04.03.2014 Views

Balancing risk and opportunity through asset allocation - Australian ...

Balancing risk and opportunity through asset allocation - Australian ...

Balancing risk and opportunity through asset allocation - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Balancing</strong> <strong>risk</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>opportunity</strong><br />

<strong>through</strong> <strong>asset</strong> <strong>allocation</strong><br />

AIA Conference<br />

Sydney 2 Sept 2011<br />

Doug Turek<br />

Managing Director


Today let’s try to answer …<br />

Why <strong>asset</strong> <strong>allocation</strong> is your most important investment decision<br />

What are the most commonly used Asset Allocations (AA)<br />

What should guide determining yours<br />

What <strong>asset</strong>s belong in your <strong>allocation</strong><br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-1-


About this presentation<br />

About Doug Turek<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

This is general information … not advice<br />

I don’t know you <strong>and</strong> by law I can’t give you<br />

advice until I do …<br />

… <strong>and</strong> only in writing <strong>and</strong> not via a lectern<br />

Please do your own research, or speak to a<br />

licensed financial advisor, before making<br />

any investment decisions<br />

This is © Professional Wealth –contact us<br />

for permission to reuse<br />

-2-<br />

MD Professional Wealth<br />

- Independently owned wealth<br />

advisory <strong>and</strong> money management firm<br />

Passionate about financial literacy via…<br />

(ABC, Eureka, AIA, Wealth benchmarks)<br />

Former industry consultant with The<br />

Boston Consulting Group<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> by birth despite accent


What drives your investment experience <strong>and</strong> results more?<br />

Choosing between …<br />

BHP vs. RIO<br />

CBA vs. ANZ vs. WBC vs. NAB<br />

WOW vs. WES<br />

DJS vs. MYR<br />

Ubank vs. ING Direct vs. Rabobank<br />

Unit 11 with a garden vs. Unit 31 w/ a view<br />

or<br />

Shares vs. cash<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> vs. International shares<br />

• Hedged vs. unhedged currency<br />

• Developed vs. Emerging markets<br />

Cash vs. TDs vs. Bonds vs. Hybrids<br />

• Fixed vs. floating vs. Inflation-linked<br />

Listed vs Unlisted vs Direct Property<br />

• Residential vs. Commercial<br />

Index vs. active management<br />

Core vs. satellite exposures<br />

Commodities? Collectables? Gold? …<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-3-


Some say <strong>allocation</strong> drives 90% of performance<br />

Determinants of Portfolio Variance<br />

Asset Class<br />

Selection<br />

94.0%<br />

Market<br />

Timing<br />

2.0%<br />

Security<br />

Selection<br />

4.0%<br />

Source: Brinson, Hood, Beebower 1986 study of 91 pension fund returns over one decade<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-4-


Asset <strong>allocation</strong> is the architecture of your portfolio<br />

whereas “ Investment selection ” is the interior design<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-5-


Wrong Asset Allocation is the #1 of 7 deadly sins of wealth management<br />

1. Have wrong <strong>asset</strong> <strong>allocation</strong> (incl. too little of … <strong>and</strong> too much of …, none of …)<br />

2. Not optimally structured (eg. super incl. pensions, income splitting, debt structure)<br />

3. Inefficient investment style (incl. tax, fees, <strong>risk</strong>/reward , too active …)<br />

4. Poor investment “process” management (eg. monitoring, rebalancing, time-averaging)<br />

5. Un- or under-insured (incl. newly retired’s young adult children)<br />

6. Incomplete Wealth Succession <strong>and</strong> “Investment Dementia” planning<br />

7. Infected with “Affluenza”<br />

Source: Professional Wealth<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-6-


Fancy knowing how others invest (earn, have in super …) ?<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-7-


Wealth benchmarks average <strong>asset</strong> <strong>allocation</strong><br />

Include the home?<br />

Exclude home<br />

Shares<br />

Property<br />

Cash<br />

Property<br />

© Wealth benchmarks<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-8-


But averages can be deceiving … % break down of AA by investor<br />

Group of<br />

investors<br />

all in cash<br />

Group of<br />

investors all<br />

in property*<br />

© Wealth benchmarks % equity-like<br />

Group of<br />

investors all<br />

in shares<br />

Diversified<br />

investor<br />

group<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

* Out of total 40% who invest in direct property<br />

-9-


Common portfolio types <strong>and</strong> <strong>asset</strong> <strong>allocation</strong> biases<br />

DIY<br />

The brokered<br />

The Planned<br />

& Industrialised<br />

Bricks/ Mortar<br />

Cash/TD*<br />

Top 10<br />

shares**<br />

*23% on avg at 20110630<br />

**ASX top 11 ex-Telstra<br />

(from Multiport SMSF study)<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> Shares!<br />

