11.03.2014 Views

Ph.D. Thesis_AS_Publishing version for IRC_12 ... - Jacobs University

Ph.D. Thesis_AS_Publishing version for IRC_12 ... - Jacobs University

Ph.D. Thesis_AS_Publishing version for IRC_12 ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 1<br />

1.4.3 Asymmetric Michael addition to nitroolefins<br />

List in 2001 15 demonstrated <strong>for</strong> the first time the asymmetric Michael additions of different<br />

unmodified ketones to nitroolefins (Scheme 1.7). He got high yields (up to 94%) and<br />

diastereoselectivities (>20:1) but the ee was very poor (maximum 23%).<br />

Aldehydes as Michael donors in catalytic asymmetric Michael additions were pioneered by<br />

Barbas group (Scheme 1.14). 34 They used catalyst 33 (Figure 1.5) <strong>for</strong> this study and had up to<br />

96% yield with 98:2 dr and 78% ee.<br />

H<br />

O<br />

R<br />

R'<br />

NO 2<br />

33 (20 mol%)<br />

THF, rt<br />

H<br />

O<br />

R<br />

R'<br />

NO 2<br />

R = alkyl<br />

R' = alkyl, aryl<br />

Yields = 42 to 96%<br />

drs = 85:15 to 98:2<br />

ees = 56 to 78%<br />

Scheme 1.14. First example of catalytic asymmetric Michael addition of aldehydes to<br />

nitroolefins.<br />

After these two reports, organocatalytic asymmetric Michael addition of aldehydes and ketones to<br />

nitroolefins is presently further developed. Figure 1.9 represents ketones that have been examined<br />

in asymmetric Michael additions. A commonly used electrophile is trans-β-nitrostyrene (Figure<br />

1.10), however a variety of electrophiles can be used. Among the examined ketones (Figure 1.9),<br />

cyclohexanone (Figure 1.9, 50) is the most common nucleophile and excellent results in terms of<br />

ee, dr, yield, reaction time, temperature and catalyst loading are possible (as shown in Table 1.2).<br />

Despite the fact that ketones are common in asymmetric Michael additions, some of these are still<br />

challenging <strong>for</strong> the reported catalysts (e.g cyclopentanone 51, Figure 1.9). For a complete<br />

comparison of the product profile given by cyclohexanone and cyclopentanone, see Table 1.2 and<br />

Table 1.3.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!