05.03.2014 Views

52. Volume 13- Number 2 - IP Australia

52. Volume 13- Number 2 - IP Australia

52. Volume 13- Number 2 - IP Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 2000 VOL <strong>13</strong> NO. 2<br />

The Plant Breeder’s Rights Scheme is administered by the Commonwealth Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – <strong>Australia</strong>.<br />

Part 1 – General Information<br />

Objections to Applications and<br />

Requests for Revocation of a<br />

Grant or of a Declaration that a<br />

Plant Variety is Essentially<br />

Derived from Another Plant<br />

Variety<br />

The Plant Breeder’s Rights scheme is administered<br />

consistent with the model law of the International<br />

Convention for the Protection of New Plant Varieties 1991<br />

(UPOV 91), that is, applicants are entitled to protection, in<br />

the absence of proof to the contrary.<br />

The Plant Breeder’s Rights Office (PBRO) is not<br />

required to prove the views, assertions, and opinions of<br />

persons challenging protection for plant varieties. Those<br />

objecting to / commenting on applications or requesting/<br />

commenting on revocation of a grant or declaration that<br />

a plant variety is essentially derived from another plant<br />

variety must provide conclusive supporting evidence<br />

why their objection / comment / request should be<br />

upheld. It cannot be stressed too strongly that conclusive<br />

argumentation should be provided from the outset.<br />

Objections to Applications<br />

A person may make objections to applications for PBR if (i)<br />

their commercial interests would be affected adversely, and<br />

(ii) the application will not fulfil all the conditions required<br />

by the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act.<br />

Objections to applications must be lodged with the<br />

Registrar no later than six months after the date the<br />

description of the variety is published in this journal. The<br />

objector must provide evidence of adverse affect on their<br />

commercial interests and that the application should not be<br />

granted.<br />

The Registrar of the Plant Breeder’s Rights Office (PBRO)<br />

is required to give a copy of the objection to the applicant.<br />

The objection is also available to the general public on<br />

request. The applicant has the opportunity to respond to the<br />

evidence presented. The Registrar then decides whether or<br />

not the objection will be upheld and, subsequently, whether<br />

the application will be granted. The PBRO is under no<br />

obligation to enter into further dialogue regarding an<br />

objection or to communicate reasons why an objection is<br />

not upheld. If an objection is upheld it will be notified in<br />

this journal.<br />

A payment of $100 is required on lodgement of the<br />

objection. Additional costs of $75 per hour for work<br />

undertaken in relation to the objection will be billed to the<br />

objector.<br />

Comments on Applications<br />

The PBRO accepts comments on applications. However, the<br />

scheme is managed on normal risk management lines and<br />

with an emphasis on the requirement that challengers with<br />

a commercial interest must demonstrate conclusively that<br />

an application should not be granted.<br />

All written comment will be acknowledged. The PBRO is<br />

under no obligation to enter into further communication<br />

regarding comments. If an application does not proceed to<br />

a grant it will be notified in this journal.<br />

Requests for Revocation, (where<br />

an individual’s interests are<br />

affected) of:<br />

• a Grant<br />

• a Declaration that a Plant<br />

Variety is Essentially Derived<br />

A person may, when their interests are affected adversely,<br />

apply for the revocation of:<br />

• a grant of PBR; or<br />

• a declaration that a plant variety is essentially derived<br />

from another plant variety.<br />

The person requesting revocation is required to lodge a<br />

revocation payment fee of $500. The person seeking<br />

revocation of a grant or declaration that a plant variety is<br />

essentially derived from another plant, must provide<br />

conclusive evidence of adverse affect on their interests and<br />

that the grant should be revoked.<br />

The PBRO also accepts information regarding revocation of<br />

grants and declarations of essentially derived plant varieties.<br />

Such information must demonstrate conclusively that a<br />

grant or declaration should not have been made. All written<br />

information will be acknowledged. The PBRO is under no<br />

obligation to enter into further communication regarding<br />

information provided.<br />

Applying For Plant Breeders<br />

Rights<br />

Applications are accepted from the original breeder of a<br />

new variety (from their employer if the breeder is an<br />

employee) or from a person who has acquired ownership<br />

from the original breeder. Overseas breeders need to<br />

appoint an agent to represent their interests in <strong>Australia</strong>.<br />

Interested parties should contact the PBR office and an<br />

accredited Qualified Person (Appendix 3) experienced in<br />

the plant species in question.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!