Int’l LICS<br />

REITs<br />

Hybrids<br />

(all ASX listed,<br />

+++ equities)<br />

Managed Funds<br />

(Retail Planner)<br />

+ incl. 30% illiquid<br />

(Industry fund)<br />

Rental properties<br />

Mostly residential<br />

Drivers: Investor need or supplier business model? Behaviour/philosophy, …<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-10-


Australia investors are 3 rd biggest equity (%) investors in the world …<br />

<strong>and</strong> lowest investors in bonds<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-11-


10,000,000.0<br />

1,000,000.0<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> investment returns 1880-2010<br />

Annualised Return (%)<br />

Price Yield Total<br />

Shares<br />

100,000.0<br />

10,000.0<br />

Company shares 6 5 11<br />

Residential property 4 3 7<br />

Government bonds - 5 5<br />

Cash 90 day deposit - 4 4<br />

Inflation (cpi) 3 - 3<br />

© Professional Wealth<br />

Property<br />

1,000.0<br />

Bonds<br />

100.0<br />

Cash<br />

10.0<br />

Inflation<br />

1.0<br />

1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

0.1<br />

-12-


Equities AND bonds can work together<br />

$2,000,000<br />

100%B<br />

$1,800,000<br />

50%E/50%B<br />

100%E<br />

$1,600,000<br />

$1,400,000<br />

50:50 rebalanced mix<br />

All <strong>Australian</strong> shares*<br />

All <strong>Australian</strong> bonds<br />

$1,200,000<br />

$1,000,000<br />

$800,000<br />

31-Dec-04 31-Dec-05 31-Dec-06 31-Dec-07 30-Dec-08 30-Dec-09<br />

*incl. dividends<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-13-


What is the right balance for you?<br />

Defensive<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-14-


Factors driving your overall “equity-bond” mix (I)<br />

Your pain threshold<br />

• emotional <strong>risk</strong>-tolerance, equity-flight <strong>risk</strong><br />

Risks you need to take or don’t<br />

• Need to fund lifestyle choice, or don’t need to if have enough<br />

Risk you can afford to take (“<strong>risk</strong> budget”)<br />

• If funding a pension, if only just have enough<br />

Other <strong>asset</strong>s you have/will<br />

• Earned income? Other DB pension? Business? Inheritance?<br />

“Intra-entity tax optimisation”<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-15-


Historic trade-offs between return <strong>and</strong> volatility-<strong>risk</strong><br />

Investment Return<br />

(% pa)<br />

For portfolios with increasing % of equities (defensive>aggressive)<br />

0% 20% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 100%<br />

Average annual (% pa) 6.9 7.9 8.6 9.0 9.3 9.7 10.0 10.3<br />

1 Year<br />

Worst<br />

Best<br />

2.4<br />

15.7<br />

-2.7<br />

18.2<br />

-12.1<br />

23.3<br />

-17.2<br />

27.5<br />

-21.8<br />

31.8<br />

-26.2<br />

37.1<br />

-32.1<br />

42.1<br />

-39.6<br />

52.1<br />

5 Years<br />

Worst<br />

Best<br />

5.3<br />

9.4<br />

5.4<br />

10.8<br />

4.6<br />

12.3<br />

4.0<br />

13.1<br />

3.4<br />

14.5<br />

3.3<br />

16.4<br />

2.8<br />

18.1<br />

1.0<br />

21.1<br />

10 Years<br />

Worst<br />

Best<br />

5.5<br />

7.9<br />

6.1<br />

9.4<br />

6.0<br />

10.7<br />

5.9<br />

11.3<br />

5.7<br />

12.1<br />

5.8<br />

13.0<br />

5.7<br />

13.5<br />

4.8<br />

15.1<br />

Frequency of negative<br />

year returns (1 in # yrs)<br />

~ 20 10 8 7 6 5 4-5<br />

Based on monthly returns for 20 years to 20100830 including <strong>through</strong> GFC<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-16-


Factors driving your overall “equity-bond” mix (II)<br />

Your pain threshold<br />

• emotional <strong>risk</strong>-tolerance, equity-flight <strong>risk</strong><br />

Risks you need to take or don’t<br />

• Need to fund lifestyle choice, or don’t need to if have enough<br />

Risk you can afford to take (“<strong>risk</strong> budget”)<br />

• If funding a pension, if only just have enough<br />

Other <strong>asset</strong>s you have/will<br />

• Earned income? Other DB pension? Business? Inheritance?<br />

“Intra-entity tax optimisation”<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-17-


