value<br />

P/CF ratio =<br />

Current Price<br />

Estimated Annual Cash Flows<br />

62


Ratio valuation - Historical<br />

• Historical ratio valuation assumes that the<br />

relationship between the company’s share price<br />

and earnings (cash flow or book value<br />

respectively) should be constant over time<br />

• In other words, each dollar invested should be<br />

worth a fixed percentage of earnings e.g.<br />

• Company A’s historical P/E is 15<br />

• Company A’s current P/E is 20<br />

• <strong>Investors</strong> should sell Company A as the current<br />

market price is high relative to its earnings<br />

63


Ratio valuation - Relative<br />

• Relative ratio valuation is used to compare<br />

different companies with similar operations. e.g.<br />

• Assume Company A and B are identical<br />

• Company A’s P/E is 20, Company B’s P/E is 15<br />

• <strong>Investors</strong> should purchase Company B<br />

• Reasoning – Company B’s earnings cost comparatively<br />

less than Company A<br />

• Note that the P/E ratio is calculated in the same<br />

way as a historical ratio valuation<br />

64


When do we use different ratios?<br />

• P/E ratios are the most widely used, as the relationship<br />

between a company’s earnings performance and stock<br />

returns are well documented<br />

• Other ratios were derived in response to limitations of the<br />

P/E ratio:<br />

• PEG ratio allowed comparison of companies different growth profiles.<br />

Traditional P/E assumes companies have similar growth<br />

• P/CF ratio catered for the argument that company’s will use creative<br />

accounting to boost nominal profits. Cash flow is hard to manipulate<br />

and P/CF is used for companies with consistent cash flows<br />

• P/BV was created for similar reasons as P/CF. This ratio is used to<br />

determine the value of a company if it liquidated immediately. This<br />

ratio is more useful for asset heavy companies. Book value is also<br />

commonly referred to as Net Tangible Assets (NTA)<br />

65


Valuation exercise<br />

• RCG Corporation Limited (RCG)<br />

• Current share price is $0.50<br />

• Expected earnings is 4.5 cents per share<br />

• Historical P/E of 17<br />

• Average retail sector P/E of 12<br />

• What is RCG’s current P/E?<br />

• P/E = $0.50 / $0.045 = 11<br />

• Is RCG cheap compared to its historical P/E?<br />

• Is RCG cheap compared to its sector’s P/E?<br />

66


Valuation exercise<br />

• RCG Corporation Limited (RCG)<br />

• Current P/E is 11<br />

• Expected earnings growth is 23%<br />

• Oroton Group Limited (ORL) PEG is 4.36<br />

• What is RCG’s PEG?<br />

• PEG = 11 / 23 = 0.48<br />

• Is RCG cheap compared to ORL?<br />

67


Enterprise value<br />

• Enterprise Value is an economic measure used to<br />

determine the market value of a business<br />

• Enterprise Value is commonly known as the<br />

theoretical takeover price. An acquirer would have<br />

to take on the company’s debt but will be able to<br />

pocket its cash<br />

• It is used as an alternative to Market Capitalisation<br />

when valuing a company as a whole<br />

• It is also used as an alternative to Price for ratio<br />

valuation. e.g. EV/EBITDA as an alternative to P/E<br />

68


Enterprise value<br />

Enterprise<br />

Value<br />

=<br />

Market Value of Ordinary Shares<br />

+<br />

Market Value of Preference Shares<br />

+<br />

Market Value of Debt<br />

+<br />

Market Value of Minority Interest<br />

-<br />

Market Value of Associate Company<br />

-<br />

Cash and Cash Equivalents<br />

69


Dividend discount model<br />

• The dividend discount model (DDM) values<br />

companies based on their return to shareholders<br />

in the form of dividends<br />

• A simple example of a dividend discount model<br />

is the Gordon Growth model, which values a<br />

security based on a constant dividend growth<br />

and a constant required rate of return<br />

• This can be expanded to a two-stage model<br />

where an initial level of growth is assumed and<br />

then another after time<br />

70


Gordon Growth model<br />

• Note that even a simple dividend discount<br />

model like the Gordon Growth model requires a<br />

number of assumptions and estimates<br />

Valuation =<br />

Expected Dividend Amount<br />

Required<br />

Rate of Return<br />

-<br />

Expected<br />

Dividend<br />

Growth<br />

71


Valuation exercise<br />

• RCG Corporation Limited (RCG):<br />

• Is expected to pay 3 cents of dividends<br />

• This dividend is expected to grow 6% going forward<br />

• Our current required rate of return for a company of<br />

RCG’s risk profile is 10%<br />

• How much is RCG worth according to a<br />

Gordon Growth model?<br />

• RCG’s valuation = $0.03 / ( 0.1 – 0.06 ) = $0.75<br />

72


Discounted cash flow model<br />

• The discounted cash flow (DCF) model is based<br />

on a similar premise as the dividend growth<br />

model<br />

• This valuation model examines the cash flows a<br />

company is expected to generate in future<br />

periods<br />

• These individual cash flows are ‘discounted’<br />

back to the current period to determine the<br />

intrinsic value of the company<br />

73


Bringing it all together<br />

74


Things to remember<br />

• Check the Financial Health<br />

• Use liquidity, leverage and profitability ratios<br />

• Review past performance<br />

