22.03.2014 Views

October 27-29, 2000 - Klofas.com

October 27-29, 2000 - Klofas.com

October 27-29, 2000 - Klofas.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CubeSat: The Next Generation of Educational Picosatellites<br />

Prof. Jordi Puig-Suari, jpuigsua@calpoly.edu <br />

California Polytechnic State University <br />

San Luis Obispo, CA <br />

Prof. Robert Twiggs KE6QMD, Bob.Twiggs@Stanford.edu <br />

Stanford University <br />

Stanford, CA <br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A picosatellite called CubeSat is now under development by more than 20 groups of amateur radio enthusiasts<br />

and universities. This picosatellite that is a 4" cube and will weigh about lkg presents a real advantage for<br />

interested space enthusiasts in that it is significantly less expensive to build than micro or nano satellites and<br />

due to the small size and weight will be relatively inexpensive to launch into space. There is a technical<br />

challenge of building a useful satellite this small, but also political challenge of providing the frequency<br />

spectrum that would be required if hundreds of these CubeSats were launched using the amateur frequency<br />

bands. This paper will describe the international program of developers, the launch opportunities available for<br />

CubeSats, some of the issues with global operation of these satellites, some experiments planned for them and<br />

some proposals for sharing amateur frequency bands for educational purposes.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

2. CubeSat Development Program<br />

3. Participants in CubeSat Program<br />

4. Launch Opportunities<br />

5. Use of Amateur Frequency Considerations<br />

6. Conclusions<br />

7. Acknowledgements<br />

8. References<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

The current trend in satellites to do more for less cost has led to the "Smaller, Cheaper, Faster, Better" space<br />

missions. It is generally resulting in many cases of doing things the same way as before in a somewhat smaller<br />

fonnat for less cost, but this has been cited as the basis for some ofNASA's recent deep space mission failures.<br />

To support some science missions and in proposing new missions, the trend is now to see what can be done by<br />

decreasing the spacecraft sizes by orders of magnitude. This is be<strong>com</strong>ing more practical with the rapid<br />

advances in decreasing electronics size, in greatly increased capability and very low power consumption. This<br />

decrease in size also directly benefits the mission cost in lower launch costs.<br />

There are several programs now exploring micro, nano and pico satellite sizes. These sizes ranging from<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!