Most pension funds can’t afford volatility/<strong>risk</strong><br />

Return (%)<br />

Fund / Portfolio / Series Steady Volatile<br />

Year 1 9 -10<br />

Year 2 9 30<br />

Year 3 9 -10<br />

Year 4 9 30<br />

Year 5 9 -10<br />

Year 6 9 30<br />

Year 7 9 -10<br />

Year 8 9 30<br />

Year 9 9 -10<br />

Year 10 9 30<br />

Average Annual Return (%) 9.0 10.0<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Deviation (%) 0.0 20.0<br />

Growth of $100,000 $ 236,736 $ 219,245<br />

Compound Annual Return (%) 9.0 8.2<br />

Balance of $1m after $100k pa pension $ 711,334 $ 459,891<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-18-


Life stage / lifecycle investing – “have your age in bonds”<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-19-


Factors driving your overall “equity-bond” mix (III)<br />

Your pain threshold<br />

• emotional <strong>risk</strong>-tolerance, equity-flight <strong>risk</strong><br />

Risks you need to take or don’t<br />

• Need to fund lifestyle choice, or don’t need to if have enough<br />

Risk you can afford to take (“<strong>risk</strong> budget”)<br />

• If funding a pension, if only just have enough<br />

Other <strong>asset</strong>s you (will) have<br />

• Other DB pension? Business sale? Inheritance? Earned income?<br />

“Intra-entity tax optimisation”<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-20-


Work & Wealth<br />

also inter-relate<br />

Contracting Part-time<br />

Overseas<br />

Directorships Consulting<br />

?<br />

Teaching<br />

Venturing<br />

+ $<br />

Charitable<br />

Family<br />

Leisure<br />

-$<br />

Earn ?<br />

Pay = expenses<br />

Lets investments<br />

compound,<br />

postpone drawing<br />

Invest<br />

Retirement<br />

has been retired<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-21-


Equity / bond mix<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> vs. International equity (hedged vs. unhedged) ?<br />

Small companies vs. large?<br />

Growth vs. value?<br />

Industry Sectors? Income? …<br />

Property trusts or direct?<br />

Listed vs. unlisted?<br />

Commercial vs. residential? Developmental vs. passive? …<br />

Cash vs. TDs vs. hybrids vs. bonds vs. mortgage trusts vs. ……..<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

Alternatives ….<br />

-22-


International diversification <strong>and</strong> currency protection<br />

Markets by Sectors<br />

Top 10 Companies <strong>and</strong> % of market<br />

2.9%<br />

4.3%<br />

6.2%<br />

10.6%<br />

Australia<br />

43.1%<br />

4.8%<br />

9.9%<br />

The World<br />

12.0%<br />

4.1%<br />

0.5%<br />

21.0%<br />

8.5%<br />

Australia top 10 stocks <strong>and</strong> size % World top 10 stocks <strong>and</strong> size %<br />

BHP Billiton Ltd 14.1% Exxon Mobil Corp 1.2%<br />

Commonwealth Bank of Australia 8.6% Apple Inc 1.0%<br />

Westpac Banking Corp 7.5% Microsoft Corp 0.8%<br />

Australia & NZ Banking Group 6.5% Procter & Gamble Co 0.7%<br />

National Australia Bank Ltd 5.8% Nestle SA Reg 0.7%<br />

Woolworths Ltd 3.9% HSBC Holdings Plc 0.6%<br />

Rio Tinto ltd 3.6% Intl Business Machine Corp 0.6%<br />

8.8%<br />

9.5%<br />

Wesfarmers Ltd 3.6% Chevron Corp 0.6%<br />

Newcrest Mining Ltd 3.3% AT & T Inc 0.6%<br />

27.2%<br />

10.4%<br />

10.7%<br />

Westfield Group 2.9% General Electric Co 0.6%<br />

Total <strong>Australian</strong> Top 10 59.7% Total MSCI Top 10 7.4%<br />

Source: iShares MSCI Australia <strong>and</strong> ACWI index at 30 September 2010<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> market is 2/3rds<br />

banks & resources<br />

Top 10 <strong>Australian</strong> stocks = 60% of market<br />

vs. 7% for top 10 Int’l companies<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-23-


Small <strong>and</strong> value stocks sometimes outperform<br />

Long-term low priced large-company returns vs. large, high priced vs. small companies:<br />

(% pa)<br />

Source: Dimensional Fund Advisors<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-24-


Outlook for property?<br />

Prior to latest run up property<br />

prices rose at inflation +0-1%<br />

Recent<br />

<strong>Australian</strong><br />

boom <strong>and</strong> … ?<br />

US boom<br />

<strong>and</strong> bust<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-25-


Shares <strong>and</strong> Property (not or)<br />

Shares<br />

Property<br />

Interest in a company<br />

Interest in l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> a building<br />