• Tells you about the efficiency and effectiveness of<br />

management<br />

• Assess the company<br />

• Understand the company – its operations, strengths,<br />

weaknesses and risks<br />

• Determine the Valuation<br />

• Use price multiples, EV, DDM, and DCF<br />

75


Fundamental checklist<br />

76


Nine Golden Rules<br />

Your intellectual framework<br />

1. Financial Health<br />

2. Management Assessment<br />

3. Outlook / Forecast<br />

4. Share Price Value<br />

5. Share Price Trend/Sentiment<br />

6. Liquidity and size<br />

7. Company Activities<br />

8. News/Announcements<br />

9. Follow the above rules<br />

77


Thank you for your attendance<br />

Lincoln Indicators Pty Ltd<br />

ACN 006 715 573 AFSL 237740<br />

Call 1300 676 333<br />

enquiries@lincolnindicators.com.au<br />

www.lincolnindicators.com.au<br />

78


Important information<br />

Lincoln Indicators Pty Ltd (Lincoln) makes no re<strong>presentation</strong> and gives no warranty as to the<br />

accuracy of the information contained in this <strong>presentation</strong>, and does not accept any responsibility<br />

for any errors or inaccuracies in, or omissions from, this <strong>presentation</strong> (whether negligent or<br />

otherwise), and Lincoln shall not be liable for any loss or damage howsoever arising as a result of<br />

any person acting or refraining from acting in reliance on any information contained herein. No<br />

reader should rely on this <strong>presentation</strong>, as it does not purport to be comprehensive or to render<br />

personal advice. This disclaimer does not purport to exclude any warranties implied by law which<br />

may not be lawfully excluded.<br />

Information in this <strong>presentation</strong> is current as at date of <strong>presentation</strong> unless otherwise stated. It is<br />

provided for educational purposes only and may not reflect current market data or opinion. It<br />

should not be relied upon in respect to any current investment decision. Investments can go up<br />

and down. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.<br />

Economic and other information taken into account in forming any opinions are subject to change<br />

and therefore opinions expressed as to future matters may no longer be reliable.<br />

79


Important information<br />

Our advice has been prepared without taking into account your personal circumstances, and<br />

you should therefore consider its appropriateness in light of your objectives, financial situation<br />

and needs, before acting on it.<br />

Where we refer to the Lincoln <strong>Australian</strong> Share Fund (the ‘Fund’), information and advice<br />

provided should be considered in conjunction with the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) of<br />

the Fund, which is available on request and from our website. You should read and consider the<br />

PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire or continue to hold the product.<br />

Responsible Entity/ Issuer of the Fund is Equity Trustees Limited ABN 46 004 031 298 AFSL<br />

240975. Lincoln and its Authorised Representatives will be remunerated on the basis of monies<br />

invested in the Fund. You should read and consider our Financial Services Guide (FSG)<br />

provided to you, which sets out key information about the services we provide. The FSG is also<br />

available at www.lincolnindicators.com.au.<br />

Testimonials are provided by third parties for information purposes only and are not intended to<br />

be financial product advice. They do not represent opinion or advice from Lincoln. The<br />

information provided may not be appropriate to your particular circumstances. You should<br />

consider obtaining your own independent advice before making any decision.<br />

80


Important information<br />

ASX-listed company data is copyright and provided by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd<br />

(‘Morningstar’) © 2010 ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892 (a subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc).<br />

All rights reserved. The data and content contained herein are not guaranteed to be accurate,<br />

complete or timely. Neither Morningstar, nor its affiliates nor their content providers will have any<br />

liability for use or distribution of any of this information. To the extent that any of this information<br />

constitutes advice, it is general advice that has been prepared by Morningstar without reference<br />

to your objectives, financial situation or needs.<br />

Before acting, you should consider the appropriateness of the advice and obtain financial, legal<br />

and taxation advice before making any financial investment decision. <strong>Investors</strong> should obtain<br />

the relevant product disclosure statement and consider it before making any decision to invest.<br />

Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information<br />

www.morningstar.com.au/fsg.asp. Some of the material provided is published under licence<br />

from ASX Operations Pty Limited ACN 004 523 782 (‘ASXO’). Consensus forecast data is<br />

copyright Thomson Financial.<br />

Lincoln and/or associates and/or its employees may hold an interest in companies referred to in<br />

this <strong>presentation</strong>. This position can change at any time without notice.<br />

All pricing GST inclusive.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!