MAKETA 5/3
MAKETA 5/3
MAKETA 5/3
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A C T A M E D I C A M A R T I N I A N A 2 0 0 5 5/3 25<br />
Table 2 Distribution of DCIS into subtypes and VNC groups<br />
DCIS….ductal carcinoma in situ<br />
Only in 39 (36.8 %) of the cases one architectonic subtype was noted and in the rest of the<br />
67 cases (63.2 %) the combination of two or three subtypes was present. In 44 cases (41.5 %)<br />
a comedo subtype of DCIS was detected and in 23 (21.7 %) non-comedo subtypes have been diagnosed.<br />
The pure cribriform type in „non-high grade“ categories was present in 17 cases, with<br />
dominance in VNC 1 group (n=13; 76.5 %). Despite this the pure comedo-type, such as mixed<br />
subtypes with comedo-type have been mostly revealed in the VNC 3 category (n=11; 92 %, and<br />
n=33; 75 %). Only one case of DCIS micropapillary subtype was diagnosed in the VNC 3 group.<br />
Vascular invasion (VI) was diagnosed in 43 (40.6 %) cases and it was most prevalent in the<br />
VNC 3 of DCIS group (57.4 %). The distribution of the DCIS cases in VNC 1, VNC 2, and VNC 3<br />
groups between VI+ and VI– groups is statistically significant (p < 0.01). In reciprocal categorization,<br />
differences in VNC 2 versus VNC 3 (p< 0.01) are higher than in VNC 1 versus VNC 2 (p<<br />
0.05). We did not find significant differences in correlation of VNC 1 versus VNC 3.<br />
Table 3 Correlation between the vascular invasion and DCIS groups by VNC<br />
DCIS….ductal carcinoma in situ<br />
VNC….Van Nuys classification<br />
In the examining procedure we have evaluated the NPI in 96 cases (table 4). The most frequent<br />
conclusions of NPI were in score range 3.4 to 5.4 (n = 46; 47.9 %). The finding of DCIS component<br />
with VNC 3 was found only in cases with NPI higher than 3.4. There were found 3 cases