10.03.2014 Views

30 Years of shark fishing in west africa - Shark Specialist Group

30 Years of shark fishing in west africa - Shark Specialist Group

30 Years of shark fishing in west africa - Shark Specialist Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Shark</strong>s caught aboard a boat <strong>in</strong> Cape Verde (I. Ndiaye)<br />

devaluation <strong>of</strong> the CFA franc <strong>in</strong> 1994. This<br />

immediately meant that products produced<br />

<strong>in</strong> the CFA zone were highly competitive<br />

globally and greatly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

the commercial value <strong>of</strong> <strong>fish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> products<br />

exported from the ‘franc zone’. As <strong>fish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

activities <strong>in</strong>creased, <strong>fish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> zones<br />

moved further south, with many fishermen<br />

from Sa<strong>in</strong>t-Louis <strong>in</strong> Senegal target<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s as far south as Sierra Leone. In<br />

the sub-region today, with the exception<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cape Verde, resources seem to be fully<br />

exploited, if not overexploited, for almost<br />

all selachian species.<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the SRPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s<br />

Process<br />

Concerned by the global status <strong>of</strong> <strong>Shark</strong>s,<br />

the FAO Committee on Fisheries created<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1995 a work<strong>in</strong>g group to tackle<br />

the problem. Recommendations from the<br />

group resulted <strong>in</strong> the creation and adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> the International Plan <strong>of</strong> Action<br />

for the Conservation and Management <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s (IPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s) by the Committee<br />

on Fisheries <strong>in</strong> February 1999. The goals<br />

<strong>of</strong> this strategic <strong>in</strong>strument were firstly to<br />

improve the statistical <strong>in</strong>formation available<br />

and the capacity to describe and monitor<br />

the status <strong>of</strong> <strong>Shark</strong> populations, and<br />

secondly to set up conservation and management<br />

measures when needed (see the<br />

text box on the IPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Appendix<br />

2).<br />

In light <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g awareness <strong>of</strong> the risks<br />

<strong>of</strong> rapid depletion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Shark</strong> stocks and the<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> this depletion on biological<br />

diversity, the SRFC member states<br />

decided, <strong>in</strong> agreement with the recommendations<br />

made by the IPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s, to<br />

create a Sub-regional Plan <strong>of</strong> Action for the<br />

Conservation and Management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Shark</strong>s<br />

(SRPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s). This plan was adopted<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2001 by the Conference <strong>of</strong> M<strong>in</strong>isters<br />

<strong>of</strong> the SRFC, and its effective implementation<br />

began <strong>in</strong> 2004 with the SRPOA-<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s Project. This was <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

with other provisions, mechanisms, and<br />

programmes concern<strong>in</strong>g access to <strong>fish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

zones and the management <strong>of</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

resource utilisation <strong>in</strong> the member states.<br />

The SRPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s Process falls with<strong>in</strong><br />

the framework <strong>of</strong> the SRFC’s 2002-2010<br />

strategic plan <strong>of</strong> action (see text box on<br />

this Commission <strong>in</strong> the Appendix).<br />

Between 2004 and 2007, with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> the PRCM, activities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

SRPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s Project focused on the<br />

conservation, monitor<strong>in</strong>g, and susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Shark</strong> populations, with<br />

funds from the MAVA Foundation and the<br />

Dutch Embassy <strong>in</strong> Dakar. In addition to<br />

the mechanisms set up to monitor trends<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>shark</strong> resources and the actions performed<br />

to regulate <strong>shark</strong> <strong>fish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, several<br />

studies were carried out on other issues<br />

relat<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>shark</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> the subregion.<br />

To effectively contribute to the success<br />

<strong>of</strong> the SRPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s Project, each country<br />

was required to create its National<br />

Plan <strong>of</strong> Action (NPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s), <strong>in</strong>spired<br />

by the Sub-Regional Plan <strong>of</strong> Action. This<br />

began <strong>in</strong> 2003 with technical support<br />

from the FIBA for the draft<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> NPOA-<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s documents. The <strong>of</strong>ficial NPOA-<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s review process started <strong>in</strong> 2005.<br />

First, the NPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s documents were<br />

distributed to the various concerned parties<br />

(adm<strong>in</strong>istrators, researchers, fishermen,<br />

fish processors, and wholesale fish<br />

merchants), and then workshops were<br />

organised <strong>in</strong> each country. Currently,<br />

five out <strong>of</strong> seven NPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s have been<br />

reviewed (Senegal, Gu<strong>in</strong>ea, Mauritania,<br />

Sierra Leone, and Gu<strong>in</strong>ea-Bissau); these<br />

documents have been approved by the<br />

governments <strong>in</strong>volved (texts published <strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>of</strong>ficial bullet<strong>in</strong>s giv<strong>in</strong>g details <strong>of</strong> laws<br />

and <strong>of</strong>ficial announcements), show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

encourag<strong>in</strong>g commitment on the part <strong>of</strong><br />

the member states to <strong>shark</strong> conservation.<br />

In Cape-Verde, NPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s goals have<br />

been given <strong>of</strong>ficial back<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them <strong>in</strong>to national development plans.<br />

Support project<br />

for the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the SRPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s Process<br />

1. Goals and organisation<br />

In l<strong>in</strong>e with SRFC mandate and mission,<br />

the project supported the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the SRPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s. The <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

strategy focused on conservation<br />

issues and responsible management <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Shark</strong> populations at the regional level.<br />

Additional support was made to Member<br />

States to assist with the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

national plans.<br />

1.a. Goals <strong>of</strong> Phase 1<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g Phase One <strong>of</strong> the project, special<br />

attention was paid to three ma<strong>in</strong> goals:<br />

1. support<strong>in</strong>g the implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

SRPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s Process and the production<br />

<strong>of</strong> tools for <strong>Shark</strong> population<br />

management;<br />

2. develop<strong>in</strong>g a pilot programme to transition<br />

people out <strong>of</strong> <strong>Shark</strong> <strong>fish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries to other activities;<br />

3. Through outreach and communication<br />

actions, share the best conservation<br />

and susta<strong>in</strong>able management practices<br />

acquired through the project with the<br />

participants.<br />

Many activities have been carried out to<br />

achieve these goals. Before describ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

these activities, we will briefly present the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention strategy adopted to perform<br />

them.<br />

Project architecture<br />

and <strong>in</strong>tervention strategy<br />

The SRFC adm<strong>in</strong>isters the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the SRPOA-<strong>Shark</strong>s Process for the M<strong>in</strong>ister<br />

<strong>of</strong> Fish<strong>in</strong>g through the National Plans<br />

- 18 - - 19 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!