13.03.2014 Views

Ch 11 - Jeff Standen

Ch 11 - Jeff Standen

Ch 11 - Jeff Standen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Ch</strong>apter <strong>11</strong><br />

( Summary" 1<br />

The biological model classifies psychological disorders in<br />

terms of their symptoms.<br />

It assumes that psychological disorders have a biological<br />

basis.<br />

It states that the presence of certain genes can<br />

predispose individuals to psychological disorders.<br />

An imbalance of chemicals in the nervous system and<br />

endocrine system is seen as a major cause of<br />

psychological disorders.<br />

v.<br />

CD<br />

CD<br />

Drug treatments which alter the body's biochemistry are<br />

seen as one of the main treatments for psychological<br />

disorders.<br />

Evidence to support the biological model is inconclusive.<br />

The complexities of brain chemistry and human genetics<br />

are only partially understood.<br />

Many researchers argue that biological factors are only<br />

part of the picture. They must be seen in a wider context,<br />

as the diathesis-stress model suggests.<br />

Activity 1<br />

The biological model<br />

f^SSEK Twins and psychological disorders ) 'Magic bullets'<br />

The bar chart<br />

shows the<br />

likelihood of<br />

twins having the<br />

same<br />

psychological<br />

disorder. Identical<br />

or monozygotic<br />

twins have the<br />

same genes.<br />

Fraternal or<br />

dizygotic twins<br />

share around 50%<br />

of their genes.<br />

The concordance<br />

level refers to the<br />

extent to which<br />

twins share a<br />

particular<br />

1.0-1<br />

0.8-<br />

0.6-<br />

0.4-<br />

0.2-<br />

U Identical twins j<br />

• Fraternal twins j<br />

characteristic - in this case a psychological disorder. If<br />

the concordance level is 1, then each pair of twins in the<br />

study share a particular characteristic.<br />

Adapted from Sarason & Sarason, 1996<br />

Questions<br />

1 a) What support for the biological model is provided by<br />

Item A?<br />

b) Suggest an alternative explanation for the findings<br />

shown in Item A.<br />

2 Not all psychiatrists are as optimistic about Prozac as<br />

Kramer in Item B. Briefly outline the case for and against<br />

drug treatment.<br />

Sometimes known as<br />

'magic bullets' because<br />

of their shape and the<br />

belief in their curative<br />

powers, Prozac has been<br />

prescribed to millions<br />

of people worldwide.<br />

Prozac is extremely<br />

popular with many<br />

psychiatrists and people<br />

suffering from<br />

depression. In a book<br />

entitled Listening to Prozac (1993), Peter Kramer, an<br />

American psychiatrist, claims that Prozac not only reduced<br />

some of his patients' symptoms of depression, it also<br />

transformed their personalities and behaviour. He describes<br />

the case of Tess.<br />

'Within weeks of starting Prozac, Tess settled into a<br />

satisfying dating routine. I'd never seen a patient's social<br />

life reshaped so rapidly and dramatically. Low self-worth<br />

and poor interpersonal skills - the usual causes of social<br />

awkwardness - are so deeply ingrained and difficult to<br />

influence that ordinarily change comes gradually, if ever.<br />

But Tess blossomed all at once.'<br />

Despite this glowing report, there is evidence that<br />

Prozac may have harmful effects in certain cases. This<br />

evidence indicates possible links with violence and<br />

suicidal tendencies. For example, a 63-year-old man from<br />

Cornwall suffocated his wife and threw himself off a cliff<br />

in 1996. He had been taking Prozac for eleven days. His<br />

family blames the drug and has issued court proceedings<br />

against the manufacturers.<br />

Adapted from Kramer, 1993 and Boseley, 1999

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!