05.03.2014 Views

64. Volume 10- Number 2 - IP Australia

64. Volume 10- Number 2 - IP Australia

64. Volume 10- Number 2 - IP Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PLANT VARIETIES JOURNAL 1997 VOL <strong>10</strong> NO. 2<br />

Contributed articles may not necessarily represent the<br />

position, policy or procedures of the PBR office.<br />

NEGOTIATING PBR LICENCES –<br />

THINGS NOT TO DO<br />

by Edwina Menzies and Jamie Wodetzki of Minter Ellison<br />

When negotiating a PBR licence there are a number of traps<br />

to watch out for. In this article, we look at some of the<br />

things you should avoid doing.<br />

• Don’t make wild overstatements<br />

In the course of any negotiations, there is always a<br />

temptation to give a glowing description of the product you<br />

are selling. However, you need to be careful not to overstate<br />

the qualities and performance of the product. This applies to<br />

plant varieties in the same way as to any other product.<br />

Under section 52 of the Commonwealth Trade Practices Act<br />

(and similar State legislation), businesses are not permitted<br />

to engage in misleading or deceptive conduct. It is<br />

important, therefore, that you don’t say misleading or<br />

deceptive things about a variety when negotiating a PBR<br />

licence agreement. If a licensee takes out a PBR licence on<br />

the basis of misleading statements about the qualities or<br />

performance of the variety, they may be able to get out of<br />

the agreement and make a claim for damages. So, no matter<br />

how tempting it may be, don’t make claims about the<br />

growth rate, size, yield, hardiness or any other<br />

characteristics or qualities of a variety unless you are very<br />

confident about backing those claims up. Wild<br />

overstatements could come back to haunt you.<br />

Prospective licensees may also ask you (as licensor) to<br />

include in the licence agreement certain warranties about<br />

the qualities and performance of the plant. If, for example,<br />

you claimed that the variety of tree in which you own PBR<br />

produces larger fruit more quickly than any other tree on the<br />

market, you may be asked to give a warranty to that effect<br />

in the licence agreement. You need to tread very carefully<br />

when giving warranties like this. If the tree fails to live up<br />

to the warranty, you will be in breach of the agreement and<br />

may be liable for any losses suffered by the licensor as a<br />

result of that breach. Don’t give warranties you can’t live up<br />

to.<br />

• Don’t impose unreasonable restrictions<br />

Another trap to steer clear of is the inclusion of<br />

unreasonable, restrictive and anti-competitive conditions in<br />

a PBR licence agreement. Licences that impose<br />

unreasonable restrictions on the licensee could fall foul of<br />

the Trade Practices Act or the PBR Act itself.<br />

Don’t push licensees into acquiring third party goods or<br />

services as a condition of granting the PBR licence. For<br />

example, don’t insist that a particular company be<br />

contracted to tend and manage a plantation. This practice is<br />

known as 3rd line forcing and is prohibited under section 47<br />

of the Trade Practices Act.<br />

Don’t try to set minimum prices below which the licensee<br />

is not allowed to sell. Even if you make it known, induce or<br />

attempt to induce a minimum price level for resale of the<br />

variety, that will be contrary to the resale price maintenance<br />

prohibition under section 48 of the Trade Practices Act.<br />

There are large financial penalties for engaging in 3rd line<br />

forcing and resale price maintenance.<br />

Don’t limit supply to an extent that reasonable public access<br />

to the variety is denied. Under section 19 of the PBR Act<br />

1994, the grantee of PBR must take all reasonable steps to<br />

ensure reasonable public access to the variety. If<br />

propagating material of reasonable quality is not available<br />

at reasonable prices and in sufficient quantities to meet<br />

demand, a person could apply to the Secretary of the<br />

Department for a compulsory licence of PBR. In these<br />

circumstances, the PBR owner risks losing control of the<br />

terms of the licence. To avoid this risk, you should try not<br />

to refuse reasonable requests for PBR licences.<br />

There are other things to watch out for, but these are some<br />

of the more important things not to do when negotiating a<br />

PBR licence.<br />

Important Changes<br />

Current PBR Forms<br />

The official forms for PBR purposes are periodically updated. A list of current PBR forms with their numbers and date of last<br />

update is given below. When a form is updated, the month and the year of the last update follows the form number within<br />

parentheses. For example, Form P1 was last updated in July 1996 and therefore this form gets a designation of Form P1 (7/96).<br />

We encourage you to use the latest version of the forms. If you do not have the latest updated version of the form(s) you want<br />

to use, please contact the PBR office to obtain them.<br />

Name of Form Form <strong>Number</strong> Last Updated<br />

Application for Plant Breeders Rights Form P1 July 1996<br />

Part 1 – General Information<br />

Application for Plant Breeders Rights Form P2 September 1996<br />

Part 2 – Description of New Variety<br />

Nomination of a Qualified Person Form QP 1 October 1996<br />

Certification by a Qualified Person From QP 2 September 1994<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!