06.03.2014 Views

Approach 12 FYP - Indian Railways Institute of Transport Management

Approach 12 FYP - Indian Railways Institute of Transport Management

Approach 12 FYP - Indian Railways Institute of Transport Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 <strong>Approach</strong> to the Twelfth Five Year Plan<br />

2.16 There was also a purely domestic factor at play. In the Ninth Plan (1997-98 to 2001-02) the<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> GDP growth was subdued at 5.5 per cent and the incremental capital output ratio (ICOR),<br />

notwithstanding comparatively lower investment rates, was rather high at 4.5 per cent, as it also was in the<br />

first two years <strong>of</strong> the Tenth Plan (2002-03 and 2003-04) at 4.9 per cent. This flowed from slower growth<br />

in domestic demand during these years, and as a result India had a persistent current account surplus<br />

for three successive years from 2001-02 to 2003-04. There was thus some slack in the system, which got<br />

utilized in the Tenth Plan period. This should be borne in mind when viewing investment and growth<br />

rates realized in the Tenth Plan.<br />

2.17 The current account balance slipped back into negative in 2004-05 and averaged (–) 0.9 per cent<br />

<strong>of</strong> GDP in the last three years <strong>of</strong> the Tenth Plan. On account <strong>of</strong> the large surpluses in the first two years<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Tenth Plan, the average current account deficit for the five year period was nil. The Eleventh Plan<br />

period did not start out with the benefit <strong>of</strong> a slack in the system, as did the Tenth. One consequence <strong>of</strong><br />

this was that despite the high investment rates that were realized during the closing years <strong>of</strong> the Tenth, and<br />

early years <strong>of</strong> the Eleventh Plan, inflation came to be a persistent problem.<br />

2.18 While there are specific sectoral bottlenecks that explain some <strong>of</strong> the inflationary pressures, at the<br />

aggregate level, resolving these bottlenecks requires additional investment. Hence, in order to sustain high<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> growth per centwhile maintaining moderate inflation, investment rate has to be higher than in the<br />

past, especially in areas where supply side bottlenecks could trigger inflation. Thus the average investment<br />

rate needed during the Twelfth Plan period is estimated to be 38.5 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP for the 9.0 per cent<br />

growth with 4.5–5.0 average inflation. The investment rate would have to rise to as much as 41.4 per cent<br />

<strong>of</strong> GDP for the 9.5 per cent growth with 5.0–5.5 rate <strong>of</strong> inflation.<br />

2.19 The rate <strong>of</strong> fixed capital formation had increased rapidly during the Tenth Plan. It averaged around<br />

28.4 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP over the Tenth Plan period as against 23.2 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP in the Ninth Plan. It<br />

had risen to 32.9 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP in 2007-08, after which it declined through the years <strong>of</strong> the crisis to<br />

29.5 per cent (provisional) in 2010-11. Even so, the rate <strong>of</strong> fixed capital formation is likely to average<br />

around 31 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP in the Eleventh Plan, which is 2.6 per centage points <strong>of</strong> GDP higher than<br />

in the Tenth Plan. As pointed out above, the pick up in the average rate <strong>of</strong> growth in the Eleventh Plan<br />

period was not fully commensurate with this increase partly due to external developments. Further in<br />

order to sustain high growth while keeping inflation within moderate limits, it is imperative to expand the<br />

productive potential <strong>of</strong> the economy at a faster rate. In order to achieve an average economic growth rate <strong>of</strong><br />

9.0 per cent, the rate <strong>of</strong> fixed capital formation needs to improve to around 33.5 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP over the<br />

Twelfth Plan period. This is feasible considering that a fixed capital formation rate <strong>of</strong> 32.9 per cent was<br />

actually achieved in 2007-08.<br />

2.20 For the 9 per cent economic growth scenario, the likely break-up <strong>of</strong> fixed capital formation by<br />

investing sector shows some interesting features:<br />

(i)<br />

Fixed capital formation in the household sector (which, in addition to agriculture and<br />

residential construction, includes practically all the micro and small enterprises) has been<br />

rather stable, and are projected to increase to <strong>12</strong>.0 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP in the Twelfth Plan from<br />

11.6 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP during the Eleventh Plan. For this to happen, the flow <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

resources to these sectors has to increase significantly. This would require not only expansion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the reach <strong>of</strong> the formal banking sector, but also revitalisation <strong>of</strong> the micro finance and other<br />

innovative financial institutions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!