Value tied to profits (dividends)<br />

Value tied to rental income <strong>and</strong> also<br />

… <strong>and</strong> also expected future profits<br />

… appreciating l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> depreciating bldg<br />

Tax benefits (imputation, CG, gearing) Tax benefits (dep’n, CG, gearing)<br />

No holding costs<br />

Holding costs (taxes, maintenance)<br />

Divisible<br />

“Lumpy”<br />

Liquid <strong>and</strong> low transaction costs<br />

Illiquid <strong>and</strong> high t/x costs<br />

… volatile pricing (+39%, -43%, …) … stable pricing (~ 5%pa or ???)<br />

… leverage able 50-75% … leverage to 90+ %<br />

Intangible<br />

Tangible<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-26-


Can you have too much cash?<br />

Average silver content of 10 European countries’ coins (grams)<br />

Do you suspect there is still a pound of silver in a GB £ Pound Sterling?<br />

Source: Reinhart <strong>and</strong> Rogoff<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-27-


<strong>Australian</strong> inflation experience – time for a change?<br />

Negative<br />

High<br />

Low<br />

High<br />

Low<br />

(on gold<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard )<br />

Inflation persists, over long periods (doesn’t mean revert)<br />

Likely to encounter inflation over 30 year long retirement periods<br />

Recent 20 year absence long enough for it to surprise again<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-28-


Inflation can be unkind to retirement portfolios<br />

$2,500,000<br />

$2,000,000<br />

$1,500,000<br />

$1,000,000<br />

$500,000<br />

Actual retirements<br />

from 1875 – 2008<br />

Early failures were<br />

during high inflation<br />

periods (eg. 1970s)<br />

<strong>and</strong> not from<br />

retiring <strong>through</strong><br />

poor investment<br />

eras (eg. 1930s)<br />

$0<br />

© Professional Wealth<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />

1970 start 1930 start<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

Projection of $1m retirement balance invested earning actual year-year returns before 1.5% pa taxes/fee, not averages, for 60/40 <strong>Australian</strong><br />

equity/bond portfolio for retirements beginning in 1875 <strong>and</strong> every 2 nd <strong>and</strong> 5 th year thereafter. Initial 6% drawdown adjusted by actual inflation for<br />

subsequent years.<br />

-29-


Inflation linked bonds might strengthen your defense<br />

Cash<br />

Nominal<br />

bonds<br />

Inflation<br />

linked<br />

bonds<br />

Interest rate linked<br />

CPI linked<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-30-


How different cash/bond components might work together<br />

Inflation linked<br />

Long term inflation protection<br />

Higher yield from longer<br />

bonds (safer than if from<br />

nominal bonds)<br />

Match real liability<br />

DIY annuity?<br />

Short-term FI,<br />

cash,<br />

floating<br />

notes?<br />

Long (or<br />

medium)<br />

term fixed<br />

nominal<br />

FI<br />

Or add ….<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

High Yield?<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

Capital protection, short-term<br />

inflation hedge, liquidity for<br />

income <strong>and</strong> rebalancing,<br />

overall portfolio volatility<br />

reduction<br />

De/dis-inflation protection<br />

(Capital gain if i-rates drop)<br />

Volatility reduction from –ve<br />

correlation with equities<br />

Lock in higher income<br />

-31-<br />

+ Higher return from credit<br />

<strong>risk</strong> from non-investment<br />

grade bonds? Use equities<br />

instead?


Fancy something alternative?<br />

Gold <strong>and</strong> other precious metals<br />

Other hard commodities <strong>and</strong> oil<br />

Soft commodities (eg. agriculture)<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Private equity<br />

Hedge funds<br />

Art <strong>and</strong> other collectables<br />

…<br />

ETFs <strong>and</strong> indexing<br />

Core-satellite constructions<br />

Portfolio protection<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-32-


Example portfolio mixes from defensive to aggressive<br />

Truth in labeling? “balanced growth”, “assertive” , “alternative defensive”, …<br />

Source: Morningstar<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-33-


Investment portfolios like a garden need occasional pruning<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-34-


Rebalancing controls <strong>risk</strong> & may reward - example equity/bond mix<br />

+10 %<br />

Target<br />

-10 %<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-35-


PW AGSM 0405<br />

-36-


An unmanaged property portfolio?<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-37-


Know more about your investment performance than your car’s!<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-38-


Dr Douglas Turek<br />

Managing Director<br />

Professional Wealth Pty Ltd<br />

AFSL No. 369453<br />

13/350 Collins Street<br />

GPO Box 4975<br />

Melbourne VIC 3001<br />

Australia<br />

p 61 3 9605 0600<br />

e dturek@professionalwealth.com.au<br />

w www.professionalwealth.com.au<br />

PW AGSM 0405<br />

-39-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!